Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 562 - файл
.pdf
178
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
E. Nisenbaum and E. A. Nicolli
22. Unal D, Orhan O, Eroglu C, Kaplan B.Prealbumin
is a more sensitive marker than albumin to assess
the nutritional status in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Contemp Oncol
(Pozn). 2013;17:276–80.
23. Danan D, Shonka DC Jr, Selman Y, Chow Z, Smolkin
ME, Jameson MJ. Prognostic value of albumin in
patients with head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope.
2016;126:1567–71.
24. Yu J, Hong JP, Suh HP, etal. Prognostic nutritional
index is a predictor of free ap failure in extremity
reconstruction. Nutrients. 2020;12:562.
25. Jensen GL, Bistrian B, Roubenoff R, Heimburger
DC. Malnutrition syndromes: a conundrum
vs continuum. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2009;33:710–6.
26. Library ADAEA. Does serum albumin correlate with weight loss in four models of prolonged
protein-energy restriction: anorexia nervosa, nonmalabsorptive gastric partitioning bariatric surgery,
calorie-restricted diets, or starvation.
27. Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What
is subjective global assessment of nutritional status?
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11:8–13.
28. PG-SGA. https://pt- global.org/pt- global/.
29. Capuano G, Gentile PC, Bianciardi F, Tosti M,
Palladino A, Di Palma M.Prevalence and inuence
of malnutrition on quality of life and performance
status in patients with locally advanced head and
neck cancer before treatment. Support Care Cancer.
2010;18:433–7.
30. Souza MTP, Singer P, Ozorio GA, et al. Resting
energy expenditure and body composition in patients
with head and neck cancer: an observational study
leading to a new predictive equation. Nutrition.
2018;51–52:60–5.
31. Bauer J, Capra S, Ferguson M.Use of the scored
patient-generated subjective global assessment
(PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients
with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56:779–85.
32. Nitichai N, Angkatavanich J, Somlaw N, Voravud
N, Lertbutsayanukul C. Validation of the scored
patient-generated subjective global assessment
(PG-SGA) in Thai setting and association with
nutritional parameters in cancer patients. Asian Pac
J Cancer Prev. 2019;20:1249–55.
33. Cong M, Song C, Xu H, etal. The patient-generated
subjective global assessment is a promising screening tool for cancer cachexia. BMJ Support Palliat
Care. 2020;12:e39.
34. Rodrigues CS, Lacerda MS, Chaves GV.Patient generated subjective global assessment as a prognosis
tool in women with gynecologic cancer. Nutrition.
2015;31:1372–8.
35. Härter J, Orlandi SP, Gonzalez MC.Nutritional and
functional factors as prognostic of surgical cancer
patients. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25:2525–30.
36. Jager-Wittenaar H, Ottery FD.Assessing nutritional
status in cancer: role of the patient-generated sub-
jective global assessment. Curr Opinion Clin Nutr
Metab Care. 2017;20:322–9.
37. Carriço M, Guerreiro CS, Parreira A. The validity of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global
Assessment Short-form©; in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN.
2021;43:296–301.
38. De Groot LM, Lee G, Ackerie A, van der Meij
BS. Malnutrition screening and assessment in the
cancer care ambulatory setting: mortality predictability and validity of the patient-generated subjective global assessment short form (PG-SGA SF) and
the GLIM criteria. Nutrients. 2020;12:2287.
39. Jager-Wittenaar H, de Bats HF, Welink-Lamberts
BJ, et al. Self-completion of the patient-generated
subjective global assessment short form is feasible
and is associated with increased awareness on malnutrition risk in patients with head and neck cancer.
Nutr Clin Pract. 2020;35:353–62.
40. Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga
Z. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new
method based on an analysis of controlled clinical
trials. Clin Nutr. 2003;22:321–36.
41. Liu W, Gao L, Huang X, etal. Pretreatment nutritional risk as a prognostic factor in head and neck
cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2019;28:223–9.
42. Orell-Kotikangas H, Österlund P, Saarilahti K,
Ravasco P, Schwab U, Mäkitie AA.NRS-2002 for
pre-treatment nutritional risk screening and nutritional status assessment in head and neck cancer
patients. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:1495–502.
43. Hsueh SW, Lai CC, Hung CY, etal. A comparison
of the MNA-SF, MUST, and NRS-2002 nutritional
tools in predicting treatment incompletion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with head and
neck cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:5455–62.
44. Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia M, etal. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition—a consensus
report from the global clinical nutrition community.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10:207–17.
45. O'Neill JP, Shaha AR. Nutrition management of
patients with malignancies of the head and neck.
Surg Clin North Am. 2011;91:631–9.
46. Beeken L, Calman F. A return to “normal eating”
after curative treatment for oral cancer. What are the
long-term prospects? European journal of cancer
part B.Oral Oncol. 1994;30:387–92.
47. Rettig EM, D'Souza G.Epidemiology of head and
neck cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015;24:379–96.
48. Ross LJ, Wilson M, Banks M, Rezannah F, Daglish
M. Prevalence of malnutrition and nutritional risk
factors in patients undergoing alcohol and drug treatment. Nutrition. 2012;28:738–43.
49. Flannery AH, Adkins DA, Cook AM. Unpeeling
the evidence for the Banana bag: evidence-based
recommendations for the Management of AlcoholAssociated Vitamin and Electrolyte Deciencies in
the ICU.Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1545–52.

12 Perioperative Nutrition inHead andNeck Free Flap Reconstruction
179
50. Jo YH, Talmage DA, Role LW.Nicotinic receptormediated effects on appetite and food intake. J
Neurobiol. 2002;53:618–32.
51. Risso D, Drayna D, Morini G.Alteration, reduction
and taste loss: Main causes and potential implications on dietary habits. Nutrients. 2020;12:3284.
52. Cervenka BP, Rao S, Bewley AF. Head and neck
cancer and the elderly patient. Otolaryngol Clin N
Am. 2018;51:741–51.
53. Larsson L, Degens H, Li M, etal. Sarcopenia: agingrelated loss of muscle mass and function. Physiol
Rev. 2019;99:427–511.
54. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, etal. Denition and
classication of cancer cachexia: an international
consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:489–95.
55. Baracos VE, Martin L, Korc M, Guttridge DC,
Fearon KC. Cancer-associated cachexia. Nat Rev
Dis Primers. 2018;4:1–18.
56. Biswas AK, Acharyya S. Cancer-associated
cachexia: a systemic consequence of cancer progression. Annu Rev Cancer Biol. 2020;4:391–411.
57. George J, Cannon T, Lai V, etal. Cancer cachexia
syndrome in head and neck cancer patients: part
II.Pathophysiology Head Neck. 2007;29:497–507.
58. Lakananurak N, Gramlich L.The Role of preoperative parenteral nutrition. Nutrients. 2020;12:1320.
59. Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, et al. ESPEN
guidelines on enteral nutrition: surgery including
organ transplantation. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:224–44.
60. Parhar HS, Durham JS, Anderson DW, Rush B,
Prisman E. The association between the nutritionrelated index and morbidity following head and neck
microsurgery. Laryngoscope. 2020;130:375–80.
61. Patel RS, McCluskey SA, Goldstein DP, et al.
Clinicopathologic and therapeutic risk factors for
perioperative complications and prolonged hospital
stay in free ap reconstruction of the head and neck.
Head Neck. 2010;32:1345–53.
62. Eskander A, Kang S, Tweel B, etal. Predictors of
complications in patients receiving head and neck
free ap reconstructive procedures. Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg. 2018;158:839–47.
63. Alwani MM, Jones AJ, Novinger LJ, etal. Impact of
sarcopenia on outcomes of autologous head and neck
free tissue reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg.
2020;36:369–78.
64. Anesthesiology AAoN. Enhanced recovery after
surgery: considerations for pathway development
and implementation. https://www.aana.com/docs/
default- source/practice- aana- com- web- documents(all)/professional- practice- manual/enhancedrecovery- after- surgery.pdf?sfvrsn=6d184ab1_14.
65. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, etal. Consensus review
of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery:
enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group recommendations. Arch Surg. 2009;144:961–9.
66. Dort JC, Farwell DG, Findlay M, etal. Optimal perioperative care in major head and neck cancer surgery
with free ap reconstruction: a consensus review
and recommendations from the enhanced recovery
after surgery society. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg. 2017;143:292–303.
67. Engelman DT, Ben Ali W, Williams JB, et al.
Guidelines for perioperative care in cardiac surgery:
enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:755–66.
68. Debono B, Wainwright TW, Wang MY, et al.
Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
(ERAS®) Society recommendations. Spine J.
2021;21:729–52.
69. Chorath K, Go B, Shinn JR, etal. Enhanced recovery
after surgery for head and neck free ap reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral
Oncol. 2021;113:105117.
70. Network NCC.Head and neck cancers. https://www.
nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/head- andneck.pdf.
71. Talwar B, Donnelly R, Skelly R, Donaldson
M.Nutritional management in head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary
Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130:S32–s40.
72. Victoria CCVaDoH.Optimal care pathway for people with head and neck cancer. Melbourne: Cancer
Council Victoria; 2021.
73. Heyland DK, Montalvo M, MacDonald S, Keefe
L, Su XY, Drover JW. Total parenteral nutrition in
the surgical patient: a meta-analysis. Can J Surg.
2001;44:102–11.
74. Jie B, Jiang ZM, Nolan MT, Zhu SN, Yu K, Kondrup
J.Impact of preoperative nutritional support on clinical outcome in abdominal surgical patients at nutritional risk. Nutrition. 2012;28:1022–7.
75. Von Meyenfeldt MF, Meijerink WJHJ, Rouart
MMJ, Builmaassen MTHJ, Soeters PB.Perioperative
nutritional support: a randomised clinical trial. Clin
Nutr. 1992;11:180–6.
76. Van V B-d, der Schuer MA, Langendoen SI,
Vondeling H, Kuik DJ, Quak JJ, Van Leeuwen
PA. Perioperative enteral nutrition and quality of
life of severely malnourished head and neck cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Nutr.
2000;19:437–44.
77. McClave SA, Kozar R, Martindale RG, et al.
Summary points and consensus recommendations
from the North American Surgical Nutrition Summit.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013;37:99s–105s.
78. Huang AT, Georgolios A, Espino S, Kaplan B,
Neifeld J, Reiter ER. Percutaneous endoscopic
gastrostomy site metastasis from head and neck
squamous cell carcinoma: case series and literature
review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;42:20.
79. Nugent B, Lewis S, O'Sullivan JM.Enteral feeding
methods for nutritional management in patients with
head and neck cancers being treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev. 2013;2013:Cd007904.
80. Corry J, Poon W, McPhee N, et al. Randomized
study of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tubes for enteral feeding in head and

180
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
E. Nisenbaum and E. A. Nicolli
neck cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiation. J
Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52:503–10.
81. Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, et al. ESPEN
guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr.
2017;36:623–50.
82. Worthington ML, Cresci G. Immune-modulating
formulas: who wins the meta-analysis race? Nutr
Clin Pract. 2011;26:650–5.
83. Morris SM Jr. Arginine: beyond protein. Am J Clin
Nutr. 2006;83:508s–12s.
84. Tong BC, Barbul A. Cellular and physiological effects of arginine. Mini-Rev Med Chem.
2004;4:823–32.
85. Smith RJ. Glutamine metabolism and its physiologic importance. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
1990;14:40s–4s.
86. Schloerb PR. Immune-enhancing diets: products,
components, and their rationales. JPEN J Parenter
Enteral Nutr. 2001;25:S3–7.
87. Calder PC. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and
inammation: from molecular biology to the clinic.
Lipids. 2003;38:343–52.
88. Marimuthu K, Varadhan KK, Ljungqvist O, Lobo
DN.A meta-analysis of the effect of combinations of
immune modulating nutrients on outcome in patients
undergoing major open gastrointestinal surgery. Ann
Surg. 2012;255:1060–8.
89. Wong CS, Aly EH. The effects of enteral immunonutrition in upper gastrointestinal surgery: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg.
2016;29:137–50.
90. Strickland A, Brogan A, Krauss J, Martindale R,
Cresci G. Is the use of specialized nutritional formulations a cost-effective strategy? A national
database evaluation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2005;29:S81–91.
91. August DA, Huhmann MB. A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: nutrition support therapy during
adult anticancer treatment and in hematopoietic
cell transplantation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2009;33:472–500.
92. Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, et al. ESPEN
guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr.
2017;36:11–48.
93. Hegazi RA, Hustead DS, Evans DC.Preoperative
standard Oral nutrition supplements vs
Immunonutrition: results of a systematic
review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg.
2014;219:1078–87.
94. Howes N, Atkinson C, Thomas S, Lewis
SJ.Immunonutrition for patients undergoing surgery
for head and neck cancer. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev. 2018;2018(8):CD010954.
95. Mueller SA, Mayer C, Bojaxhiu B, etal. Effect of
preoperative immunonutrition on complications
after salvage surgery in head and neck cancer. J
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;48:25.
96. Brady M, Kinn S, Stuart P. Preoperative fasting
for adults to prevent perioperative complications.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(4):Cd004423.
97. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force.
Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the
use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of
pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients
undergoing elective procedures: an updated report
by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task
Force on preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:376–93.
98. Smith I, Kranke P, Murat I, etal. Perioperative fasting
in adults and children: guidelines from the European
Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol.
2011;28:556–69.
99. Pogatschnik C, Steiger E.Review of preoperative carbohydrate loading. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30:660–4.
100. Pimenta GP, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE.Prolonged
preoperative fasting in elective surgical patients: why
should we reduce it? Nutr Clin Pract. 2014;29:22–8.
101. Offodile AC 2nd, Chou HY, Lin JA, et al.
Hyperglycemia and risk of adverse outcomes following microvascular reconstruction of oncologic
head and neck defects. Oral Oncol. 2018;79:15–9.
102. Viganò J, Cereda E, Caccialanza R, etal. Effects of
preoperative oral carbohydrate supplementation on
postoperative metabolic stress response of patients
undergoing elective abdominal surgery. World J
Surg. 2012;36:1738–43.
103. Zelić M, Stimac D, Mendrila D, etal. Inuence of
preoperative oral feeding on stress response after
resection for colon cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterology.
2012;59:1385–9.
104. Melis GC, van Leeuwen PA, von Blomberg-van der
Flier BM, etal. A carbohydrate-rich beverage prior
to surgery prevents surgery-induced immunodepression: a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. JPEN J
Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30:21–6.
105. Helminen H, Viitanen H, Sajanti J.Effect of preoperative intravenous carbohydrate loading on preoperative discomfort in elective surgery patients. Eur J
Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:123–7.
106. Smith MD, McCall J, Plank L, Herbison GP, Soop
M, Nygren J. Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(8):Cd009161.
107. Noba L, Wakeeld A.Are carbohydrate drinks more
effective than preoperative fasting: a systematic
review of randomised controlled trials. J Clin Nurs.
2019;28:3096–116.
108. Amer MA, Smith MD, Herbison GP, Plank LD,
McCall JL.Network meta-analysis of the effect of
preoperative carbohydrate loading on recovery after
elective surgery. Br J Surg. 2017;104:187–97.
109. Henriksen MG, Hessov I, Dela F, Hansen HV,
Haraldsted V, Rodt SA.Effects of preoperative oral
carbohydrates and peptides on postoperative endocrine response, mobilization, nutrition and muscle
function in abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol
Scand. 2003;47:191–9.
110. Yi HC, Ibrahim Z, Abu Zaid Z, et al. Impact of
enhanced recovery after surgery with preoperative

12 Perioperative Nutrition inHead andNeck Free Flap Reconstruction
181
whey protein-infused carbohydrate loading and postoperative early Oral feeding among surgical gynecologic cancer patients: an open-labelled randomized
controlled trial. Nutrients. 2020;12:264.
111. Perrone F, da Silva Filho AC, Adôrno IF, et al.
Effects of preoperative feeding with a whey protein
plus carbohydrate drink on the acute phase response
and insulin resistance. A randomized trial. Nutr J.
2011;10:66.
112. Pexe-Machado PA, de Oliveira BD, DockNascimento DB, de Aguilar-Nascimento
JE.Shrinking preoperative fast time with maltodextrin and protein hydrolysate in gastrointestinal resections due to cancer. Nutrition. 2013;29:1054–9.
113. de Carvalho CS, Silva TH, JCS A, etal. Preoperative
fasting abbreviation with whey protein reduces
the occurrence of postoperative complications in
patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized
clinical trial. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021;36:665–72.
114. Herbert G, Perry R, Andersen HK, etal. Early enteral
nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery versus later commencement for length
of hospital stay and postoperative complications.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2019:CD004080.
115. Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S.Early
enteral feeding versus "nil by mouth" after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and metaanalysis of controlled trials. BMJ. 2001;323:773–6.
116. Willcutts KF, Chung MC, Erenberg CL, Finn KL,
Schirmer BD, Byham-Gray LD.Early Oral feeding
as compared with traditional timing of Oral feeding
after upper gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;264:264.
117. Milinis K, Gaskell P, Lau A, Lancaster J, Jones
T.Early versus late oral feeding following total (pharyngo)laryngectomy: systematic review and metaanalysis. Head Neck. 2021;43:1359–68.
118. Grover S, Swisher-McClure S, Mitra N, etal. Total
laryngectomy versus larynx preservation for T4a larynx cancer: patterns of care and survival outcomes.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92:594–601.
119. Hoffman HT, Porter K, Karnell LH, etal. Laryngeal
cancer in the United States: changes in demographics, patterns of care, and survival. Laryngoscope.
2006;116:1–13.
120. Singh R, Karantanis W, Fadhil M, et al. Metaanalysis on the rate of pharyngocutaneous stula in
early oral feeding in laryngectomy patients. Am J
Otolaryngol. 2021;42:102748.
121. Guidera AK, Kelly BN, Rigby P, MacKinnon CA,
Tan ST.Early oral intake after reconstruction with
a free ap for cancer of the oral cavity. Br J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51:224–7.
122. McAuley D, Barry T, McConnell K, Smith J,
Stenhouse J. Early feeding after free ap reconstruction for oral cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
2015;53:618–20.
123. Brady G, Leigh-Doyle L, Riva F, Kerawala C, Roe
J.Early post-operative feeding: an investigation of
early functional outcomes for oral cancer patients
treated with surgical resection and free ap reconstruction. Dysphagia. 2021;37:1008.
124. Kerawala CJ, Riva F, Paleri V.The impact of early
oral feeding following head and neck free ap reconstruction on complications and length of stay. Oral
Oncol. 2021;113:105094.

Pain Management
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
JoshuaIsaacReece, HeatherA.Edwards,
andNicoleZ.Spence
13
Introduction
Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are a signicant
public health problem, with over 350,000 new
cases diagnosed yearly and 150,000 deaths annually worldwide [1]. The disease process and morbidities of treatment have a profound effect on
the quality of life. In addition to cosmetic changes
and functional challenges, patients frequently
suffer from acute and chronic pain. This chapter
discusses pain management strategies for patients
undergoing complex head and neck microvascular reconstructive surgery.
Physicians strive to minimize psychological
and physiologic stresses associated with surgery
and pain. Furthermore, we seek to mitigate side
effects and associated risks with opioid prescriptions. Adequate perioperative pain management
is integral to patient care and outcomes. Each of
the biological, psychological, and social dimensions of the pain experience should be considered
and explored to provide optimal perioperative
pain management [2]. Ensuring adequate analge-
J. I. Reece · N. Z. Spence (*)
Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical
Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
e-mail: Joshua.Reece@bmc.org;
Nicole.Spence@BMC.org
H. A. Edwards
Department of Otolaryngology, Boston Medical
Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
e-mail: Heather.Edwards@bmc.org
sia is crucial for patient comfort and enhances
early ambulation, minimizes deconditioning,
decreases length of stay, mitigates cardiac and
pulmonary complications (i.e., reduces the risk of
venous thromboembolism), improves recovery,
reduces the likelihood of developing chronic
pain, and reduces healthcare cost [3]. Providing
adequate analgesia may be challenging as mainstay treatments like opioids have signicant side
effects and addiction potential. The use of multimodal analgesia has been studied in patients
undergoing major head and neck surgeries and
should be used as part of routine pain management. Multimodal techniques aim to reduce total
opioid consumption and their associated side
effects. Various pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options for analgesia are discussed in this
chapter.
Factors Associated withPain
Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional
experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage. The head and neck are richly innervated with many anatomical structures conned
in a small space contributing to high sensitivity to
pain [4]. Pain associated with head and neck
reconstruction has characteristics of nociceptive
and neuropathic pain types. Nociceptive pain is
caused by tissue injury, whereas neuropathic pain
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023
A. Quimby et al. (eds.), Complex Head and Neck Microvascular Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38898-9_13
183

184
J. I. Reece et al.
is from nerve injury. Although seemingly similar,
their descriptions and treatments may be unique.
Factors that correlate with the severity of postoperative pain include preoperative opioid use,
increased body mass index, anxiety, depression,
extensivity of surgery, and duration of surgical
operation. Depression and anxiety are associated
with increased perception of pain severity,
whereas prolonged duration of acute pain leads
to increased mood dysregulation [5]. In certain
cases, consulting a psychiatrist preoperatively
can aid in utilizing psychodynamic, behavioral,
and pharmacologic modes of treatment [6].
Physicians should recognize that an individual’s
perception, expression, and reaction to pain are
inuenced by genetic, developmental, familial,
psychological, social, and cultural variables.
Each of these factors of the pain model can profoundly affect the experience of pain in each
patient to varying degrees. Understanding these
factors helps physicians individualize their
approach to pain management within the framework of the biopsychosocial model. Physicians
can identify and potentially intervene on these
patient factors. With the help of case managers
and social workers, clinical pathways can be
developed to address sociocultural variables.
Other independent factors that affect postoperative interpretation of pain include attention to
pain and understanding, control, and expectation
of pain. Data supports a correlation between
higher cerebral function and perception of pain
[7]. As personalized medicine grows, we may be
able to offer patients more effective medications
based on their underlying genetic factors.
Pain management considerations for patients
undergoing head and neck free ap surgeries
begin before the operation occurs. Physicians
should set reasonable expectations for the degree
of pain patients generally experience after free
ap surgery. The initial postoperative period is
the most painful, and pain normally reduces in
subsequent days to weeks. Extended resection,
ap coverage, nerve lesions, inammation, and
high-dose opioid administration can lead to
hyperalgesia and, at worst, chronic postoperative
pain [8]. Causes of inadequate postoperative
analgesia include lack of reasonable pain expec-
tations, complications, medication tolerance and
side effects, and poor pain assessment [9].
Counseling should focus on minimizing opioid
use, including instructions on how to safely taper
off. The tapering process can take days to weeks
or months, depending on the patient and his/her
opioid use patterns. Follow-ups should be scheduled to screen for opioid dependence, guide
tapering, and assess for persistent pain. Clinical
pathways developed at the departmental or institutional level provide patients and physicians
with appropriate preoperative planning and counseling centered around what to expect on the day
of surgery and the postoperative course
thereafter.
Opioids
Most opioids are synthetic derivatives of morphine, which was rst isolated from poppy plants
in 1804 and is still used. Opioids play a vital role
in analgesia as they are considered the treatment
of choice for moderate-to-severe pain and recommended for patients who are unresponsive to
other types of analgesic medications [10, 11].
Opioids vary based on their receptor afnity and
agonist qualities. Opioids are classied as pure
agonists, agonists-antagonists, or partial agonists. For acute postoperative analgesia, pure opioid agonists are most frequently chosen, whereas
partial agonists and antagonists are utilized in the
treatment of chronic pain and/or substance use
disorders. Opioids are chosen and dosed based on
their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
within the context of each patient’s history.
Opioid use is associated with side effects, including postoperative nausea and vomiting, constipation, sedation, hypotension, and respiratory
depression. These side effects, if present, create
barriers to patients’ postoperative recovery.
Chronic opioid use is a global health problem,
and surgery is often the point of initial exposure
for many chronic opioid users [12]. A retrospective study showed a considerable prevalence of
chronic postoperative opioid use in patients who
have undergone major resection with free ap
reconstruction for head and neck cancers, with

13 Pain Management
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
185
52% of opioid-naïve patients continuing to use
opioids at 3months and 41% at 12months postoperatively. In chronic opioid users, 82% continued opioid use at 3months and 77% at 12months
postoperatively [13]. Preoperative opioid use,
prior tobacco use, and advanced pathologic
T-stage were identiable risk factors for chronic
opioid use in patients undergoing free ap reconstructive surgeries. Patient age may also factor
into pain experience. One study showed that continued opioid use was common in younger
patients (under 60 years of age), whereas older
patients had fewer opioid rells [14]. Growing
evidence supports an association between opioid
use in the acute postoperative period and subsequent development of chronic opioid use [12,
15–17]. State prescription monitoring programs
can be used to verify medication history to screen
for patients at risk for potential use disorder.
Opioids can be rotated or converted based on
their equianalgesic dose (Table 13.1); however,
the side effect proles are the same at equianalgesic doses. If patients are on opioids for a long
term, they are at risk for withdrawal if abruptly
discontinued. Withdrawal, while unpleasant, is
not life-threatening. For patients who suffer
from chronic pain or use opioids at baseline as
outpatients, physicians should attempt to mitigate these patients’ baseline pain. Perioperatively,
patients should continue their basal analgesic
medications. Some physicians may attempt to
decrease baseline opioid use or encourage
involvement in therapy or behavioral modications to decrease patients’ pain prior to surgery.
For patients on chronic opioid maintenance therapy (i.e., buprenorphine or methadone), physicians may consider consulting addiction
Table 13.1 Equianalgesic opioid dosages. When converting between opioids, the physician must decrease the
dose offered (by 25–50%) to account for cross-tolerance
or differences in opioid binding afnities. Failing to
account for cross-tolerance puts a patient at risk of adverse
events, such as respiratory depression. mg=milligram
Intravenous Oral
Morphine 10mg 30mg
Oxycodone – 20mg
Hydromorphone 1.5mg 7.5mg
Fentanyl 0.15mg –
specialists to participate in a multidisciplinary
care team to assist with any necessary dose
adjustments. Maintenance medications should
be continued perioperatively, including
buprenorphine- naloxone and methadone. Other
medications, such as naltrexone, should be held.
The timing and perioperative planning must be
coordinated with an anesthesiologist or perioperative physician in advance of surgery [18].
Patients with concomitant psychological pathologies, including poorly controlled major depressive disorder, may meet indications to consult
psychiatry to reduce postoperative complications like worsening of preexisting psychiatric
disorders. Multidisciplinary hospital pathways
may be created to decrease a patient’s preoperative opioid use by 10–30% prior to their surgical
admission, if able.
If complex HNC patients must be NPO postoperatively or must use a gastric tube, analgesic
medication administration should be altered. If
patients who are on chronic or long-acting oral
opioid therapies are limited to using a gastric
tube or parenteral administration postoperatively,
their long-acting medications need to be converted into a regimen that would provide appropriate, equianalgesic basal analgesia either
enterally, intravenously, or transdermally. Longacting opioids, such as MS Contin® or
OxyContin®, cannot be crushed for administration into a gastric tube. Consider consultation
with the acute pain service or pharmacists for
guidance. Parenteral opioids can be used postoperatively, although currently there are no longacting parenteral formulations available for use.
However, when patients are able to tolerate an
oral regimen, parenteral opioids should be converted to an oral (or per gastric tube) regimen as
swiftly as possible as oral medications provide
longer lasting analgesia.
Providing patients with patient-controlled
analgesia (PCA) is safer than ordering nurseadministered intravenous opioid boluses. A PCA
regimen consists of an infusion pump delivering
a programmed dose of medication in response to
the patient pushing a demand button. There are
inherent safety facets when using a PCA, including that only the patient is to push the demand

186
J. I. Reece et al.
Table 13.2
are limited to pediatric patients or complex opioid-tolerant patients. If considering starting a continuous infusion, it is
prudent to seek expertise from pain service physicians. mg=milligram; mcg=microgram
Demand dose 1mg 0.2mg 10mcg
Lockout Every 6 or 10min Every 6 or 10min Every 6min
Continuous infusion 0 0 0
1h limit 10mg or 6mg 2mg or 1.2mg 100mcg
button, and if the patient becomes sleepy, he/she
will not be able to activate his/her demand.
Consequently, PCAs decrease the risk of inadvertent overdose. Furthermore, providing patients
with an independent way to administer analgesics as needed can be helpful for patients’ sense
of control, eliminating administrative delays, and
better approximating patients’ variable analgesic
needs. Common PCA settings are listed in
Table13.2. PCAs can help physicians understand
a patient’s opioid consumption over 24h, and this
data can help guide appropriate as-needed (PRN)
opioid dosing. Some patients, however, such as
those who are confused or delirious, may not be
able to use a PCA effectively, and alternatives
should be implemented.
Standard intravenous PCA starting settings for opioid-naïve patients [19]. Generally, continuous infusions
Morphine Hydromorphone Fentanyl
which is propagated by ascending sensory neurons. Local anesthetics target these rst-order
sensory neurons. The synthesis of local inammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins, can be
inhibited by cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors.
The initial sensory transmission from rst-order
afferent nociceptive bers synapses in the dorsal
horn of the central nervous system (CNS) using
neurotransmitters, including substance P, prostaglandins, adenosine, and glutamate. From the
dorsal horn, the second-order neurons of the spinothalamic tract decussate and ascend the spinal
cord to reach the thalamus. The trigeminothalamic tract supplies the head and face. Signals
reaching the thalamus are processed by the ventral posterior nucleus (VPN) and transmitted to
the cerebral cortex via the posterior limb of the
internal capsule. This ascending pathway initi-
Multimodal Analgesia
ates conscious realization of pain. At the cerebral
cortical level, pain is a subjective experience that
Multimodal analgesia is designed to reduce or
eliminate opioid use [20]. Rather than relying
solely on opioids, other analgesic modalities
should be offered if and when appropriate. The
mechanisms and pathways of pain signaling play
a role in pharmacologic targets. As part of optimal perioperative care in head and neck reconstructive surgeries, effective pain management is
an important goal of the Enhanced Recovery
After Surgery (ERAS) protocol and includes
multimodal analgesia [21]. Multimodal analgesia
is the concurrent use of more than one modality
of pain control to achieve effective analgesia,
with opioids reserved for severe refractory pain
[20]. An understanding of the physiologic basis
of pain allows physicians to appropriately choose
pharmacologic agents to target pain.
Pain occurs when mechanical energy of nox-
ious stimuli is converted into electrical energy,
varies in perception. A concomitant descending
efferent pain pathway, originating within the
hypothalamus, modulates the sensation of pain.
This endogenous “pain-inhibiting” system is the
target of some analgesic therapies, including opioids. Stimulation of the periaqueductal gray
within the midbrain activates enkephalinreleasing neurons that descend to the raphe
nucleus in the brain stem. Serotonergic neurons
from the raphe synapse with inhibitory interneurons within the substantia gelatinosa, resulting in
the release of enkephalin and dynorphin.
Descending noradrenergic bers from the locus
coeruleus of the brain stem modulate ascending
pain signals. This explains some of the physiologic hyperadrenergic manifestations of pain
such as hypertension and tachycardia. These
manifestations may be detrimental in microvascular surgeries intraoperatively and postopera-

13 Pain Management
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
187
tively. Many of the analgesic agents target
receptors of the ascending and/or descending
pain pathway; thus, understanding the neurophysiologic basis of pain transmission and perception can help physicians provide superior
analgesia.
Multimodal analgesia is successful because it
targets different pain signaling molecules or
directly affects receptors involved in the pain
pathway. It is best clinical practice to use a multimodal approach to manage patients’ pain during
their hospital course [22]. A multimodal approach
can be implemented preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Preoperatively treating patients with analgesic medications to reduce
postoperative pain is known as preemptive analgesia and has become part of multimodal pain
pathways that have been applied to many types of
surgeries, including head and neck cancer surgery [23]. Preoperatively, patients can be administered oral or intravenous medications.
Preemptive analgesia has been shown to delay
time to the rst analgesic request and reduce total
analgesic use [24]. Timing of administration has
not been shown to make a signicant difference
in effect, thus giving preemptive analgesics
immediately before surgery is acceptable. The
most frequently used preemptive analgesics are
acetaminophen and gabapentin [22]. Multimodal
analgesia reduces opioid use intraoperatively and
in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) when
patients are administered preoperative oral celecoxib, gabapentin, and/or tramadol [25]. A large
systematic review study showed that gabapentinoids were the most commonly used non-opioid
(72.9%) followed by nonsteroidal antiinammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (44.6%), acetaminophen (44.3%), corticosteroids (25.1%),
ketamine (7.2%), and nerve block (3.4%) [22].
The use of multimodal analgesia is associated
with signicant reductions in opioid use and concomitantly decreases opioid-related adverse
events (ORAEs) [26]. Patients who receive multimodal analgesia have lower pain scores in the
postoperative period (POD 0–6) compared to
opioid-only counterparts [20]. Of the multimodal
analgesic regimens studied, none have demonstrated increased incidence of postoperative
hematomas or ap failure, even with the use of
NSAIDs [27]. Topical applications, such as topical capsaicin, lidocaine, or diclofenac, may be
benecial for patients. These medications are
well tolerated but should be limited in certain
patient populations.
Lidocaine and ketamine infusions are viable
options but depend on the expertise of intraoperative anesthesiologists or postoperative acute pain
specialists and require investment from hospital
systems to ensure safe and effective applications
[8]. A multidisciplinary, dynamic approach to
pain management for patients undergoing free
ap surgery must be tailored to each patient.
When possible, multimodal analgesic approaches
should be implemented to decrease the risk of
opioid dependence and ORAEs, provide better
perioperative analgesia, and enhance recovery
after surgery.
Acetaminophen
Most multimodal analgesic approaches include
the use of acetaminophen. Acetaminophen, also
known as paracetamol, was rst synthesized in
1877 and is widely used over the counter as an
antipyretic and analgesic. Acetaminophen is
inexpensive and has minimal side effects when
used in appropriate doses. Acetaminophen has
two mechanisms of analgesic action. First, prostaglandin synthesis is inhibited through cyclooxygenase- 1 (COX-1) and, mainly, COX-2. Second,
the active paracetamol metabolite is formed in
the CNS and acts as a weak agonist of cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 [28]. In addition to
its role in preemptive analgesia, acetaminophen
has been proven to provide effective analgesia in
the postoperative phase of care [29]. Onset of
action of oral acetaminophen can take up to 1h,
whereas intravenous acetaminophen provides
analgesic effect within 5–10min and peak analgesia within 1h. Studies have demonstrated that
intravenous acetaminophen may play a role in
reducing the total narcotic requirement in the rst
8h after surgical resection of head and neck cancer surgery and contributes to alleviation of postoperative pain, decreased length of stay, and

188
J. I. Reece et al.
potentially decreased cost to the patient and hospital overall [30]. Current recommendations suggest a maximum of 3–4g administered in a 24-h
period. In patients with hepatic dysfunction, a
maximum of 2g should be administered in a 24-h
period. Acetaminophen is known to be hepatotoxic; thus, caution should be used in patients
with liver pathology. Otherwise, acetaminophen
is well tolerated with minimal side effects and
low addictive potential, making it essential to the
multimodal analgesic approach.
Nonsteroidal Anti-inammatory
Drugs (NSAIDs)
An important component of multimodal analgesia is NSAIDs. Medications such as celecoxib,
ibuprofen, and naproxen are within this class of
drugs, most of which are widely used and easily
accessible over the counter. Most conventional
NSAIDs are nonselective competitive inhibitors
of COX-1 and COX-2 and work by inhibiting the
conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandins
and thromboxane. Prostaglandins play a role in
initiating the inammatory response, local vasodilation, and sensitization to pain and hyperalgesia. Thromboxane induces vasoconstriction and
platelet aggregation. Although celecoxib, unlike
COX-1 inhibitors, has been shown to have minimal inhibitory effects on platelet aggregation,
there have been case reports of associated surgical bleeding [21]. While these medications are
generally well tolerated, their manufacturers
report considerable risk including gastric ulceration/bleeding, renal failure, and increased risk
of serious (and potentially fatal) adverse cardiovascular thrombotic events, including myocardial
infarction and stroke. Risk may occur early during treatment and may increase with duration of
use. The use of NSAIDs should be avoided in
patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) less
than 30 and/or on hemodialysis as NSAIDs may
increase the risk of acute kidney injury and renal
failure. It is recommended to use the lowest
effective dose for the shortest duration of time,
consistent with individual patient goals, to reduce
the risk of adverse effects. Selective COX-2
inhibitors (i.e., celecoxib) were thought to be
associated with increased risk of thrombosis by
promoting an imbalance of prostacyclin and
thromboxane; however, studies have demonstrated that the use of celecoxib does not have
deleterious effects on free tissue transfer survival
or healing [31]. The American Head and Neck
Society showed that the use of celecoxib after
head and neck free ap reconstructive surgery
provides effective analgesia and reduces oral,
intravenous, and total opioid consumption perioperatively without increasing surgical aprelated complications [32]. NSAIDs are an
effective adjuvant and should be considered as
part of a multimodal analgesic regimen.
Gabapentinoids
Recent studies have shown that gabapentinoids
do not have clinically signicant analgesic
effects. Their use is not routinely recommended
in the perioperative setting by the American
Society of Anesthesiologists [33]. Despite these
recommendations, some clinical pathways
include gabapentin as part of their multimodal
analgesic pathway. Though gabapentin is not
routinely used for the management of postoperative pain, evidence supports use of gabapentin to
improve pain control and signicantly decrease
opioid use in the acute postoperative setting in
head and neck free ap surgery [26]. In reconstruction surgeries involving the tongue, studies
have shown that administration of a single preoperative dose of gabapentin improves analgesia
while decreasing opioid requirements (measured
in morphine equivalents), sedation scales, and
antiemetic usage without additional side effects
or surgical complications [34].
Gabapentin, which acts on voltage-gated calcium channels, was initially marketed as an anticonvulsant and is currently used for neuropathic
pain. Contrary to its name, it has no GABAergic
action. Gabapentinoids exert their mechanism of
action by reducing the activation of excitatory
calcium channels and decreasing neuronal signaling within the pain signaling pathway.
Gabapentinoids have the potential to be misused,
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025
