Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 795 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
12 Мб
Скачать
Clinical features [Box19.1]
https://t.me/med1917
Symptoms
Pain is the most important symptom (85%). It typically commences as a colicky pain lasting 2–3 min, during which time the infant screams and draws up his knees. Spasms typically occur at intervals of 15–20 min. The infant becomes intermittently pale and clammy (similar to a syncopal episode in older children), exhausted and lethargic between spasms. After 12 h or so, the pain becomes more continuous.
Vomiting almost always occurs as well: usually once or twice in the first hours and then again if intestinal obstruction is fully established.
Signs
Children with intussusception look pale and lethargic, except when they are aroused by a spasm of severe pain. A mass (sometimes described as sausage shaped) is palpable in more than half the infants and is usually found in the right hypochondrium, although it may be anywhere between the line of the colon and the umbi­licus [Fig.19.1]. The intussusception mass is most likely to be felt early, before being concealed by abdominal distension and increasing abdominal tenderness.
Normal or loose stools are often passed shortly after the onset of symptoms, and any diarrhoea tends to be of small volume and transient. About half the patients pass a stool containing blood and mucus (red currant jelly), formed by the diapedesis of red cells through the con­gested mucosa of the intussusceptum. Blood may be identified on the glove following rectal examination, which may disclose the apex of the intussusceptum within the rectum.
The infant is pale, limp and tired and has tachycardia. If there is delay in diagnosis, the infant becomes dehy­drated, listless and febrile, has abdominal distension and looks ill. These are late signs and ideally the diagnosis should be made before they appear.
Box 19.1 Presenting features of intussusception
1 Vomiting 2 Abdominal colic 3 Pallor 4 Lethargy 5 Abdominal mass 6 Rectal bleeding
Chapter19: Intussusception 127
(a)
(b)
Figure 19.1 The site of the sausage-shaped mass of intussus-
ception in the abdomen, shown schematically in (a) and in a patient (b).
Differential diagnosis
Wind colic is common in the first 3 months after birth but rarely lasts more than an hour and usually is not accompanied by vomiting. Persisting severe colic for more than 1–2 h should arouse suspicion of an intussus­ception, particularly if accompanied by vomiting.
Colic and the passage of blood and mucus in severe cases of gastroenteritis may mimic intussusception, except that the volume of diarrhoea is greater. In intussuscep­tion, the small loose stools passed early in the course of the disease simply represent evacuation of the stimulated colon beyond the obstruction. Persistent vomiting and pain without diarrhoea is unlikely to be gastroenteritis.
A strangulated inguinal hernia may present with abdominal pain, vomiting and distension but is recognised
128 Part IV: Abdomen
https://t.me/med1917
easily when an irreducible lump is seen on examination ofthe inguinal region.
Investigations
A plain x-ray of the abdomen may be normal, show non-specific abnormalities or reveal a small bowel obstruction with air–fluid levels in the dilated small bowel. Occasionally, the apex of the intussusceptum may be seen.
The diagnosis is confirmed on ultrasonography, which is usually the first investigation when intussusception is suspected [Fig. 19.2]. An air or contrast enema study will also confirm the diagnosis and may be therapeutic (see the following).
Treatment
Enema reduction of intussusception should be attempted in most cases, unless there is clinical evidence of dead bowel, as demonstrated by peritonitis or septicaemia. Gas(air or oxygen) is the most commonly used enema medium and is preferred over the historical barium enema because of its superior efficacy and safety [Fig.19.3]. Enema reduction is slightly less likely to be successful if there are prolonged symptoms (>24 h), if the patient is outside the usual age range (<3 months or >24 months) or if there is an established small bowel obstruction with air–fluid levels on x-ray. Providing there is no peritonitis, it is still worth attempting enema reduction in these circumstances. If the child remains stable clinically after attempted, incomplete reduction, a delayed repeat enema 30 min to 2 h later is performed. Overall, 80–90% of intussusceptions should be reduc­ible using a gas enema.
Figure 19.2 Ultrasonography is the first investigation in infants
and children with suspected intussusception. Upper panel shows longitudinal view of intussusception, while lower panel is a transverse section.
Figure 19.3 Gas enema showing the end of the intussusceptum,
which confirms the diagnosis of intussusception (Reproduced with permission from Phelan et al. (1988)).
Chapter19: Intussusception 129
https://t.me/med1917
Technique of gas enema reduction
The patient is resuscitated with intravenous fluids and kept warm. A Foley catheter is inserted into the rectum. To achieve a seal, the catheter balloon is inflated and/orbut­tocks are strapped tightly together. Gas (usually oxygen from the wall supply) is introduced into the colon through the catheter, the pressure being controlled by a manom­eter [Fig. 19.3]. Under continuous fluoroscopic control, progress of the reduction is monitored. Sudden filling of the small bowel with gas suggests reduction is complete. The infant may be fed within hours of the procedure.
Surgery
Operative intervention is indicated when the delayed repeat enema fails to reduce the intussusception, where there is peritonitis clinically or where there is strong evidence of a pathological lesion at the lead point, for example, circumoral pigmentation of Peutz–Jegher syn­drome. Laparotomy via a transverse right supra-umbilical incision, or laparoscopy, may be used. The intussuscep­tion is reduced by manipulation, although segmental resection may be required if there is gangrene or where there is a pathological lesion at the lead point, for example, Meckel’s diverticulum or polyp.
Recurrent intussusception
Intussusception recurs in about 7% of patients and is more likely after enema reduction than surgery. It usually occurs within 2 or 3 days of the first
reduction. Recurrence usually presents early and is treated the same way as a first episode, although the possibility of a pathological lead point should be considered.
KEY POINTS
• Intussusception should be suspected when children between 3 months and 3 years present with vomiting, colicky abdominal pain and intermittent pallor.
• Intussusception is diagnosed by palpating a central/right­sided mass and conrming with x-ray, ultrasound scan or gas enema.
• Hydrostatic enema reduction corrects intussusception in about 85%, with 7% risk of recurrence.
Further reading
Beasley SW, Hutson JM, Auldist AW (1996) Intussusception.
In: Essential Pediatric Surgery. Arnold, London, pp. 45–51.
Fuchs JR, Langer JC (2006) Small bowel disorders. In: Stringer
MD, Oldham KT, Mouriquand PDE (eds) Pediatric Surgery and Urology: Long-Term Outcomes, 2nd Edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 305–314.
Kaiser AD, Applegate KE, Ladd AP (2007) Current success in
the treatment of intussusception in children. Surgery 142(4): 469–477.
Ong N-T, Beasley SW (1990) The leadpoint in intussusception.
J Pediatr Surg 25: 640–643.
Phelan E, de Campo JF, Malecky G (1988) Comparison of
oxygen and barium reduction of ileocolic intussusception. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150(6): 1349–1352.
CHAPTER20
https://t.me/med1917
Abdominal Pain: Appendicitis?
CASE 1
A 6-year-old boy developed central abdominal pain and high fever yesterday. Today, he has pain in the right iliac fossa. He looks ushed and has enlarged, tender cervical lymph nodes. There is tenderness in both iliac fossae (right more so than left), but no peritonism.
Q 1.1
What is the likely diagnosis? What tests are required?
Q 1.2
Improved diagnosis of appendicitis has been a major factor in reducing its morbidity in children. As a rule, abdominal pain in childhood lasting more than 4 h should be regarded as evidence of a potential abdominal emergency, until proven otherwise. Likewise, diarrhoea lasting more than 24 h should raise the possibility of pelvic, retrocaecal or retro-ileal appendicitis, particularly if associated with lower abdominal pain. An illness may start with gastroen­teritis and diarrhoea, but later, appendicitis may super­vene. Importantly, only a minority of children presenting with acute abdominal pain are found to have a genuine surgical cause. Where there is a high index of suspicion of appendicitis, the child must be reassessed frequently, with early referral to a paediatric surgeon.
CASE 2
Alex is a 5-year-old who has been vaguely unwell with abdominal pain for 2 days. Today, he has pain in the right iliac fossa. He limps into the consulting room but does not look ushed, and his temperature is normal (37.2°C). There is tenderness and guarding very lateral in the right ank.
Q 2.1
What is the likely diagnosis?
What investigations, if any, will aid you making your diagnosis?
Q 2.2
Features suggesting that movement exacerbates the pain heighten the concern that peritonitis is present, for example, when an infant prefers to lie still, refuses to be cuddled, wants to be left untouched and is reluctant to be examined.
If abdominal pain persists, active observation must be continued and examination repeated until there are definite signs that indicate a need for an operation or until the pain has subsided. In most children whose pain is subsiding, an operation should be deferred if the physical signs are not completely diagnostic.
Assessment of physical findings
Interpreting abdominal pain inchildren
The interpretation of abdominal pain can be difficult in children who are young or have developmental delay. Significant pain is often recognised late by parents and cli­nicians alike, because of children’s inability to voice their symptoms adequately, but also because the pain of appen­dicitis may not be as dramatic in the younger age group.
Jones’ Clinical Paediatric Surgery, Seventh Edition. Edited by John M. Hutson, Michael O’Brien, Spencer W. Beasley, Warwick J. Teague and Sebastian K. King. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
130
Examination of the older cooperative child is relatively straightforward, whereas in a young, sick and fright­ened child, physical examination requires great skill. The examination must be unhurried, gentle and per­formed with warm hands with the examiner seated beside the child. The child should be supine and straight, with arms resting alongside. Useful assessment may sometimes be made if the child is asleep. In the toddler, the abdomen may be palpated from behind with both hands while the parent cuddles the child’s front against
Chapter20: Abdominal Pain: Appendicitis? 131
https://t.me/med1917
themselves. However, with a continually crying child, adequate assessment is difficult and re-examination must be undertaken later. Failure to acknowledge inad­equate examination may result in serious diagnostic error.
Abdominal tenderness
Localised tenderness is found in conditions ranging from excess flatus, a faecally loaded colon or inflamed mesenteric lymph nodes to acute appendicitis and stran­gulated gut; consequently, tenderness alone is an insuffi­cient reason for operation. Direct palpation over any distended or inflamed loop of the gut may elicit localised tenderness. This is a particular feature of the solitary distended loop in closed-loop intestinal obstruction but may also be observed in gastroenteritis. Inflamed vis­ceral peritoneum will produce tenderness by direct, rather than by referred, pathways.
Localised tenderness in the right iliac fossa, without guarding or a strongly suggestive clinical history, may be due to causes other than appendicitis. Although local­ised tenderness is often the earliest sign of appendicitis, children requiring operation soon develop signs of peri­tonism to support the diagnosis. In contrast, tenderness due to non-surgical conditions typically subsides in the following days.
Peritonitis: Guarding and percussion tenderness
Children with localised or generalised peritonitis rarely display the board-like rigidity so often found in adults. More often, there is a variable degree of involuntary increased muscle resistance, referred to as guarding. Small differences in resistance in the lower and upper abdomen, or between right and left sides, may be significant when the findings are consistent.
Assessment of percussion tenderness is a sensitive test of peritoneal irritation in children and should be used in preference to rebound tenderness, which is unkind and unhelpful. Likewise, pain in the abdomen during mictu­rition (as opposed to dysuria) is common in pelvic appendicitis, as the appendix lies close to and irritates the bladder.
There are no pathognomonic symptoms or signs of appendicitis itself, but when signs of peritonitis are localised to the right iliac fossa, appendicitis is likely.
Acute appendicitis may be missed when it presents with signs of local peritonitis outside the right iliac fossa.
The interposition of other structures between the appendix and the anterior abdominal wall in pelvic, ret­rocaecal and retro-ileal appendicitis may delay the appearance of abdominal signs until relatively late, and even then, they may be atypical.
In retrocaecal appendicitis, tenderness is maximally high and lateral on the right side, whereas in pelvic appendicitis, or in retro-ileal appendicitis, the signs are more central and lower and may even be predomi­nantly left sided.
A palpable mass
Apart from faecal masses and symptomless masses inthe loin (Chapter25), the most common mass in a child’s abdomen is an appendiceal abscess (or phleg­mon), particularly in children under 5 years of age, in the developmentally delayed child or when the appendix is in an unusual position.
Scrotal examination
Torsion of the testis or appendix testis occasionally pres­ents with referred pain in the iliac fossa and may be mis­taken for appendicitis. The scrotum must always be examined to exclude this important finding.
Rectal examination
Rectal examination is not indicated if appendicitis can be diagnosed on history and anterior abdominal signs alone. However, it may aid diagnosis of a pelvic mass with a perforated pelvic appendicitis should an ultra­sound scan be unavailable or equivocal. When required, rectal examination should be performed by a member of the surgical team, having first gained informed consent from the carers and ensured a chaperone is present.
Signs arising in other systems
Infections in the ear, tonsils or respiratory passages may be accompanied by abdominal pain and vomiting and simulate an abdominal emergency. Measles or chicken­pox may produce abdominal signs, as may many other viral infections, by causing mesenteric lymphadenitis. Acute appendicitis may coexist with other conditions, so that proven pneumonia, tonsillitis or generalised lymphadenopathy should not divert attention from any abdominal signs, which also may be present. Similarly, gastroenteritis may progress to appendicitis, so that even a well-established and undoubted diagnosis of gastroenteritis should be subject to review. Special
132 Part IV: Abdomen
https://t.me/med1917
diagnostic difficulties may be presented by the abdom­inal crises of diabetic ketoacidosis, Henoch–Schönlein purpura and various haematological disorders, including sickle cell disease and haemophilia. In these conditions, an operative intervention is usually contraindicated. Active observation and re-examination for signs of peritonitis are essential.
Acute appendicitis
The mortality of acute appendicitis in children is less than 0.2%, due to early diagnosis and the management of fluids and electrolytes before and after operation.
The clinical diagnosis is determined by localised ten­derness and objective signs of localised or generalised peritonitis. The value of history lies in arousing suspi­cion that an abdominal emergency is present and in determining its most likely cause. However, acute appendicitis is not only a common abdominal emergency, but also a great imitator, and it may appear in a variety of guises [Box20.1].
Differential diagnosis
A perforated appendix is the only common cause of general peritonitis in childhood. In most children with an appendiceal abscess, there are signs of localised or generalised peritonitis. Occasionally, however, an appendiceal mass may be present with little or no consti­tutional upset or localised signs of peritoneal irritation.
Infections of the urinary tract may mimic appendicitis and vice versa. Lower urinary tract infection may give rise to tenderness in the right iliac fossa, but does not exhibit the guarding typical of peritoneal irritation. Conversely, a high retrocaecal appendicitis occasionally imitates acute pyelonephritis with prominent loin ten­derness. In pelvic appendicitis, the child may complain of lower abdominal pain during micturition. Mild pyuria (20–50 white cells/mm to an inflamed appendix adjacent to the ureter or bladder.
Referred pain to the right abdomen may occur with right lower lobe pneumonia or right testicular torsion.
Peritonitis in the young child
Peritonitis is a frequent complication of appendicitis that may be difficult to recognise in infants and young chil­dren. Tenderness may be diffuse rather than localised
3
) may occur in appendicitis due
Box 20.1 The various presentations of acute appendicitis:
Presentation and differential diagnosis
Local tenderness in the right iliac fossa
Simple colic Bilious attack (food poisoning) Gastroenteritis Acute constipation Mild mesenteric adenitis Urolithiasis Deep iliac lymphadenitis
Local peritonitis (mostly in the right iliac fossa)
Severe mesenteric adenitis Primary peritonitis Meckel’s diverticulitis Ruptured luteal cyst Ovarian torsion Omental torsion Suppurating deep iliac lymph nodes
Generalised peritonitis
Primary peritonitis Perforated Meckel’s diverticulum
Urinary tract infection
Urinary tract infection Acute pyelonephritis
An inflammatory mass
Intussusception Duplication of the gut Ectopic kidney Retroperitoneal masses (Chapter25)
Intestinal obstruction
Adhesive bowel obstruction Internal hernia Meckel’s band
Acutely painful scrotum (Chapter 29)
Torsion of testis
Torsion of appendix testis Gastroenteritis (from the retro-ileal or pelvic appendix)
Gastroenteritis
and marked guarding may be absent, even with advanced generalised peritonitis. Often, a lesser degree of involuntary muscular rigidity or guarding is encoun­tered. Differences in muscle tone between the right and left sides, or between the lower and upper abdomen, are highly significant.
As localised peritonitis progresses, the signs become more definite in the right iliac fossa. Paradoxically, as peritonitis becomes more generalised and the abdomen more distended, the right iliac fossa signs may appear to diminish in some children. In this situation, abdominal distension and the child’s reluctance to allow abdominal palpation are signs of great significance.
Chapter20: Abdominal Pain: Appendicitis? 133
https://t.me/med1917
Even without distension, however, persisting pain with or without accompanying diarrhoea demands careful assessment, re-examination of the abdomen and some­times a rectal examination.
Treatment
The management of acute appendicitis involves:
1 Adequate preoperative replacement of fluid and elec-
trolyte deficits
2 Operative removal of the appendix 3 Irrigation of the peritoneal cavity to remove pus and
contaminated free fluid
4 Effective antibiotic treatment to cover aerobic and anaer-
obic organisms commencing prior to the operation A dehydrated, toxic child is an anaesthetic risk. Obstructed airways by inhaled vomitus, unexpected cardiac arrest and prolonged surgical shock with circulatory collapse are all minimised by adequate preoperative resuscitation. This includes intravenous replacement of fluid and electrolyte deficits and, in children with marked abdom­inal distension, nasogastric tube decompression of the bowel.
An operation by laparoscopy or laparotomy aims to remove the appendix and perform intraperitoneal lavage.
Antibiotics reduce the septic complications of appendi­citis, which is a polymicrobial infection caused by bowel organisms. A combination of an anti-aerobic agent (e.g. cephalosporin derivative) and an anti-anaerobic agent (e.g. metronidazole) is effective, but complicated cases may require broader cover. Antibiotics should be com­menced at induction, or earlier if there is significant pre­operative delay or the child is unwell. Preoperative antibiotics can reduce wound infection resulting from intra-operative soiling by infected peritoneal fluid.
absence of guarding (the inflammation is confined to mucosa only) and failure of the signs to progress mesenteric adenitis. A succussion splash in the right iliac fossa on palpation is typical and reflects an ileus with stagnant loops containing air and fluid without guarding from peritonitis.
suggests
Abdominal emergencies in developmentally delayed children
Acute appendicitis is still the most common abdominal emergency in developmentally delayed children, but perforation by an ingested foreign body is more fre­quent than in children with normal development.
The diagnostic difficulty depends on the severity of delay. In the most severely affected children, with hyperkinesia, hypertonia, inability to speak and a high threshold of pain, there may be few symptoms, and abdominal signs – for example, tenderness or rigidity – may be difficult to detect or evaluate. Abdominal dis­tension and absent bowel sounds, although late developments, are usually present once attention is first drawn to the abdomen. Vomiting, fever and tachy­cardia may also be present.
Similar to preschool children, appendicitis in develop mentally delayed children more often presents with a local abscess or spreading peritonitis. A pelvic mass or intestinal obstruction from the small bowel adhering to the wall of an appendiceal abscess is common. The delayed diagnosis leads to increased complications and, consequently, an increase in mortality.
-
Intestinal obstruction
Abdominal pain of uncertain origin
There are some children [Box 20.1] where the final diagnosis remains in doubt. Indigestion, wind pains, acute constipation and other minor bowel disturbances are not objective diagnoses, but which tend to be attached to a number of children.
Mesenteric adenitis non-specific viral infection of the ileum causes difficulty in distinguishing some cases from acute appendicitis. The combination of high fever, mild abdominal tenderness that varies in location, the
A common cause of intestinal obstruction is a strangu­lated inguinal hernia [Box20.2], which, if recognised, presents few problems in diagnosis or management.
In children with no previous abdominal operation, the cause of obstruction may be a volvulus (Chapter 7), Meckel’s band or diverticulum (Chapter23), an intestinal duplication (Chapter7) or, very rarely, an internal hernia [see Box20.2].
Most cases of obstruction in older children are due to adhesions following a previous operation. Recurrent pain, accompanied by bile-stained vomiting, generally causes these patients to present early. Visible or palpable
134 Part IV: Abdomen
https://t.me/med1917
Box 20.2 Causes of bowel obstruction in children after the
neonatal period
Common
Adhesive bowel obstruction Intussusception Appendicitis Strangulated inguinal hernia
Uncommon
Malrotation with volvulus Meckel’s band (closed-loop obstruction or localised
volvulus) Duplication cyst Internal hernia
distended intestinal loops, or air–fluid levels on an abdominal x-ray, confirm the diagnosis.
Bowel obstruction is less obvious and so more likely to be overlooked in (i) the early post-operative period after abdominal surgery, when pain is difficult to inter­pret and the expected delay in recovery from paralytic ileus may mask an early adhesive bowel obstruction, and (ii) proximal small bowel obstruction, in which pain and abdominal distension may be minimal and vomiting alone is the presenting feature.
Treatment
The mainstay of management is non-operative: oral intake is withheld, the stomach is aspirated by nasogas­tric tube, and resuscitation (and maintenance) intrave­nous fluids are commenced. Some children respond promptly to this regimen and symptoms may subside within a few hours.
Most adhesive bowel obstructions will self-resolve within 1–2 days of initiating the aforementioned non-operative management. However, continuing or increasing volumes of aspirate or persistent localised abdominal tenderness are sufficient grounds for surgery, preferably before a rising pulse rate, severe pain and increasing abdominal tenderness that suggest impend­ing strangulation of the bowel.
Meckel’s diverticulum
A Meckel’s diverticulum may cause abdominal pain in a variety of ways. The tip of a Meckel’s diverticulum may still be joined to the umbilicus by a fibrous band, which may entrap the bowel, causing a closed-loop obstruc-
tion or a localised volvulus. Therefore, A Meckel’s diver­ticulum may also be suspected in intestinal obstruction in a child with no previous abdominal operation.
Alternatively, Meckel’s diverticulum may become inflamed. The clinical manifestations are rarely distin­guishable clinically from appendicitis, and the diagnosis often only becomes apparent at operation.
Finally, Meckel’s diverticulum is the most common cause of major gastrointestinal bleeding in childhood and presents when the child passes dark-red stools asso­ciated with dull abdominal pain and tenderness. Often, the child looks pale and anaemic (Chapter23).
Primary peritonitis
Primary peritonitis (also known as spontaneous bacte­rial peritonitis) presents with a sudden onset of high fever greater than 39°C with diffuse abdominal disten­sion and tenderness with guarding. This is a primary infection of the peritoneum and the abdominal contents are normal.
The condition is more common in girls, but often, it is not related to tubal infection. It may occur in patients with ascites secondary to nephrotic syndrome. Laparoscopy is performed as the presumed clinical diagnosis is appendi­citis with secondary peritonitis. Odourless peritoneal fluid with a soapy feel is found, along with a normal appendix. Sometimes, the infecting organism is Streptococcus pyogenes, but in most cases, the culture is negative. The prognosis is good and the peritonitis resolves rapidly.
Paediatric gynaecologic emergencies
In menarcheal or pubertal girls, a gynaecologic disorder may present with acute abdominal pain. This group of conditions includes intraperitoneal bleeding at the normal time of ovulation (Mittelschmerz bleeding) or rupture of a small luteal cyst. Tubal menstruation, torsion of the ovary and acute salpingitis are all uncommon. Physical examination of girls with any of these conditions will typically reveal lower abdominal tenderness and guarding. Pelvic inflammatory disease may also present with fever and vaginal discharge.
Rectal examination is occasionally performed after informed consent and with a nurse chaperone, but a pelvic/ abdominal ultrasound scan will diagnose most conditions.
Chapter20: Abdominal Pain: Appendicitis? 135
https://t.me/med1917
Ovarian torsion demands urgent surgery, and the ovary is usually preserved after untwisting the torsion.
KEY POINTS
• Abdominal pain requires careful physical assessment to determine the cause.
• Peritonitis is hard to diagnose in preschool children: beware of a toddler who refuses examination.
• Localised peritonitis in the right iliac fossa is likely to be appendicitis.
• Pelvic appendicitis (by ultrasonography or rectal exam) and testicular torsion (by scrotal exam) need exclusion in children with vague pains in the right iliac fossa.
Further reading
Dunn JCY (2012) Appendicitis. In: Coran AG, Adzick NS,
Krummel TM, Laberge J-M, Shamberger RC, Caldamone AA (eds) Pediatric Surgery, 7th Edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 973–984.
Hutson JM, Beasley SW (2013) Abdominal pain: Is it appendi-
citis? In: The Surgical Examination of Children, 2nd Edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 19–40.
Morrow SE, Newman KD (2007) Current management of
appendicitis. Semin Pediatr Surg 16: 34–40.
Puri P, Martell A (2006) Appendicitis. In: Stringer MD, Oldham
KT, Mouriquand PDE (eds) Pediatric Surgery and Urology: Long Term Outcomes, 2nd Edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 374–384.
CHAPTER21
https://t.me/med1917
Recurrent Abdominal Pain
CASE 1
A 10-year-old girl presents with recurrent abdominal pain.
Q 1.1
What underlying fears may the parents have about
thepain?
Q 1.2
Q 1.3
How may the history and examination distinguish the
causes of recurrent abdominal pain?
What is the role of the surgeon in this situation?
Recurrent abdominal pain is a common problem in children. The child usually has frequent short-lived episodes of peri-umbilical colic. The attacks are unpredictable in onset and usually last only a few minutes, although they may last for longer periods of time. Often, they have gone on for many months, or even years. Sometimes, they may be exacerbated by stress at school or home or by intercurrent illness. Despite these psychological triggers, the pain itself is very real, and while its exact nature remains uncertain, it may be due to intestinal colic. It may be compared with the psychosomatic stress headaches or non-specific gastric problems seen in adults. Constipation and intestinal upset brought on by food allergies may also cause recurrent abdominal pain. A frequent reason some families present to a surgeon with these symptoms is because of an underlying parental fear of a serious cause for the pain, such as appendicitis, cancer or a twisted bowel. In fact, it is quite unusual to find a serious underlying cause for recurrent abdominal pain. Despite this, it is important to exclude these uncommon but more serious causes for abdominal pain: only then can the family recognise the true nature of the problem, which sometimes is stress induced. The diagnosis depends on a careful history andphysical examination, augmented as required by children presenting to an emergency department with more severe colic, pains may be caused by transient ileo-ileal intussusception. This form in intussuscep­tion is probably triggered by disordered small bowel
targeted investigations. In
peristalsis in response to an enteric pathogen and usu­ally resolves spontaneously. It can be distinguished easily from the more severe ileo-colic intussusception in infants by its transient nature.
History
The nature, severity and periodicity of pain is the key to the diagnosis. Recurrent abdominal pain is mild to moderate in severity. The pains come on suddenly and without warning in short-lived episodes lasting often only a few minutes and are often peri-umbilical. The episodes of pain are unpredictable and frequent and scarcely a day goes by without any. In contrast, pain due to surgical causes such as appendicitis, obstructive hydronephrosis or malrotation with volvulus is severe and persistent.
A child may find it difficult to quantify the severity of pain, which is best established by other factors. Severe pain will stop the child from normal activities such as play, or the child may be sent home from school. Severe pain will wake the child from sleep and may induce vomiting. Bile-stained vomitus is of particular signifi­cance in relation to the possibility of malrotation with volvulus. Surgical pain tends to be more continuous and prolonged, lasting for some hours, and may be localised in relation to the underlying cause: the pain of an obstructed kidney in the older child will be localised to one loin, while the pain of appendicitis will typically
Jones’ Clinical Paediatric Surgery, Seventh Edition. Edited by John M. Hutson, Michael O’Brien, Spencer W. Beasley, Warwick J. Teague and Sebastian K. King. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
136