Twelve Men

TWELVE MEN

he took issue with his former fellow-soldiers in various ways, commenting satirically on their church regularity and professed Christianity, as opposed to their indifference to the late colonel, and denouncing in various public conversations the double-mindedness and sharp dealings of the “little gods,” as he termed those who ran the G.A.R. Post, the church, and the shipyards.

Not long after his religious affairs reached a climax when the minister, once a good friend of his, following the lead of the dominant star, Mr. Palmer, publicly denounced him from the pulpit one Sunday as an enemy of the church and of true Christianity!

“There is a man in this congregation,” he exclaimed in a burst of impassioned oratory, “who poses as a Christian and a Baptist, who is in his heart’s depth the church’s worst enemy. Hell and all its devils could have no worse feelings of evil against the faith than he, and he doesn’t sell tobacco, either!”

The last reference at once fixed the identity of the person, and caused Burridge to get up and leave the church. He pondered over this for a time, severed his connections with the body, and having visited Graylock one Sunday drove there every Sabbath thereafter, each time going to a different church. After enduring this for six months he generated a longing for a more convenient meeting-place, and finally allied himself with the Baptist Church of Eustis. Here his anchor might possibly have remained fast had it not been that subtle broodings over his wrongs, a calm faith in the righteousness of his own attitude, and disgust with those whom he saw calmly expatiating upon the doctrines and dogmas of religion in his own town finally caused him to suspect a universal misreading of

291

THEODORE DREISER

the Bible. This doubt, together with his own desire for justification according to the Word, finally put the idea in his mind to make a study of the Bible himself. He would read it, he said. He would study Hebrew and Greek, and refer all questionable readings of words and passages back to the original tongue in which it had been written.

With this end in view he began a study of these languages, the importance of the subject so growing upon him that he neglected his business. Day after day he labored, putting a Bible and a Concordance upon a pile of soap-boxes near the door of his store and poring over them between customers, the store meantime taking care of itself. He finally mastered Greek and Hebrew after a fashion, and finding the word “repent” frequently used, and that God had made man in the image of Himself, with a full knowledge of right and wrong, he gravitated toward the belief that therefore his traducers in Noank knew what they were doing, and that before he needed to forgive them – though his love might cover all – they must repent.

He read the Bible from beginning to end with this one feeling subconsciously dominant, and all its loving commands about loving one another, forgiving your brother seventy times seven, loving those that hate you, returning good for evil, selling all that you have and giving it to the poor, were made to wait upon the duty of others to repent. He began to give this interpretation at Eustis, where he was allowed to have a Sun- day-school, until the minister came and told him once, “to his face,” as the local report ran: “We don’t want you here.”

Meekly he went forth and, joining a church across the Sound on Long Island, sailed over every Sunday and there ad-

292

TWELVE MEN

vanced the same views until he was personally snubbed by the minister and attacked by the local papers. Leaving there he went to Amherst, always announcing now that he held distinctive views about some things in the Bible and asking the privilege of explaining. In this congregation he was still comfortably at rest when I knew him.

“All sensitiveness,” the sail-maker had concluded after his long account. “There ain’t anything the matter with Elihu, except that he’s piqued and grieved. He wanted to be the big man, and he wasn’t.”

I was thinking of this and of his tender relationship with children as I had noticed it, and of his service to the late colonel when one day being in the store, I said:

“Do you stand on the Bible completely, Mr. Burridge?” “Yes, sir,” he replied, “I do.”

“Believe every word of it to be true?” “Yes, sir.”

“If your brother has offended you, how many times must you forgive him?”

“Seventy times seven.”

“Do you forgive your brothers?” “Yes, sir – if they repent.”

“If they repent?”

“Yes, sir, if they repent. That’s the interpretation. In Matthew you will find, ‘If he repent, forgive him.’”

“But if you don’t forgive them, even before they repent,” I said, “aren’t you harboring enmity?”

“No, sir, I’m not treasuring up enmity. I only refuse to forgive them.”

293

THEODORE DREISER

I looked at the man, a little astonished, but he looked so sincere and earnest that I could not help smiling.

“How do you reconcile that with the command, ‘Love one another?’ You surely can’t love and refuse to forgive them at the same time?”

“I don’t refuse to forgive them,” he repeated. “If John there,” indicating an old man in a sun-tanned coat who happened to be passing through the store at the time, “should do me a wrong – I don’t care what it was, how great or how vile – if he should come to me and say, ‘Burridge, I’m sorry,’” he executed a flashing oratorical move in emphasis, and throwing back his head, exclaimed: “It’s gone! It’s gone! There ain’t any more of it! All gone!”

I stood there quite dumbfounded by his virility, as the air vibrated with his force and feeling. So manifestly was his reading of the Bible colored by the grief of his own heart that it was almost painful to tangle him with it. Goodness and mercy colored all his ideas, except in relation to his one-time followers, those who had formerly been his friends and now left him to himself.

“Do you still visit the poor and the afflicted, as you once did?” I asked him once.

“I’d rather not say anything about that,” he replied stern-

ly.

“But do you?” “Yes, sir.”

“Still make your annual New Year round?” “Yes, sir.”

“Well, you’ll get your reward for that, whatever you believe.”

294

«VANITY, VANITY,» SAITH

THE PREACHER

Sometimes a single life will clearly and effectively illustrate a period. Hence, to me, the importance of this one.

I first met X – at a time when American financial methods and American finances were at their apex of daring and splendor, and when the world was in a more or less tolerant mood toward their grandiose manners and achievements. It was the golden day of Mr. Morgan, Senior, Mr. Belmont, Mr. Harriman, Mr. Sage, Mr. Gates, Mr. Brady, and many, many others who were still extant and ruling distinctly and drastically, as was proved by the panic of 1907. In opposition to them and yet imitating their methods, now an old story to those who have read “Frenzied Finance,” “Lawless Wealth,” and other such exposures of the methods which produced our enormous American fortunes, were such younger men as Charles W. Morse (the victim of the 1907 panic), F. Augustus Heinze (another if less conspicuous victim of the same “panic”), E.R. Thomas, an ambitious young millionaire, himself born to money, David A. Sullivan, and X – . I refuse to mention his name because he is still alive although no longer conspicuous, and anxious perhaps to avoid the uncomfortable glare of publicity when all the honors and comforts which made it endurable in the first place are absent.

296

TWELVE MEN

The person who made X – essentially interesting to me long before I met him was one Lucien de Shay, a ne’er-do-well pianist and voice culturist, who was also a connoisseur in the matters of rugs, hangings, paintings and furniture, things in which X – was just then most intensely interested, erecting, as he was, a great house on Long Island and but newly blossoming into the world of art or fashion or culture or show – those various things which the American multi-millionaire always wants to blossom or bloom into and which he does not always succeed in doing. De Shay was one of those odd natures so common to the metropolis – half artist and half man of fashion who attach themselves so readily to men of strength and wealth, often as advisors and counselors in all matters of taste, social form and social progress. How this particular person was rewarded I never quite knew, whether in cash or something else. He was also a semi-confidant of mine, furnishing me “tips” and material of one sort and another in connection with the various publications I was then managing. As it turned out later, X – was not exactly a multi-millionaire as yet, merely a fledgling, although the possibilities were there and his aims and ambitions were fast nearing a practical triumph the end of which of course was to be, as in the case of nearly all American multi-millionaires of the newer and quicker order, bohemian or exotic and fleshly rather than cultural or æsthetic pleasure, although the latter were never really exactly ignored.

But even so. He was a typical multi-millionaire in the showy and even gaudy sense of the time. For if the staid and conservative and socially well-placed rich have the great houses and the ease and the luxury of paraphernalia, the bohemian rich of the X – type have the flare, recklessness and imagination

297

THEODORE DREISER

which lend to their spendings and flutterings a sparkle and a shine which the others can never hope to match.

Said this friend of mine to me one day: “Listen, I want you to meet this man X – . You will like him. He is fine. You haven’t any idea what a fascinating person he really is. He looks like a Russian Grand Duke. He has the manners and the tastes of a Medici or a Borgia. He is building a great house down on Long Island that once it is done will have cost him five or six hundred thousand. It’s worth seeing already. His studio here in the C – studio building is a dream. It’s thick with the loveliest kinds of things. I’ve helped buy them myself. And he isn’t dull. He wrote a book at twenty, ‘Icarus,’ which is not bad either and which he says is something like himself. He has read your book (“Sister Carrie”) and he sympathizes with that man Hurstwood. Says parts of it remind him of his own struggles. That’s why he wants to meet you. He once worked on the newspapers too. God knows how he is making his money, but I know how he is spending it. He’s decided to live, and he’s doing it splendidly. It’s wonderful.”

I took notice, although I had never even heard of the man. There were so very, very many rich men in America. Later I heard much more concerning him from this same de Shay. Once he had been so far down in the scale that he had to shine shoes for a living. Once he had walked the streets of New York in the snow, his shoes cracked and broken, no overcoat, not even a warm suit. He had come here a penniless emigrant from Russia. Now he controlled four banks, one trust company, an insurance company, a fire insurance company, a great real estate venture somewhere, and what not. Naturally all of this

298

TWELVE MEN

interested me greatly. When are we indifferent to a rise from nothing to something?

At de Shay’s invitation I journeyed up to X – ‘s studio one Wednesday afternoon at four, my friend having telephoned me that if I could I must come at once, that there was an especially interesting crowd already assembled in the rooms, that I would meet a long list of celebrities. Two or three opera singers of repute were already there, among them an Italian singer and sorceress of great beauty, a veritable queen of the genus adventuress, who was setting the town by the ears not only by her loveliness but her voice. Her beauty was so remarkable that the Sunday papers were giving full pages to her face and torso alone. There were to be several light opera and stage beauties there also, a basso profundo to sing, writers, artists, poets.

I went. The place and the crowd literally enthralled me. It was so gay, colorful, thrillful. The host and the guests were really interesting – to me. Not that it was so marvelous as a studio or that it was so gorgeously decorated and furnished – it was impressive enough in that way – but that it was so gracefully and interestingly representative of a kind of comfort disguised as elegance. The man had everything, or nearly so – friends, advisors, servants, followers. A somewhat savage and sybaritic nature, as I saw at once, was here disporting itself in velvets and silks. The iron hand of power, if it was power, was being most gracefully and agreeably disguised as the more or less flaccid one of pleasure and friendship.

My host was not visible at first, but I met a score of people whom I knew by reputation, and listened to clatter and chatter of the most approved metropolitan bohemian character. The Italian sorceress was there, her gorgeous chain ear-

299

THEODORE DREISER

rings tinkling mellifluously as she nodded and gesticulated. De Shay at once whispered in my ear that she was X – ‘s very latest flame and an expensive one too. “You should see what he buys her!” he exclaimed in a whisper. “God!” Actresses and society women floated here and there in dreams of afternoon dresses. The automobiles outside were making a perfect uproar. The poets and writers fascinated me with their praises of the host’s munificence and taste. At a glance it was plain to me that he had managed to gather about him the very element it would be most interesting to gather, supposing one desired to be idle, carefree and socially and intellectually gay. If America ever presented a smarter drawing-room I never saw it.

My friend de Shay, being the fidus Achates of the host, had the power to reveal the inner mysteries of this place to me, and on one or two occasions when there were not so many present and while the others were chattering in the various rooms – music-, dining-, ball-, library and so forth – I was being shown the kitchen, pantry, wine cellar, and also various secret doors and passages whereby mine host by pressing a flower on a wall or a spring behind a picture could cause a door to fly open or close which gave entrance to or from a room or passage in no way connected with the others save by another secret door and leading always to a private exit. I wondered at once at the character of the person who could need, desire or value this. A secret bedroom, for instance; a lounging-room! In one of these was a rather severe if handsome desk and a steel safe and two chairs – no more; a very bare room. I wondered at this silent and rather commercial sanctum in the center of this frou-frou of gayety, no trace of the sound of which seemed to penetrate here. What I also gained was a sense of an exotic, sybaritic and

300