Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 562 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
25 Мб
Скачать
2 Surgical Assessment
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
23
abc
Fig. 2.3 (a) Common carotid artery isolated for anastomosis. (b) Use of a punch biopsy tool to create the puncture. (c) The puncture in the CCA ready for end-to-side anastomosis
thoracoacromial artery is a branch of the axillary artery and has been described successfully when other vessels are unavailable. The vessels are very caudal, and so a ap with a long pedicle length is often needed, and the vein is often very caudal, frequently requiring a vein graft [24]. Also, harvesting the thoracoacromial artery will compromise any potential for utilizing a pectora­lis major myocutaneous pedicled ap as a sal­vage option. Contralateral neck arteries can also be used as mentioned earlier. However, as antici­pated, a longer pedicle length is needed to reach the contralateral neck vessels. Additionally, vein grafts, or a Corlett loop, can be used to reach the contralateral neck vessels where needed [25]. The Corlett loop will be discussed further in the next section.
Venous Options intheVessel­Depleted Neck
Venous drainage is often the rate-limiting step in the vessel-depleted neck and may require cre­ative solutions by the reconstructive surgeon to achieve adequate venous drainage. The internal jugular vein and the external jugular vein are the main venous systems used for venous anastomo­sis. However, these options are often unavailable in the vessel-depleted neck and so alternative options are usually needed. In the above section, we discussed the accompanying veins of the supercial temporal system, the transverse cervi­cal system, and the internal mammary vessels. Vein grafts can be utilized where needed to
lengthen the available venous or arterial options. However, vein grafts require two anastomoses for each vessel, and hence have a higher rate of fail­ure in several studies [26]. The cephalic vein can be harvested and rotated into the neck defect for venous anastomosis. Often, this vein has not been affected by prior surgery or radiation. The cephalic vein drains directly into the axillary vein and can be harvested relatively easily. The cephalic vein travels from the axillary vein through the coracoclavicular fascia proximally. It then travels between the pectoralis major and the deltoid muscles before travelling in the groove of the lateral border of the biceps brachii. It then crosses supercial to the musculocutaneous nerve and then courses between the brachioradia­lis and the brachii muscles distal to the elbow. A curved incision can be extended from the neck incision along the deltopectoral groove to locate the vein and follow it distally [26]. Once ade­quate length is acquired, it can then be rotated and transposed into the neck (Fig. 2.4). Care needs to be taken to avoid the cephalic vein from kinking at the coracoclavicular fascia.
When a suitable local artery and vein are not available, the technique of a Corlett loop can be used. This technique utilizes the long length of the cephalic vein to achieve both arterial and venous vessels for microvascular anastomosis. In this technique, the cephalic vein is harvested as described above, and it is rst anastomosed to the contralateral neck branches of the external carotid artery forming a temporary arteriovenous stula. The vessel is then divided, and the proximal end is attached to the vein of the ap, and the distal
24
abc
O. Breik and S. Parmar
Fig. 2.4 (a) Incision markings for cephalic vein transpo- sition for a known vessel-depleted neck. (b)Exposed cephalic vein along the deltopectoral groove. The ap pedicle vessels are clamped here to approximate the length needed for the cephalic vein transposition. (c)
end (which was anastomosed to the contralateral neck artery) is attached to the artery of the ap [25]. This can be performed as a single-stage or a two-stage delayed procedure [27]. The technique of forming an arteriovenous stula has been well described in limb reconstruction, but it is rarely used in head and neck reconstruction [27]. The study by Lin etal. demonstrated a higher rate of failure with two-stage arteriovenous stulas [27]. All reported cases in the head and neck have been single-stage procedures [25, 28].
Extreme Circumstances
When suitable locoregional alternative vessels are not available, surgeons can consider the pedi­cle of previous aps used for reconstruction. The options in this scenario include (1) using a side branch of the proximal pedicle; (2) assuming that the former ap has developed alternative vascu­larization, sacricing the current pedicle vessel using the pedicle as recipient vessels; and (3) using the distal end of the previous ap pedicle for ‘ow-through’ anastomosis20. Where no pos­sible vessels are available, Wolff et al. have described the use of extracorporeal perfusion devices to maintain vascularity to a ap while it develops independent blood supply. The protocol aims to accelerate neovascularization and auton­omization of the ap within 2 weeks of recon­struction [29].
Cephalic vein transposed and tunnelled under the clavicle to reduce the risk of compression from external neck pres­sure and swelling. An adequate space is obviously needed under the clavicle to allow the vein to safely distend under the clavicle
Flap Selection
Selecting a ap is a combination of art and sci­ence—there are many different aps to choose from, and while some may be suggested by par­ticular scenarios, there is rarely a single possible choice. The clinician should consider the pathol­ogy, the patient as a whole (including their opin­ions and priorities), what previous treatment has been performed, and the availability of necessary equipment and/or expertise.
Pedicle length in particular is important in the reconstruction of maxillary defects as there are few suitable donor vessels in close proximity.
In soft tissue reconstruction, the choice of ap depends on the type of skin, the thickness of skin, and the colour of skin required. For partial glos­sectomy defects, often a radial forearm free ap reconstruction provides thin, pliable skin that can seal the oral cavity from the neck and provide enough pliability of skin to allow tongue extension and movement from the residual tongue. When the base of tongue/oropharynx is likely to be involved, or greater than a hemiglossectomy is planned, then more skin and soft tissue bulk may be required, and hence an anterolateral thigh ap is the work­horse ap for these reconstructions. Alternatives for soft tissue aps include medial sural artery per­forator (MSAP) aps, Supercial circumex iliac artery perforator ap (SCIP) lateral arm ap, TDAP, scapula (soft tissue only), and freestyle free aps based on unnamed perforators.
2 Surgical Assessment
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
25
Bony reconstruction however has more spe­cic options. These include the bula free ap, deep circumex iliac artery (DCIA), aps based on the subscapular artery system, composite radial free ap, and medial femoral condyle free ap. Once a bony ap has been selected, it is now considered best practice to undergo preoperative virtual planning. This can be done with traditional dental models, 3D software, rapid prototyping, or a combination of techniques. CAD/CAM tech­niques have revolutionized bony reconstruction. Cutting guides can now be made to perform the resection, and the use of cutting templates allows accurate 3-dimensional reconstruction. Plates used to stabilize the bone can also be custom­made. These techniques have improved recon­structive results and also save intraoperative time.
In this section of the chapter, we will briey discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the most common free aps, and key preoperative planning needed for these aps.
Radial Forearm Free Flap
The radial forearm free ap is the most commonly used free ap for intra-oral soft tissue reconstruc­tion. The reliability of the anatomy, presence of thin pliable skin, and quick harvest make it an ideal option to consider. Due to its pliability, it is ideal for defects involving moving structures like the soft palate, lips, and tongue. It is our preferred ap for partial glossectomy defects, oor of mouth defects, buccal mucosal defects, oropha­ryngeal defects, and posterior maxillary defects.
Disadvantages
• Donor site must be skin grafted.
• Poor aesthetics of donor site.
Preoperative Planning
Clinical examination of the forearm is necessary to ensure no previous scars or evidence of inter­ventions where the radial artery has been har­vested. Allen’s test should be performed to ensure adequate collateral supply. If Allen’s test is inconclusive, then a duplex US should be consid­ered to ensure normal vascular anatomy.
Anterolateral Thigh Flap
The anterolateral thigh free ap has become increasingly popular since its rst description in
1984. This ap is based on various perforators from the descending branch of the lateral circum­ex femoral artery and its associated venae comi­tantes. It is a versatile ap, which can be harvested as a subcutaneous, fasciocutaneous, musculocu­taneous, or adipofascial ap, making it an option for a variety of applications in the head and neck. It can also be harvested as a chimeric ap. Additionally, the donor site can often be closed primarily and heals with acceptable donor-site morbidity. The pedicle is also long, potentially 7–16cm.
Advantages
Advantages
• High-quality thin skin produced.
• Long, large-calibre, reliable pedicle.
• Very reliable anatomy.
• Choice of venae comitantes or cephalic vein
or both for venous drainage.
• Allows two-team operating.
• The pedicle is long and possesses large- calibre vessels.
• Up to 25cm diameter, skin paddle can be har­vested with only one perforator.
• It can be harvested as a chimeric ap.
• Primary closure of the donor site is often possible.
• It allows a two-team approach.
26
O. Breik and S. Parmar
Disadvantages
• It is technically more demanding.
• It has high variability in the position of perforators.
• In very rare cases, there may not be a perforator.
Preoperative Planning
Clinical examination of the leg will identify any pre­vious scars, surgical interventions, or injuries. Pinch test will give a clue to the thickness of the skin. Especially in oral cavity reconstruction, bulkiness of the ap may render the ALT inappropriate. Doppler within a 3cm radius circle around the centre of the line from the superolateral aspect of the patella to the ASIS may demonstrate likely position or availability of perforators (Fig.2.5). However, this is not gener­ally accurate, and the only way to check for perfora­tors is to make an incision and check.
Fibula Free Flap
The bula is the ‘workhorse’ ap for the recon­struction of bony defects in the head and neck. It provides a great length of high-quality bone, which is suitable for osseointegrated implants, and has a long, large-calibre, reliable pedicle. It can also be harvested with skin, although the skin paddle is less reliable than the bony component. The skin defect can also be slow to heal, even when grafted, and so where appropriate, we sometimes use mus­cle and subcutaneous fat alone to line intra-oral defects, which we nd generally mucosalizes well and reduces intra-oral bulk. It is the ideal ap for long-segment mandibular defects, mandibular defects involving the temporomandibular joint, and low-level maxillectomies [3032]. It is also the ideal ap for immediate implant surgery and virtual planning. It’s exact shape and the pedicle orientation allows for application of accurate sur­gical guides, and it has a good bicortical structure that allows for good primary stability of the implants at the time of insertion.
Fig. 2.5 Markings on the anterolateral thigh with the dot­ted line extending from the ASIS to the superolateral aspect of the patella. The dotted circle demonstrates 3cm radius from the centre of the line, and the black dots cor­respond with the perforators identied on Doppler
Advantages
• Large length of high-quality bone (25cm).
• Long pedicle (15cm).
• Can provide skin for reconstruction of intra­or extra-oral defects.
• Bone is suitable for placement of osseointe­grated implants.
• Allows two-team approach.
Disadvantages
• Not possible in all patients—Patient may not have adequate three-vessel ow to the foot; hence, a bula ap may jeopardize the vascu­larity of the foot.
• Skin paddle is not as reliable as the bony component.
• Defect closure requires grafting if skin is taken.
• Healing of donor site can be slow, requiring lengthy specialist wound care.
2 Surgical Assessment
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
27
• Unaesthetic donor-site scar.
• Can cause foot drop if peroneal nerve damaged.
Preoperative Planning
Clinical examination of the lower leg will iden­tify any previous scars, surgical interventions, or injuries. Palpate the pulses of the foot, and look for evidence of venous stasis and vascular insuf­ciency in the form of venous skin changes, vari­cosities, or peripheral oedema. All of these features are contraindications for bula free ap reconstruction.
Imaging
Preoperative angiogram—either a CT angiogram or an MR angiogram is necessary when planning for a bula free ap reconstruction. This is vital to ensure normal trifurcation of the popliteal artery into anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and sural arteries and to ensure no signicant athero­sclerotic narrowing of the vessels due to periph­eral vascular disease. This is necessary because in 0.2–8% of the population, the dominant blood supply to the foot is the peroneal magna artery. As mentioned above, in these cases, bula free ap harvest is an absolute contraindication, as it risks vascular compromise to the foot.
Deep Circumex Iliac Artery Flap
The DCIA ap provides a good quantity and quality of bone, which has contours that can be adapted to the mandible or maxilla. It can also provide vascularized muscle for soft tissue cover­age, but the traditional skin paddle was not exi­ble. More recently, perforator-based skin paddles have overcome this disadvantage.
There are also questions over its reliability: a
meta-analysis of nearly 10,000 composite free aps suggested that DCIA aps were less reliable overall than other composite aps for mandibular
reconstruction (6.2% ap failure rate vs. 3.4% for all other aps combined) [33]. Furthermore, clo­sure of the DCIA ap is not trivial, and inade­quate closure can lead to troublesome incisional hernias.
However, it is ideal for reconstruction of the dentate mandible and high-level Brown class 3 and 4 maxillary defects.
Advantages
• Good quality and quantity of bone (up to
14cm) with curves suitable for mandibular or
maxillary reconstruction (important for the
dentate mandible and class 3 and 4 Brown
defects).
• Can provide muscle and skin for reconstruc-
tion of intra- or extra-oral defects.
• Bone is in excellent quality for placement of
osseointegrated implants.
• The donor-site scar can be concealed by
clothing.
• Allows two-team operating.
Disadvantages
• Short pedicle (6cm), but this can be improved
by raising the ap posterior to the anterior
superior iliac spine.
• Post-operative mobilization is slow and
painful.
• Less reliable than other composite aps.
• Risk of donor-site hernia.
• Defect closure is laborious.
• Associated soft tissue is bulky and inexible.
Preoperative Planning
Clinically, examine the pelvis, palpating for the iliac crest. Look for scars from previous abdomi­nal surgery. Obese patients make raising the DCIA more difcult.
No specic imaging is required for the DCIA free ap preoperatively.
28
O. Breik and S. Parmar
Subscapular Artery System Flaps
The scapular/parascapular ap and scapular tip aps are versatile aps that are notable for provid­ing excellent skin coverage, the possibility of a chi­meric ap, a good amount of high-quality bone, and an aesthetic, low-morbidity donor site. Furthermore, the aps are characterized by great exibility, with the osseous and cutaneous components able to be positioned independently. The downsides are that it is most commonly harvested in lateral decubitus position to harvest the ap, which makes two-team simultaneous operating all but impossible, greatly increasing the overall operative time.
The true scapular ap is taken with the hori­zontal branch of the circumex scapular artery. The parascapular ap is based on the descending branch: choosing between them is largely down to the preference and experience of the surgeon. A chimeric, dual-paddled ap can also be taken with one paddle arising from each branch. The edge and/or tip of scapula can be taken as the osseous component, providing good-quality bone and a ap with great 3-dimensional exibility. The scapular ap is ideally suited to elderly patients for mandibular reconstruction, patients where the bula is unsuitable for any reason.
The scapula tip can be harvested indepen­dently based on the angular branch of the thora­codorsal artery. This ap provides thinner bone than the true scapular ap but has a much longer pedicle (up to 17cm) and can be harvested with the thoracodorsal artery perforator and part of latissimus dorsi. The scapula tip is particularly suited to maxillary reconstruction considering its shape and long pedicle.
Advantages
• Large amount of good-quality skin.
• Skin paddles have considerable exibility
(independent of each other and the bone)—
allows simultaneous reconstruction of skin,
bone, and mucosal defects with a single ap.
• Skin has good colour match with facial skin.
• Good-quality bone, up to 14cm.
• Very reliable anatomy.
• Reliable pedicle of good diameter.
• Good-quality bone.
• Low donor-site morbidity.
• Long pedicle for scapular tip free aps (up to 17cm).
Disadvantages
• Short pedicle (3–4cm) for lateral border scap­ula free aps.
• Need to move the patient into decubitus position.
• Two-team operating is difcult.
• The skin paddles can be too bulky for intra­oral reconstruction, especially in obese patients.
Preoperative Planning
Clinically examine the back for scars, and pal­pate for any scapula abnormalities.
Generally, vessels in this area of the body are
rarely affected by peripheral vascular disease, and so no angiography is needed to investigate these vessels.
Virtual planning can be performed by captur-
ing the scapula bone from the CT chest per­formed for staging purposes.
Composite Radial Forearm FreeFlap
The radial forearm ap is the most commonly used and most reliable soft tissue ap for intra­oral reconstruction. In addition to the pliable, thin skin, if a composite ap is required, a moder­ate amount of unicortical bone can also be har­vested without major modication to the technique. This bone is often inadequate for implant rehabilitation. It is ideally suited to reconstructing edentulous mandibles and smaller orbitomaxillary defects.
2 Surgical Assessment
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
29
Advantages
• High-quality thin skin produced.
• Long, large-calibre, reliable pedicle.
• Choice of venae comitantes or cephalic vein or both for venous drainage.
• Straight, unicortical bone (up to 10 cm) (Fig.2.6).
• Allows two-team operation.
Fig. 2.6 A composite radial harvested with 10 cm of bone for mandibular reconstruction
Disadvantages
• Risk of post-operative fracture of radius—risk minimized by using a cutting guide and plat­ing of the radius (Fig.2.7).
• Bone is often not suitable for osseointegrated implants.
• Donor site must be skin grafted.
• Poor aesthetics of donor site.
Preoperative Planning
Clinical examination of the forearm is necessary to ensure no previous scars or evidence of inter­ventions where the radial artery has been har­vested. Allen’s test should be performed to ensure adequate collateral supply. If Allen’s test is inconclusive, then a duplex US should be consid­ered to ensure normal vascular anatomy.
CT forearm is ideal for virtually planning the
amount of bone being harvested to minimize the risk of radius fracture post-operatively. CT scans can be used to design a cutting guide to take the right amount of bone and to prebend a distal radius plate reducing the risk of post-operative fracture.
a
d
Fig. 2.7 Virtual plan for a small composite radial free ap. (a) 3D printed radius bone with the planned bone harvest. (b) Planned distal radius plate adapted to the 3D printed radius bone. (c) Distal radius plate and titanium
b
e
c
cutting guide for intraoperative adaptation to the radius. (d) Radius cutting guide in situ. (e) Pre-adapted distal radius plate in situ
30
O. Breik and S. Parmar
Flap Selection intheVessel­Depleted Neck
Reconstructive surgeons tackling these cases need to have a wide spectrum of free microvascu­lar aps within their armamentarium. In a recent systematic review of microvascular reconstruc­tions in the vessel-depleted neck, 329 reconstruc­tions from 26 included studies were performed with a vast diversity of 18 different aps used [18]. The most commonly used were the antero­lateral thigh ap (ALT) and the radial forearm free ap (RFFF). When choosing the ideal ap, several factors need to be considered. Firstly, which options are available as some aps may have already been utilized in previous surgeries. Secondly, adequate pedicle length is particularly important in these patients as they are already compromised in terms of vessels available for anastomosis. Commonly used soft tissue aps for head and neck reconstruction with the longest pedicle lengths are radial forearm aps, antero­lateral thigh aps, latissimus dorsi aps, and rec­tus abdominis aps, respectively. Composite aps with the longest pedicle lengths are bula and scapula-tip aps (utilizing the angular branch of the thoracodorsal artery as the pedicle).
Where possible, the surgeon can also plan to modify a particular well-known ap to increase pedicle length through a variety of ways. The deep circumex iliac artery (DCIA) ap pedicle length can be increased by harvesting the bone more posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine than usual. The scapula free ap pedicle can be lengthened by harvesting the thoracodorsal artery
and anastomosing to the distal end of the thora­codorsal artery. Blood will travel in a reverse ow into the circumex scapular artery supply­ing the ap. During planning for these cases, the reconstructive surgeon should consider their plan A but always have a plan B and plan C for the patient depending on which vessels are identied on neck exploration. Pedicled reconstructive options need to be considered in cases when no good recipient vessels are identied. Most com­monly used include pectoralis major myocutane­ous aps, pedicled latissimus dorsi aps, deltopectoral aps, and supraclavicular artery aps [18, 34].
Rehabilitation andVirtual Planning
Planning for rehabilitation should not be an afterthought but should be considered at the time of initial surgical planning. What are the patient’s long-term goals from treatment? What factors are important for each individual patient’s qual­ity of life? Considering these factors will help guide the chosen reconstruction and the chosen approach. Sometimes, a microvascular free ap is not the ideal option, and small defects can often be managed with skin grafts and prosthe­ses to help the skin graft to take (Fig.2.8). In the majority of cases however, microvascular free aps are required, and rehabilitation can be made much more accurate with the availability of vir­tual surgical planning, and advances in virtual surgical planning have allowed for immediate jaw reconstruction at the same time as surgery
ab
Fig. 2.8 86-Year-old female patient who had a small anterior mandibular alveolar SCC.She underwent a mar­ginal mandibulectomy and split-thickness skin graft for reconstruction. The skin graft was inset and supported by
a denture dressed with coe-pak dressing for 2weeks. (a) Appearance of the defect at 2weeks and 6weeks post­operatively. (b) Skin graft at 3 months demonstrating good sulcus depth and a partial denture for rehabilitation
2 Surgical Assessment
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
[31]. However, the majority of patients will have delayed rehabilitation, and the way for rehabili­tation can be prepared by accurate custom patient- centred reconstructions. There is a wide variety of ways in which 3D computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufactur­ing (CAM) can be used to aid the surgeon in their reconstructive goals ranging from just printing biomodels to allow a reconstruction plate to be bent on the model (Fig.2.9) to fully guided 3D printed cutting guides, titanium plates, and stents (Figs. 2.10, 2.11, 2.12). Preoperatively planning the soft tissue for future implant rehabilitation is as important as the bony reconstruction. Predicting the future soft tissue issues with implant rehabilitation will also guide the approach. Often, skin paddles are not ideal for the future implant interface. Considering fat fascia paddles with bula free aps instead of skin paddles, or lining the oral cavity with mus­cle instead of skin, allows for better mucosaliza­tion, making implant rehabilitation easier (Fig.2.13).
As the technology continues to advance, most of these options will be available in-house
31
Fig. 2.9 3D printed biomodel of a planned mandibulec­tomy and reconstruction with a bula. The plate was bent and adapted on the biomodel
and will not depend on proprietary providers. This will allow for more rapid turnover of designs and will render this technology avail­able to all patients being considered for bony reconstructions [32].
32
hi
O. Breik and S. Parmar
a
d
b
e
c
f
g
Fig. 2.10 Case demonstrating the 3D computer-assisted planning of a class III defect with a DCIA free ap with prefabricated orbital oor reconstruction. (a, b) Showing the area of resection and planned lateral cutting guide. (c) DCIA planned and shaped to reconstruct the left maxilla. (d) Cutting guide designed to harvest the iliac crest bone.
(e) A worm’s-eye view of a 3D computer-guided reformat demonstrating the symmetry achieved by the DCIA reconstruction. (f–i) Showing the clinical result of DCIA reconstruction of the left side of the face after radiother­apy showing good facial symmetry and good mucosalization
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025