Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 528 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
28 Мб
Скачать
290
https://t.me/medicina_free
hypertrophy, biventricular hypertrophy, anterior myocardial infarction, and inferior myocardial infarction [49]. A fully CNN algorithm was applied directly on ECG data without preprocessing to detect myocardial infarction and investigate its deci­sion criteria. The trained algorithm showed a human-level performance by 93% sensitivity and 90% specicity. The same signs that human cardiologists used as MI indicators were recognized in the network’s decisions. It was shown with this, despite the need for continued testing and renement of such programs, the ability to read ECGs using standard computer programs can facilitate obtaining more con­sistent and uniform interpretations [50]. In 2020, as the next step in algorithmic ECG interpretation, BeatLogic platform provides beat detection, beat classication, and rhythm detection/classication with much more accuracy than current approaches, whereas the previously published algorithms could process just one of these three [51]. Also, it was shown that AI-enabled ECG acquired during sinus rhythm assists in identifying patients with atrial brillation bedside testing [52].
AI might also be helpful in early diagnosis of cardiac rhythm disorders; it was proved that DL long short-term memory (LSTM) model with more than 0.90 accu­racy and ultrafast rhythm classication is more effective in interpreting 12 common heart rhythms in comparison to emergency physicians, internists, and cardiolo­gists [53].
P. Motie et al.
2.5 AI inDermatology
The application of AI in clinical dermatologic visits can enhance the clinician’s diagnostic ability. This technology has the potential to help the diagnosis of skin disorders out of photographs [54]. The DL algorithm can be used for malignancy diagnosis, treatment suggestion, and classication of 134 diseases based on clinical photographs of skin lesions with a performance comparable to that of the experts [55]. In detections of skin cancers such as melanoma and non-melanoma skin can­cers in which early diagnosis plays a critical role in treatment and prognosis, AI can perform as well as or even better than trained dermatologists [56]. AI also has the potential in diagnosis and treatment suggestion of psoriasis [5759], atopic derma­titis [60], and onychomycosis [61, 62], distinguishing between benign nevi vs. mel­anoma [63, 64], ulcer assessment [65, 66], and acne severity evaluation [67]. Although AI is still far from human-level capabilities in judgment, interpretation, and face-to-face communications, its use in clinical situations is ready to be tested since AI can lever up the clinician’s judgment and diagnostic abilities. It is fast and can supply additional services such as lesion comparison or differential diagnosis suggestions. It also has the potential of automatic diagnosis of simple skin lesions, so the referrals to dermatologists could be limited to the complex and advanced cases [68].
Application of Articial Intelligence in Diagnosing Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions…
https://t.me/medicina_free
291
3 AI inDentistry andOral andMaxillofacial Surgery
Dental clinicians can also take advantage of AI potentials in various elds. In ortho­dontics, the BN (Bayesian network) was compared with expert orthodontists and it was highly accurate in determining whether a patient needed orthodontic treatment or not [69]. AI also showed promising cephalometry landmark detection, skeletal classication, and tooth extraction decision [70]. In periodontics, support vector machine (SVM) classiers were able to distinguish between periodontal health, generalized aggressive periodontitis, and generalized chronic periodontitis in young individuals using a panel of 40 bacterial species [71]. DL algorithms could also identify the strongest tooth mobility predictors, such as aging, general health, soda intake, ossing behavior, and nancial stress [72]. An increasing body of literature shows that machine learning models perform well for diagnostic and prognostic analyses in studies of oral cancer [73]. And in endodontics, an articial neural net­work determined the apical foramen location more accurately than endodon­tists [74].
3.1 Implementation ofAI fortheDiagnosis ofMaxillofacial
Pathologic Conditions
Accurate differential diagnoses of disease are crucial because these rst diagnoses gure out the treatment plan. Today, we see outstanding improvements in AI perfor­mance in diagnosing and classifying pathologic conditions. It has shown a diagnos­tic accuracy level equal to or greater than specialists [75] and could aid the residents or inexperienced dentists in formulating more precise diagnoses. Using AI also brings the opportunity of detecting malignant neoplasms and other pathologic lesions in early stages before even they become detectible by experienced special­ists. This early detection provides a better prognosis and decreases patients’ treat­ment costs and loads, since dramatically less time is sacriced [76].
3.1.1 Cystic Lesions
Cystic lesions are pathological cavities having luminal uid or semiuid compo­nents. Cysts can be seen in images as clearly delineated areas with different contrast from the surrounding tissues. These cavities could be covered fully or partially by epithelium [77]. As the type and the biologic nature of the epithelium determine the prognosis and the potential for recurrence of cysts, the classication of the cystic lesions is based on the origin of this epithelium; odontogenic cysts develop from the odontogenic process, and non-odontogenic cysts arise from head and neck embryo­genesis [78].
Radiologically, the characteristics of odontogenic cysts and tumors appear only once they reach a certain volume. Also, initial radiological appearances of cysts and tumors are so indistinguishable from each other that even by experienced specialists their proper differentiation is hard to reach. They are also asymptomatic during their early stages of progression, and most of them are found accidentally in panoramic
292
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Motie et al.
images [76]. Automatic lesion detection based on either plain radiographs or three­dimensional image modalities using deep CNN has snowballed in recent years, attracting substantial public attention [76, 77, 79].
Yang etal. did a comparative study among three groups of YOLO architecture, oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and general clinicians to detect and diagnose odon­togenic cysts and tumors, including dentigerous cysts, odontogenic keratocyst, and ameloblastoma on panoramic images. YOLO achieved at least similar correct results than oral and maxillofacial specialists and signicantly higher than general practi­tioners. They showed the usefulness of CNN in specic pathology detection and showed that CNN could be a great assistant for inexperienced dentists and other specialists who are not oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Also, in cases with low clinical signs and symptoms, especially at early stages, double-checking diagnoses with YOLO would prevent the surgeon from misdetection or unnecessary surgical intervention [76].
Odontogenic keratocysts (OKC) and ameloblastoma are both clinically prevalent benign radiolucent lesions of the jaws. Due to their different behavior, the correct differential diagnosis of these lesions is crucial because it has a direct impact on surgical planning. Accurately distinguishing between these two lesions by pan­oramic radiography is usually difcult; therefore histopathological ndings are now the gold standard for differential diagnosis [80]. A trained deep CNN model to dif­ferentiate ameloblastoma and OKCs on panoramic radiographs achieved high accu­racy, sensitivity, and specicity, demonstrating that the CNN algorithm can provide a reliable recommendation for oral and maxillofacial specialists without the need for incisional or excisional biopsy [81].
Comparing various lesions, detection and classication of radicular cysts by deep CNN architecture showed the highest recall and accuracy (than OKCs, dentig­erous cysts, etc.). The reason may be that radicular cysts are more frequent among other cysts; they form the main percentage of datasets used for the learning process that might have favored their detection, and also radicular cysts mainly occur around the root apexes, which makes it easier to differentiate them from nasopalatine duct cysts and dentigerous cysts [77, 82]. In contrast, OKCs had the lowest recall and accuracy. It might happen because rather mandibular OKCs tend to grow in poste­rior regions; maxillary OKCs mainly extend in the maxillary sinus area, so their proper detection is usually hard to reach. Ariji etal. conducted a study to detect radiolucent lesions in the mandible and classify them into four groups (ameloblas­tomas, OKCs, dentigerous cysts, and radicular cysts). The model could correctly detect OKCs (100%), but their classication sensitivity was very low (13%) [79]. In this study, the performance of CNN in the detection of cyst-like lesions in the max­illa and mandible was also compared. Mandible cyst-like lesions were better detected with higher accuracy and sensitivity due to the high contrast between the radiolucent lesions and the surrounding bony structures of the mandible, while in the maxilla, radiolucency of air-containing structures and the hard palate and infe­rior nasal concha superimpositions decreases which makes the identication of lesions more difcult [79, 82].
Application of Articial Intelligence in Diagnosing Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions…
https://t.me/medicina_free
CNN-based
system has high
performance in the
identication of
maxillary radicular
cysts
Classication
sensitivity: test
1=0.949, test
2=1.00
Accuracy/sensitivity/
No. of
images/
Deep CNN
architecture
achieved better
results when it’s
Outcomes
For panoramic images
(AUC=0.847,
specicity
CBCT and
panoramic
2126 images
(1140
photographs Modality
trained with CBCT
sensitivity=0.882,
specicity=0.77)
For CBCT images
images
panoramic
+986
CBCT)
images than that
trained with
(AUC=0.914,
sensitivity=0.961,
high accuracy in
panoramic image
Sensitivity=0.88 Deep CNN has
specicity=0.771)
radiographs
210 Panoramic
detecting
mandibular lesions
Detection sensitivity:
test 1=0.746, test
2=0.771
Panoramic
radiographs
1000 epochs
(410
patients)
293
(continued)
Hard tissue/
odontogenic
cystic lesions—
odontogenic
keratocysts,
Deep neural
network for
detecting and
classifying cystic
The goal of the
study Detected lesion
Deep
Algorithm
Author,
and
learning task
Google Net Detection
architecture
J.Lee
etal.
year
lesions
classication
2019
cysts
Hard tissue/
Deep CNN
DetectNet Detection
Ariji etal.
dentigerous
ameloblastoma,
odontogenic
keratocysts,
dentigerous
cysts, radicular
algorithm for
automatic
detection and
classication of
radiolucent
and
classication
2019
cysts, and
lesions of the
Hard tissue/
simple bone
cysts
Deep neural
mandible
DetectNet Detection
Watanabe
cyst-like lesions
(cyst or benign
tumors arising
network for
detecting and
showing
and
classication
etal.
2020
in the maxilla)
especially
radicular cysts
maxillary
cyst-like lesions
294
https://t.me/medicina_free
Outcomes
Accuracy/sensitivity/
specicity
CNN shows
excellent
performance in
differentiation of
ameloblastoma
Accuracy=90.36%,
sensitivity=92.88%,
specicity=87.80%,
AUC=0.946
and odontogenic
keratocyst
performance in
detecting and
Precision=0.707 YOLO has a great
Recall=0.680
classifying lesions
greater than or
equal to OMS
specialist
P. Motie et al.
No. of
images/
photographs Modality
420 Panoramic
Hard tissue/
The goal of the
study Detected lesion
CNN for
Deep
learning task
Detection
Algorithm
architecture
VGG19,
radiographs
ameloblastoma
and odontogenic
keratocyst
differentiation of
the
ameloblastoma
and odontogenic
keratocyst
and
classication
ResNet-50
radiographs
1603 Panoramic
Hard tissue/
dentigerous
cysts,
odontogenic
keratocyst,
A deep learning
algorithm for
detecting and
classifying
lesions at the
and
classication
YOLO Detection
ameloblastoma
same time and
comparative
study between
machine and
clinician
performance
Author,
year
Liu etal.
2021
Yang
etal.
2020
Application of Articial Intelligence in Diagnosing Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions…
https://t.me/medicina_free
295
3.1.2 Cancerous Lesions
Oral cancer is a general term covering cancers of the tongue, gingiva, palate, buccal mucosa, mouth oor, and lips. Opportunistic screening, particularly for high-risk groups, might be benecial in detecting oral cancers at an earlier stage. However, conventional visual and tactile oral examinations are unable to distinguish benign from malignant or potentially malignant lesions. Jubair etal. designed a study in which a deep CNN model was trained by clinical photographs to classify the oral lesions into either benign, malignant, or potentially malignant. The clinical images were gathered from various digital cameras and smartphones, resulting in variable sizes, zoom magnications, angles, light conditions, and picture orientations. So, they manually cropped and resized the images into a similar format. They indicated that CNN could be successfully used to detect cancerous or potentially malignant lesions. Its detection accuracy is (85%) near to specialist practitioners (90%) and signicantly higher than general dental practitioners (75%) [83].
The most common malignancy in oral and maxillofacial regions is squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), a form of cancer that arises from epithelial tissues of the skin or mucous membranes. Early diagnosis of SCC can reduce its mortality and morbidity. Still, most cases are diagnosed at an end stage which crucially decreases the survival rate after curative therapies. This late detection of SCC could happen due to a lack of familiarity among healthcare professionals and effective and reliable early diagnostic methods [83]. Today, the gold standard for diagnosing SCC is biopsy and histopatho­logical conrmation. The unsupervised learning ability of CNN models brings an opportunity to learn from label-free histopathology images. It can extract image pat­terns that are not tangible to the human eye. Digital pathology is a new imaging technique to improve pictures’ robustness through certain operations and make tissue analysis more efcient. Zhang H etal. maneuvered CNN models trained with these digitally enhanced histopathology images. The study’s primary attention was to sig­nify the contrast between the nucleus and cytoplasm to make the morphological fea­tures of the cell much bolder; therefore, segmentation of the nucleus and malignancy recognition became more efcient. They also omitted the images’ noise by setting a threshold through mathematical calculations. The trained CNN model by these images had a higher sensitivity score than pathologists. Therefore, the CNN model has the potential to aid the specialist in screening at-risk population groups [84]. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is another imaging modality that recently has been used for noninvasive SCC diagnosis. Previously, it has been widely used to diagnose gastrointestinal tract pathologic conditions. In comparison to bright light endomicroscopy, CLE provides a better depth (around 100μm below the surface). Because CLE is unlikely to other imaging techniques, it requires an additional train­ing program for the pathologist or surgeons for reliable analyzing; AI can reduce this burden load, help pathologists, and save the energy and time needed to train special­ists. Utilizing a CNN model trained by CLE images can bring the opportunity of automatic real-time classication, make accurate diagnoses directly on the high-risk sites, and determine the outline of the cancerous lesion synchronous with the opera­tion treatment [85]. Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy is also a recent imaging modality providing a chemical map of the tissue section. This microscopy technique does not need any tissue processing, xation, or H&E staining and can be used to analyze fresh samples directly. It takes molecular specicity data from
296
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Motie et al.
samples and can diversify proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. The contribution of SRS histology images and deep learning-based architectures can provide immediate, reli­able diagnostic data used in tumor surgeries. Zhang L etal. trained a CNN model with SRS images from normal and neoplastic specimens. The model yielded out­standing performance with 100% accuracy in SCC identication [86].
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a head and neck malignant tumor originating from the nasopharynx epithelium. It’s been more frequently reported in the south of China and southern Asia [87]. The tumor stage of NPC is gured out by its anatomical extension. A large body of research has reported that tumor volume and extension are also a dominant prognostic factor. In the currently available methods of volume esti­mation margins for treatment planning and follow-up evaluations, tumor borders in a CT or MR image must be manually drawn by a radiologist in a “slice-by-slice” approach [88]. NPC has large variations in size and shape and its growth pattern is inltrative. These tumors have inhomogeneous intensities and similar intensity to the surrounding tissues. Also, they are usually found in complex anatomical areas, which makes their segmentation a challenging, time- consuming task. This complexity can increase trustless and inaccurate segmentation. Although semiautomated segmenta­tion techniques have been developed, they still take time to process large datasets. To reduce time, workload, and human errors, automatic image segmentation is an ideal solution [89]. Until now, several methods of automatic NPC segmentation have been introduced, which can generally be categorized into three main groups: intensity­based, shape-based, and statistical approaches [88]. Tatanun etal. conducted a study that used a framework based on a region-growing method for NPC segmentation in CT images. In this technique, automatic seed generation is done using a probabilistic map that denes a tumor cell probability. Prior knowledge of tumor location, intensity, and non-tumor regions is used to make these maps; pixel with the highest probability is set as the potential seed. Afterward, the nearby seeds are examined to see if they are tumor cells. This process will be continued until no new seed is found [89].
As was mentioned previously, NPCs have inhomogeneous structures, and their inltrative growth pattern makes an indistinguishable tumor-normal tissue interface on medical images. Consequently, linear and shape-based image segmentation is not usually an effective technique in these cases.
Regarding statistical approaches, Zhou etal. used two-class support vector machines (SVM) to segment NPCs on MRI images. In this approach, rst, tumor and non-tumor areas (the classes) are dened in the model’s training process. After feature extraction, the SVM-based method can “learn” and map the actual data distribution and nally generate an optimal exible separation plane across the two pre-dened classes [90].
Ma etal. created a deep CNN and graph cut method to classify the patches for NPC segmentation. They used 3D structural information and trained the CNN indi­vidually for each sagittal, coronal, and axial view. The model then used this 3D context information to perform the segmentation in the rst stage. Afterward the graph cut framework was applied to rene the segmentation results. It was concluded that the multi-view CNN method has an acceptable segmentation performance and excellent stability and reliability [88]; however, segmentation by patches requires extensive training time and only uses the information of small local regions. A U-net model was then improved to overcome this problem, which is an end-to-end network mainly used for image segmentation. It used the whole image as NPC segmentation input instead of extracting patches increasing the segmentation efciency [91, 92].
Application of Articial Intelligence in Diagnosing Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions…
https://t.me/medicina_free
with CNN has
great
performance in
SCC
identication
CNN is an
effective tool for
OSCC diagnosis
CNN can
Specicity: 77%;
sensitivity: 80%
images
enhance the
quality and
specicity: 84.5%,
sensitivity: 86.7%,
Accuracy/
Outcomes
sensitivity/
specicity
high accuracy in
detecting and
differentiating
ameloblastoma
VGG19 Deep CNN has
Accuracy:87.50,
VGG16
Accuracy: 83.33
radiographs
and complex
odontoma
CNN has a high
AUC: 0.96,
Laser
performance in
detection of
OSCC from
CLE images
accuracy: 88.3%,
sensitivity: 86.6%,
specicity: 90%
endomicroscopy
images
AUC: 0.95 SRS afliated
Accuracy: 100%
scattering
microscopy
images
 of oral
cancer
screening and
early detection
AUC=0.928
297
(continued)
No. of
images/
photographs
The goal of
Deep learning
Algorithm
116 images Panoramic
for testing Modality
Hard tissue/
ameloblastoma,
complex
odontoma
CNN for
showing jaw
tumors
the study Detected lesion
classication
task
VGG16, VGG19 Segmentation
architecture
12 patients,
11,000
images
(extracted
from 116
Hard tissue/oral
squamous cell
carcinoma
(OSCC)
detection of
OSCC
LeNet-5 Classication CNN for
78 patients Stimulated Raman
video
sequences)
Laryngeal
squamous cell
CNN based
SRC
classication
ResNet Detection
carcinoma
microscopy for
automatic
detection of
175 images Histopathological
Hard tissue/oral
squamous cell
carcinoma
SCC
CNN for
recognition
OSCC cancer
Segmentation
classication
VGG16, VGG19,
InceptionV3,
InceptionResNetV2,
716 images Clinical images Accuracy: 85.0%,
(OSCC)
Soft tissue/
Malignant or
potentially
CNN for early
detection of
cells
and Xception
suspicious oral
Detection
classication
EfcientNet-B0,
VGG19, ResNet101
malignant tongue
lesions, SCC,
oral epithelial
dysplasia, benign
tumors
lesions
Ismael
etal./2020
Author/year
Aubreville
etal./2017
Zhang
etal./2019
Zhang
etal./2021
Jubair
etal./2020
298
https://t.me/medicina_free
Accuracy/
Outcomes
sensitivity/
specicity
DA-DSU net
has an exact
performance in
segmentation of
0.8026
CR=0.7065,
ASSD=0.8021
NPC tumors of
head and neck
graph cut
method in a
CR: 0.77
two-stage
manner are
effective in
fully-automated
NPC
segmentation
DEU has
correct and
sensitivity:0.642,
stable
performance in
NPC automatic
segmentation
precision:0.654,
T2W: DSC:0.642,
sensitivity:0.654,
precision:0.688,
T1W+T2W:
DSC:0.721,
sensitivity:0.712,
precision:0.768
P. Motie et al.
No. of
images/
95 patients MRI DSC: 0.8050, PM:
photographs
for testing Modality
Soft tissue/
nasopharyngeal
The goal of
Deep learning
Algorithm
automatic
the study Detected lesion
task
DA-DSUnet Segmentation CNN for
architecture
carcinoma
NPC
segmentation
30 patients MRI PM: 85.93 CNN and a 3D
Soft tissue /
nasopharyngeal
carcinoma
segmentation
of NPC tumors
Segmentation CNN for
AlexNet like CNN's
architectures
44 patients MRI T1W: DSC:0.620,
Soft tissue /
nasopharyngeal
carcinoma
automated
NPC
segmentation
Segmentation CNN for fully
Developed DEU
architecture
Tang
etal./2021
Author/year
Ma
etal./2018
Ye
etal./2020
DSC Dice similarity coefcient equals twice the number of pixels common to both sets divided by the sum of the number of pixels in each set, which shows
the mutual overlap between ground truth and predicted segmentation
PM percent match, the ratio of true positive (TP) to the number of tumor pixels in the ground truth
CR correspondence ratio
Application of Articial Intelligence in Diagnosing Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions…
https://t.me/medicina_free
299
3.1.3 Bone andJoint Pathology
Ameloblastoma and complex odontoma both occur in similar maxillofacial areas. They are benign tumors that typically have painless signs and symptoms and are accidentally found in panoramic images. Unlike complex odontoma, ameloblas­toma is locally aggressive; therefore, their correct differentiation is essential. Ismael etal. trained two models of CNN architecture (VGG19, VGG16) to classify amelo­blastoma and complex odontoma. Both models achieved high and accurate perfor­mance in detection and classication tasks but VGG19 shows better results in cases with limited training data [93].
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common arthritis in temporomandibular joints. Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis is a condition in which internal surfaces of the joint undergo pathological degenerative changes, and the subchondral cortical layer leads to loss. These changes occur in response to mechanical overloads and cause pain and noise in TMJ.These structural bone changes are viewable in pan­oramic radiographs; therefore, these radiographic images can be used as an addi­tional examining tool besides clinical evaluation [94]. Kim et al. trained CNN architectures to diagnose TMJ OA.They train three CNN models: Model 1 detects the TMJ, joint fossa, and condyle. Model 2 classies the selected anatomical region into normal or abnormal. Model 3 determines whether abnormal TMJ detected by model 2 is OA or not [94]. The purpose of multi-models was to divide pictures into left side and right side because the symmetry of condyles is a vital criterion guring out TMJ conditions. At last, they achieved high performance in detecting TMJ osteoarthritis and implemented the CNN model in an expert system program for pre-screening panoramic radiographs from 20 local dental clinics in South Korea [94].
3.1.4 Developmental Abnormalities
Cleft lip and palate (CLP) are one of the most common types of congenital maxil­lofacial lesions [95]. The primary palate originates from the median palatine pro­cess in the weeks of 4–7 of the gestational periods. The lip, alveolus, and hard palate anterior to the incisive foramen have the same developmental origin. Any interfer­ence in development of palates can result in primary palate cleft. Alveolar clefts (CAs) are categorized as primary palate clefts (CPs). There is a close relation between cleft lip, cleft palate, and alveolar clefts. The DL systems’ detection func­tion was used to design a model to detect and classify cleft alveolus into CA only and CA with CP groups based on panoramic radiographies. The dataset was catego­rized as lip cleft with or without palate cleft and normal group. Rectangular regions of interest were manually annotated. The inferior line of the piriform aperture span at the level of the healthy side was selected as the superior margin, and the lower margin was located at the alveolar ridge. The alveolar ridge between the central incisors and the most distal portion of the piriform aperture were set as the medial