Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 465 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
162
T. J. Swope
subcostal trocar is then replaced with a 12mm standard length disposable trocar. The 8mm subcostal trocar is then moved to the lower lateral abdominal wall medial to the anterior superior iliac spine. Care should be taken to stay a few centimeters medial to the anterior superior iliac spine to avoid nerve injury. An 8mm trocar is placed inside the 12mm port (“piggybacked”) and the robot is then docked to all three 8 mm trocars. No monopolar energy should be used through the “piggy­backed” trocar arrangement to avoid capacitive coupling and possible thermal injury. To avoid this piggybacked arrangement, alternatively three 8mm trocars can be placed followed by a 12mm assist port on the other side to assist with mesh and suture insertion. It is important to burp each robotic trocar before heading to the operative console. This is the last step I perform on EVERY robotic case before leaving the bedside. The reason for this is if the trocars are docked under tension a larger trocar site defect will be created due to arm motion possibly leading to a tro­car site hernia. Burping all of the robotic arms creates no pre-existent traction on the abdominal wall and minimizes trauma to the abdominal wall from arm motion.
Once the robot is docked attention is turned toward the dissection. This is per­formed in a similar manner as described in the laparoscopic approach. Once the falciform ligament and pre-peritoneal fat are cleared in the midline the defect is sewn closed using barbed suture as previously described. Several bites must be taken in the opposite direction of the fascial closure once closure is achieved in order to ensure the barbed suture does not unravel. If the defect is larger and there is a large sac, small bites of the sac can be taken between fascial bites during the running closure. Care must be taken to avoid the dermis. Your rst assist is the key to watching the skin during this time to ensure no skin dimpling is produced with the fascial closure. This will imbricate the sac and signicantly reduce postoperative seroma formation. If possible, a small deep dermal bite can be taken with the fascial closure to reconstruct the umbilicus.
After measuring and allowing for 5cm overlap, the mesh is introduced through the 12mm port. The mesh can be held in place against the posterior abdominal wall using a pre-placed scaffold, with suture, or by reusing the needles from the fascial closure pinning the mesh in place against the abdominal wall. The mesh is sutured to the abdominal wall using 2-0 V-loc or spiral Strattax suture. This can be per­formed using a running continuous barbed suture around the edge of the mesh. Several sutures may be required based on the size of the mesh chosen. Alternatively, a “dolphin” style stitch can be placed in a running mattress fashion. The possible advantages of the dolphin stitch are less exposed barbs and requiring slightly less suture material to secure the mesh circumferentially to the abdominal wall (see Figs.12.6 and 12.7).
Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal (TAPP) Approach
Another MIS approach to the umbilical hernia is the TAPP approach. The pre­peritoneal plane is exposed and dissected out either laparoscopically or robotically (Fig.12.8) The advantage of this approach is that uncoated mesh is placed in the
12 Umbilical Hernia Options
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 12.6 Running whip stitch to secure the mesh to the abdominal wall. Results in more exposed barbed suture, but less fold down at the edges vs. dolphin stitch
Fig. 12.7 Dolphin stitch to secure the mesh to the abdominal wall. Results in less exposed barbed suture
163
Fig. 12.8 Initial TAPP dissection. Care must be taken to avoid the retro-rectus space
164
T. J. Swope
pre-peritoneal space. This avoids direct mesh exposure to the underlying bowel. The proposed advantage is less adhesion formation to the bowel. Additionally, uncoated mesh is less expensive than the coated versions used in IPOM.The hernia sac is reduced as well which can lead to a decreased incidence of postoperative seroma formation by not leaving a mesothelial lined sac in the tissues anterior to the fascial closure. The down side to this approach is that it takes longer to perform than an IPOM. The dissection of the peritoneum especially over the ipsilateral posterior rectus sheath can be tenuous. The peritoneum tends to be very thin in this area which can lead to the creation of multiple defects. If not excessive, these defects can be closed primarily. Figure-of eight sutures are recommended vs. simple inter­rupted. The gure-of eight sutures create a more robust peritoneal closure which is less likely to breakdown vs. the simple interrupted suture. Alternatively, a 3-0 run­ning barbed suture can be used if the peritoneal defect is larger. The peritoneum is opened far enough laterally on the trocar side of the defect to allow for a 5cm mesh overlap. The dissection needs to provide enough space for the mesh to seat nicely without wrinkling which can lead to adhesion formation. Usually, sharp scissor dis­section is used along with counter-traction to develop the plane of dissection. Care must be taken to ensure an adequately sized pocket has been created, and the mesh overlap is not being compromised in order to t into a pocket that is too small (Fig.12.9). If the peritoneum is not salvageable, the bail out procedure is to proceed to an IPOM.Next the fascia is closed primarily using running barbed suture (V-loc, Strattax symmetrical) which can be done robotically or laparoscopically as previ­ously described. Alternatively, a suture passer can be used to close to fascia in an interrupted fashion.
Mesh is placed once the fascia is closed. Uncoated mesh is used. Self-gripping mesh can be used here with the adherent side facing the fascia (ParietexProGrip). It is preferable to face the grippers anteriorly in case the peritoneum was to break down and leave the mesh exposed to the bowel. Non-self-gripping mesh can also used. Medium or heavyweight macroporous mesh is preferable (BardSoft mesh).
Fig. 12.9 Finished TAPP dissection with exposed defect and posterior fascia
12 Umbilical Hernia Options
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
165
The mesh can be xed in place with tacs, laparoscopic suturing, or stay sutures if performed laparoscopically. If proceeding robotically, the mesh is sutured in place using cardinal point interrupted sutures or running barbed suture can be used. Alternatively, some surgeons use brin glue to x the mesh in place while still oth­ers use no xation and rely on the form tting pocket to keep the mesh in place after the peritoneum is closed. Laparoscopic closure of the peritoneum can be accom­plished using a tacker or by suturing the peritoneum back together based on surgeon preference. The peritoneum is closed using running 2-0 or 3-0 barbed suture (V-loc, Strattax spiral) when closing robotically. The ports are then removed and the 12mm trocar fascial defect closed.
Rives StoppaRetro-Rectus Repair
Some surgeons prefer to place the mesh in the retro-rectus location. As in the TAPP approach, the mesh is located within the abdominal wall and is not exposed to the bowel. This carries the possible advantage of less bowel adhesions and the use of less expensive uncoated meshes. Additional benets include having the mesh against the rectus muscle. This is a very vascular space which is thought to allow fast ingrowth of the mesh. The other advantage is in the case of mesh infection. Mesh is much easier to salvage in the retro-rectus space vs. an IPOM location. The vascularity on both sides of the macroporous mesh much more easily allows the infection to be cleared after drainage, antibiotics, and wound management. The Achilles heel of this approach is the risk of an interparietal hernia secondary to breakdown of the posterior fascial closure. This is thought to be caused by too much tension at the time of the posterior fascial closure. This posterior fascial separation allows the bowel to slide between the posterior fascia and the mesh and exposes uncoated mesh directly to the bowel. The key to avoiding this is to make sure there is enough laxity on the posterior closure so that the fascia does not separate postop­eratively. If a patient presents with obstructive symptoms in the early postoperative period, imaging should be obtained to rule this out right away with a return trip to the operating room if discovered.
There are several ways to accomplish a retro-rectus repair. The rst is bilateral port placement. I nd this approach very difcult and generally avoid it. Ports can be placed on both sides of the abdominal wall. Laparoscopically, the rst step is to open the retro-rectus space on the contralateral side of where your starting ports are placed. Dissection is carried out laterally to the linea semilunaris. Great care must be taken not to injure the nerves at the lateral aspect of the rectus sheath and to not vio­late the linea semilunaris. This will denervate the rectus muscle and potentially destabilize the abdominal wall. An adequate dissection is performed allowing for 5cm mesh overlap laterally, superiorly, and inferiorly. Mesh is then rolled, placed, and secured with cardinal point xation. I usually place sutures at the corners and half-way between. Another loose stitch is placed just to hold the mesh in its rolled up state prior to rolling it out later during deployment. Once this is accomplished ports are placed on the contralateral side and a similar dissection is performed opposite the
166
T. J. Swope
initial dissection. When this is performed robotically, it requires the robot to be re­docked. It should be noted that the initially dissected side will have hanging posterior fascia which can interfere with dissection of the opposite side. To work around this, a suture or two may need to be placed to suspend the fascia/mesh and make exposure to the opposite side easier prior to re-docking. Alternatively, the second set of trocars can be placed just outside of the linea semilunaris and angled medially into the lateral retro-rectus space above the mesh. This eliminates having to deal with a hanging ap, but should only be used in patients with a sizeable rectus space as suturing will be difcult in a tight space.
Once the remaining dissection is complete, the anterior fascial closure is per­formed. This is done using size 0 or 1 barbed suture (V-loc, Strattax). After the fascia is closed, mesh is spread out smoothly in the retro-rectus plane. Again self­adhering mesh can be used as well as uncoated plain macroporous mesh. Similar to the TAPP, the mesh can be xed in place with glue, tacs, or suture. Some choose not to secure the mesh as it will be in a closed pocket with no room for movement. Once the mesh is secured the posterior fascia is closed. Again the key is to close it without excessive tension which can lead to breakdown of the closure and interparietal hernias.
Another retro-rectus approach is operating with just one set of ports. A host of options are available here. Intra-abdominal ports can be placed transversely above the defect (subxyphoid), below the defect (suprapubic), or laterally. Ports can also be placed directly into the retro-rectus space thus avoiding intra-abdominal trocar placement (eTEP). These approaches can be performed laparoscopically or roboti­cally, but are much easier if approached robotically due to the increased range of motion provided by the robotic platform.
With the suprapubic and subxyphoid approaches, the ports should be placed at least 10cm away from the defect when placing ports transversely above or below the defect. This allows for a 5cm mesh overlap and enough working space for the instruments. When operating robotically, the lateral ports should be placed as far lateral as possible when operating to avoid collision with the thighs when using a suprapubic docking approach. I recommend using the longer trocars laterally as well which gets the robotic arms a little further away from the thighs. Self-adhering mesh, sutures, or glue can be used to secure the mesh. The peritoneum and posterior rectus sheath are opened transversely. Dissection is carried out laterally preserving the vessels and nerves at the lateral rectus sheath. Centrally, the pre-peritoneal plane is maintained behind the linea alba. The medial rectus sheaths are divided creating one posterior ap (Fig.12.10). Any posterior defects in the ap are closed. The ante- rior fascia is closed and mesh is placed. The initial transverse incision is then closed using running barbed suture.
A robotic lateral approach can also be used. Ports are placed and the posterior rec­tus sheath is opened vertically. The vertical incision is made laterally and vertically along the posterior sheath toward the ports. The key is to go laterally, but avoid the vessels and nerves of the linea semilunaris. I generally divide the sheath 2/3 of the way toward myself (Fig.12.11). Once the retro-rectus plane is dissected the medial sheath is opened and a pre-peritoneal dissection is carried out to reach the opposite rectus
12 Umbilical Hernia Options
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 12.10 Retro-rectus dissection. Finished superior view of dissection from suprapubic port location. Posterior rectus sheath and peritoneum make up the posterior ap
167
Fig. 12.11
retro-rectus dissection. Avoiding the linea semilunaris is paramount
Fig. 12.12 Contralateral retro-rectus space. Avoid coming anterior to the opposite rectus sheath as you come across the midline to avoid an unintended subcutaneous dissection
Initial
sheath (Fig.12.12). The hernia is reduced and the contralateral rectus space is entered. Once dissection is complete and the space has been created the anterior fascia is closed. A small deep dermal bite of the umbilical stalk is taken with the fascial closure to re­create the umbilicus. Mesh is placed and the posterior fascia is closed off the midline.
168
T. J. Swope
The endoscopic total extra-peritoneal (eTEP) approach avoids the Achilles heel of the Rives Stoppa repair by avoiding the posterior fascial closure. Trocar position and the number of trocars is quite variable depending on the width of the rectus space and the hernia location. Trocars are placed just outside of the linea semiluna­ris and angled medially and inserted into the posterior rectus space. The initial tro­car can be placed superiorly, laterally, or inferiorly depending on hernia location. The trocar may be placed optically or with a cutdown technique. Blunt dissection then ensues using the camera or by placing a balloon dissector. A second trocar is placed once space is developed and used to dissect out the retro-rectus space. The medial rectus sheath is opened and a pre-peritoneal dissection is made until the contralateral retro-rectus space is entered. A third trocar can be placed to help with dissection to the contralateral side or it can be performed with one instrument and a third trocar placed in the opposite retro-rectus space. Instrument choices include sharp scissor dissection, hook cautery, harmonic scalpel, or Ligasure. Dissection is then carried to the defect which is reduced along with preserving the hernia sac if possible. The posterior ap consists of the posterior rectus sheaths with the perito­neum in between. The posterior rectus sheaths can be re-approximated, but gener­ally are not to prevent tension. That layer is generally just used to keep the mesh isolated from the bowel. Laterally, the nerves are preserved at the linea semilunaris. An adequate space is created for mesh placement. The anterior fascial defect is closed. The mesh is placed and spread out smoothly and the trocars are removed.
For larger primary umbilical hernias, component separation may sometimes be necessary. The general idea is to bring the rectus muscles back to the midline and avoid a bridged mesh repair. This is reserved for larger defects which can’t be closed primarily or with a retro-rectus dissection alone. This allows mesh to be placed and avoid contact with the bowel. These approaches will be covered in more detail in other chapters so I will only touch on the highlights of each.
The anterior component release involves cutting the external oblique aponeuro­sis. This can be performed laparoscopically. By performing this release in an MIS fashion vs. open surgery, there is a decrease in wound complication rates from 59 to 15% [14]. A cutdown is performed about 2cm lateral to the rectus sheath in the subcostal location. The external oblique aponeurosis is opened creating the space to place a balloon dissector between the external oblique aponeurosis and internal oblique muscle. The balloon is advanced inferiorly and then inated creating the working space. One or two more trocars are placed inferior and lateral to assist with dissection. The external oblique is then sharply divided vertically about 2cm lateral to the rectus abdominis along with Scarpa’s fascia. This release allows the rectus muscles to move medially. Subcostally, an additional 5–10cm of medializa­tion can be gained, another 10–15cm around the umbilicus, and another 3–8cm suprapubically [15].
Posterior Component Separation
Posterior component separation can be performed laparoscopically, but is very challenging and requires a very advanced skill set to perform. This approach is
12 Umbilical Hernia Options
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 12.13 Preservation of the perforating nerves. Note the divided posterior lamella of the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscle
169
more easily performed using the robotic platform. The articulation and increased range of motion provided by the robot allows the complexity of the operation to be performed more easily versus the non-articulating laparoscopic instrumentation. The operation requires placement of three trocars on each side of the patient. The rst three are placed laterally and a retro-rectus dissection is performed rst on the contralateral side. The perforators are again preserved laterally (Fig.12.13). Next the posterior lamella of the internal oblique is divided exposing the medial trans­versus abdominis muscle. The muscle is then divided exposing the transversalis fascia and peritoneum. The transversalis fascia and peritoneum are then dissected away from the transversus abdominis extending laterally and allowing medializa­tion of the posterior rectus sheath. This dissection can be carried inferiorly into the space of Retzius and superiorly to the central tendon of the diaphragm if needed. Medium weight macroporous mesh is rolled and placed. I secure it with 2-0 vicryl at both corners and with a stitch centrally to the transversus abdominis. Once that dissection is done three trocars are placed through the lateral abdominal wall on the dissected side. The robot is re-docked to the newly placed trocars and the other side is dissected out in a similar manner. This provides massive posterior mobilization and permits a tension-free closure of the posterior rectus fascia. The fascia is com­monly closed with a running barbed suture. My preference is 2-0 V-loc or spiral Strattax.
After the posterior fascia is closed, attention is turned closure of the anterior fascia. V-loc or spiral Strattax can be used to close the fascia. Closure is started at either pole. Multiple loose bites are taken and then sequentially tightened like a pul­ley system starting at the apices and working toward the middle of the closure. Once the anterior fascia is closed the mesh is unfolded and secured. The mesh can be secured using sutures or brin glue based on surgeon preference. Drains can then be placed based on surgeon preference.
Plication of rectus diastasis can also be performed at the same time as the umbili­cal hernia repair. The rationale behind this is to bring the rectus muscles back to the midline and reinforce the weakened linea alba. There is a tendency to develop new hernias above the umbilical repair along the thinned out linea alba. Kohler found
170
T. J. Swope
that patients with rectus diastasis suffered from a signicantly increased rate of hernia recurrence vs. those that had no diastasis (29/93 vs. 9/108; p < 0.001). Frequently, occult primary periumbilical and epigastric ventral hernias will be dis­covered when taking down the peritoneum in the midline while exposing the fascia. Just superior to the umbilicus and at the insertion of the falciform ligament are com­mon areas to nd an occult primary hernia.The type of suture can inuence hernia recurrence rates. Kohler etal. found a lower incidence of recurrence with the use of permanent suture vs. absorbable suture (12/111 vs. 26/90); p=0.001 [16].
The diastasis repair can be approached several ways. From a lateral approach the falciform ligament is dissected away between the medial border of the rectus mus­cles exposing the posterior rectus sheath and the linea alba. After dropping the intra­abdominal pressure, the medial posterior rectus sheath is re-approximated using running barbed suture bringing the rectus muscles back to the midline. Small bites of the thinned out linea alba are taken as the midline is crossed. This allows the tis­sue to “accordion” together and minimizes postoperative bulging along the midline (Fig. 12.14). The potential downside to this approach is only taking bites of the posterior fascia and not the anterior rectus sheath. The fascial defect is closed by incorporating it with the diastasis repair as well. A deep dermal umbilical bite is taken while closing the fascial defect to reconstruct the umbilicus. The whole pli­cated midline fascia is re-inforced with mesh secured using the IPOM approach. Alternatively, a TAPP approach can be utilized to repair the diastasis and hernia. Once the pre-peritoneal space is dissected out the medial posterior rectus fascia is brought together and the defect is closed. Uncoated mesh can be placed and the peritoneum is closed to exclude the mesh from the viscera.
A suprapubic approach can also be utilized. A TAPP approach can be performed starting the dissection transversely below the defect allowing for a 5cm inferior mesh overlap. The suprapubic port should be at least 10cm from the inferior aspect of the fascial defect in order to allow enough room for mesh placement and perito­neal closure. To avoid contact with the thighs, the lateral trocars are placed as far lateral as possible when proceeding robotically. The other maneuver is to ex the table. The peritoneum is opened transversely below the defect and the
Fig. 12.14 Diastasis repair. Attempt should be made to get bites of the anterior rectus sheath without incorporating the skin
12 Umbilical Hernia Options
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
171
pre-peritoneal space is dissected heading superiorly to the xyphoid process. Once an adequate space has been created to allow for a 5cm lateral mesh overlap, the dias­tasis and hernia are repaired and the uncoated mesh is placed. The peritoneum is then closed transversely.
Another option when proceeding with the suprapubic approach is to perform a retro-rectus dissection. The retro-rectus spaces are developed below the defect and the medial rectus sheaths are opened into the pre-peritoneal plane centrally creating one large posterior ap up to the xyphoid process. The midline peritoneum makes up the ap between the posterior rectus fascias. Once the dissection is performed the diastasis is repaired taking bites of the anterior rectus sheath. The accordion technique is used to plicate the diastasis. The potential advantage with this approach is getting bites of the anterior rectus sheath, but the potential downside is the open­ing of intact fascial planes and “burning the bridge” on the retro-rectus approach if needed in the future.
The last option for umbilical hernia repair with diastasis plication is a subcuta­neous onlay approach. A small cutdown is performed suprapubically down to the fascia. The fat is then dissected off of the fascia superiorly and laterally making room for two laterally placed suprapubic subcutaneous trocars. Next dissection along the anterior fascia is performed. The umbilical hernia sac is dissected free from the umbilical stalk. Dissection is then carried superiorly over the linea alba and the medial anterior rectus sheath up toward the xyphoid process. Next the anterior medial rectus sheaths are sewn together using running barbed suture start­ing superiorly and running back toward the camera. This essentially mimics an abdominoplasty without the skin resection. Care must be taken to only take the anterior fascia and avoid taking a deep bite which could lead to bowel injury. The umbilical fascial defect is closed along the way. Next a drain is placed and the umbilical stalk is reattached to the anterior fascia. The advantage of this approach is avoidance of entry into the abdominal cavity and potential bowel injury. This approach does require drain placement due to the increased risk of postoperative seroma formation.
Cirrhosis
Umbilical hernias in patients with cirrhosis represent a challenging clinical sce­nario. Ascites contributes both to the formation of umbilical hernias as well as com­plicating their repair. Strangulation is a complicated presentation is non-cirrhotic patients, but is especially life-threatening in a cirrhotic. Another complication in a cirrhotic with ascites is ulceration of the skin over the defect and the development of a skin breakdown and ascites leak. Control of the ascites is the key to repair both in the pre-op time period as well as postoperatively.
Pre-operative control includes diuresis and parascentesis. If refractory to medi­cal management, a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can be per­formed, but does increase the risk of encephalopathy after the procedure. Once the ascites has been controlled an elective repair should be performed, especially if there
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025