- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contributors
- •Contents
- •1. Epidemiology of Pediatric Strabismus
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Forms of Pediatric Strabismus
- •1.2.1 Esodeviations
- •1.2.1.1 Congenital Esotropia
- •1.2.1.2 Accommodative Esotropia
- •1.2.1.3 Acquired Nonaccommodative Esotropia
- •1.2.1.4 Abnormal Central Nervous System Esotropia
- •1.2.1.5 Sensory Esotropia
- •1.2.2 Exodeviations
- •1.2.2.1 Intermittent Exotropia
- •1.2.2.2 Congenital Exotropia
- •1.2.2.4 Abnormal Central Nervous System Exotropia
- •1.2.2.5 Sensory Exotropia
- •1.2.3 Hyperdeviations
- •1.3 Strabismus and Associated Conditions
- •1.4.1 Changes in Strabismus Prevalence
- •1.4.2 Changes in Strabismus Surgery Rates
- •1.5 Worldwide Incidence and Prevalence of Childhood Strabismus
- •1.6 Incidence of Adult Strabismus
- •References
- •2.1 Binocular Alignment System
- •2.1.2 Vergence Adaptation
- •2.1.3 Muscle Length Adaptation
- •2.2 Modeling the Binocular Alignment Control System
- •2.2.1 Breakdown of the Binocular Alignment Control System
- •2.2.4 Changes in Basic Muscle Length
- •2.2.6 Evidence Against the “Final Common Pathway”
- •2.3 Changes in Strabismus
- •2.3.1 Diagnostic Occlusion: And the Hazard of Prolonged Occlusion
- •2.3.2.1 Supporting Evidence for Bilateral Feedback Control of Muscle Lengths
- •2.4 Applications of Bilateral Feedback Control to Clinical Practice and to Future Research
- •References
- •3.1 Dissociated Eye Movements
- •3.2 Tonus and its relationship to infantile esotropia
- •3.5 Pathogenetic Role of Dissociated Eye Movements in Infantile Esotropia
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2.1 Binocular Correspondence: Anomalous, Normal, or Both?
- •4.3 MFS with Manifest Strabismus
- •4.3.1 Esotropia is the Most Common Form of MFS
- •4.3.2 Esotropia Allows for Better Binocular Vision
- •4.3.3 Esotropia is the Most Stable Form
- •4.4 Repairing and Producing MFS
- •4.4.1 Animal Models for the Study of MFS
- •References
- •5.1 Esotropia as the Major Type of Developmental Strabismus
- •5.1.2 Early Cerebral Damage as the Major Risk Factor
- •5.1.3 Cytotoxic Insults to Cerebral Fibers
- •5.1.5 Development of Binocular Visuomotor Behavior in Normal Infants
- •5.1.6 Development of Sensorial Fusion and Stereopsis
- •5.1.7 Development of Fusional Vergence and an Innate Convergence Bias
- •5.1.8 Development of Motion Sensitivity and Conjugate Eye Tracking (Pursuit/OKN)
- •5.1.9 Development and Maldevelopment of Cortical Binocular Connections
- •5.1.10 Binocular Connections Join Monocular Compartments Within Area V1 (Striate Cortex)
- •5.1.11 Too Few Cortical Binocular Connections in Strabismic Primate
- •5.1.12 Projections from Striate Cortex (Area V1) to Extrastriate Cortex (Areas MT/MST)
- •5.1.15 Persistent Nasalward Visuomotor Biases in Strabismic Primate
- •5.1.16 Repair of Strabismic Human Infants: The Historical Controversy
- •5.1.18 Timely Restoraion of Correlated Binocular Input: The Key to Repair
- •References
- •6. Neuroanatomical Strabismus
- •6.1 General Etiologies of Strabismus
- •6.2 Extraocular Myopathy
- •6.2.1 Primary EOM Myopathy
- •6.2.2 Immune Myopathy
- •6.2.4 Neoplastic Myositis
- •6.2.5 Traumatic Myopathy
- •6.3 Congenital Pulley Heterotopy
- •6.4 Acquired Pulley Heterotopy
- •6.5 “Divergence Paralysis” Esotropia
- •6.5.1 Vertical Strabismus Due to Sagging Eye Syndrome
- •6.5.2 Postsurgical and Traumatic Pulley Heterotopy
- •6.5.3 Axial High Myopia
- •6.6 Congenital Peripheral Neuropathy: The Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders (CCDDs)
- •6.6.1 Congenital Oculomotor (CN3) Palsy
- •6.6.3 Congenital Trochlear (CN4) Palsy
- •6.6.4 Duane’s Retraction Syndrome (DRS)
- •6.6.5 Moebius Syndrome
- •6.7 Acquired Motor Neuropathy
- •6.7.1 Oculomotor Palsy
- •6.7.2 Trochlear Palsy
- •6.7.3 Abducens Palsy
- •6.7.4 Inferior Oblique (IO) Palsy
- •6.8 Central Abnormalities of Vergence and Gaze
- •6.8.1 Developmental Esotropia and Exotropia
- •6.8.2 Cerebellar Disease
- •6.8.3 Horizontal Gaze Palsy and Progressive Scoliosis
- •References
- •7.1 Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders: Facts About Ocular Motility Disorders
- •7.1.1 The Concept of CCDDs: Ocular Motility Disorders as Neurodevelopmental Defects
- •7.1.1.1 Brainstem and Cranial Nerve Development
- •7.1.1.2 Single Disorders Representing CCDDs
- •7.1.1.3 Disorders Understood as CCDDs
- •7.2 Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders: Perspectives to Understand Ocular Motility Disorders
- •7.2.1.1 Brown Syndrome
- •Motility Findings
- •Saccadic Eye Movements
- •Comorbidity
- •Epidemiologic Features
- •Laterality
- •Sex Distribution
- •Incidence
- •Heredity
- •Potential Induction of the Syndrome
- •Radiologic Findings
- •Natural Course in Brown Syndrome
- •Intra-and Postoperative Findings
- •References
- •8.1 Amblyopia
- •8.2 What Is Screening?
- •8.2.1 Screening for Amblyopia, Strabismus, and/or Refractive Errors
- •8.2.1.1 Screening for Amblyopia
- •8.2.1.2 Screening for Strabismus
- •8.2.1.3 Screening for Refractive Error
- •8.2.1.4 Screening for Other Ocular Conditions
- •8.3 Screening Tests for Amblyopia, Strabismus, and/or Refractive Error
- •8.3.1 Vision Tests
- •8.3.3 Stereoacuity
- •8.3.4 Photoscreening and/or Autorefraction
- •8.3.6 Who Should Administer the Screening Program?
- •8.4 Treatment of Amblyopia
- •8.4.1 Type of Treatment
- •8.4.2 Refractive Adaptation
- •8.4.3 Conventional Occlusion
- •8.4.4 Pharmacological Occlusion
- •8.4.5 Optical Penalization
- •8.4.7 Treatment Compliance
- •8.4.8 Other Treatment Options for Amblyopia
- •8.4.9 Recurrence of Amblyopia Following Therapy
- •8.5 Quality of Life
- •8.5.1 The Impact of Amblyopia Upon HRQoL
- •8.5.3 Reading Speed and Reading Ability in Children with Amblyopia
- •8.5.4 Impact of Amblyopia Upon Education
- •8.5.6 The Impact of Strabismus Upon HRQoL
- •8.5.7 Critique of HRQoL Issues in Amblyopia
- •8.5.8 The Impact of the Condition or the Impact of Treatment?
- •References
- •9. The Brückner Test Revisited
- •9.1 Amblyopia and Amblyogenic Disorders
- •9.1.1 Early Detection of Amblyopia
- •9.1.2 Brückner’s Original Description
- •9.2.1 Physiology
- •9.2.2 Performance
- •9.2.3 Shortcomings and Pitfalls
- •9.3.1 Physiology
- •9.3.2 Performance
- •9.3.3 Possibilities and Limitations
- •9.4.1 Physiology
- •9.4.2 Performance
- •9.4.3 Possibilities and Limitations
- •9.5 Eye Movements with Alternating Illumination of the Pupils
- •References
- •10. Amblyopia Treatment 2009
- •10.1 Amblyopia Treatment 2009
- •10.1.1 Introduction
- •10.1.2 Epidemiology
- •10.1.3 Clinical Features of Amblyopia
- •10.1.4 Diagnosis of Amblyopia
- •10.1.5 Natural History
- •10.2 Amblyopia Management
- •10.2.1 Refractive Correction
- •10.2.2 Occlusion by Patching
- •10.2.3 Pharmacological Treatment with Atropine
- •10.2.4 Pharmacological Therapy Combined with a Plano Lens
- •10.3 Other Treatment Issues
- •10.3.1 Bilateral Refractive Amblyopia
- •10.3.3 Maintenance Therapy
- •10.4 Other Treatments
- •10.4.1 Filters
- •10.4.2 Levodopa/Carbidopa Adjunctive Therapy
- •10.5 Controversy
- •10.5.1 Optic Neuropathy Rather than Amblyopia
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.1.2 Sensory or Motor Etiology
- •11.1.4 History
- •11.1.5 Outcome Parameters
- •11.2 Outcome of Surgery in the ELISSS
- •11.2.1 Reasons for the ELISSS
- •11.2.2 Summarized Methods of the ELISSS
- •11.2.3 Summarized Results of the ELISSS
- •11.2.4 Binocular Vision at Age Six
- •11.2.5 Horizontal Angle of Strabismus at Age Six
- •11.2.6 Alignment is Associated with Binocular Vision
- •11.3 Number of Operations and Spontaneous Reduction into Microstrabismus Without Surgery
- •11.3.1 The Number of Operations Per Child and the Reoperation Rate in the ELISSS
- •11.3.2 Reported Reoperation Rates
- •11.3.3 Test-Retest Reliability Studies
- •11.3.6 Spontaneous Reduction of the Angle
- •11.3.7 Predictors of Spontaneous Reduction into Microstrabismus
- •Appendix
- •References
- •12.1 Overview
- •12.1.2 Manifest Latent Nystagmus (MLN)
- •12.1.2.1 Clinical Characteristics of Manifest Latent Nystagmus (MLN)
- •12.1.3 Congenital Periodic Alternating Nystagmus (PAN)
- •12.1.3.1 Clinical characteristics of congenital periodic alternating nystagmus
- •12.2 Compensatory Mechanisms
- •12.2.1 Dampening by Versions
- •12.2.2 Dampening by Vergence
- •12.2.3 Anomalous Head Posture (AHP)
- •12.2.3.4 Measurement of AHP
- •12.2.3.6 Testing AHP at Near
- •12.3 Treatment
- •12.3.1 Optical Treatment
- •12.3.1.1 Refractive Correction
- •12.3.1.2 Spectacles and Contact Lenses (CL)
- •12.3.1.3 Prisms
- •12.3.1.4 Low Visual Aids
- •12.3.2 Medication
- •12.3.3 Acupuncture
- •12.3.4 Biofeedback
- •12.3.6 Surgical Treatment of Congenital Nystagmus
- •12.3.6.1 Management of Horizontal AHP
- •12.3.6.2 Management of Vertical AHP
- •12.3.6.3 Management of Head Tilt
- •Retro-Equatorial Recession of Horizontal Rectus Muscles
- •The Tenotomy Procedure
- •References
- •13.1 Dissociated Deviations
- •13.2 Surgical Alternatives to Treat Patients with DVD
- •13.2.1 Symmetric DVD with Good Bilateral Visual Acuity, with No Oblique Muscles Dysfunction
- •13.2.2 Bilateral DVD with Deep Unilateral Amblyopia
- •13.2.3 DVD with Inferior Oblique Overaction (IOOA) and V Pattern
- •13.2.4 DVD with Superior Oblique Overaction (SOOA) and A Pattern
- •13.2.5 Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Surgeries for DVD
- •13.3 Dissociated Horizontal Deviation
- •13.4 Dissociated Torsional Deviation. Head tilts in patients with Dissociated Strabismus
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Clinical and Theoretical Investigations
- •References
- •15.1 General Principles of Surgical Treatment in Paralytic Strabismus
- •15.1.1 Aims of Treatment
- •15.1.2 Timing of Surgery
- •15.1.3 Preoperative Assessment
- •15.1.4 Methods of Surgical Treatment
- •15.2 Third Nerve Palsy
- •15.2.1 Complete Third Nerve Palsy
- •15.2.2 Incomplete Third Nerve Palsy
- •15.3 Fourth Nerve Palsy
- •15.4 Sixth Nerve Palsy
- •References
- •16.1 Graves Orbitopathy (GO): Pathogenesis and Clinical Signs
- •16.1.1 Graves Orbitopathy is Part of a Systemic Disease: Graves Disease (GD)
- •16.1.2 Graves Orbitopathy−Clinical Signs
- •16.1.2.1 Clinical Changes Result in Typical Symptoms
- •16.1.3 Clinical Examination of GO
- •16.1.3.1 Signs of Activity
- •16.1.3.2 Assessing Severity of GO
- •16.1.3.3 Imaging
- •16.2 Natural History
- •16.3 Treatment of GO
- •16.3.1.1 Glucocorticoid Treatment
- •16.3.1.2 Orbital Radiotherapy
- •16.3.1.3 Combined Therapy: Glucocorticoids and Orbital Radiotherapy
- •16.3.1.4 Other Immunosuppressive Treatments and New Developments
- •16.3.2 Inactive Disease Stages
- •16.3.2.1 Orbital Decompression
- •16.3.2.2 Extraocular Muscle Surgery
- •16.3.2.3 Lid Surgery
- •16.4 Thyroid Dysfunction and GO
- •16.5.1 Relationship Between Cigarette Smoking and Graves Orbitopathy
- •16.5.2 Genetic Susceptibility
- •16.6 Special Situations
- •16.6.1 Euthyroid GO
- •16.6.2 Childhood GO
- •16.6.3 GO and Diabetes
- •References
208 |
16 Modern Treatment Concepts in Graves Disease |
stimulated by patient IgG, several cytokines, and autologouslymphocytes.Stimulationbyautologouslymphocytes is antigen-dependent, as direct cell−cell contact, MHC class II, and CD40–CD154 signaling are necessary [3]. In
16 addition, orbital fibroblasts may di erentiate to preadipocytes, which are accompanied by an increase in TSHR expression [4]. Thus, the shared candidate autoantigen between thyroid and orbita is the TSHR.
Clinically, high serum levels of TSHR antibodies (TRAb) are associated with higher prevalence and increased severity of GO. However, presence of TRAb alone does not cause the complete symptom complex. Neonates of mothers with TRAb positive GD usually develop hyperthyroidism, which gradually dwindles as antibodies are cleared from the child’s body, yet only few develop eye signs (mainly proptosis). Immunization of mice against the TSHR does generate TRAb and hyperthyroidism but no associated orbital inflammation [5]. Thus, factors other than the presence of TRAb are probably involved in the development of GD. In GD, there is a strong genetic component [see Chap. 16.5.2] involving immunoregulatory and thyroid-specific genes [6].
In most patients, there is a close temporal relationship between the onset of hyperthyroidism and orbitopathy. Orbitopathy usually manifests within 6 months before or after the first clinical signs of hyperthyroidism. MRI images of patients who su er from hyperthyroidism but not from clinically overt orbitopathy reveal orbital manifestation in more than two-thirds of those patients [7]. The development of GO is a marker for a more severe course of GD and associated with significantly lower remission rates of hyperthyroidism [8]. However, GO can also occur many years after the onset of thyroid disease or − in rare cases − long before or even without overt thyroid disease [9]. In 75% of euthyroid GO patients, thyroid-specific antibodies can be detected as indicators of associated thyroid disease [10].About half of those patients will develop thyroid dysfunction within the following 18 months [11].
16.1.2Graves Orbitopathy−Clinical Signs
Graves Orbitopathy is typically characterized by the following clinical characteristics (Fig. 16.1) [12, 13]:
■Most frequent sign (in 90–98% of patients): upper lid retraction, often with lateral flare and lid lag on vertical downward pursuit, lagophthalmos (due to fibrosis of the levator palpebrae muscle)
■Other common signs: soft tissue signs, e.g., periorbital swelling and redness, conjunctival swelling and injection, prominent glabellar rhytids (due to inflammation)
■Proptosis (exophthalmos) with possible concomitant lower lid retraction (mainly due to increased adipogenesis, but also due to enlargement of extraocular muscles and inflammatory swelling)
■Ocular surface lesions (due to lagophthalmos, increased lid width, impaired Bell’s phenomenon, and reduced tear secretion and deteriorated composition)
■Restriction of ocular excursions – most often upgaze and abduction (due to fibrosis of inferior and medial rectus muscles)
■In rare cases (about 5%), dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) (due to apical crowding)
16.1.2.1Clinical Changes Result in Typical Symptoms
■Change of facial appearance
■Symptoms related to inflammation: painful, oppressive feeling on or behind the globe, pain of attempted up-, lateral, or downgaze
■Symptoms related to ocular surface irritation: gritty sensation, light sensitivity, excess tearing, and reduced visual acuity
■Symptoms related to restricted ocular motility: diplopia, abnormal head positure
■Symptoms related to DON: reduced visual acuity, restricted visual field, and desaturated color perception
16.1.3Clinical Examination of GO
Determining the phase of GO at each clinical assessment [14] is fundamental to the establishment of an appropriate management plan (Fig. 16.2). Immunomodulatory therapies can only be e ective in the presence of active inflammation. Certain surgical treatments, on the other hand, (orbital, lid, or strabism surgery) should only be performed when GO has been constantly inactive for at least 6 months.
16.1.3.1Signs of Activity
The active phase of the disease is the period when the patient is most likely to be symptomatic: gaze evoked or spontaneous grittiness, light sensitivity, and excessive orbital aching – gaze evoked or spontaneous. Patients notice change of severity over the previous 3 months. Classical signs of inflammation are used as surrogate markers to evaluate the degree of orbital inflammation:
16.1 |
Graves Orbitopathy (GO): Pathogenesis and Clinical Signs |
209 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
|
b |
|
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d |
|
e |
|
f |
|
|
|
|
|
g |
|
h |
|
i |
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 16.1 Patient examples of typical symptoms of GO: 1A–1C Patient with mild GO, the only sign is upper lid retraction at the right eye. 1D–1F Patient with typical impairment of motility: 1D the patients developed a vertical squint of 22° (+VD), the upgaze of the left eye with 0°, 1E the coronary MRI scans show the enlargement of the inferior rectus muscle of the left eye. The other muscles are almost normal. 1G–1I Patients with full picture of GO with DON: marked signs of soft tissue inflammation (conjunctival injection and chemosis, caruncle inflammation, redness and swelling of the lids), marked proptosis, severe impairment of ocular motility right and dysthyroid optic neuropathy both eyes. Enlargement of all extraocular muscles was seen in the coronary MRI apical crowding in the orbital apex and intracranial fat prolapse in the axial MRI
■Eyelid redness
■Conjunctival injection
■Chemosis (conjunctival edema)
■Eyelid swelling
■Inflammation of caruncle or plica
All features of soft tissue inflammation can be assessed by comparison with standard patient photographs available at www.eugogo.eu. Studies show that reproducibility of patient assessment can be improved by the use of this atlas and careful methodology (interobserver agreement − 86%). Photographic documentation is a reliable method for assessing soft tissue signs for follow-up. Signs of activity are summarized in the clinical activity score (CAS) (maximal seven points at the first visit and maximal ten points at follow-up) (Table 16.1) [16]. Using a cut-o of at least four (first visit three), the positive predictive value
was 80% in estimating the response to immunomodulation. Patients with disease duration of more than 18 months are less likely to respond to immunomodulation. A-mode ultrasound, T2 weighted or STIR sequence MRI images, and serum or urine levels of a number of inflammatory markers including IL-6, and urine GAG excretion provide only little additional benefit in predicting the response to anti-inflammatory therapy [17].
16.1.3.2Assessing Severity of GO
The following features are quantified to assess severity:
■Lid fissure width (distance between the lid margins in mm with the patient in primary position; sitting, relaxed, with distant fixation)
■Swelling of the eyelids (absent/moderate/severe)
210 |
16 Modern Treatment Concepts in Graves Disease |
All patients with GO
•Restore euthyroidism
•Urge smoking withdrawal
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
• Refer to specialist centers, except for the mildest cases |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
• Local measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mild |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderate to severe |
|
|
|
Sight-threatening (DON) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i.v. GCs |
|||
Local measures |
|
|
|
Active |
|
Inactive |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Progression |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
wait and see |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poor response (2 weeks) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stable and |
|
|
|
i.v. GCS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prompt decompression |
|||||||||||||
|
inactive |
|
|
|
(± OR) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still active |
Stable and inactive |
||||||
Rehabilitative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
Stable and |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Rehabilitative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
surgery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
inactive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
(if needed) |
|
|
|
|
surgery |
i.v. GCs |
|
Rehabilitative |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(± OR) |
|
|
surgery |
||||
Fig. 16.2 Management of Graves’ orbitopathy. Anti-inflammatory therapy in the active phase includes: intravenous glucocorticoids (i.v. GCs) and orbital radiotherapy (OR); Rehabilitative surgery includes orbital decompression, squint surgery, lid lengthening, and blepharoplasty/browplasty. Sight threatening GO (with dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) demands rapid decompression in case of poor response to i.v. GCs within 2 weeks. For the definitions of GO severity and activity, see Chap. 16.1.3
■Redness of the eyelids (absent/present)
■Conjunctival injection (absent/present)
■Conjunctival chemosis (absent/present)
■Inflammation of the caruncle or plica (absent, present)
■Exophthalmos (measured in mm using the same Hertel exophthalmometer and same intercanthal distance for an individual patient)
■Subjective diplopia score (0 no diplopia; 1 intermittent, i.e., diplopia in primary position of gaze, when tired or when first awakening; 2 inconstant, i.e., diplopia at extremes of gaze; 3 constant, i.e., continuous diplopia in primary or reading position)
■Eye muscle involvement (duction in degrees)
■Corneal involvement (absent/punctate lesions/corneal ulcer)
■Dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) (best-corrected visual acuity, color (de-) saturation, optic disk, relative a erent pupillary defect (absent/present), visual fields, visually evoked potentials)
Examination of lid fissure width should be performed with the head in a stationary position and under fixation.
If vertical strabism is present, the contralateral eye should be occluded. To evaluate upper and lower lid retraction, eyelid position is measured in relation to the respective limbus.
Proptosis is usually measured with an exophthalmometer. Numerous di erent makes are available with di erent scales, so for each patient the same exophthalmometer with identical intercanthal distance should always be used for follow-up. Proptosis is defined as a reading 2 mm greater than the upper normal limit for that patient’s age, gender, and “race.” More important, however, is the measured change during follow-up.
There are numerous ways of assessing extraocular muscles. Subjective diplopia scores are simple but only of limited help, since significant changes in limitation of motility may go unnoticed, when bilateral symmetrical reduction of upgaze results in no noticeable double vision. The measurement of monocular excursions is a more exact way to assess restricted excursions of each eye separately. Excursions are best measured using a bowl or arc perimeter, but so-called “Kestenbaum glasses” or the position of light reflexes may be used as well. Normal
16.1 Graves Orbitopathy (GO): Pathogenesis and Clinical Signs |
211 |
Table 16.1. Clinical activity score (CAS), maximal 7 points at the first visit and maximal 10 points at follow-up, active disease CAS ≥4 (three first visits)
Clinical activity score CAS (one point is given for each feature)
Subjective signs of activity |
|
Painful, oppressive feeling on |
1 |
or behind the globe |
|
Pain of attempted up-, side-, |
1 |
or downgaze |
|
Objective signs of activity |
|
Redness of the eyelids |
1 |
Redness of the conjunctiva |
1 |
Chemosis |
1 |
Inflammatory eyelid swelling |
1 |
Inflammation of the caruncle |
1 |
or plica |
|
Sum score (at first consultation no |
Maximal 7 |
evaluation of progression possible) |
|
Signs of progression |
|
Increase of 2 mm or more in |
1 |
proptosis in the last 1–3 months |
|
Decrease in eye movements of 5° |
1 |
or more in the last 1–3 months |
|
Decrease in visual acuity in the |
1 |
last 1–3 months |
|
Sum score |
Maximal 10 |
very large muscles in the orbital apex, fat herniation through the superior orbital fissure, and tense ballottement of the globe and venous stasis. DON is insidious as its onset is rarely obvious and visual acuity is long preserved. Color vision disturbances are present in most patients. Only 30–40% of the patients present with swelling of the optic disc. Visual field defects are most commonly paracentral or inferior. VEP amplitudes are reduced and latency periods can be delayed [14].
Severity can be scored using the NOSPECS classification, which provides in its slightly modified version a maximal score of 14 (Table 16.3) for patients with all manifestations of GO in its most active stage [19].
16.1.3.3Imaging
Orbital imaging can be necessary for di erential diagnosis as well as, in special situations, to facilitate treatment decisions.If the patient presents with asymmetrical symptoms (usually unilateral proptosis), inflammatory orbital disease of nonthyroidal etiology or orbital tumors have to be ruled out. Orbital imaging is necessary for all clinical treatment decisions in Dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Signal intensity in T2-weighted MRI scans corresponds to inflammatory edema and can be used to ease treatment decisions in di cult clinical situations. Orbital ultrasound is only informative if performed and evaluated by experienced clinicians [20].
values are given in Table 16.2. The prism cover test (separate measurement of the squint angles in primary position for far and near distances) and the field of binocular single vision are used to fit corrective prisms and to plan squint surgery.
Of outstanding importance is the evaluation of the corneal surface. This requires slit lamp examination to detect punctate fluoresceine staining or ulceration; the latter constitutes an ophthalmologic emergency.
There is no single test that proves DON. DON occurs bilateral in 70% of the patients. Anatomical indicators are
Table 16.2. Normal values for monocular excursions (after Mourits et al. [18])
Direction of gaze |
Monocular excursion (°) |
Abduction |
46 |
Upgaze 90° |
34 |
Adduction |
47 |
Downgaze 270° |
58 |
16.1.4Classification of GO
Members of EUGOGO recommend to classify patients according to activity (active disease CAS ≥ 4, inactive disease CAS < 4) and according to severity to manage patients with GO [21].
Severity classification:
1.Sight-threatening GO: Patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) or corneal breakdown. This category warrants immediate intervention.
2.Moderate-to-severe GO: Patients without sight-threat- ening GO whose eye disease has su cient impact on daily life to justify the risks of immunosuppression (if active) or surgical intervention (if inactive). Patients with moderate-to-severe GO usually present with one or more of the following: lid retraction >2 mm, moderate or severe soft tissue involvement, exophthalmos >3 mm above normal for “race” and gender, intermittent, or constant diplopia.
