Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 495 - файл
.pdf
344
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
criterion-based observational protocol
for clinical use. These now offer clinicians, at last, greater standardization
and optimization of videofluoroscopy.
TELEPRACTICE
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted further the worldwide need
for validated, remote pediatric feeding
assessments. Much of this work comes
from countries with rural and remote
challenges such as Australia. The University of Queensland group advocates
for a mixture of synchronous and asynchronous methods when using telepractice for pediatric feeding assessments.
They caution careful attention to establishing optimal technology and camera
positions, including the collection of
asynchronous intraoral still pictures to
enhance diagnostic precision alongside
synchronous videoconferencing. They
describe the need for alterations to
standard videoconferencing to ensure
assessment is valid (Raatz et al., 2019;
Raatz, Ward, Marshall, Burns, Afoakwah, et al., 2021; Raatz, Ward, Marshall,
& Burns, 2021). I strongly recommend
clinicians read these papers if considering telepractice in pediatric feeding
assessment in their practice.
ing team must comprise specialists who
not only are skilled clinicians but can
also share and work together in clinical decision-making for the individual
child’s best interests.
STUDY QUESTIONS
1. Describe the key members of a
pediatric feeding team and why a
team approach is vital.
2. Describe the key components of a
case history with a parent of a child
referred with complaints of feeding
difficulties.
3. What are the signs of potential aspi-
ration in (a) the medical history, (b)
parent case history, and (c) clinical
observation? How does this differ
in a premature infant compared
with a term 6-month-old?
4. Describe normal development in
chewing abilities.
5. Why would you refer a child for a
videofluoroscopic study of swallowing? What tools are available
to enhance your videofluoroscopic
interpretation and reporting?
6. What considerations do you need
to attend to when using telepractice
for pediatric feeding assessment?
CONCLUSION
The assessment of feeding in children
is complex and requires an interprofessional approach, including medical
and developmental history; current
developmental stage; physical, cognitive, and emotional abilities; and current priorities for child, family, and the
medical team. The pediatric swallow-
REFERENCES
American Academy of Pediatrics, Commit-
tee on Nutrition. (2020). Assessment of
Nutritional Status. In R. E. Kleinman &
F. R. Greer (Eds.), Pediatric nutrition hand-
book (8th ed., pp. 723–774). American
Academy of Pediatrics.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Asso-
ciation. (2008). Pediatric dysphagia [Policy
statement]. http://www.asha.org/PRP
PrintTemplate.aspx?folderid=858993 4965

14. PEDIATRIC CLINICAL FEEDING ASSESSMENT
https://t.me/medicina_free
345
Archer, L. A., Rosenbaum, P. L., & Streiner,
D. L. (1991). The Children’s Eating Behavior Inventory: Reliability and validity results. Journal of Pediatric Psychology,
16(5), 629–642.
Arvedson, J. C. (2008). Assessment of pedi-
atric dysphagia and feeding disorders:
Clinical and instrumental approaches.
Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews,
14, 118–127.
Arvedson, J. C., & Brodsky, L. (2002). Pedi-
atric swallowing and feeding: Assessment
and management (2nd ed.). Thomson
Learning.
Arvedson, J. C., Rogers, B., Buck, G., Smart,
P., & Msall, M. (1994). Silent aspiration
prominent in children with dysphagia.
International Journal of Pediatric Otolaryngology, 28(2), 173–181.
Braun, M. J., & Palmer, M. M. (1986). A pilot
study of oral-motor dysfunction in “atrisk” infants. Physical & Occupational
Therapy in Pediatrics, 5, 13–25.
Calvo, I., Conway, A., Henriques, F., &
Walsh, M. (2016). Diagnostic accuracy of
the clinical feeding evaluation in detecting aspiration in children: A systematic
review. Developmental Medicine & Child
Neurology, 58, 541–553.
Casaer, D., Daniels, H., Devlieger, H.,
Decock, P., & Eggermont, E. (1982). Feeding behavior in preterm neonates. Early
Human Development, 7, 331–346.
Chatter, I. (2002). Feeding disorders in
infants and toddlers: Diagnosis and
treatment. Child and Adolescent Psychiat-
ric Clinics of North America, 11, 163–183.
Criss, W., & Napier-Philips, A. (2001).
Mealtime behaviors of young children:
A comparison of normative and clinical
data. Journal of Developmental & Behav-
ioral Pediatrics, 22(5), 279–286.
da Costa, S. P., Kaufman, N., & Bos, A. F.
(2016). New scoring system improves
inter-rater reliability of the Neonatal
Oral-Motor Assessment Scale. Acta Pae-
diatrica, 105, e339–e344.
Davies, W. H., Ackerman, L. K., Davies, C.
M., Vannatta, K., & Noll, R. B. (2007).
About your child’s eating: Factor structure and psychometric properties of a
feeding relationship measure. Eating
Behaviors, 8, 457–463.
DeMatteo, C., Matovich, D., & Hjartarson,
A. (2005). Comparison of clinical and
videofluoroscopic evaluation of children
with feeding and swallowing difficulties.
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47, 149–157.
Dharmarathna, I., Miles, A., & Allen, J.
(2018). Current approaches to instrumental assessment of swallowing in children. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology
and Head & Neck Surgery, 26(6), 349–355.
https://doi.org/10.109MOO.00000
000000492
Dharmarathna, I., Miles, A., & Allen, J.
(2020a). Twenty years of quantitative
instrumental measures of swallowing in
children: A systematic review. European
Journal of Pediatrics, 179(2), 203–223.
https://doi.org/10.100s00431-01903546-x
Dharmarathna, I., Miles, A., & Allen, J.
(2020b). Quantitative video-fluoroscopic
analysis of swallowing in infants. Inter-
national Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 138, 110315. https://doi.org/10 .10
16/j.ijporl.2020.110315
Dharmarathna, I., Miles, A., & Allen, J.
(2021a). Predicting penetration–aspiration through quantitative swallow measures of children: A videofluoroscopic
study. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-
Laryngology, 278(6), 1907–1916. https://
doi.org/10. 100s00405-021-06629-4
Dharmarathna, I., Miles, A., & Allen, J.
(2021b). Quantifying bolus residue and
its risks in children: A videofluoroscopic
study. American Journal of Speech-Language
Pathology, 30(2), 687–696. https://doi
.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00275
Gosa, M. M., Suiter, D. M., & Kahane, J.
C. (2015). Reliability for identification
of a select set of temporal and physiologic features of infant swallows. Dys-
phagia, 30(3), 365–372. https://doi.org/
10.100s00455-015-9610-9
00

346
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
Haley, S. M., Coster, W. J., Ludlow, L. H.,
Haltiwanger, J. T., & Andrellos, P. A.
(1992). Pediatric evaluation of disability
inventory: Development, standardization
and administration manual. Trustees of
Boston University.
Heckathorn, D., Speyer, R., Taylor, J., &
Cordier, R. (2016). Systematic review:
Non-instrumental swallowing and feeding assessments in pediatrics. Dysphagia,
31, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.100s00
015-9667-5
Henderson, M., Miles, A., Holgate, V., Pery-
man, S., & Allen, J. (2016). Development
and validation of quantitative objective
videofluoroscopic swallowing measures
in children. Journal of Pediatrics, 178,
200–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds
.2016.07.050
Huber, C. J. (1991). Documenting quality
of parent-child interactions: Use of the
NCAST scales. Infants and Young Chil-
dren, 4(2), 63–72.
Imhoff, S., & Wigginton, V. (1991). Identify-
ing feeding and swallowing problems in
infants and young children. Clinical Com-
munication Disorders, 1, 56–67.
Jaafar, N. H., Othman, A., Majid, N. A.,
Harith, S., & Zabidi-Hussin, Z. (2019).
Parent-report instruments for assessing feeding difficulties in children with
neurological impairments: A systematic
review. Developmental Medicine & Child
Neurology, 61(2), 135–144. https://doi
.org/ 10.1111/dmcn.13986
Jelm, J. M. (1990). Oral Sensori-Motor/Feeding
Rating Scale. Therapy Skill Builders.
Kauer, J., Pelchat, M. L., Rozin, P., & Zick-
graf, H. F. (2015). Adult picky eating.
Phenomenology, taste sensitivity, and
psychological correlates. Appetite, 90,
219–228.
Kenny, D. J., Koheil, R. M., Greenberg, J., &
Judd, P. L. (1989). Development of a multidisciplinary feeding profile for children
who are dependent feeders. Dysphagia,
4(1), 16–28.
Kleiman, R., & Warman, K. (1994). Nutri-
tion in liver disease. In S. Baker, R. Baker,
455-
& A. Davis (Eds.), Pediatric enteral nutri-
tion (pp. 261–279). Chapman and Hall.
Lefton-Greif, M. A., & McGrath-Morrow, S.
A. (2007). Deglutition and respiration:
Development, coordination, and practical implications. Seminars in Speech and
Language, 28(3), 166–179. https://doi
.org/ 10.1055/s-2007-984723
Litchford, A., Wengreen, H., Mateja R., &
Savoie-Roskos, R. (2021). Tools available
to screen for child feeding dysfunction:
A systematic review. Appetite, 167, 105611.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021
5611
Loughlin, G. M. (1989). Respiratory con-
sequences of dysfunctional swallowing
and aspiration. Dysphagia, 3(3), 126–130.
Ludwig, S. M., & Waitzman, K. A. (2007).
Changing feeding documentation to
reflect infant-driven feeding practice.
Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews, 7(3),
155–160.
Lukens, C. T., & Linscheid, T. R. (2008).
Development and validation of an inventory to assess mealtime behavior
problems in children with autism. Jour-
nal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
38, 342–352.
Manikam, R., & Perman, J. A. (2000). Pedi-
atric feeding disorders. Journal of Clinical
Gastroenterology, 30, 34–46.
Martin-Harris, B., Carson, K. A., Pinto, J. M.,
& Lefton-Greif, M. A. (2020). BaByVFSSImP. A novel measurement tool for videofluoroscopic assessment of swallowing
impairment in bottle-fed babies: Establishing a standard. Dysphagia, 35(1), 90–98.
https://doi.org/10.100s00455-019-10008-x
McComish, C., Brackett, K., Kelly, M., Hall,
C., Wallace, S., & Powell, V. (2016). Interdisciplinary feeding team: A medical,
motor, behavioral approach to complex
pediatric feeding problems. MCN: The
American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 41(4), 230–236.
McPhie, S., Skouteris, H., Daniels, L., &
Jansen, E. (2014). Maternal correlates of
maternal child feeding practices: Asystematic review: Correlates of maternal
.10

14. PEDIATRIC CLINICAL FEEDING ASSESSMENT
https://t.me/medicina_free
347
child feeding practices. Maternal and
Child Nutrition, 10(1), 18–43. https://doi
.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00452.x
Miles, A., Dharmarathna, I., Fuller, L., Jar-
dine, J., & Allen, J. (2021). Developing a
protocol for quantitative analysis of liquid swallowing in children. American
Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31,
1244–1263. https://doi.or g/10.1044/
_AJSLP-20-00337
Miles, A., Fuller, L., Dharmarathna, I., &
Allen, J. (2022). Variability in swallowing biomechanics in infants with feeding
difficulties: A videofluoroscopic analysis. Dysphagia, 37, 1740–1747. https://doi
.org/ 10.100s00455-022-10436-2
Myer, C. M., Howell, R. J., Cohen, A. P.,
Willging, J. P., & Ishman, S. L. (2016).
Asystematic review of patient- or proxyreported validated instruments assessing pediatric dysphagia. Otolaryngology-
Head and Neck Surgery, 154(5), 817–823.
https://doi.org/10.1170194599816630531
Poppert, K. M., Patton, S. R., Borner, K. B.,
Davis, A. M., & Gillette, M. L. D. (2015).
Systematic review: Mealtime behavior
measures used in pediatric chronic illness populations. Journal of Pediatric Psy-
chology, 40(5), 475–486.
Porges, S. (1996). Physiological regulation
ment and potential intervention. Devel-
opmental and Psychopathology, 8, 43–58.
Raatz, M., Ward, E. C., Marshall, J., Burns,
C. L., Afoakwah, C., & Byrnes, J. (2021).
Atime and cost analysis of speech pathology paediatric feeding services delivered
in-person versus via telepractice. Journal
of Telemedicine and Telecare. https://doi
.org/10.1171357633X211012883
Raatz, M., Ward, E. C., Marshall, J., & Burns,
C. L. (2019). Developing the system
architecture for conducting synchronous paediatric feeding assessments via
telepractice. Journal of Telemedicine and
Telecare, 25(9), 552–558. https://doi.org/
10.1171357633X19872091
Raatz, M., Ward, E. C., Marshall, J., & Burns,
C. L. (2021). Evaluating the use of tele-
2021
practice for bottle-feeding assessments.
Children (Basel), 1(8), 989–993. https://
doi.org/10.3390/children8110989
Reilly, S., & Skuse, D. (1992). Characteristics
and management of feeding problems
of young children with cerebral palsy.
Developmental Medicine in Child Neurology, 34, 379–388.
Reilly, S., Skuse, D., & Wolke, D. (2000).
SOMA: Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment. Whurr.
Sheppard, J. J., Hochamt, R., & Baer, C.
(2014). The dysphagia disorder survey:
Validation of an assessment for swallowing and feeding function in developmental disability. Research in Developmental
Disabilities, 35(5), 929–942. https://doi
.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.02.017
Tauman, R., Levine, A., Avni, H., Nehama,
H., Greenfeld, M., & Sivan, Y. (2011).
Coexistence of sleep and feeding disturbances in young children. Pediatrics, 127,
e615–e621.
Thach, B. T. (2007). Maturation of cough
and other reflexes that protect the fetal
and neonatal airway. Pulmonary Pharma-
cology and Therapeutics, 20(4), 365–370.
Thorsteinsdottir, S., Olsen, A., & Olafsdottir,
A. S. (2021). Fussy eating among children
and their parents: Associations in parentchild dyads, in a sample of children with
and without neurodevelopmental disorders. Nutrients, 13(7), 2196. https://doi
.org/10.3390/nu13072196
Thoyre, S. M., Pados, B. F., Park, J., Estrem,
H., & Hodges, E. A. (2014). Development
and content validation of the Pediatric
Eating Assessment Tool (pedi-EAT).
American Journal of Speech-Language
Pathology, 23, 46–59.
Thoyre, S. M., Shaker, C. S., & Pridham, K. F.
(2005). The Early Feeding Skills Assessment for preterm infants. Neonatal Net-
work, 24(3), 7–16.
Tsu-Hsin Howe, K. L., Chung-Pei Fu, C-T.
S., & Ching-Lin, H. (2008). A review of
psychometric properties of feeding assessment tools used in neonates. Journal
of Gynaecological & Neonatal Nursing, 37,

348
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
338–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j .15
52-6909.2008.00240.x
Tutor, J. D., & Gosa, M. M. (2012). Dyspha-
gia and aspiration in children. Pediatric
Pulmonology, 47(4), 321–337.
Tutor, J. D., & Schoumacher, R. A. (2003).
Is aspiration causing your pediatric
patient’s symptoms? The Journal of Respi-
ratory Diseases, 24(1), 30–40.
Wessel, J. J., & Samour, P. Q. (2005). In P.
Q. Samour & K. King (Eds.) Handbook of
pediatric nutrition (3rd ed., p. 407). Jones
& Bartlett.

Esophageal Phase Dysphagia
https://t.me/medicina_free
James H. Clark, Catherine J. Rees Lintzenich,
and Peter C. Belafsky
INTRODUCTION
The esophageal phase of deglutition
begins with the passage of the food
bolus through the most distal aspect
of the pharyngoesophageal segment.
Gravity and esophageal peristalsis are
responsible for moving the bolus 25 cm
along the esophageal body, through the
lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and
into the proximal stomach. The most
common causes of solid food dysphagia include gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), cricopharyngeus muscle
dysfunction, and radiation therapy for
head and neck cancer (Figure 15–1).
An esophageal etiology of dysphagia can be found in 60% of individuals presenting to an outpatient tertiary
swallowing center (Belafsky & Kuhn,
2014). Up to one third of individuals
with an oropharyngeal swallowing disorder may have comorbid esophageal
pathology.
Undertaking a detailed history and
physical exam will aid in establishing
the underlying pathophysiological
process in most patients and provide
guidance for further management
(Cook, 2008). The sensory innervation of the esophagus is complex, and
the dual innervation from vagal and
spinal nerves frequently results in
referred symptoms due to a convergence between visceral and somatic
fibers (Lottrup et al., 2011). The clinician, therefore, needs to recognize that
Figure 15 –1. The most common causes
of solid food dysphagia.
349

350
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
patients are sometimes unsuccessful at
localizing their dysphagia site (Roeder
et al., 2004). A prospective study demonstrated that 56% of patients attributed the site of their complaint as
within their throat or at the level of
sternal notch, despite having radiological evidence of an isolated distal
esophageal etiology for dysphagia
(Figure 15–2) (Smith et al., 1998). When
patients locate the sensation of dysphagia as having a retrosternal site of
origin, there is a high probability of an
esophageal etiology (Liu et al., 2018). In
contrast, when the dysphagia is located
within the throat or at the level of the
sternal notch, there is a poor correlation
with etiology location.
Given the critical role of eliciting a
detailed history, the high incidence
and complexity of esophageal anatomy necessitates the need for a thorough knowledge and understanding
of esophageal phase dysphagia when
managing individuals with swallowing complaints.
ESOPHAGITIS
Esophagitis denotes inflammation and/
or injury of the esophageal mucosa.
Despite considerable overlap in the
symptomatic presentation of esophagitis, the underlying pathogenesis is
broad and varied and includes GERD,
as well as infectious, eosinophilic, and
iatrogenic causes.
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Disease Esophagitis
Within the Western world, GERD is
estimated to have an incidence of 10%
to 20%, whereas rates are reported
to be lower in Asia and occur in <5%
of the population (Dent et al., 2005).
Dysphagia symptoms are reported in
up to 50% of individuals with GERD,
making it the most common cause of
esophageal phase dysphagia (Vakil
etal., 2004) (Figure 15–3). The mechanism by which GERD causes dysphagia
Figure 15–2. Fluoroscopic esophagram
with a patient localizing the site of dysphagia to the sternal notch (red arrow )
with a barium tablet stuck in the region
of the lower esophageal sphincter (blue
arrow ).
Figure 15–3. High-grade erosive esopha-
gitis (Grade D) in a person presenting with
solid food dysphagia. There is stricture formation (white arrows) at the esophago-
gastric junction.

15. ESOPHAGEAL PHASE DYSPHAGIA
https://t.me/medicina_free
351
is believed to be chronic inflammation
causing esophageal body edema and
diminished motility. The severity of
dysphagia symptoms has been found to
correlate with the degree of esophagitis
present (Vakil et al., 2004). Dysphagia
symptoms appeared to resolve in 80%
of patients who completed a 4-week
antireflux regime with proton-pump
inhibitors (PPIs) (Wetscher et al., 1997).
Persistent dysphagia, despite medical
therapy, suggests an incomplete resolution of the esophagitis but also raises the
possibility of a peptic stenosis/stricture
or a hiatal hernia (HH) (Figure 15–4).
The incidence of esophageal stenosis/
stricture from peptic insult has declined
dramatically since the introduction of
PPIs, but given the increasing concern
for long-term complications associated with these agents, the incidence
of esophageal stricture is predicted to
increase. The simple presence of an HH
is rarely the cause of dysphagia unless
the HH sac has become impinged by the
diaphragm (Figure 15–5). In contrast,
the presence of a large sliding or para-
esophageal HH is a likely etiology for
swallowing complaints (Figure 15–6).
In a study by Kaul (1990), over 90% of
patients treated surgically for symptomatic HH experienced improvement
in their dysphagia symptoms.
Figure 15–5. Endoscopic view of a hiatal
hernia in a person with solid food dysphagia. The rugae can be seen sliding above
the diaphragm (black arrows). Com-
pression on the hernia sac from the diaphragm (white arrows) can cause solid
food dysphagia. The dysphagia resolved
after treatment.
Figure 15 –4. Fluoroscopic esophagram
displaying a small hiatal hernia (blue
arrow ) and a stricture at the gastroesoph-
ageal junction (red arrow ).
Figure 15–6. Large hiatal hernia (red
arrows) with compression of the distal
esophagus at the gastroesophageal
junction (blue arrow ).

352
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
Infectious Esophagitis
Candida albicans is the most commonly
encountered pathogen causing infectious esophagitis. Patients may present
solely with the complaint of dysphagia
(difficulty swallowing) or odynophagia
(pain with swallowing), but it is frequently associated with throat clearing,
globus (food sticking), or a sensation
of excessive throat mucus. Fiberoptic
laryngoscopy may display pharyngeal candidiasis but is often normal.
A fluoroscopic swallow evaluation is
usually unremarkable. Esophagoscopy
with biopsy is necessary to confirm the
diagnosis (Figure 15–7). Risk factors for
esophageal candidiasis include diabetes mellitus, corticosteroid use (inhaled,
oral, and injected), immunodeficiency,
dehydration, and a history of chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Esophageal candida infection may be present,
however, in the absence of these risk
factors. Other, less common, causes of
Figure 15–7. Florid esophageal candidi-
asis in a person presenting with solid food
dysphagia and globus.
infectious esophagitis include histoplasmosis, actinomycetes, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex virus.
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) was once
considered to be a finding of GERD
but has now risen from near obscurity
to become the most common cause of
esophageal food impaction in children
and adults (Furuta & Katzka, 2015;
Winter et al., 1982). A retrospective
review noted that EE was diagnosed
in 35% of foreign body/food impactions necessitating urgent endoscopic
intervention (David et al., 2017). The
exact etiology of EE remains unknown
but is believed to be atopic in nature.
Typical presenting symptoms include
dysphagia and/or odynophagia unresponsive to antireflux medication.
Most individuals have a prior history
of allergic rhinitis, eczema, or asthma.
Endoscopy may reveal a corrugated,
ringed, or trachealized esophagus, and
esophageal strictures are common (Figure 15–8). The mucosa can often look
normal, so it is important to biopsy an
esophagus of ordinary appearance in
an individual with dysphagia and no
other apparent cause. The diagnosis
is made by demonstrating >20 eosinophils per high-powered field on esophageal biopsy. Treatments with topical
and systemic corticosteroids, montelukast, PPIs, histamine antagonists, and
cromolyn sodium have all shown varying degrees of success. Esophageal dilation may occasionally be necessary, but
it should be performed with caution as
the mucosa is often extremely friable
(easily torn, fragile) with an increased
risk of perforation and laceration.

Figure 15–8. Endoscopic view of a cor-
https://t.me/medicina_free
rugated, trachealized mid-esophagus in
a person with eosinophilic esophagitis.
15. ESOPHAGEAL PHASE DYSPHAGIA
Table 15 –1. Medications That Relax
the Lower Esophageal Sphincter and
Promote Reflux
• Oral contraceptives
•
Ethanol
Tobacco
•
• Theophylline
Alpha-antagonists
•
• Anticholinergic agents
•
Dopamine
• Nitrates
Meperidine
•
•
Morphine
Calcium channel blockers
•
Diazepam
•
353
Referral to an allergist with expertise
in food allergy is indicated. Usually, a
particular food allergy can be identified, and repeat endoscopy is necessary
to confirm the resolution of esophageal inflammation after initiation of an
appropriate elimination diet.
Iatrogenic Esophagitis
Pills can produce esophageal phase dysphagia through their systemic effects
or by directly causing caustic injury.
Medications may systemically cause
dysphagia by inducing reflux, impairing esophageal motility and clearance,
or compromising the immune system,
predisposing the individual to esophageal infection. Displayed in Table 15–1
is a list of medications that relax the
LES and promote reflux. With prolonged esophageal mucosal contact,
many pills can cause caustic esophageal injury and dysphagia. In a study
of 98 consecutive upper gastrointestinal radiologic examinations, over 50%
of barium tablets taken by individuals
while supine remained in the esophagus for more than 5 minutes (Evans
& Roberts, 1976). This provides sufficient time for many medications to
induce local tissue irritation or injury.
The medications most likely to cause
pill-induced esophagitis include slowrelease potassium, tetracyclines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and
alendronate (Fosamax). To prevent pillinduced esophagitis, patients should
take pills upright with a relatively
large quantity of water (120 cc), avoid
a double swallow (to avoid deglutitive
inhibition), and avoid lying down for
30 minutes after consumption.
Radiation esophagitis remains the
primary dose-limiting acute toxicity in
the radiotherapeutic management of
thoracic neoplasms (Bradley & Movsas, 2004). Concurrent chemotherapy
and/or a maximal esophageal point
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025
