Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 465 - файл
.pdf
162
T. J. Swope
subcostal trocar is then replaced with a 12mm standard length disposable trocar.
The 8mm subcostal trocar is then moved to the lower lateral abdominal wall medial
to the anterior superior iliac spine. Care should be taken to stay a few centimeters
medial to the anterior superior iliac spine to avoid nerve injury. An 8mm trocar is
placed inside the 12mm port (“piggybacked”) and the robot is then docked to all
three 8 mm trocars. No monopolar energy should be used through the “piggybacked” trocar arrangement to avoid capacitive coupling and possible thermal
injury. To avoid this piggybacked arrangement, alternatively three 8mm trocars can
be placed followed by a 12mm assist port on the other side to assist with mesh and
suture insertion. It is important to burp each robotic trocar before heading to the
operative console. This is the last step I perform on EVERY robotic case before
leaving the bedside. The reason for this is if the trocars are docked under tension a
larger trocar site defect will be created due to arm motion possibly leading to a trocar site hernia. Burping all of the robotic arms creates no pre-existent traction on the
abdominal wall and minimizes trauma to the abdominal wall from arm motion.
Once the robot is docked attention is turned toward the dissection. This is performed in a similar manner as described in the laparoscopic approach. Once the
falciform ligament and pre-peritoneal fat are cleared in the midline the defect is
sewn closed using barbed suture as previously described. Several bites must be
taken in the opposite direction of the fascial closure once closure is achieved in
order to ensure the barbed suture does not unravel. If the defect is larger and there
is a large sac, small bites of the sac can be taken between fascial bites during the
running closure. Care must be taken to avoid the dermis. Your rst assist is the key
to watching the skin during this time to ensure no skin dimpling is produced with
the fascial closure. This will imbricate the sac and signicantly reduce postoperative
seroma formation. If possible, a small deep dermal bite can be taken with the fascial
closure to reconstruct the umbilicus.
After measuring and allowing for 5cm overlap, the mesh is introduced through
the 12mm port. The mesh can be held in place against the posterior abdominal wall
using a pre-placed scaffold, with suture, or by reusing the needles from the fascial
closure pinning the mesh in place against the abdominal wall. The mesh is sutured
to the abdominal wall using 2-0 V-loc or spiral Strattax suture. This can be performed using a running continuous barbed suture around the edge of the mesh.
Several sutures may be required based on the size of the mesh chosen. Alternatively,
a “dolphin” style stitch can be placed in a running mattress fashion. The possible
advantages of the dolphin stitch are less exposed barbs and requiring slightly less
suture material to secure the mesh circumferentially to the abdominal wall (see
Figs.12.6 and 12.7).
Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal (TAPP) Approach
Another MIS approach to the umbilical hernia is the TAPP approach. The preperitoneal plane is exposed and dissected out either laparoscopically or robotically
(Fig.12.8) The advantage of this approach is that uncoated mesh is placed in the

12 Umbilical Hernia Options
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 12.6 Running whip
stitch to secure the mesh to
the abdominal wall.
Results in more exposed
barbed suture, but less fold
down at the edges vs.
dolphin stitch
Fig. 12.7 Dolphin stitch
to secure the mesh to the
abdominal wall. Results in
less exposed barbed suture
163
Fig. 12.8 Initial TAPP
dissection. Care must be
taken to avoid the
retro-rectus space

164
T. J. Swope
pre-peritoneal space. This avoids direct mesh exposure to the underlying bowel. The
proposed advantage is less adhesion formation to the bowel. Additionally, uncoated
mesh is less expensive than the coated versions used in IPOM.The hernia sac is
reduced as well which can lead to a decreased incidence of postoperative seroma
formation by not leaving a mesothelial lined sac in the tissues anterior to the fascial
closure. The down side to this approach is that it takes longer to perform than an
IPOM. The dissection of the peritoneum especially over the ipsilateral posterior
rectus sheath can be tenuous. The peritoneum tends to be very thin in this area
which can lead to the creation of multiple defects. If not excessive, these defects can
be closed primarily. Figure-of eight sutures are recommended vs. simple interrupted. The gure-of eight sutures create a more robust peritoneal closure which is
less likely to breakdown vs. the simple interrupted suture. Alternatively, a 3-0 running barbed suture can be used if the peritoneal defect is larger. The peritoneum is
opened far enough laterally on the trocar side of the defect to allow for a 5cm mesh
overlap. The dissection needs to provide enough space for the mesh to seat nicely
without wrinkling which can lead to adhesion formation. Usually, sharp scissor dissection is used along with counter-traction to develop the plane of dissection. Care
must be taken to ensure an adequately sized pocket has been created, and the mesh
overlap is not being compromised in order to t into a pocket that is too small
(Fig.12.9). If the peritoneum is not salvageable, the bail out procedure is to proceed
to an IPOM.Next the fascia is closed primarily using running barbed suture (V-loc,
Strattax symmetrical) which can be done robotically or laparoscopically as previously described. Alternatively, a suture passer can be used to close to fascia in an
interrupted fashion.
Mesh is placed once the fascia is closed. Uncoated mesh is used. Self-gripping
mesh can be used here with the adherent side facing the fascia (ParietexProGrip). It
is preferable to face the grippers anteriorly in case the peritoneum was to break
down and leave the mesh exposed to the bowel. Non-self-gripping mesh can also
used. Medium or heavyweight macroporous mesh is preferable (BardSoft mesh).
Fig. 12.9 Finished TAPP
dissection with exposed
defect and posterior fascia

12 Umbilical Hernia Options
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
165
The mesh can be xed in place with tacs, laparoscopic suturing, or stay sutures if
performed laparoscopically. If proceeding robotically, the mesh is sutured in place
using cardinal point interrupted sutures or running barbed suture can be used.
Alternatively, some surgeons use brin glue to x the mesh in place while still others use no xation and rely on the form tting pocket to keep the mesh in place after
the peritoneum is closed. Laparoscopic closure of the peritoneum can be accomplished using a tacker or by suturing the peritoneum back together based on surgeon
preference. The peritoneum is closed using running 2-0 or 3-0 barbed suture (V-loc,
Strattax spiral) when closing robotically. The ports are then removed and the
12mm trocar fascial defect closed.
Rives StoppaRetro-Rectus Repair
Some surgeons prefer to place the mesh in the retro-rectus location. As in the TAPP
approach, the mesh is located within the abdominal wall and is not exposed to the
bowel. This carries the possible advantage of less bowel adhesions and the use of
less expensive uncoated meshes. Additional benets include having the mesh
against the rectus muscle. This is a very vascular space which is thought to allow
fast ingrowth of the mesh. The other advantage is in the case of mesh infection.
Mesh is much easier to salvage in the retro-rectus space vs. an IPOM location. The
vascularity on both sides of the macroporous mesh much more easily allows the
infection to be cleared after drainage, antibiotics, and wound management. The
Achilles heel of this approach is the risk of an interparietal hernia secondary to
breakdown of the posterior fascial closure. This is thought to be caused by too much
tension at the time of the posterior fascial closure. This posterior fascial separation
allows the bowel to slide between the posterior fascia and the mesh and exposes
uncoated mesh directly to the bowel. The key to avoiding this is to make sure there
is enough laxity on the posterior closure so that the fascia does not separate postoperatively. If a patient presents with obstructive symptoms in the early postoperative
period, imaging should be obtained to rule this out right away with a return trip to
the operating room if discovered.
There are several ways to accomplish a retro-rectus repair. The rst is bilateral
port placement. I nd this approach very difcult and generally avoid it. Ports can
be placed on both sides of the abdominal wall. Laparoscopically, the rst step is to
open the retro-rectus space on the contralateral side of where your starting ports are
placed. Dissection is carried out laterally to the linea semilunaris. Great care must be
taken not to injure the nerves at the lateral aspect of the rectus sheath and to not violate the linea semilunaris. This will denervate the rectus muscle and potentially
destabilize the abdominal wall. An adequate dissection is performed allowing for
5cm mesh overlap laterally, superiorly, and inferiorly. Mesh is then rolled, placed,
and secured with cardinal point xation. I usually place sutures at the corners and
half-way between. Another loose stitch is placed just to hold the mesh in its rolled up
state prior to rolling it out later during deployment. Once this is accomplished ports
are placed on the contralateral side and a similar dissection is performed opposite the

166
T. J. Swope
initial dissection. When this is performed robotically, it requires the robot to be redocked. It should be noted that the initially dissected side will have hanging posterior
fascia which can interfere with dissection of the opposite side. To work around this,
a suture or two may need to be placed to suspend the fascia/mesh and make exposure
to the opposite side easier prior to re-docking. Alternatively, the second set of trocars
can be placed just outside of the linea semilunaris and angled medially into the lateral
retro-rectus space above the mesh. This eliminates having to deal with a hanging
ap, but should only be used in patients with a sizeable rectus space as suturing will
be difcult in a tight space.
Once the remaining dissection is complete, the anterior fascial closure is performed. This is done using size 0 or 1 barbed suture (V-loc, Strattax). After the
fascia is closed, mesh is spread out smoothly in the retro-rectus plane. Again selfadhering mesh can be used as well as uncoated plain macroporous mesh. Similar to
the TAPP, the mesh can be xed in place with glue, tacs, or suture. Some choose not
to secure the mesh as it will be in a closed pocket with no room for movement. Once
the mesh is secured the posterior fascia is closed. Again the key is to close it without
excessive tension which can lead to breakdown of the closure and interparietal
hernias.
Another retro-rectus approach is operating with just one set of ports. A host of
options are available here. Intra-abdominal ports can be placed transversely above
the defect (subxyphoid), below the defect (suprapubic), or laterally. Ports can also
be placed directly into the retro-rectus space thus avoiding intra-abdominal trocar
placement (eTEP). These approaches can be performed laparoscopically or robotically, but are much easier if approached robotically due to the increased range of
motion provided by the robotic platform.
With the suprapubic and subxyphoid approaches, the ports should be placed at
least 10cm away from the defect when placing ports transversely above or below
the defect. This allows for a 5cm mesh overlap and enough working space for the
instruments. When operating robotically, the lateral ports should be placed as far
lateral as possible when operating to avoid collision with the thighs when using a
suprapubic docking approach. I recommend using the longer trocars laterally as
well which gets the robotic arms a little further away from the thighs. Self-adhering
mesh, sutures, or glue can be used to secure the mesh. The peritoneum and posterior
rectus sheath are opened transversely. Dissection is carried out laterally preserving
the vessels and nerves at the lateral rectus sheath. Centrally, the pre-peritoneal plane
is maintained behind the linea alba. The medial rectus sheaths are divided creating
one posterior ap (Fig.12.10). Any posterior defects in the ap are closed. The ante-
rior fascia is closed and mesh is placed. The initial transverse incision is then closed
using running barbed suture.
A robotic lateral approach can also be used. Ports are placed and the posterior rectus sheath is opened vertically. The vertical incision is made laterally and vertically
along the posterior sheath toward the ports. The key is to go laterally, but avoid the
vessels and nerves of the linea semilunaris. I generally divide the sheath 2/3 of the way
toward myself (Fig.12.11). Once the retro-rectus plane is dissected the medial sheath
is opened and a pre-peritoneal dissection is carried out to reach the opposite rectus

12 Umbilical Hernia Options
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 12.10 Retro-rectus
dissection. Finished
superior view of dissection
from suprapubic port
location. Posterior rectus
sheath and peritoneum
make up the posterior ap
167
Fig. 12.11
retro-rectus dissection.
Avoiding the linea
semilunaris is paramount
Fig. 12.12 Contralateral
retro-rectus space. Avoid
coming anterior to the
opposite rectus sheath as
you come across the
midline to avoid an
unintended subcutaneous
dissection
Initial
sheath (Fig.12.12). The hernia is reduced and the contralateral rectus space is entered.
Once dissection is complete and the space has been created the anterior fascia is closed.
A small deep dermal bite of the umbilical stalk is taken with the fascial closure to recreate the umbilicus. Mesh is placed and the posterior fascia is closed off the midline.

168
T. J. Swope
The endoscopic total extra-peritoneal (eTEP) approach avoids the Achilles heel
of the Rives Stoppa repair by avoiding the posterior fascial closure. Trocar position
and the number of trocars is quite variable depending on the width of the rectus
space and the hernia location. Trocars are placed just outside of the linea semilunaris and angled medially and inserted into the posterior rectus space. The initial trocar can be placed superiorly, laterally, or inferiorly depending on hernia location.
The trocar may be placed optically or with a cutdown technique. Blunt dissection
then ensues using the camera or by placing a balloon dissector. A second trocar is
placed once space is developed and used to dissect out the retro-rectus space. The
medial rectus sheath is opened and a pre-peritoneal dissection is made until the
contralateral retro-rectus space is entered. A third trocar can be placed to help with
dissection to the contralateral side or it can be performed with one instrument and a
third trocar placed in the opposite retro-rectus space. Instrument choices include
sharp scissor dissection, hook cautery, harmonic scalpel, or Ligasure. Dissection is
then carried to the defect which is reduced along with preserving the hernia sac if
possible. The posterior ap consists of the posterior rectus sheaths with the peritoneum in between. The posterior rectus sheaths can be re-approximated, but generally are not to prevent tension. That layer is generally just used to keep the mesh
isolated from the bowel. Laterally, the nerves are preserved at the linea semilunaris.
An adequate space is created for mesh placement. The anterior fascial defect is
closed. The mesh is placed and spread out smoothly and the trocars are removed.
For larger primary umbilical hernias, component separation may sometimes be
necessary. The general idea is to bring the rectus muscles back to the midline and
avoid a bridged mesh repair. This is reserved for larger defects which can’t be closed
primarily or with a retro-rectus dissection alone. This allows mesh to be placed and
avoid contact with the bowel. These approaches will be covered in more detail in
other chapters so I will only touch on the highlights of each.
The anterior component release involves cutting the external oblique aponeurosis. This can be performed laparoscopically. By performing this release in an MIS
fashion vs. open surgery, there is a decrease in wound complication rates from 59
to 15% [14]. A cutdown is performed about 2cm lateral to the rectus sheath in the
subcostal location. The external oblique aponeurosis is opened creating the space
to place a balloon dissector between the external oblique aponeurosis and internal
oblique muscle. The balloon is advanced inferiorly and then inated creating the
working space. One or two more trocars are placed inferior and lateral to assist
with dissection. The external oblique is then sharply divided vertically about 2cm
lateral to the rectus abdominis along with Scarpa’s fascia. This release allows the
rectus muscles to move medially. Subcostally, an additional 5–10cm of medialization can be gained, another 10–15cm around the umbilicus, and another 3–8cm
suprapubically [15].
Posterior Component Separation
Posterior component separation can be performed laparoscopically, but is very
challenging and requires a very advanced skill set to perform. This approach is

12 Umbilical Hernia Options
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 12.13 Preservation
of the perforating nerves.
Note the divided posterior
lamella of the internal
oblique and transversus
abdominis muscle
169
more easily performed using the robotic platform. The articulation and increased
range of motion provided by the robot allows the complexity of the operation to be
performed more easily versus the non-articulating laparoscopic instrumentation.
The operation requires placement of three trocars on each side of the patient. The
rst three are placed laterally and a retro-rectus dissection is performed rst on the
contralateral side. The perforators are again preserved laterally (Fig.12.13). Next
the posterior lamella of the internal oblique is divided exposing the medial transversus abdominis muscle. The muscle is then divided exposing the transversalis
fascia and peritoneum. The transversalis fascia and peritoneum are then dissected
away from the transversus abdominis extending laterally and allowing medialization of the posterior rectus sheath. This dissection can be carried inferiorly into the
space of Retzius and superiorly to the central tendon of the diaphragm if needed.
Medium weight macroporous mesh is rolled and placed. I secure it with 2-0 vicryl
at both corners and with a stitch centrally to the transversus abdominis. Once that
dissection is done three trocars are placed through the lateral abdominal wall on the
dissected side. The robot is re-docked to the newly placed trocars and the other side
is dissected out in a similar manner. This provides massive posterior mobilization
and permits a tension-free closure of the posterior rectus fascia. The fascia is commonly closed with a running barbed suture. My preference is 2-0 V-loc or spiral
Strattax.
After the posterior fascia is closed, attention is turned closure of the anterior
fascia. V-loc or spiral Strattax can be used to close the fascia. Closure is started at
either pole. Multiple loose bites are taken and then sequentially tightened like a pulley system starting at the apices and working toward the middle of the closure. Once
the anterior fascia is closed the mesh is unfolded and secured. The mesh can be
secured using sutures or brin glue based on surgeon preference. Drains can then be
placed based on surgeon preference.
Plication of rectus diastasis can also be performed at the same time as the umbilical hernia repair. The rationale behind this is to bring the rectus muscles back to the
midline and reinforce the weakened linea alba. There is a tendency to develop new
hernias above the umbilical repair along the thinned out linea alba. Kohler found

170
T. J. Swope
that patients with rectus diastasis suffered from a signicantly increased rate of
hernia recurrence vs. those that had no diastasis (29/93 vs. 9/108; p < 0.001).
Frequently, occult primary periumbilical and epigastric ventral hernias will be discovered when taking down the peritoneum in the midline while exposing the fascia.
Just superior to the umbilicus and at the insertion of the falciform ligament are common areas to nd an occult primary hernia.The type of suture can inuence hernia
recurrence rates. Kohler etal. found a lower incidence of recurrence with the use of
permanent suture vs. absorbable suture (12/111 vs. 26/90); p=0.001 [16].
The diastasis repair can be approached several ways. From a lateral approach the
falciform ligament is dissected away between the medial border of the rectus muscles exposing the posterior rectus sheath and the linea alba. After dropping the intraabdominal pressure, the medial posterior rectus sheath is re-approximated using
running barbed suture bringing the rectus muscles back to the midline. Small bites
of the thinned out linea alba are taken as the midline is crossed. This allows the tissue to “accordion” together and minimizes postoperative bulging along the midline
(Fig. 12.14). The potential downside to this approach is only taking bites of the
posterior fascia and not the anterior rectus sheath. The fascial defect is closed by
incorporating it with the diastasis repair as well. A deep dermal umbilical bite is
taken while closing the fascial defect to reconstruct the umbilicus. The whole plicated midline fascia is re-inforced with mesh secured using the IPOM approach.
Alternatively, a TAPP approach can be utilized to repair the diastasis and hernia.
Once the pre-peritoneal space is dissected out the medial posterior rectus fascia is
brought together and the defect is closed. Uncoated mesh can be placed and the
peritoneum is closed to exclude the mesh from the viscera.
A suprapubic approach can also be utilized. A TAPP approach can be performed
starting the dissection transversely below the defect allowing for a 5cm inferior
mesh overlap. The suprapubic port should be at least 10cm from the inferior aspect
of the fascial defect in order to allow enough room for mesh placement and peritoneal closure. To avoid contact with the thighs, the lateral trocars are placed as far
lateral as possible when proceeding robotically. The other maneuver is to ex the
table. The peritoneum is opened transversely below the defect and the
Fig. 12.14 Diastasis
repair. Attempt should be
made to get bites of the
anterior rectus sheath
without incorporating the
skin

12 Umbilical Hernia Options
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
171
pre-peritoneal space is dissected heading superiorly to the xyphoid process. Once an
adequate space has been created to allow for a 5cm lateral mesh overlap, the diastasis and hernia are repaired and the uncoated mesh is placed. The peritoneum is
then closed transversely.
Another option when proceeding with the suprapubic approach is to perform a
retro-rectus dissection. The retro-rectus spaces are developed below the defect and
the medial rectus sheaths are opened into the pre-peritoneal plane centrally creating
one large posterior ap up to the xyphoid process. The midline peritoneum makes
up the ap between the posterior rectus fascias. Once the dissection is performed
the diastasis is repaired taking bites of the anterior rectus sheath. The accordion
technique is used to plicate the diastasis. The potential advantage with this approach
is getting bites of the anterior rectus sheath, but the potential downside is the opening of intact fascial planes and “burning the bridge” on the retro-rectus approach if
needed in the future.
The last option for umbilical hernia repair with diastasis plication is a subcutaneous onlay approach. A small cutdown is performed suprapubically down to the
fascia. The fat is then dissected off of the fascia superiorly and laterally making
room for two laterally placed suprapubic subcutaneous trocars. Next dissection
along the anterior fascia is performed. The umbilical hernia sac is dissected free
from the umbilical stalk. Dissection is then carried superiorly over the linea alba
and the medial anterior rectus sheath up toward the xyphoid process. Next the
anterior medial rectus sheaths are sewn together using running barbed suture starting superiorly and running back toward the camera. This essentially mimics an
abdominoplasty without the skin resection. Care must be taken to only take the
anterior fascia and avoid taking a deep bite which could lead to bowel injury. The
umbilical fascial defect is closed along the way. Next a drain is placed and the
umbilical stalk is reattached to the anterior fascia. The advantage of this approach
is avoidance of entry into the abdominal cavity and potential bowel injury. This
approach does require drain placement due to the increased risk of postoperative
seroma formation.
Cirrhosis
Umbilical hernias in patients with cirrhosis represent a challenging clinical scenario. Ascites contributes both to the formation of umbilical hernias as well as complicating their repair. Strangulation is a complicated presentation is non-cirrhotic
patients, but is especially life-threatening in a cirrhotic. Another complication in a
cirrhotic with ascites is ulceration of the skin over the defect and the development
of a skin breakdown and ascites leak. Control of the ascites is the key to repair both
in the pre-op time period as well as postoperatively.
Pre-operative control includes diuresis and parascentesis. If refractory to medical management, a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can be performed, but does increase the risk of encephalopathy after the procedure. Once the
ascites has been controlled an elective repair should be performed, especially if there
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025
