Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Майнор / Книги / Chapter-5---Forced-convection_2021_Heat-Transfer-Engineering.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
08.05.2026
Размер:
2.69 Mб
Скачать

5.4 Approximate solution to the boundary layer equations 137

N uL = 0.662Re1/2 Pr1/3

N uL = 0.662 × (2.66 ×105 )1/2 (0.711)1/3

N uL = 304.77

N uL = hL = 304.77 kf

h = 304.77 × 0.027

1

h = 8.23 W/m2 K

The rate of heat transfer is given by

q = hA T

q = 494.1 W/m2

Flow over a cylinder

Flow over a cylinder is commonly encountered in several heat transfer applications like evaporator, condenser, recuperator, automative radiator, and so on. The special difficulty associated with flow over a cylinder is the curvature and its effect on the boundary layer development. Consider a flow over a cylinder, as shown in Fig. 5.3.

The key difference between the flat plate and this flow is that Uis no longer a constant and varies with x, as indicated in the figure. For θ = 0 to 90 , u(x) increases

FIGURE 5.3

Development and separation of boundary layer over a cylinder.

138 CHAPTER 5  Forced convection

with x and this results in a favorable pressure gradient, whereas for 90 ≤ θ ≤ 180 , the fluid decelerates consequent upon which there is an adverse pressure gradient, and separation of the boundary layer occurs from the wall the condition for which is mathematically given by ∂u/∂y = 0. When the boundary layer detaches at the surface, a wake is formed in the downstream. Please refer to Incropera et al. (2013) for a more comprehensive discussion on this special flow. If ReD 2 ×105 , the flow stays laminar and separation occurs at θ = 80 . However, beyond a ReD of 2 ×105 , transition to turbulence (more on this in Section 5.5) occurs and separation takes place at θ = 140 .

For flow over a cylinder, the correlation for Nusselt number (NuD ) proposed by Zukauskas (1972) is of the form

 

 

= CRem Prn

Pr 0.25

 

Nu

 

(5.135)

D

 

 

 

 

D

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prs

 

The constants C, m are reported in Table 5.1.

This correlation is valid for 0.7 ≤ Pr ≤ 500 and 1 ≤ ReD ≤ 106. If Pr ≤ 10 then n = 0.37 and if Pr >10, then n = 0.36. Churchill and Bernstein (1977) have proposed a single comprehensive equation as follows

 

 

= 0.3

+

0.62 Re1/2D Pr1/3

 

1

+

 

ReD

 

5/8 4/5

 

Nu

 

 

 

D

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5.136)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

28200

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.25 1

+

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The above equation is recommended for all the values of ReD Pr ≥ 0.2

Flow over a sphere

Whitaker (1972) proposed a correlation for the average Nusselt number for flow over a sphere as follows.

 

1/2

2/3

 

2/5

 

1/2

 

 

 

NuD = 2 + (0.4 ReD

+ 0.06 ReD

)Pr

 

 

 

 

(5.137)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

 

This

correlation

is valid for 0.71 Pr 380,3.5 ReD 7.6 ×106 , and

1 ≤ / s

≤ 3.2. All properties are to be evaluated at T

except for s, which alone is to

be evaluated at the surface (or wall temperature) Ts (or Tw ).

Table 5.1  Constants in Eq. (5.135).

 

 

Re

 

 

C

 

m

 

 

 

0.4–4

 

 

0.989

 

0.330

4−40

 

 

0.911

 

0.385

40–4000

 

0.683

 

0.466

4000–40000

 

0.193

 

0.618

40000–400000

 

0.027

 

0.805

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.4 Approximate solution to the boundary layer equations 139

Heat transfer in flows across a bank of tubes

Flow and heat transfer over a bank of tubes or rod bundles frequently occur in industrial practice, as, for example, in heat exchangers, regenerators (for example, in an application where exhaust gases preheat the incoming fluid, say air or water), and in nuclear fuel rods. A variety of configurations are possible. Two frequently encountered ones are shown below in Figs. 5.4A and 5.4B.

In the above two figures, there are three rows of tubes. The difference between the two is that in (a) the arrangement is aligned and is frequently referred to as “in-line arrangement” while in (b) the arrangement of the tubes is staggered. There are two key geometrical parameters that enter the problem. These are the transverse pitch ST and the longitudinal pitch SL. For such flows, it is intuitive to expect that the average Nusselt number is a function of the pertinent parameters as follows.

FIGURE 5.4

Arrangement of (A) aligned and (B) staggered rows of tubes in tube/rod bundle.

140 CHAPTER 5  Forced convection

 

= f (Re,Pr,ST , SL )

 

NuD

(5.138)

Following the development presented in the earlier portions of this chapter, the Nusselt number should vary as

Nu

D

 

= aReb Pr1/3Sc Sd , or

(5.139)

 

 

T

L

 

 

 

 

 

= aReb Pr1/3 (S /S

 

)e

 

Nu

D

 

L

(5.140)

 

 

T

 

 

Professor Zukauskas from Lithuania did extensive work and has presented reviews of heat transfer in these geometries. In fact, he synthesized the work of all the investigators before him and proposed a generic expression for NuD as

 

= Pr0.36 (Pr/Prw )n Z (ReD )

 

NuD

(5.141)

where n = 0 for gases and 0.25 for liquids. All properties need to be evaluated at the bulk fluid temperature, while Prw is evaluated at the wall temperature Tw .

For 102 ≤ ReD 103

Aligned rows : Z = 0.52ReD0.5

Staggered rows : Z = 0.71ReD0.5

For 103 ReD 2 ×105

Aligned rows : Z = 0.27 ReD0.63 , ST /SL 0.7

Staggered rows : Z = 0.35(ST /SL )0.2 ReD0.6 , ST /SL 2

For even higher Reynolds numbers and for liquid metals, please refer to Lienhard and Lienhard (2020), who have presented a comprehensive account of heat transfer across tube bundles.

Example 5.2: Consider a long pin fin of diameter 8 mm. The fin is made of aluminum (k = 205 W /mK ) and is maintained at a base temperature of 100 °C. Air at 30 °C flows over the fin with a velocity of 8 m/s.

a.Determine the heat transfer coefficient from the fin.

b.Determine the net heat transfer from the fin.

c.If the diameter of the fin is changed to 14 mm, with all other conditions being the same, determine the heat transfer coefficient and the heat transfer from the fin.

Solution:

 

uD

 

The Reynolds number, ReD =

 

 

ν

 

 

 

Air properties at T =

Tw + T

 

= 100 + 30 = 65 C = 338 K.

 

 

m

2

2

 

Now, we obtain the air properties at 338 K from Table 5.2 given on the next page.

5.4 Approximate solution to the boundary layer equations 141

Table 5.2  Thermophysical properties of air at atmospheric pressure (Kadoya et al., 1985; Jacobsen, R. T., et al., 1992).

 

 

 

 

µ (kg/m.s)

α (m2/s)

ν (m2/s)

 

T(K)

ρ (kg/m3)

cp (J/kg.K)

k (W/m.K)

× 106

× 105

× 106

Pr

100

3.605

1039

0.00941

7.11

0.251

1.97

0.784

135

2.739

1020

0.01267

9.38

0.486

3.65

0.757

150

2.368

1012

0.01406

10.35

0.587

4.37

0.745

170

2.128

1010

0.01578

11.54

0.764

5.63

0.739

200

1.769

1007

0.01836

13.33

1.031

7.54

0.731

225

1.591

1007

0.02038

14.69

1.305

9.46

0.726

250

1.412

1006

0.02241

16.06

1.578

11.37

0.721

260

1.358

1006

0.02329

16.49

1.705

12.14

0.712

270

1.308

1006

0.02400

16.99

1.824

12.99

0.712

273

1.294

1006

0.02400

17.13

1.841

13.25

0.712

280

1.261

1006

0.02473

17.47

1.879

13.85

0.711

290

1.217

1006

0.02544

17.95

2.078

14.75

0.710

300

1.177

1007

0.02623

18.57

2.213

15.78

0.713

310

1.139

1007

0.02684

18.89

2.340

16.59

0.709

320

1.103

1008

0.02753

19.35

2.476

17.54

0.708

330

1.070

1008

0.02821

19.81

2.616

18.51

0.708

340

1.038

1009

0.02888

20.25

2.821

19.51

0.707

350

1.008

1009

0.02984

20.90

2.931

20.73

0.707

360

0.983

1010

0.03052

21.34

3.089

21.82

0.706

380

0.932

1012

0.03191

22.22

3.405

24.01

0.705

400

0.882

1014

0.03328

23.10

3.721

26.19

0.704

420

0.843

1017

0.03459

23.93

4.059

28.55

0.704

440

0.803

1020

0.03590

24.76

4.397

30.92

0.703

450

0.784

1021

0.03656

25.17

4.567

32.10

0.703

460

0.768

1023

0.03719

25.56

4.746

33.37

0.703

480

0.737

1027

0.03845

26.35

5.105

35.91

0.704

500

0.706

1030

0.03971

27.13

5.464

38.45

0.704

550

0.642

1040

0.04277

29.02

6.412

45.24

0.706

600

0.588

1051

0.04573

30.82

7.400

52.42

0.708

650

0.543

1063

0.04863

32.57

8.430

60.01

0.712

700

0.504

1075

0.05146

34.25

9.498

67.96

0.715

750

0.471

1087

0.05425

35.88

10.612

76.23

0.719

800

0.441

1099

0.05699

37.47

11.761

84.97

0.723

900

0.392

1121

0.06237

40.52

14.193

103.42

0.728

1000

0.353

1142

0.06763

43.43

16.792

123.13

0.733

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

142CHAPTER 5  Forced convection

ρ= 1.038 kg/m3 cp = 1009 J/kg.K

ν= 1.951 × 105

k = 0.0289 W/mK Pr = 0.707

(For convenience, all properties were taken at 340 K.)

ReD =

u

D

=

 

8

× 8

×103

= 3280

 

ν

19.51×106

 

 

 

 

The constants C and m from Table 5.1 corresponding to this Reynolds number are

C = 0.683 and m = 0.466.

Nu = 0.683Re0.466 Pr0.37 Pr 0.25

D

Prs

Prs = 0.706

(It is to be noted that for air, unless the temperature difference between the surface and the surrounding is very high (100 to 150 °C), the Prandtl number correction parameter will have a negligible role in the determination of the Nusselt number.)

a. For the problem under consideration,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

× (3280)

0.466

× (0.707)

0.37

 

0.707

0.25

 

NuD = 0.683

 

 

 

×

0.706

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

= 26.13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NuD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

h =

 

 

k

= 25.87 × 0.0289

 

 

 

 

 

 

N u.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D

8 × 103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

h = 94.43W/m2K

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

b.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q =

 

hpAkθb

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q =

94.43 × π × 8 × 103 × π ×

(8 × 103 )2

× 205

× 70

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q= 10.94 W

c.When the fin diameter is increased to 14 mm

ReD = 3280 × 148 = 5740

Now, the constants C and m change to 0.193 and 0.618, respectively.

 

 

 

0.618

 

0.37

 

0.707

0.25

NuD = 0.193 (5740)

(0.707)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.706

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NuD = 35.72

5.4 Approximate solution to the boundary layer equations 143

h =

NuD

.k

=

35.72 × 0.0289

= 73.75 W/m2K

 

 

 

14 × 103

 

 

D

 

 

 

 

 

Q =

h.p.A.kθb

 

 

 

 

 

Q =

73.75 ×

π × 14 × 103 ×

π ×

(14

× 103 )2

× 205 × 70

 

4

 

Q = 22.37 W

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The key takeaway from this problem is that if we had tried to solve this problem with knowledge of only fin heat transfer but without any idea of how the heat transfer coefficient will change for a change in diameter, our solution would have been

Q

 

h.p

.A

.k θ

b

 

p A

 

D3

D

1.5

1

=

2

2

 

=

2 2

=

2

=

2

 

Q2

 

 

 

 

p1A1

3

 

 

h.p1.A1.k θb

 

D

D1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

Q2 = 2.311

Q1

The actual ratio of Q2 /Q1 We obtained is 2.04 (i.e., 22.37 W/10.94 W), which leads to a significantly different result by about 15%.

Example 5.3: A heated sphere made of aluminum (k = 205 W/mK) of 8 mm diameter at 100 °C cools in a current of air at 30 °C, with a free stream velocity of 8 m/s. The density and specific heat of aluminum are 2700 kg/m3 and 900 J /kgK respectively.

a.Determine the heat transfer coefficient from the sphere.

b.Determine the time constant of the sphere.

c.How much time will it take for the sphere to cool to 50 °C.

Neglect radiation from the sphere.

Solution:

a. The Reynolds number ReD , is given by

 

 

 

 

 

 

ReD =

 

u

D

=

 

8 × 8 ×103

= 3280

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ν

19.51×

106

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ReD , is the same as in part (a) of Example 5.2.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

+ 0.06(3280)

0.667

 

 

0.4

1.857 × 105 0.25

 

N uD =

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

2 + 0.4(3280)

 

 

(0.707)

2.025 × 10

 

 

= 2 + [22.91+ 13.28]× 0.87 × 0.979 = 32.83

 

 

 

 

N uD

 

 

 

 

 

h =

N uD

k

=

32.83 × 0.0289

 

= 118.58 W/m2K

 

 

 

 

 

D

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8 × 103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

144 CHAPTER 5  Forced convection

b. Time constant

τ =

mcp

 

 

 

 

 

hA

 

 

4

π (4 × 103 )3 × 900

 

ρVcp

 

2700 ×

τ =

=

3

hA

118.58 × 4π (4 × 103 )2

τ= 27.33 s

c.Let us now calculate the Biot number.

Bi = hr = 118.58 × 4 ×103 3k 3× 205

Bi = 0.00077

Since Bi < 0.1, the lumped capacitance method is valid. Recalling the solution for a spatially lumped object undergoing cooling (from Chapter 3),

((T T)) = et /T

Ti T

(50 30) = et /27.33

(100 30)

0.2857 = et /27.33t = 34.24 s

5.5  Turbulent flow

Consider flow and heat transfer over a flat plate. Up to ReL = 5 ×105 , the flow stays laminar and beyond this there is transition to turbulence. The boundary layer grows thicker and eddies, and consequent mixing will be in the transition region and in the fully turbulent region beyond the transition. A depiction of the boundary layer flow over a flat plate is shown in Fig. 5.5.

FIGURE 5.5

Forced convection boundary layer development over a horizontal flat plate depicting the laminar, transition, and turbulent regions of flow.

5.5 Turbulent flow 145

FIGURE 5.6

Typical variation of velocity with time for a turbulent flow.

In the turbulent regions of flow, we encounter time-dependent velocities and temperatures, and these dependencies are characterized by fluctuations.

For example, the horizontal velocity u may be expressed as

u =

 

+ u

(5.142)

u

In the above equation, u is the mean velocity and uis the fluctuating component. The velocity u typically varies with time, as shown in Fig. 5.6.

Similarly,

 

 

v =

 

 

+ v

(5.143)

v

and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T =

 

+ T

(5.144)

T

The average velocity

 

is given by

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

u

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

u =

 

 

1

T0 u dt

(5.145)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T0

 

 

 

 

0

 

T0 is the integrating time and must be larger than the slowest fluctuations associated with velocity u or any variable for that matter.

For two-dimensional, steady, incompressible flow with constant properties, using the expressions for u, v, and T , with the inclusion of fluctuating components, the governing equations after applying the boundary layer assumptions become

ux + uy

ρu u + v ux y

=0

=µ u

y y

(5.146)

ρuv(5.147)

146CHAPTER 5  Forced convection

and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T

 

T

 

T

ρcp u

x

+ v

 

 

 

=

 

k

y

 

 

 

 

 

y

 

y

ρcp vT (5.148)

The above equations are obtained after we perform time averaging of the governing equations. Let us demonstrate this for term uv.

Consider the term

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

=

 

 

 

 

 

=

 

+

 

 

 

 

+ u

 

+

 

 

 

 

 

 

(u + u ')(v + v ')

 

 

 

 

 

uv

u v

uv

v

uv

(5.149)

However, as fluctuations have a zero mean

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

= 0

(5.150)

 

 

 

u

and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

= 0

(5.151)

 

 

 

v

But,

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

(5.152)

 

 

 

 

uv

 

 

 

uv = u v +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

u

v

(5.153)

(with the understanding that u v = u v).

A similar procedure can be followed for other terms in the momentum and energy equations.

Now, we can define two new quantities, namely, total shear stress, τ total, and total heat flux, qtotal , as follows

 

u

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5.154)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

τ total = µ y ρuv

 

and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

qtotal = −

T

 

 

(5.155)

 

 

 

 

k

y

ρcp vT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now we introduce two new quantities, namely, eddy viscosity of momentum, εm , and eddy viscosity of heat, εH, as follows.

ρεm

u

= −ρ

 

 

uv

y

 

(5.156)

and

ρcpεH

H

= −ρcp

 

 

 

 

 

vT

 

 

(5.157)

 

y

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

τ total

= ρ (ν +εm )

u

(5.158)

y