Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 292 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
64 Мб
Скачать
183
PLATE
83
A R  R: S--E A (B)
INDICATIONS  e low-lying lesions of the rectum and rectosigmoid may
be resected and bowel continuity established anterior to the sacrum in a variety of ways. Although the end-to-end anastomosis (Plate ) can be used, side-to-end anastomosis is advantageous in cases with considerable discrepancy in size between the resected bowel and the rectal stump, par­ticularly in obese patients. When the lesion is so low that abdominoperineal resection, with sacri ce of the rectum, ordinarily would be indicated, and in the presence of distant metastases, or when the patient refuses to give permission for a permanent colostomy, bowel continuity can be established by a very low side-to-end anastomosis.  is approach may occasionally be needed in colostomy (Hartmann’s) closure, and a similar ileorectal anas­tomosis can be used in closing an ileostomy (e.g., a er total colectomy for pseudomembranous colitis).
 e principles of cancer surgery should be observed, including en bloc excision of the lymphatic drainage area and early ligation of the inferior mes­enteric vessels near the point of origin (figures 1 and 2).  e blood supply to the sigmoid will be sustained through the marginal artery of Drummond via the middle colic artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery.  e malignant lesion of the rectosigmoid should be at least  cm above the anus unless the anterior resection is carried out for palliation alone. At least  cm and preferably more of the bowel should be resected below the malignant tumor to assure removal of all adjacent lymph nodes.  e continuity can be reestablished a er the descending colon, the splenic  exure, and the le portion of the transverse colon are mobilized (figure 3).
 e entire right colon can be freed from its lateral peritoneal attach­ments and rotated to its embryologic position on the le side of the abdo­men, if more mobility is desired.
 e advantages of the side-to-end anastomosis include assurance of a larger and more secure anastomosis than may be possible by the end-to­end method.
PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION A er the lesion has been proved to be
malignant by microscopic examination, and polyps or secondary lesions ruled out by appropriate colonoscopic and barium studies of the colon, the patient is shi ed to a clear liquid diet for a day or so before surgery. A prelim­inary computed tomography scan with IV contrast may reveal distal spread and locate the courses of the ureters. For cancers below the peritoneal re ec­tion, an endorectal ultrasound study will aid in the staging of the extent of disease. Appropriate tumors should be evaluated for radiation therapy and chemotherapy prior to operation.  e rectum is irrigated with saline or a povidine-iodine solution.  e tube is le in place for rectal decompression. An indwelling urethral catheter ensures a collapsed bladder, providing bet­ter exposure of deep pelvic structures. Systemic antibiotics are given.
ANESTHESIA General endotracheal anesthesia is satisfactory. Spinal anes-
thesia may be used.
POSITION  e patient is placed near the le side of the table and so immo-
bilized that the Trendelenburg position can be assumed during the  nal anastomosis without di culty.
OPERATIVE PREPARATION  e skin is prepared from the symphysis up
to the epigastrium. If a stapled anastomosis is planned, Allen stirrups are used to create a modi ed lithotomy position allowing concurrent prepara­tion and draping for later access to the rectum.  e perineum and rectum are prepared and included in the draping if stapling is planned.
INCISION AND EXPOSURE A midline incision is made, starting just
above the symphysis and extending down to the umbilicus and around it on the le side.  e height to which the incision is carried in the epigastrium depends on the location of the splenic  exure. Because it will be necessary to detach the splenic  exure, easy exposure of this area must be provided. Undue tension of the le half of the colon and splenic  exure will tear the splenic capsule, causing blood loss and risking splenectomy.
A er the abdomen is opened, a self-retaining retractor is inserted, and the liver is palpated for evidence of metastasis. Palpation should be carried out well over the top of both lobes of the liver as well as on the undersurface. Likewise, lymph nodes along the course of the inferior mesenteric artery and at the bifurcation of the aorta are inspected for evidence of involve­ment.  e position and  xation of the tumor are ascertained by palpation. In the presence of metastasis to the liver or seeding throughout the general peritoneal cavity, a sleeve type of segmental resection is indicated. When a palliative resection is carried out, wide dissection of the inferior mesenteric blood supply up to the point of origin in the region of the ligament of Treitz is not necessary.
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE A er it has been decided that the lesion is
resectable, that an anterior resection is warranted, and that adequate bowel can be resected distal to the tumor, the small intestines are walled o and the transverse colon and splenic  exure are mobilized (figure 4).
While the omentum is held upward, sharp dissection is used to divide the attachment of the omentum to the transverse colon. A few blood ves­sels may need to be ligated during this procedure. Opening into the lesser sac above the transverse colon ensures an easier and safer separation of the omentum from the splenic  exure of the colon, particularly in the obese patient. Again, great care must be exercised as the splenocolic ligament is divided in order to avoid tearing the splenic capsule. Clamps should be applied in this area so that the contents of the splenocolic ligament can be carefully divided and ligated (figure 5).
CONTINUES
184
Inferior mesenteric artery
Superior hemorrhoidal artery
Middle colic artery
1
Lesion
Pouch of Douglas
Middle hemorrhoidal artery
Pectinate line
Omentum
2
Inferior mesenteric vein
Inferior mesenteric artery
Superior hemorrhoidal artery
Marginal artery of Drummond
Middle colic artery
Left colic artery
Sigmoid arteries
3
Marginal artery of Drummond
Lesser sac
4
Spleen
5
5
Colon
Transverse colon
Splenocolic ligament
Line of division
185
PLATE
84
A R  R: S--E A (B)
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE  e peritoneum over the region
of the le kidney is divided as gentle traction is maintained downward and medially on the splenic  exure of the colon.  ere is a tendency to grasp the colon and to encircle it completely with the  ngers.  is tends to puncture the thinned out mesentery. Rents can be avoided if a gauze pack is used to gently sweep the splenic  exure downward and medially (figure 6). Usually, it is unnecessary to divide and ligate any vessels dur­ing this procedure.  e peritoneum in the le lumbar gutter is divided, and the entire descending colon is swept medially.
 e rectosigmoid is freed from the hollow of the sacrum as shown in Plates  and , Total Mesorectal Excision.  e sigmoid is  rst separated from any attachments to the iliac fossa on the le side, and the le gonadal vessels and the ureter are identi ed throughout their course in the  eld of operation (figure 7). O en, especially in the female, a very low-lying lesion can be mobilized and li ed up well into the wound.
A er the bowel has been freed from the hollow of the sacrum, the  ngers of the le hand should separate the right ureter from the overlying peritoneum by blunt dissection (figure 8).  e peritoneum is incised some distance from the tumor, and the rectum is freed further down to the region of the levator muscles using the mesorectal dissection (Plates  and ). Division of the middle hemorrhoidal vessels with the suspensory ligaments may be neces­sary to ensure the needed length of bowel to be resected below the tumor.  e surgeon should not hesitate to divide the peritoneal attachments in the region of the pouch of Douglas, to free the rectum from the prostate gland in the male and from the posterior wall of the vagina in the female.  e inferior mesenteric artery is freed from the underlying aorta to near its point of origin (figure 9).  ree curved clamps are applied to the inferior mesenteric artery, and the vessel is divided and ligated with  silk.  e inferior mesenteric vein should be ligated at this time, before the tumor has been palpated and compressed due to the manipulation required during resection.
CONTINUES
186
Splenic exure
6
Stomach
7
Spleen
Pouch of Douglas
Peritoneal reection
Left ureter
Gonadal vessels
Line of incision
Lesion
8
9
Line of incision
Lesion
Right ureter
Bifurcation of aorta
Inferior mesenteric artery
187
PLATE
85
A R  R: S--E A (B)
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE A er the mesenteric vessels have
been ligated and the rectum has been mobilized adequately, a Pace-Potts noncrushing clamp is applied across the bowel at least  to  cm below the tumor (figure 10a).  e position of both ureters should once again be identi ed before the clamp is applied. A straight clamp is applied  cm proximal to the noncrushing clamp, and the bowel is divided (figure 10b). As soon as possible the specimen is wrapped in a large pack held in place by encircling ties (figure 11).
It is reassuring for the surgeon, especially in obese patients, to see active pulsations at the anastomotic site, and the surgeon should take the time to free the mobilized colon and to loosen any tension on the middle colic vessels. Procaine,  percent, can be injected into the mesentery to strengthen pulsations in elderly patients or in the presence of large fat deposits in the mesentery (figure 11).  e Doppler apparatus may be used to verify the adequacy of the blood supply.  e small bowel should be returned to the abdomen from the plastic bag, since the base of the mesentery of the small intestine can compress the middle colic vessels, particularly if the small intestine is placed on the abdominal wall above
and to the right of the umbilicus (figure 12).  e blood supply improves as the colon resection nears the middle colic vessels, since the descending colon is now dependent upon the marginal vessels of Drummond arising from the middle colic vessels (figure 12).  e entire transverse colon as well as the right colon may be mobilized by detaching the omentum and the peritoneal attachments as indicated by the dotted line (figure 12).
 e mesentery is divided up to the bowel wall (figure 13) where active pulsations have been identi ed.  e mesentery to the sigmoid is further mobilized and divided until a su cient amount of bowel has been isolated proximal to the lesion.
 e remaining colon must be su ciently mobilized then to reach the rectal stump loosely and without tension. Extra mobility is mandatory, since postoperative distention of the bowel and subsequent tension on the suture line must be anticipated.
A decision is made for an end-to-end anastomosis with or without a stapling instrument or a side-to-end anastomosis.  e adequacy of the exposure, the amount of omental fat, and  nally, the discrepancy between the sizes of the upper and lower lumens may in uence the  nal technical approach.
CONTINUES
188
10a
11
Noncrushing clamp
Procaine 1%
10b
Tumor
12
Middle colic artery
Marginal artery of Drummond
Line of resection
Inferior mesenteric vein
Lahey bag
Rectal stump
13
Line of resection
Ligament of Treitz
Marginal artery of Drummond
Inferior mesenteric vein
Line of division
189
PLATE
86
A R  R: S--E A (B)
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE  e bowel is divided obliquely
a er the mesentery has been cleared o to about  cm from the clamp (figure 14).  e mobility of this segment of bowel is tested by bring­ing it down to the region of the rectal stump to be absolutely certain that side-to-end anastomosis can be carried out without tension. If the initial segment is too tight, additional transverse colon may be mobilized.  e hepatic  exure can be freed as well as the entire right colon. Any attach­ments constricting the mesentery of the descending colon can be divided.  e presence of active arterial pulsations should be determined while the closed end of the colon is held deep in the pelvis.  e end of the bowel is closed using a running absorbable suture followed by  interrupted silk Halsted mattress sutures. Alternatively, a stapled closure and division with a GIA instrument can be used. Some surgeons oversew this staple line with interrupted  silks for better security and inversion.
 e taenia adjacent to the mesentery along the inferior surface of the mobilized segment is grasped with Babcock forceps, and traction sutures (A and B) are placed at either end of the proposed opening (figure 15).  ese sutures keep the inferior taenia under traction during the subsequent placement of the posterior serosal row of interrupted  silk sutures (fig-
ure 16).  e traction suture (B) should be within  cm of the closed end of
the bowel, since it is undesirable to leave a long blind stump of colon beyond the site of the anastomosis. A er this, the Pace-Potts clamp is removed.  e margins of the rectal stump are protected by gauze pads to avoid gross spill­ing and contamination. It is advisable to excise the edge of the rectal stump if it has been damaged by the clamp.  e color of the mucosa and viability of the rectal stump should be rechecked. Any bleeding points on the edge of the rectal stump are grasped and ligated with  absorbable sutures. It has been found useful for exposure to insert a traction suture (C) in the midportion of the anterior wall of the rectum (figure 17).  is keeps the bowel under modest traction and aids in subsequent placement of mucosal sutures. A noncrushing clamp may be applied across the colon to avoid the possibility of gross contamination. An incision is made between the traction sutures (A and B) along the taenia, and the lumen of the proximal bowel is opened (figure 15). All contamination is removed in both angles of the openings.  e same type of traction suture (C) can be placed in the midpor­tion of the wall of the sigmoid. Interrupted  silks are placed full thickness through the posterior edges of both the descending colon and rectal stump (figure 16).  e knots are tied within the lumen and then cut.  is layer provides absolute full thickness control for the posterior suture row. A double-ended running  absorbable suture is tied in the posterior mid­line.  is proceeds laterally as a running, locking, continuous suture until each suture line reaches the corner. A Connell inverting suture is then used as the closure proceeds from both corners to the midline.  erea er, an interrupted row of  nonabsorbable sutures are placed in a submucosal mattress manner for inversion and security of the completed anterior anas­tomosis (figure 18).
 is provides a large stoma.  e patency of the stoma is determined by palpation and the integrity of the anastomosis can be checked by  lling the pelvis with saline and then insu ating the rectum with air using an Asepto syringe.  e appearance of air bubbles signals the needs to reevaluate the suture line or even in the entire anastomosis.
A er completing the anastomosis, the surgeon should recheck the ade­quacy of the distal blood supply and be certain that the proximal colon is
not under tension.  e hollow of the sacrum is irrigated with saline and the placement of a closed-system Silastic catheter in this region is optional.
To release tension from the suture line as the bowel becomes dilated in the early postoperative period, it is useful to anchor some fat pads to the peri­toneal re ection in the iliac fossa.  is seals o entrance into the pelvis as it anchors the bowel in this area. Likewise, the free medial edge of the mesen­tery should be approximated to the right peritoneal margin in order to cover all raw surfaces. As this peritoneum is closed, the course and location of both ureters must be identi ed repeatedly to avoid including them in a suture.
ALTERNATE STAPLED TECHNIQUE  e Baker’s side-to-end anastomosis
as illustrated is a very safe approach when the surgeon must perform a hand­sewn anterior or low anterior resection. Most surgeons, however, have access to and pro ciency with stapling instruments. In these circumstances, the proximal descending colon is transected with a cutting linear stapler (GIA) while the rectal stump is divided between a pair of suture lines created with a noncutting linear stapler (TA) stapling device (figure 19).  e rectum is divided between the staple lines and the specimen removed.  e staple line of the proximal colon is partially resected along the antimesenteric border so as to create an opening that allows passage of a circular stapler (EEA) anvil, whose sha will exit through the taenia, approximately  cm proximal to this opening. A purse string is then applied about the anvil sha and tied in a snug manner (figure 20).  e open cut end of the proximal colon is closed with the noncutting linear stapler.  e main circular stapler (EEA) instru­ment is passed, with its disposable trocar retracted within, until it reaches the staple line of the rectal stump. Under direct vision, the surgeon guides the circular stapler (EEA) trocar out through the posterior rectal bowel wall about ½ cm behind the suture line. A purse string is carefully placed about the penetrating trocar.  e trocar is removed and the anvil inserted into the circular stapler (EEA) instrument within the rectum.  e rectal purse string is tightened and both purse strings are inspected.  e two segments of bowel are carefully brought together and the instrument is  red.  e  ring and release require adherence to the manufacturer’s instructions to verify correct tightness or compression of the tissue before  ring and the correct amount of loosening for the cap to tilt before careful removal.  e surgeon veri es the presence of two intact tissue rings (donuts) containing the purse strings of both the proximal and distal colon walls. A er inspection of the anasto­mosis, the air bubble test described above is most useful, as the surgeon can­not always see fully around the anastomosis. An advantage of bringing the circular stapler (EEA) stapler trocar out posterior to the rectal stump staple line is that it places the junction of the two staple lines (corners) somewhat anteriorly, where they may be most easily reinforced with interrupted  nonabsorbable mattress sutures.
CLOSURE  e routine closure is performed.
POSTOPERATIVE CARE  e Foley catheter is removed in  to  days,
depending upon how much bladder and presacral dissection was per­formed. Careful observation of the voiding pattern, volumes, and resid­ual volumes determines successful recovery.  e initial liquid diet is advanced as tolerated.  e presacral drain is monitored for output and blood content. It is usually removed in a few days unless a urine leak is suspected on the basis of a large output of clear  uid with an elevated urea content.
190
191
PLATE
87
INDICATIONS A permanent ileostomy following removal of the colon can
be avoided in selected patients by removing all diseased colon down to the top of the columns of Morgagni or the pectinate line, followed by construc­tion of an ileal reservoir, with anastomosis of the anal canal (figure 1). Patients with ulcerative colitis and polyposis are candidates for this pro­cedure, but those with Crohn’s disease are not, because of the potential for involvement of the small intestine.  e patient must have an adequate anal sphincter by digital examination or, better yet, by manometry.  e rectum should be free of ulcerations, abscesses, stricture,  ssures, or  stulae.  is is especially important in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).  is procedure can be considered in patients who are strongly opposed to an ileostomy and who are available for prolonged close follow-up.  e patient should thoroughly understand the uncertainties of postoperative anal control and the need to have patience during the early months a er the operation.  e procedure is not recommended for patients older than  years and those who have fecal incontinence. Obesity may make it impossible to per­form the anal pouch anastomosis. In patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) desmoids tumors involving the small bowel mesentery can make it di cult to obtain adequate length to reach the anus with the pouch. All patients should realize that a permanent ileostomy can sometimes be required due to factors not known until the procedure is underway.
Various surgical procedures have been used in an e ort to improve long­term anal continence. It is questionable whether any procedure currently used is always completely successful, and the patient should be informed of this uncertainty. Increasing experience suggests the use of some type of anal pull-through procedure has a reasonable chance of providing more comfort than the terminal ileostomy or the ileal abdominal pouch.
A prolonged period of preoperative hyperalimentation or nonalimenta­tion with catabolism may be avoided by a staged procedure, especially in the presence of toxic megacolon, poor general condition, or rectal disease. A permanent ileostomy is performed with subtotal colectomy, leaving the rectum in place, and the superior hemorrhoidal vessels undivided.  is also o ers the chance to review the pathology of the colon to further exclude Crohn’s disease. A er several months, an ileoanal anastomosis is considered and a diverting ileostomy is created at the time of the pouch. A er a suit­able recovery the temporary ileostomy is closed making this a three-stage procedure. Various pouches have been advocated.  ey include the J pouch (figure 2, a), the three loop S pouch (figure 2, b), the lateral isoperistaltic ileal reservoir (figure 2, c), and the four-loop W reservoir (figure 2, d).
PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION Documentation of the pathologic pro-
cess involved is done with biopsies taken from the anal canal as well as the rectum or colon.  e stomach and duodenum are inspected by gastroduo­denoscopy. Patients with polyposis and UC patients with high-grade dys­plasia should be informed of the potential for malignancy. It is important to have medical and surgical agreement that surgical removal of the entire colon is in the best long-term interest of the patient. Time is usually required for the patient to accept the recommendation and the patient can bene t from talking with another patient who has undergone this procedure.  e patient’s medications, including steroid therapy for ulcerative colitis, must be considered, and steroid therapy continued. Intravenous antibiotics are given before operation, and any major blood volume de cit is corrected. Patients receive a clear liquid diet for a day or two and an oral bowel prepa­ration the day before.
In severe cases, some prefer a -week period of intense medication to keep the colon at rest permitting the in ammatory reaction to subside.
I A
Such patients may be placed on total parenteral alimentation, systemic ste­roids and steroid enemas, and systemic antibiotics when ulcerative colitis is present.  e rectal mucosa is evaluated by sigmoidoscopic examination immediately prior to the operation. A large rectal tube is placed for irriga­tion with saline and povidone-iodine antiseptic solution.
ANESTHESIA General endotracheal anesthesia is preferred.
POSITION  e patient is placed in the modi ed lithotomy position using
Allen stirrups.  is allows the abdominal as well as perineal dissections to be performed without repositioning of the patient.
OPERATIVE PREPARATION  e rectum is given a very limited low-
pressure irrigation, and the perianal skin and buttocks are given the routine skin preparation. Constant bladder drainage is instituted and a nasogastric tube is inserted.  e pubis and abdominal skin are also prepared in the routine fashion, and sterile drapes are applied.
INCISION AND EXPOSURE A lower midline incision that extends to the
le of the umbilicus is made, and the abdomen is explored. Particular atten­tion is given to the entire small intestine to make certain there is no evi­dence of Crohn’s disease, which would contraindicate the operation.  e involvement of the colon with in ammation or polyposis is evaluated. In the presence of polyposis, the possibility of encountering an unsuspected site of malignancy or metastases to the liver is ever present. If there is any question of Crohn’s colitis, the colon is resected and sent to the pathologist for gross and microscopic veri cation.
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE  e colon may be constricted, friable, and
quite vascular, with  rm attachments to the omentum. Gentle traction is applied to avoid tearing the friable bowel with resulting gross contamina­tion.  e mesentery of the colon can be divided and blood vessels ligated relatively near the bowel wall, except in di use polyposis, where there is always a possibility of metastases to regional lymph nodes. It is judicious to have the pathologist evaluate the entire specimen as soon as possible.
Before proceeding with the removal of the mucosa from the lower seg­ment and before constructing the ileal reservoir, it is essential that su cient ileum has been mobilized to construct the pouch. Approximately  cm of terminal ileum is required for the construction of the ileal reservoir. Such mobilization is accomplished by dividing the ileocolic vessels and the mesen­tery down to near the arcade of vessels at the very end of the ileum, but none of the latter is ligated (figure 3). It may be necessary to evaluate the mobility of the small bowel all the way up to the ligament of Treitz with division of any bands that tend to limit the mobility of the small intestine (figure 4). Inci­sions within the posterior peritoneum may be worthwhile to provide added mobility. Some divide the last ileal arcade (figure 4).  e adequacy of the blood supply involved should be evaluated frequently to be certain a vigorous blood supply is sustained to the end of the mobilized ileal terminal.  e end of the proposed pouch should reach at least to the pubis, and preferably to the edge of the Bookwalter ring being used for retraction.
 e dissection below the rectosigmoid junction is carried out close to the bowel wall to avoid damage to the presacral and parasympathetic nerves.  e rectal stump is washed out with povidone-iodine, and the bowel divided at the anorectal junction.  is leaves a stump about  to  cm in length (figure 5). Some prefer to have a longer rectal anal stump, which requires resection of the rectal mucosa from above rather than entirely through the anus. Others use a stapling instrument for closure of the rectal stump.
CONTINUES
192
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025