Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 863 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
10 Мб
Скачать
82
https://t.me/med1917
82
CHAPTER10 Burn depth assessment
Clinical assessment
Table 10.1 provides an overview of the clinical assessment for burns.
https://t.me/med1917
Yes Brisk
Highly
sensitive/
painful
3– 4days
kerationcytes
regenerate damage
blistered
Yes Brisk
2– 3 weeks Sensitive/
Scald Red/ Blistered
painful
Moist
Slow
Fixed
Staining
decreased
Contact Dark shade of red >3 weeks Sensation
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT
Absent
Absent
blanching
blanching
Absent Non
Never unless very
small
Never Absent Non
Leathery
Leathery
Flame White/ black
83
Table10.1 Clinical assessment table forburns
Classication Degree Layer of skin involved Examples Appearance Time to heal Sensation Blanching Bleeding
Supercial 1st degree Epidermis Sunburn Redness but not
Epidermis+
2nd degree
Supercial Partial
Papillary Dermis
(2a)
Thickness
Epidermis +
Reticular dermis
2nd degree
(2b)
Deep partial
thickness (deep
dermal)
involves underlying
structures
Full thickness 3rd Degree All layers involved Flame White/ Black
Catastrophic 4th degree Through skin and
84
https://t.me/med1917
84
CHAPTER10 Burn depth assessment
Technology
There are three main areas in which technology is being used in burns depth assessment. These are:
• Tissue perfusion
• Surface colour
• Structural analysis
Extremely important is the concept that the burn wound is dynamic not static and assessment at one point in time should be interpreted with this in mind. There remain considerable dierences of opinion in regard to the role of clinical vs. objective measures of burn depth assessment and some believe that NICE guidelines in favour of laser Doppler assessments have over- reached.
Tissue perfusion
It is assumed that a deeper burn will correlate with a lower blood perfusion due to blood vessels either being destroyed or thrombosed. Clinically we judge this by the blanching of the skin.
The problem with all tissue perfusion measurement is that a number of other factors can eect tissue perfusion. These include:
• Hypothermia
• Room temperature
• Vasoconstructive drugs
• Tourniquets
• Hypovolaemia
• Respiratory rate
• Patient’s emotional state
Laser Doppler
Laser Doppler technology uses the measurement in alteration in light to measure the velocity and number of moving particles.
Laser Doppler owmetry
Initially laser dopplers were introduced in 1975 and required contact with the burn wound– this is known as laser Doppler owmetry (LDF). This method was proven to be 70- 100% accurate in predicting healing within 21days and 93– 100% accurate in predicting failure to heal.
However, a number of problems were identied with the method, which included:
• Contact needed with burn wound, leading to increased infection risk
and pain
• Pressure with probe, leading to occlusion and articial results
• Only a small area could be scanned (1mm area)
Laser Doppler imager
Owing to the problems of the LDF requiring contact with the patient laser Doppler imagers (LDIs) were introduced in the 1990s. LDIs could scan a larger area and used a non- touch technique. The laser typically penetrates 1– 2mm. Before 48 hours accuracy in indeterminate depths is less than 80% and this compares to a 60– 70% clinical accuracy. They have therefore been recommended for scanning between 2– 5days.
https://t.me/med1917
NICE guidelines (2011) recommend LDI use for all intermediate depth burn wounds. However, many burns surgeons feel that this guidance came prematurely and assessment and treatment of intermediate depth burns is both controversial and varied amongst burns surgeons.
Depending on the make and local hospital policies safety goggles may need to be worn.
There are two types of commercially available LDIs:
• Scanning LDI
• Alaser is reected onto the skin by moving mirrors to produce a scan of the area. Reected light from the skin is then mirrored back to the photodiodes
• Speckle LDI
• The laser source hits the surface of the skin and forms a speckle pattern. This reects the coherence of the source and the microcirculation of the skin. The pattern is received over a time period and relayed to the screen
Interpretation
Laser dopplers measure inammatory response therefore a high reading would be expected in supercial burns.
Unburnt skin has low blood ow and therefore will appear to look like
a deep burn.
As the LDI depends on blood ow they are only accurate before the in­ammatory phase of the burn declines and the dermal circulation stabilizes. This occurs between 48 hours and 5days.
The results of the machines are recorded in perfusion units. Traditionally these perfusion units are scaled against healing times (see Table 10.2)
LDI problems
Movement of the patient or machine, however small, gives an inaccurate image of perfusion. Therefore a deep burn can appear more supercial, because the machine will analyse the movement as blood ow and thereby lead to misdiagnosis.
Undebrided, tattooed, and darker pigmented skins eect the penetration of the laser and therefore will give low readings.
TECHNOLOGY
85
Table10.2 Interpreting laser Doppler results
Inammatory response/ velocity of red blood cells
High Red <14days
Medium Yellow 14– 21
Same as unburnt skin or lower Blue >21
Reproduced from Pape etal. (2012) Burn wound healing time assessed by laser Doppler imaging (LDI). Part1:Derivation of a dedicated colour code for image interpretation Burns 38(2):187– 94 with permission from Elsevier
LDI colour Potential healing time
86
https://t.me/med1917
86
CHAPTER10 Burn depth assessment
Angle artefact
The LDI must be parallel to the area skin to be scanned to get the max­imum recording of the reected light. If this angle changes you do not get the full reection of the laser, leading to an lower, inaccurate reading. This can happen on small areas (eg. ngers), where a body part curves away (eg. ank, arm, leg), or if the laser is not set up correctly.
• Dierent areas of the body have dierent perfusions therefore an area
may be misdiagnosed
• Topical agents disrupt LDI readings as they form a barrier to laser
penetrance
• Distance measured can also eect readings
Other measures oftissue perfusion
• Injection techniques of either radioactive isotopes or dyes. Presence
would imply good perfusion and a supercial burn. However these are invasive, expensive and not readily available.
• Video microscopy
• Uses a visual evaluation of vessel integrity
• Thermography
• It is a non- contact technique which uses infrared radiation produced by the skin to assess burn depth. However environmental factors can sometimes dramatically eect readings. Progress continues to be made in this area.
• LDI is very expensive, and after a wave of purchasing and enthusiasm, some units no longer use the equipment in favour of clinical assessments
Surface colour
Part of a clinical assessment is the colour of the wound bed, which can indicate the burn depth. Two scientic ways exist of conducting this are photography and spectrophotometry.
• Photography is increasing in popularity due to the increase in
telemedicine usage. In obvious supercial and deep burns it is purported to have a 90% accuracy. However without the ability to test blanching, etc., it is of questionable use in dicult to determine wounds. This does however facilitate the storage of images
• Spectrophotometry. This judges the wound surface colour by sending
light from a spectrometer and the reected light intensity is assessed by the photometer
• Photography and telemedicine with an experienced eye can be
surprisingly accurate
Structural analysis
The gold standard is considered to be histological analysis by punch biopsy. However for obvious reasons this is conned mostly to a research environ­ment. This is due to the fact they only show the area biopsied, processing can take several days, needing expert knowledge and can leave additional scarring.
Ultrasound at high frequencies has been shown to be of some use how-
ever it requires contact with the burn and is dicult to interpret.
https://t.me/med1917
TECHNOLOGY
87
88
https://t.me/med1917
88
CHAPTER10 Burn depth assessment
Further reading
Hoeksema H, Baker RD, Holland AJ, etal. A new, fast LDI for assessment of burns:a multi- centre
clinical evaluation. Burns 2014;40:1274– 82.
Javed M, Shokrollahi K. VACUETTE(®) for burn depth assessment— a simple and novel alternative
use for a ubiquitous phlebotomy device. Burns 2012;38:1084– 5.
Hop MJ, Moues CM, Bogomolova K, etal. Photographic assessment of burn size and depth:reliability
and validity. Journal of Wound Care 2014;23:144– 5, 148– 52.
Shokrollahi K, Sayed M, Dickson W, Potokar T. Mobile phones for the assessment of bur ns:we have
the technology. Emergency Medicine Journal 2007;24:753– 5.
https://t.me/med1917
Chapter11
89
Fluid resuscitation inburns
Introduction to uid resuscitation in burns 90 Calculation of uid requirement 92 Further reading 94
90
https://t.me/med1917
90
CHAPTER11 Fluid resuscitation inburns
Introduction tofluid resuscitation inburns
Burns injury demands uid resuscitation when total body surface area (TBSA) exceeds 15% in adults and 10% in children.
There are two key mechanisms underlying this:
• Alarge volume of uid is lost from the wound when the integrity of the
epidermis is lost. The greatest loss is in the rst 12 hours post burn
• Inammatory mediators are released into the wound causing
vasodilation. This process becomes systemic with burns >20% resulting in intravascular hypovolaemia. The altered capillary permeability that drives this tends to recover from 36 hours post burn
Full thickness burns develop three areas zones of decreasing injury (Jackson’s burn wound model):
• Central zone of coagulative necrosis
• Intermediate zone of stasis of blood ow
• Outer zone of vasodilation and hyperaemia
The primary function of uid resuscitation is to
• Prevent burn shock by giving adequate uid without overloading the
vascular system or causing excessive oedema
• Maintain circulatory volume in the face of losses due to the burn— this is
essential for cardiac output, renal perfusion and tissue perfusion
• Provide metabolic water
• Maintain tissue perfusion to the zone of stasis and prevent the burn
from deepening
With limited physiological reserve resuscitation must commence in children >10% TBSA and be accompanied by additional background uid support.
Inhalation injury further increases uid requirement and can represent
up to an additional 20% TBSA.
There is no clear evidence to favour one resuscitation uid over another, but most units use easily accessible crystalloid such as Hartmann’s solution (Parkland).
Albumin is also often used via a dierent protocol (Muir and Barclay).
The crystalloid vs. colloid debate continues.
https://t.me/med1917
INTRODUCTION TOFLUID RESUSCITATION INBURNS
91
www.merseyburns.com
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025