Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 292 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
64 Мб
Скачать
Varieties of pouches
21
A
B
Temporary loop ileostomy
D
Ileoanal anastomosis
3
Side-to-side
C
Cecum
Ileocolic vessels
4
Testing mobility of ileum
Alternate level of anastomosis
External sphincter muscle
Incision in mesentary
Ileum
5
Rectal cuff
Levator ani
Internal sphincter
Columns of Morgagni
Pectinate line
193
PLATE
88
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE Many surgeons advocate leav-
ing about  cm of mucosa above the columns. Recurrence of in ammatory bowel disease and malignant degeneration are possible and careful follow-up is essential. In general, avoidance of rectal dilatation or eversion of the stump plus a high level of anastomosis results in better fecal continence. In patients with high-grade dysplasia in the rectum, a traditional mucosectomy may be a better option, as it removes all the mucosa. If this technique is done, a hand­sewn ileoanal anastomosis would be required.  e J-pouch is constructed by rotating the terminal ileum clockwise to create a “J”-shape (as seen from anteriorly)  cm long.  e anterior ends are held by semicircular  silk sutures (figure 6).  e length is then checked as described above to ensure it will reach the pelvis.  e distal antimesenteric end of the pouch is opened with electrocautery. A linear stapler is then inserted and  red, creating a pouch from the two limbs (figure 7). Multiple  rings are used to complete the full length of the pouch (to reach the upper end, the distal end is tele­scoped onto the stapler). A - Prolene suture is then used to create a “whip­stitch” purse-string suture around the opening in the tip of the pouch. An anvil of the circular stapler (EEA) is then inserted and the purse-string tied around it (figure 8).  e anvil must sit so that the anti-mesenteric aspect of the ileum is draped across it.  e circular stapling (EEA) instrument is then inserted gently into the rectum by an assistant. It is advanced up to the level of the stapled rectal stump.  e sharp spike then pierces through the stump at the staple line and it is approximated with the anvil (figure 9).  e device
I A
is then closed and  red, taking care not to include adjacent structures such as the vagina. Naive or too-vigorous insertion of the circular stapler (EEA) instrument will rip through the very short rectal stump and make the pro­cedure much more di cult. figure 10 demonstrates the completed J-pouch with ileorectal stump anastomosis.
If the rectal mucosa is severely diseased, then a complete mucosal proc­tectomy may be indicated.  e mucosa is excised from the dentate line up to include the  or  cm of mucosa in the rectal stump. Some prefer to outline the dentate line with electrocoagulation followed by the submucosal injection of :, adrenaline solution (figure 11).  is tends to elevate the mucosa and facilitate the dissection in a more bloodless  eld. All mucosa must be com­pletely removed.  is dissection is o en the most time-consuming part of the technical procedure and must be done with the greatest care (figure 12).  e underlying muscle and nerves must not be injured. A dry  eld is essential.
Some prefer to grasp the stump with a Babcock forceps in the anus and everted out the anus (figure 13).  is facilitates the removal of the mucosa under direct vision but may result in poor fecal continence (figure 14).
Others prefer to divide the mucosa at the top of the columns of Mor­gagni (Plate , figure 5).  is avoids telescoping the rectal stump and lessens the possibility of nerve injury where the patient may not be able to di erentiate stool from  atus postoperatively.
If a mucosal proctectomy is performed, then a hand-sewn ileoanal anas­tomosis must be completed.  is is demonstrated in Plate .
CONTINUES
194
7
8
9
6
10
12
Anus
11
Cauterization of pectinate line
Mobilization of mucosa
Anus
Injection of epinephrine
14
Internal sphincter muscle
Rectal mucosa
13
Everted rectal cuff
195
PLATE
89
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE  e adequacy of the blood supply
to the reservoir is again double-checked. Two interrupted sutures with nee­dles attached (figure 15) are anchored on each side of the two- nger open­ing in the reservoir.  ese sutures are passed by the surgeon down through the anus, and the reservoir is placed in the proper position from above.
 e two sutures on each side are then anchored to either side of the opening at the level of the dentate line (figure 16). An additional suture is placed in the midline anteriorly and posteriorly. Eight or ten additional sutures may be required to ensure an accurate anastomosis.  ese sutures include the full thickness of the ileal wall, as well as a portion of the internal sphincter (figure 17).
Any openings in the mesentery are closed with interrupted sutures to avoid intestinal hernia.  e pelvic peritoneum is closed about the pouch to avoid twisting or displacement. A suture may be placed to anchor the pouch to each side of the muscular rectal cu to secure the pouch in position and lessen the possible tension on the suture in the dentate line anastomosis. Some prefer to insert a rubber drain between the wall of the pouch and the rectal cu .  e rubber tissue drain is brought out anteriorly.
While it is tempting to avoid an ileostomy, fewer postoperative complica­tions result if a complete diversion of the fecal stream is accomplished by ileo­stomy.  e defunctioning ileostomy is performed through a small opening in the le lower quadrant about  cm from the pouch (figure 18). It is advis­able to ensure complete diversion of the fecal stream (figure 19) by intus­suscepting up the proximal limb or stoma over the rod (see also Plate ).
POSTOPERATIVE CARE Steroid therapy is gradually decreased until it
can be omitted completely.  e bladder catheter is removed a er testing for
I A
sensation a er a few days.  e diet is slowly increased, but may need to be adjusted or limited depending upon the incidence of diarrhea.
Incidental obstruction, pelvic sepsis, and local problems around the ileostomy are occasional complications a er the operation. Before clo­sure, the integrity of the pouch and the anal anastomosis is evaluated by radiographic procedures with water-soluble contrast. Direct evaluation of the anastomosis for patency is also necessary. Frequently it strictures or develops a web across it requiring examination with sedation in the GI lab. Pouchoscopy can also be performed at this time. If no problems exist, the ileostomy is closed within  months.
 e major consideration involves the degree of anal continence that has been achieved. Patience is required during the  rst year, as the capacity of the pouch increases and sphincter control gradually improves.  e control of diarrhea during the day and soiling at night are of major concern and may require adjustment in bulk and type of food, as well as special medi­cation.  e number of daily stools varies, with an average of six per day and one or two per night. Patients with polyposis usually have fewer bowel movements per day than patients with ulcerative colitis.
A troublesome complication is a poorly de ned syndrome known as pouchitis.  e stools are increased in frequency with malaise, fever, and bloody stools, along with abdominal cramps.  is complication is far more common in patients with ulcerative colitis than in those with multiple poly­posis. Speci c medication and dietary adjustments are indicated.  is pro­cedure is believed to be associated with chronic residual stasis. Intestinal obstruction may occur in  percent more of the patients.
Patients with this operation require frequent, long-term follow-up evaluations.
196
15
16
Ileal mucosa
17
Mucosa anchored to internal sphincter
Pectinate line
18
Diverting ileostomy
Ileal mucosa
19
197
PLATE
90
INDICATIONS Cholecystectomy is indicated in symptomatic patients
with proven disease of the gallbladder, and the indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy are essentially those for open cholecystectomy.  ere are certain de nitive contraindications, which at present include peritonitis, small bowel obstruction secondary to gallstone ileus, coagulopathy, and large diaphragmatic hernia. Relative contraindications are becoming fewer as the surgical experience of the individual surgeon increases.  e factors for increased risk include cirrhosis with portal hypertension, previous intra­abdominal surgery with adhesions, and acute gangrenous cholecystitis.
PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION Following a history and physical exami-
nation, the diagnosis of biliary disease is documented with ultrasound examination of the abdomen.  e remainder of the gastrointestinal tract may require additional studies. A chest x-ray and electrocardiogram are usually performed and may indicate the need for further evaluation of the cardiopulmonary systems. Routine laboratory blood tests are obtained and should include a liver function panel as well as coagulation studies.  e risks of laparoscopy, including trocar injuries to viscera or blood vessels and the increased risk of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecys­tectomy, are discussed with the patient as well as the possibility of conver­sion to an open procedure.  e management of patients with gallstones and common duct stones remains to be de ned. An endoscopic retrograde cho­langiopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincterotomy are commonly tried  rst. If the common duct is successfully cleared of stones, then a staged lap­aroscopic cholecystectomy is performed. If the ERCP procedure is not suc­cessful, the patient should be prepared for an open cholecystectomy with common duct exploration.
ANESTHESIA General anesthesia with endotracheal intubation is recom-
mended. Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics for anticipated bile patho­gens are administered such that adequate tissue levels exist.
POSITION As laparoscopic cholecystectomy makes extensive use of sup-
porting equipment, it is important to position this equipment such that it is easily visualized by all members of the surgical team (figure 1).
 e surgeon must have a clear line of sight to both the video monitor and the high  ow CO insu ator such that he or she can monitor both the intra-abdominal pressure and gas  ow rates. In general, all members of the team are looking across the operating table at video monitors and therefore the positions of the video monitors may require adjustment once all mem­bers step to their  nal positions at operation.  e patient is placed supine with the arms either secured at the sides or out at right angles so as to allow the maximum access to monitoring devices by the anesthesiologist at the head of the table. An orogastric tube is passed a er the patient is asleep. As increased intra-abdominal pressure from the pneumoperitoneum impedes venous return and may raise the risk of deep venous thrombosis, both legs are either wrapped or placed in elastic stockings over which sequen­tial pneumatic compression stockings may be placed.  e electrocautery grounding pad is placed near the hip avoiding any region where internal
C, L
metal orthopedic parts or electronic devices may have been implanted.  e position of the patient on the table relative to placement of the x-ray cassette for a cholangiogram or the C arm for  uoroscopy is rechecked.  e legs, arms, and upper chest are covered with blankets to minimize heat loss.
OPERATIVE PREPARATION  e skin of the entire abdomen and lower
anterior chest is prepared in the routine manner.
INCISION AND EXPOSURE  e abdomen is palpated to  nd the liver
edge or unsuspected intra-abdominal masses.  e patient is placed in a mild Trendelenburg position and an appropriate site for the creation of the pneumoperitoneum is chosen.  e initial port may be placed by an open or Hasson technique which is preferred. Alternatively, a Veress needle technique is used as described below. In the unoperated abdomen this is usually at the level of the umbilicus (figure 2); however, previ­ous laparotomy incisions with presumed adhesions may suggest a more lateral approach site which avoids the epigastric vessels (figure 2 at X). A -cm vertical or horizontal skin incision is made and the abdominal wall on either side of the umbilicus is grasped by the surgeon and  rst assistant either by thumb and fore nger or by towel clips so as to elevate the abdominal wall (figure 3). A Veress needle is held like a pencil by the surgeon who inserts it through the linea alba and peritoneum where a characteristic popping sensation is felt (figure 4). An unobstructed free intraperitoneal position for the Veress needle is veri ed by easy irri­gation of clear saline in and out of the peritoneal space (figure 5) and by the hanging drop method where the saline in the translucent hub of the Veress needle is drawn into the peritoneal space when the abdominal wall is li ed.
If one does not obtain a free  ow or an unobstructed saline irrigation, then the Veress needle may be removed and reinserted. In general it is safer to convert the umbilical site into the Hasson open approach (Plate ) if any di culty is experienced with the placement, irrigation, or insu ation of the Veress needle.  e appropriate tubing and cables for the CO  ation, the  beroptic light source, and the laparoscopic videoscope with its sterile sheath are positioned as are the lines for the cautery or laser, suction, and saline irrigation.  e pneumoperitoneum begins with a low  ow of about  or  L/min with a low-pressure limit of approximately  to  cmH Once  to  L of CO are in, the abdomen should be hyperresonant to per­cussion.  e  ow rate may be increased; however, the pressure should be limited to  cmH the abdomen and the Veress needle is removed. A er grasping either side of the umbilicus, a -mm trocar port is inserted with a twisting motion, aiming towards the pelvis (figure 6). If a disposable trocar port is used, it is important to be certain that the safety sheath is cocked. A characteristic popping sensation is felt as the trocar enters the peritoneal space.  e trocar is removed and the escape of free CO
Although the Veress needle technique has a long history and is preferred by some, most general surgeons use the Hasson technique, as shown in the following Plate .
O.  ree to four liters of CO are required to fully in ate
gas is veri ed.
insuf-
O.
198
199
PLATE
91
INDICATIONS  e  rst step in most abdominal laparoscopic procedures is
insu ation of the intraperitoneal space with CO gas and the introduction of the videoscope system.  e original and most established technique uses the Veress needle, as described in the preceding Plate .  e Veress needle can be placed in any quadrant of the abdomen, but it is most frequently inserted just below the umbilicus, where a skin incision has been made for the introduction of a large -mm port for the videoscope. General sur­geons, however, have been cautious in adopting this technique of blind puncture, as their training has emphasized the importance of complete visualization of anatomy and of the planned action of their surgical instru­ments. Accordingly, the open or Hasson technique for entering the abdo­men under direct vision has become more popular and safer.  is tech­nique can be used to enter into any quadrant of the abdomen but is most commonly employed at the central umbilical site (figure 1). A vertical or transverse skin incision approximately  to  mm in length is made just below (figure 2) or above the umbilicus.  e choice of site may be based on the surgeon’s preference or the presence of a previous regional incision that may have adhesions.  e subcutaneous fat and tissues are bluntly dis­sected apart using small narrow  nger retractors or a Kelly hemostat.  e white linea alba is visualized and grasped on either side with hemostats.  e linea alba is elevated with the hemostats and a vertical -mm incision is made through the fascia (figure 2). Further dissection with a hemostat will reveal the thickened white peritoneum, which is grasped with a pair of laterally placed hemostats (figure 3).  e peritoneum is elevated and opened cautiously with a scalpel. A dark, empty peritoneal space is seen and a pair of lateral stay sutures are placed.  ese sutures incorporate the peritoneum and linea alba and are later used to secure the Hasson port.
 e next step is to verify that the intraperitoneal space has been entered freely.  e surgeon’s   h  nger is inserted (figure 4).  is maneuver sizes the hole for the port and allows the surgeon to palpate the region. Usually this space is clear, but on occasion there are some  lmy omental adhe­sions that can be swept away.  e Hasson port with its blunt, rounded-tip obturator is introduced into the abdomen (figure 5).  e spiral collar is screwed into the fascia so as to provide a snug gas seal, and the lateral stay sutures are secured to the notches on the collar.  e obturator is removed.  e CO rates of CO  ow and maximum pressure ( mmHg). He or she observes the intra-abdominal pressure and the total volume of CO infused as the abdomen enlarges and becomes tympanitic.  e videoscope is white-bal­anced and focused.  e optical end of the instrument is coated with anti­fog solution.  e videoscope is introduced into the port and advanced into the peritoneal space. If an angled optical instrument, typically  degrees, is used, it is important for the operator of the videoscope to establish the correct orientation of the optics and the video head. Typically, the optical bevel is downward-viewing ( o’clock) when the  beroptic light cable is
line is attached and the stopcock opened.  e surgeon sets the
H O T, L
vertical ( o’clock).  e video head is correctly oriented when its cable is positioned at  o’clock posteriorly. Rotation of either instrument from these positions will produce a rotated view on the TV monitor.
In the presence of omental adhesions or an enlarged falciform ligament, the intraperitoneal space may not easily be entered as the videoscope comes to the end of the Hasson port. If this area was clear to palpation with the surgeon’s   h  nger, careful angulation and rotation of the videoscope usu­ally  nds the right opening. When the opening cannot be found, the port is removed and a repeat  nger palpation is performed before reinsertion of the Hasson port. In extreme cases, when  nger palpation cannot  nd an easy intraperitoneal entrance because of dense adhesions, an alternative site for the Hasson port should be used.
 e usual alternative sites (figure 1) are in the four quadrants of the abdomen, although the Hasson port can also be placed through the midline linea alba in the epigastric or suprapubic regions. A transverse skin inci­sion is made and the subcutaneous fat spread with narrow  nger retractors or a Kelly hemostat.  e fascia of the external oblique muscle is incised with a scalpel. Further deep dissection is performed through the internal oblique and transversus muscles, whose thin fascia usually does not require incision.  e white peritoneum is grasped between hemostats and elevated. A scalpel incises the peritoneum and a clear entry into the intraperitoneal space is veri ed by deep passage of a Kelly hemostat. A pair of lateral stay sutures incorporating the peritoneum and fascia are placed.  e remainder of this procedure is performed as described for the umbilical site.
SUTURE OF PORT SITE Most -mm port sites do not require suture
closure of the fascia, especially if the port is passed originally in a zigzag or oblique manner through the muscle layers of the abdominal wall. On occasion, however, a blood vessel of the intra-abdominal wall that was not seen with transillumination may be cut by the trocar during the place­ment of a port. Most small vessels will stop bleeding. However, some may continue to drip into the intraperitoneal space and obscure visualization. A technique for the control of these vessels or for closure of a fascial defect is shown (figure 6). A  delayed absorbable suture is placed into the tip of a special suturing needle.  e needle and suture are passed through the inner abdominal wall about  cm beyond the edge of the port entry site (figure 6A).  e suture is released from the needle tip with a long free end showing within the abdomen.  e special suturing needle is removed and reinserted about  cm beyond the opposite edge of the port entry site.  e needle tip is opened and the suture is grasped (figure 6B).  e free end of the suture and the needle are withdrawn.  e suture is tied down through the skin opening.  is technique produces a mattress suture that can secure abdominal wall blood vessels or close fascial defects created by the placement of large ports. Both maneuvers are done under direct visu­alization using the videoscope.
CONTINUES
200
AB
201
PLATE
92
SUTURE OF PORT SITE  e CO
port and the videoscope with its sterile light source cord inserted a er white­balancing and focusing the system. Topical antifog solution is applied to the optical end of the telescope, which may be either angled (30 degrees) or  at (0 degrees) (figure 7). A general examination of the intra-abdominal organs is performed taking special note of any organ pathology or adhesions.  e  nding of any trocar-related injuries to intra-abdominal viscera or blood ves­sels requires an immediate repair using advanced laparoscopic techniques or more commonly open laparotomy.
 ree additional trocar ports are placed, using direct visualization of their sites of intra-abdominal penetration.  e second 10-mm trocar port is placed in the epigastrium about 5 cm below the xiphoid, with its intra-abdominal entrance site being just to the right of the falciform liga­ment (figure 8). Some surgeons use a 5-mm port at this site. Two smaller 5-mm trocar ports for instruments are then placed: one in the right upper quadrant near the midclavicular line several centimeters below the costal margin and another quite laterally at almost the level of the umbilicus.  ese sites may be varied according to the anatomy of the patient and the experience of the surgeon.  e skin of each selected site is in ltrated with a long-acting local anesthetic.  is needle can then be advanced into the peritoneal cavity under direct vision of the videoscope to verify proper positioning for the planned port.  e skin is opened with a scalpel, hemostasis is obtained, and the subcutaneous fat is dilated with a small hemostat.  e patient is placed in a mild (10 to 15 degrees) reverse Tren­delenburg position, although some surgeons prefer to rotate the patient slightly to the le (right side up) for better visualization of the gallbladder region.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
source is attached to this
2
 e apex of the gallbladder fundus is grasped with a ratcheted forceps (A) through the lateral port.  e gallbladder and liver are then li ed supe­riorly (figure 9).  is maneuver provides good exposure of the under- surface of the liver and gallbladder. Omental or other loose adhesions to the gallbladder are gently teased away by the surgeon (figure 9).
 e infundibulum of the gallbladder is grasped with forceps (B) through the middle port. Lateral traction with the middle forceps exposes the region of the cystic duct and artery. Dissecting forceps (C) are used by the surgeon through the epigastric port to open the peritoneum over the presumed junction of the gallbladder and cystic duct (figure 10). With gentle teasing and spreading motions, the cystic duct and artery are exposed (figure 11). Each structure is exposed circumferentially. If possible both structures are dissected free and identi ed prior to clipping and division. It is helpful to obtain the critical view. To minimize bile duct injury the concept of the “critical view of safety” is help­ful. In this technique, the neck of the gallbladder must be dissected o the liver bed (i.e., unfolding Calot’s triangle) to achieve conclusive identi cation of the two structures to be divided: the cystic duct and cystic artery. In the classic view the liver is seen posterior to Calot’s triangle (figure 12).
 e clear zone may be veri ed and elongated by sweeping back and forth (figure 12).  e importance of the second assistant manning the video­scope now becomes apparent. He or she must pull back and visualize the entrance of each new delicate instrument through the ports and then follow the instrument down to the area of dissection, which is maintained in the center of the  eld. Suitable magni cation is controlled by the closeness of the videoscope to the dissection site. At this point, if the dissection is dif­ cult because of in ammatory swelling and scarring, the surgeon should consider conversion to an open procedure.
CONTINUES
202
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025