- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contributors
- •Contents
- •1. Epidemiology of Pediatric Strabismus
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Forms of Pediatric Strabismus
- •1.2.1 Esodeviations
- •1.2.1.1 Congenital Esotropia
- •1.2.1.2 Accommodative Esotropia
- •1.2.1.3 Acquired Nonaccommodative Esotropia
- •1.2.1.4 Abnormal Central Nervous System Esotropia
- •1.2.1.5 Sensory Esotropia
- •1.2.2 Exodeviations
- •1.2.2.1 Intermittent Exotropia
- •1.2.2.2 Congenital Exotropia
- •1.2.2.4 Abnormal Central Nervous System Exotropia
- •1.2.2.5 Sensory Exotropia
- •1.2.3 Hyperdeviations
- •1.3 Strabismus and Associated Conditions
- •1.4.1 Changes in Strabismus Prevalence
- •1.4.2 Changes in Strabismus Surgery Rates
- •1.5 Worldwide Incidence and Prevalence of Childhood Strabismus
- •1.6 Incidence of Adult Strabismus
- •References
- •2.1 Binocular Alignment System
- •2.1.2 Vergence Adaptation
- •2.1.3 Muscle Length Adaptation
- •2.2 Modeling the Binocular Alignment Control System
- •2.2.1 Breakdown of the Binocular Alignment Control System
- •2.2.4 Changes in Basic Muscle Length
- •2.2.6 Evidence Against the “Final Common Pathway”
- •2.3 Changes in Strabismus
- •2.3.1 Diagnostic Occlusion: And the Hazard of Prolonged Occlusion
- •2.3.2.1 Supporting Evidence for Bilateral Feedback Control of Muscle Lengths
- •2.4 Applications of Bilateral Feedback Control to Clinical Practice and to Future Research
- •References
- •3.1 Dissociated Eye Movements
- •3.2 Tonus and its relationship to infantile esotropia
- •3.5 Pathogenetic Role of Dissociated Eye Movements in Infantile Esotropia
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2.1 Binocular Correspondence: Anomalous, Normal, or Both?
- •4.3 MFS with Manifest Strabismus
- •4.3.1 Esotropia is the Most Common Form of MFS
- •4.3.2 Esotropia Allows for Better Binocular Vision
- •4.3.3 Esotropia is the Most Stable Form
- •4.4 Repairing and Producing MFS
- •4.4.1 Animal Models for the Study of MFS
- •References
- •5.1 Esotropia as the Major Type of Developmental Strabismus
- •5.1.2 Early Cerebral Damage as the Major Risk Factor
- •5.1.3 Cytotoxic Insults to Cerebral Fibers
- •5.1.5 Development of Binocular Visuomotor Behavior in Normal Infants
- •5.1.6 Development of Sensorial Fusion and Stereopsis
- •5.1.7 Development of Fusional Vergence and an Innate Convergence Bias
- •5.1.8 Development of Motion Sensitivity and Conjugate Eye Tracking (Pursuit/OKN)
- •5.1.9 Development and Maldevelopment of Cortical Binocular Connections
- •5.1.10 Binocular Connections Join Monocular Compartments Within Area V1 (Striate Cortex)
- •5.1.11 Too Few Cortical Binocular Connections in Strabismic Primate
- •5.1.12 Projections from Striate Cortex (Area V1) to Extrastriate Cortex (Areas MT/MST)
- •5.1.15 Persistent Nasalward Visuomotor Biases in Strabismic Primate
- •5.1.16 Repair of Strabismic Human Infants: The Historical Controversy
- •5.1.18 Timely Restoraion of Correlated Binocular Input: The Key to Repair
- •References
- •6. Neuroanatomical Strabismus
- •6.1 General Etiologies of Strabismus
- •6.2 Extraocular Myopathy
- •6.2.1 Primary EOM Myopathy
- •6.2.2 Immune Myopathy
- •6.2.4 Neoplastic Myositis
- •6.2.5 Traumatic Myopathy
- •6.3 Congenital Pulley Heterotopy
- •6.4 Acquired Pulley Heterotopy
- •6.5 “Divergence Paralysis” Esotropia
- •6.5.1 Vertical Strabismus Due to Sagging Eye Syndrome
- •6.5.2 Postsurgical and Traumatic Pulley Heterotopy
- •6.5.3 Axial High Myopia
- •6.6 Congenital Peripheral Neuropathy: The Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders (CCDDs)
- •6.6.1 Congenital Oculomotor (CN3) Palsy
- •6.6.3 Congenital Trochlear (CN4) Palsy
- •6.6.4 Duane’s Retraction Syndrome (DRS)
- •6.6.5 Moebius Syndrome
- •6.7 Acquired Motor Neuropathy
- •6.7.1 Oculomotor Palsy
- •6.7.2 Trochlear Palsy
- •6.7.3 Abducens Palsy
- •6.7.4 Inferior Oblique (IO) Palsy
- •6.8 Central Abnormalities of Vergence and Gaze
- •6.8.1 Developmental Esotropia and Exotropia
- •6.8.2 Cerebellar Disease
- •6.8.3 Horizontal Gaze Palsy and Progressive Scoliosis
- •References
- •7.1 Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders: Facts About Ocular Motility Disorders
- •7.1.1 The Concept of CCDDs: Ocular Motility Disorders as Neurodevelopmental Defects
- •7.1.1.1 Brainstem and Cranial Nerve Development
- •7.1.1.2 Single Disorders Representing CCDDs
- •7.1.1.3 Disorders Understood as CCDDs
- •7.2 Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders: Perspectives to Understand Ocular Motility Disorders
- •7.2.1.1 Brown Syndrome
- •Motility Findings
- •Saccadic Eye Movements
- •Comorbidity
- •Epidemiologic Features
- •Laterality
- •Sex Distribution
- •Incidence
- •Heredity
- •Potential Induction of the Syndrome
- •Radiologic Findings
- •Natural Course in Brown Syndrome
- •Intra-and Postoperative Findings
- •References
- •8.1 Amblyopia
- •8.2 What Is Screening?
- •8.2.1 Screening for Amblyopia, Strabismus, and/or Refractive Errors
- •8.2.1.1 Screening for Amblyopia
- •8.2.1.2 Screening for Strabismus
- •8.2.1.3 Screening for Refractive Error
- •8.2.1.4 Screening for Other Ocular Conditions
- •8.3 Screening Tests for Amblyopia, Strabismus, and/or Refractive Error
- •8.3.1 Vision Tests
- •8.3.3 Stereoacuity
- •8.3.4 Photoscreening and/or Autorefraction
- •8.3.6 Who Should Administer the Screening Program?
- •8.4 Treatment of Amblyopia
- •8.4.1 Type of Treatment
- •8.4.2 Refractive Adaptation
- •8.4.3 Conventional Occlusion
- •8.4.4 Pharmacological Occlusion
- •8.4.5 Optical Penalization
- •8.4.7 Treatment Compliance
- •8.4.8 Other Treatment Options for Amblyopia
- •8.4.9 Recurrence of Amblyopia Following Therapy
- •8.5 Quality of Life
- •8.5.1 The Impact of Amblyopia Upon HRQoL
- •8.5.3 Reading Speed and Reading Ability in Children with Amblyopia
- •8.5.4 Impact of Amblyopia Upon Education
- •8.5.6 The Impact of Strabismus Upon HRQoL
- •8.5.7 Critique of HRQoL Issues in Amblyopia
- •8.5.8 The Impact of the Condition or the Impact of Treatment?
- •References
- •9. The Brückner Test Revisited
- •9.1 Amblyopia and Amblyogenic Disorders
- •9.1.1 Early Detection of Amblyopia
- •9.1.2 Brückner’s Original Description
- •9.2.1 Physiology
- •9.2.2 Performance
- •9.2.3 Shortcomings and Pitfalls
- •9.3.1 Physiology
- •9.3.2 Performance
- •9.3.3 Possibilities and Limitations
- •9.4.1 Physiology
- •9.4.2 Performance
- •9.4.3 Possibilities and Limitations
- •9.5 Eye Movements with Alternating Illumination of the Pupils
- •References
- •10. Amblyopia Treatment 2009
- •10.1 Amblyopia Treatment 2009
- •10.1.1 Introduction
- •10.1.2 Epidemiology
- •10.1.3 Clinical Features of Amblyopia
- •10.1.4 Diagnosis of Amblyopia
- •10.1.5 Natural History
- •10.2 Amblyopia Management
- •10.2.1 Refractive Correction
- •10.2.2 Occlusion by Patching
- •10.2.3 Pharmacological Treatment with Atropine
- •10.2.4 Pharmacological Therapy Combined with a Plano Lens
- •10.3 Other Treatment Issues
- •10.3.1 Bilateral Refractive Amblyopia
- •10.3.3 Maintenance Therapy
- •10.4 Other Treatments
- •10.4.1 Filters
- •10.4.2 Levodopa/Carbidopa Adjunctive Therapy
- •10.5 Controversy
- •10.5.1 Optic Neuropathy Rather than Amblyopia
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.1.2 Sensory or Motor Etiology
- •11.1.4 History
- •11.1.5 Outcome Parameters
- •11.2 Outcome of Surgery in the ELISSS
- •11.2.1 Reasons for the ELISSS
- •11.2.2 Summarized Methods of the ELISSS
- •11.2.3 Summarized Results of the ELISSS
- •11.2.4 Binocular Vision at Age Six
- •11.2.5 Horizontal Angle of Strabismus at Age Six
- •11.2.6 Alignment is Associated with Binocular Vision
- •11.3 Number of Operations and Spontaneous Reduction into Microstrabismus Without Surgery
- •11.3.1 The Number of Operations Per Child and the Reoperation Rate in the ELISSS
- •11.3.2 Reported Reoperation Rates
- •11.3.3 Test-Retest Reliability Studies
- •11.3.6 Spontaneous Reduction of the Angle
- •11.3.7 Predictors of Spontaneous Reduction into Microstrabismus
- •Appendix
- •References
- •12.1 Overview
- •12.1.2 Manifest Latent Nystagmus (MLN)
- •12.1.2.1 Clinical Characteristics of Manifest Latent Nystagmus (MLN)
- •12.1.3 Congenital Periodic Alternating Nystagmus (PAN)
- •12.1.3.1 Clinical characteristics of congenital periodic alternating nystagmus
- •12.2 Compensatory Mechanisms
- •12.2.1 Dampening by Versions
- •12.2.2 Dampening by Vergence
- •12.2.3 Anomalous Head Posture (AHP)
- •12.2.3.4 Measurement of AHP
- •12.2.3.6 Testing AHP at Near
- •12.3 Treatment
- •12.3.1 Optical Treatment
- •12.3.1.1 Refractive Correction
- •12.3.1.2 Spectacles and Contact Lenses (CL)
- •12.3.1.3 Prisms
- •12.3.1.4 Low Visual Aids
- •12.3.2 Medication
- •12.3.3 Acupuncture
- •12.3.4 Biofeedback
- •12.3.6 Surgical Treatment of Congenital Nystagmus
- •12.3.6.1 Management of Horizontal AHP
- •12.3.6.2 Management of Vertical AHP
- •12.3.6.3 Management of Head Tilt
- •Retro-Equatorial Recession of Horizontal Rectus Muscles
- •The Tenotomy Procedure
- •References
- •13.1 Dissociated Deviations
- •13.2 Surgical Alternatives to Treat Patients with DVD
- •13.2.1 Symmetric DVD with Good Bilateral Visual Acuity, with No Oblique Muscles Dysfunction
- •13.2.2 Bilateral DVD with Deep Unilateral Amblyopia
- •13.2.3 DVD with Inferior Oblique Overaction (IOOA) and V Pattern
- •13.2.4 DVD with Superior Oblique Overaction (SOOA) and A Pattern
- •13.2.5 Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Surgeries for DVD
- •13.3 Dissociated Horizontal Deviation
- •13.4 Dissociated Torsional Deviation. Head tilts in patients with Dissociated Strabismus
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Clinical and Theoretical Investigations
- •References
- •15.1 General Principles of Surgical Treatment in Paralytic Strabismus
- •15.1.1 Aims of Treatment
- •15.1.2 Timing of Surgery
- •15.1.3 Preoperative Assessment
- •15.1.4 Methods of Surgical Treatment
- •15.2 Third Nerve Palsy
- •15.2.1 Complete Third Nerve Palsy
- •15.2.2 Incomplete Third Nerve Palsy
- •15.3 Fourth Nerve Palsy
- •15.4 Sixth Nerve Palsy
- •References
- •16.1 Graves Orbitopathy (GO): Pathogenesis and Clinical Signs
- •16.1.1 Graves Orbitopathy is Part of a Systemic Disease: Graves Disease (GD)
- •16.1.2 Graves Orbitopathy−Clinical Signs
- •16.1.2.1 Clinical Changes Result in Typical Symptoms
- •16.1.3 Clinical Examination of GO
- •16.1.3.1 Signs of Activity
- •16.1.3.2 Assessing Severity of GO
- •16.1.3.3 Imaging
- •16.2 Natural History
- •16.3 Treatment of GO
- •16.3.1.1 Glucocorticoid Treatment
- •16.3.1.2 Orbital Radiotherapy
- •16.3.1.3 Combined Therapy: Glucocorticoids and Orbital Radiotherapy
- •16.3.1.4 Other Immunosuppressive Treatments and New Developments
- •16.3.2 Inactive Disease Stages
- •16.3.2.1 Orbital Decompression
- •16.3.2.2 Extraocular Muscle Surgery
- •16.3.2.3 Lid Surgery
- •16.4 Thyroid Dysfunction and GO
- •16.5.1 Relationship Between Cigarette Smoking and Graves Orbitopathy
- •16.5.2 Genetic Susceptibility
- •16.6 Special Situations
- •16.6.1 Euthyroid GO
- •16.6.2 Childhood GO
- •16.6.3 GO and Diabetes
- •References
72 |
6 Neuroanatomical Strabismus |
Fig. 6.9 Orbital T2-weighted MRI in chronic left abducens palsy. Axial view above shows thinning and lateral inflection of palsied LR
6 muscle, which in coronal view below is seen to have reduced cross-section
muscle, entering the IO in the EOM’s posterior surface relatively superficially in the orbit when compared with innervation to the other EOMs. Isolated acquired neuropathic IO palsy is thus anatomically possible. When it occurs, IO palsy is associated with denervation atrophy of the IO belly [78].
6.8Central Abnormalities of Vergence and Gaze
Several common causes of strabismus are not associated with abnormalities of the EOMs, motor nerves, or orbital connective tissues. The forms of strabismus arise from abnormalities in the central nervous system, some of which are structural lesions that may be imaged.
Summary for the Clinician
■Developmental esotropia and exotropia are not associated with structural abnormalities in the orbit.
6.8.1Developmental Esotropia and Exotropia
Human infantile and accommodative esotropia are not known to be associated with anatomic abnormalities in the orbit. Naturally and artificially esotropic and exotropic monkeys also exhibit latent nystagmus and other features typical of human childhood strabismus, but these monkeys have normal horizontal EOM structure, normal EOM locations, and normal intraorbital EOM innervation [79]. However, strabismic monkeys have microscopic evidence of abnormalities in visual cortical area V1 [80], and most likely also other visual cortical areas.
6.8.2Cerebellar Disease
The cerebellum contributed toward binocular alignment [81]. Hereditary cerebellar degeneration is often associated with convergence insu ciency, and in advanced cases often produces cerebellar atrophy [82]. Cerebellar or brainstem tumors may be associated with acute onset of concomitant esotropia in children [83]. Acquired cerebellar damage, such as by infarction, may produce skew deviation other strabismus.
6.8.3Horizontal Gaze Palsy and Progressive Scoliosis
Horizontal gaze palsy and progressive scoliosis is a recessive disorder of axon path finding in the central nervous system. Patients have essentially complete horizontal ophthalmoplegia despite intact EOMs and peripheral motor innervation to them, but MRI demonstrates dysplasia of the hindbrain suggestive of a sagittal fissure interrupting decussating white matter tracts [84].
References
1.Ortube MC, Bhola R, Demer JL (2006) Orbital magnetic resonance imaging of extraocular muscles in chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia: Specific diagnostic findings. J AAPOS 10:414–418
2.Biousse V, Newman NJ (2001) Neuro-ophthalmology of mitochondrial diseases. Semin Neurol 3:275–291
3.Vilarinho L, Santorelli FM, Cardoso ML, et al (1998) MitochondrialDNAanalysisinocularmyopathy.Observations in 29 portuguese patients. Euro Neurol 39: 148–153
4.Kuriyan AE, Phipps RP, Feldon SE (2008) The eye and thyroid disease. Cur Opin Ophthalmol 19:499–506
References 73
5.Wolf AB, Yang MB, Archer SM (2007) Postoperative myositis in reoperated extraocular muscles. J AAPOS 11: 373–376
6.Capone AJ, Slamovits TL (1990) Discrete metastasis of solid tumors to extraocular muscles. Arch Ophthalmol 108:237–243
7.Demer JL (2003) A 12 year, prospective study of extraocular muscle imaging in complex strabismus. J AAPOS 6:337–347
8.Koornneef L (1982) Current concepts on the management of orbital blow-out fractures. Ann Plast Surg 9:185–200
9.Wojno TH (1987) The incidence of extraoular muscle and cranial nerve palsy in orbital floor blow-out fractures. Ophthalmol 94:682–687
10.Ortube MC, Rosenbaum AL, Goldberg RA, et al (2004) Orbital imaging demonstrates occult blow out fracture in complex strabismus. J AAPOS 8:264–273
11.Tse R, Allen L, Matic D (2007) The white-eyed medial blowout fracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:277–286
12.Demer JL (2004) Pivotal role of orbital connective tissues in binocular alignment and strabismus. The Friedenwald lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:729–738
13.Demer JL (2006) Current concepts of mechanical and neural factors in ocular motility. Cur Opin Neurol 19:4–13
14.Demer JL (2006) Ocular motility in a time of revolutionary paradigm shift. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
15.Kono R, Poukens V, Demer JL (2002) Quantitative analysis of the structure of the human extraocular muscle pulley system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2923–2932
16.Clark RA, Miller JM, Rosenbaum AL, et al (1998) Heterotopic muscle pulleys or oblique muscle dysfunction? J AAPOS 2:17–25
17.Miller JM, Demer JL Biomechanical modeling in strabismus surgery. In: Rosenbaum AL, Santiago P (eds) (1999) Clinical strabismus management: principles and techniques. Mosby, St. Louis
18.Clark RA, Miller JM, Demer JL (1997) Location and stability of rectus muscle pulleys inferred from muscle paths. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:227–240
19.Miller JM (2007) Understanding and misunderstanding extraocular muscle pulleys. J Vision 7:1–15
20.Miller JM, Pavlovski DS, Shaemeva I (1999). Orbit 1.8 gaze mechanics simulation. Eidactics, San Francisco
21.Clark RA, Miller JM, Demer JL (1998) Displacement of the medial rectus pulley in superior oblique palsy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:207–212
22.Demer JL, Clark RA, Miller JM (1999) Heterotopy of extraocular muscle pulleys causes incomitant strabismus. In: Lennerstrand G (ed) Advances in strabismology. Aeolus, Buren, The Netherlands
23.Velez FG, Clark RA, Demer JL (2000) Facial asymmetry in superior oblique palsy and pulley heterotopy. J AAPOS 4:233–239
24.Demer JL, Oh SY, Clark RA, et al (2003) Evidence for a pulley of the inferior oblique muscle. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:3856–3865
25.Rutar T, Demer JL (2009) “Heavy eye syndrome” in the absence of high myopia: A connective tissue degeneration in elderly strabismic patients. J AAPOS 13(1):36–44
26.Clark RA, Demer JL (2002) E ect of aging on human rectus extraocular muscle paths demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Ophthalmol 134:872–878
27.Lim L, Rosenbaum AL, Demer JL (1995) Saccadic velocity analysis in patients with digergence paralysis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 32:76–81
28.Clark RA, Isenberg SJ (2001) The range of ocular movements decreases with aging. J AAPOS 5:26–30
29.Krzizok TH, Schroeder BU (1999) Measurement of recti eye muscle paths by magnetic resonance imaging in highly myopic and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2554–2560
30.Kowal L, Troski M, Gilford E (1994) MRI in the heavy eye phenomenon. Aust N Zeal J Ophthalmol 22:125–126
31.Ward DM (1956) The heavy eye phenomenon. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 87:717–726
32.Demer JL, von Noorden GK (1989) High myopia as an unusual cause of restrictive motility disturbance. Surv Ophthalmol 33:281–284
33.Wu J, Isenberg S, DJ L (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates neuropathology in congenital inferior division oculomotor palsy. J AAPOS 10:473–475
34.Engle EC, Goumnerov BC, McKeown CA, et al (1997) Oculomotor nerve and muscle abnormalities in congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles. Ann Neurol 41:314–325
35.Apt L, Axelrod N (1978) Generalized fibrosis of the extraocular muscles. Am J Ophthalmol 85:822–829
36.Brodsky MC, Pollock SC, Buckley EG (1989) Neural misdirection in congenital ocular fibrosis syndrome: Implications and pathogenesis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 26:159–161
37.Harley RD, Rodrigues MM, Crawford JS (1978) Congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles. Trans Am Ophtlalmol Soc 76:197–226
38.Demer JL, Clark RA, Engle EC (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging evidence for widespread orbital dysinnervation in congenital fibrosis of extraocular muscles due to mutations in KIF21A. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:530–539
39.Brodsky MC (1998) Hereditary external ophthalmoplegia, synergistic divergence, jaw winking, and oculocutaneous hypopigmentation. Ophthalmology 105:717–725
40.Yamada K, Andrews C, Chan W-M, et al (2003) Heterozygous mutations of the kinesin KIF21A in congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles type 1 (CFEOM1). Nat Genet 35:318–321
74 |
6 Neuroanatomical Strabismus |
41.Demer JL, Clark RA, Engle EC (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging evidence of an asymmetrical endophenotype in congenital fibrosis of extraocular muscles type 3. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (in preparation)
642. Clark RA, Engle EC, Demer JL (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the endophenotype of congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles type 3 (CFEOM3). Abstracts of 35th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. J Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthmol Strabismus 13(1):e13
43.Duane A (1905) Congenital deficiency of abduction associated with impairment of adduction, retraction movements, contraction of the palpebral fissure and oblique movements of the eye. Arch Ophthalmol 34:133–159
44.Huber A (1974) Electrophysiology of the retraction syndromes. Br J Ophthalmol 58:293–300
45.Strachan IM, Brown BH (1972) Electromyography of extraocular muscles in Duane’s syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 56:594–599
46.Miller NR, Kiel SM, Green WR, et al (1982) Unilateral Duane’s retraction syndrome (type 1). Arch Ophthalmol 100:1468–1472
47.Hotchkiss MG, Miller NR, Clark AW, et al (1980) Bilateral Duane’s retraction syndrome. A clinical-pathologic case report. Archives of Ophthalmology 98:870–874
48.Parsa CF, Grant E, Dillon WP, et al (1998) Absence of the abducens nerve in Duane syndrome verified by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Ophthalmol 125:399–401
49.Ozkurt H, Basak M, Oral Y, et al (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging in Duane’s retraction syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 40:19–22
50.Kim JH, Hwang J-M (2005) Hypoplastic oculomotor nerve and absent abducens nerve in congenital fibrosis syndrome and synergistic divergence with magnetic resonance imaging. Ophthalmology 112:728–732
51.Kim JH, Hwang JM (2005) Presence of abducens nerve according to the type of Duane’s retraction syndrome. Ophthalmology 112:109–113
52.DeRespinis PA,Caputo AR,Wagner RS,et al (1993) Duane’s Retraction Syndrome. Surv Ophthalmol 38:257–288
53.Demer JL, Clark RA, Lim KH, et al (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging evidence for widespread orbital dysinnervation in dominant Duane’s retraction syndrome linked to the DURS2 locus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:194–202
54.Kumar D (1990) Moebius syndrome. J Med Genet 27: 122–126
55.MacDermot KD, Winter RM, Taylor D, et al (1991) Oculofacialbulbar palsy in mother and son: review of 26 reports of familial transmission within the ‘Mobius spectrum of defects’. J Med Genet 28:18–26
56.Verzijl HT, van der Zwaag B, Cruysberg JR, et al (2003) Mobius syndrome redefined: a syndrome of rhombencephalic maldevelopment. Neurology 61:327–333
57.Bielschowsky A (1939) Lectures on motor anomalies. XI. Etiology, prognosis, and treatment of ocular paralyses. Am J Ophthalmol 22:723–734
58.von Noorden GK, Murray E, Wong SY (1986) Superior oblique paralysis. A review of 270 cases. Arch Ophthalmol 104:1771–1776
59.Adler FE (1946) Physiologic factors in di erential diagnosis of paralysis of superior rectus and superior oblique muscles. Arch Ophthalmol 36:661–673
60.Scott WE, Kraft SP (1986) Classification and treatment of superior oblique palsies: II. Bilateral superior oblique palsies. In: Caldwell D (ed) Pediaric ophthalmology and strabismus: transactions of the New Orleans academy of ophthalmology. Raven, New York
61.Straumann D, Ste en H, Landau K, et al (2003) Primary position and Listing’s law in acquired and congenital trochlear nerve palsy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:4282–4292
62.Kushner BJ (2004) Ocular torsion: Rotations around the “WHY” axis. J AAPOS 8:1–12
63.Kushner BJ (1988) The diagnosis and treatment of bilateral masked superior oblique palsy. Am J Ophthalmol 105:186–194
64.Robinson DA (1985) Bielschowsky head-tilt test–II. Quantitative mechanics of the Bielschowsky head-tilt test. Vision Res 25:1983–1988
65.Chan TK, Demer JL (1999) Clinical features of congenital absence of the superior oblique muscle as demonstrated by orbital imaging. J AAPOS 3:143–150
66.Demer JL, Miller JM (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging of the functional anatomy of the superior oblique muscle. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:906–913
67.Kono R, Demer JL (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of the functional anatomy of the inferior oblique muscle in superior oblique palsy. Ophthalmology 110:1219–1229
68.Demer JL, Poukens V, Ying H, et al (2008) E ects of acute trochlear denervation on primate superior oblique (SO) muscle: di erential sparing of orbital layer. ARVO Abstracts: #4495
69.Demer JL, Miller MJ, Koo EY, et al (1995) True versus masquerading superior oblique palsies: muscle mechanisms revealed by magnetic resonance imaging. In: Lennerstrand G (ed) Update on strabismus and pediatric ophthalmology. CRC, Boca Raton (FL)
70.Kushner BJ (1987) Errors in the three-step test in the diagnosis of vertical strabismus. Ophthalmology 96:127–132
71.Brodsky ME (2003) Three dimensions of skew deviation. Br J Ophthalmol 87:1440–1441
72.Donahue SP, Lavin PJ, Hamed LM (1999) Tonic ocular tilt reaction simulating a superior oblique palsy: diagnostic confusion with the 3-step test. Arch Ophthalmol 117:347–352
73.Kono R, Okanobu H, Ohtsuki H, et al (2008) Displacement of the rectus muscle pulleys simulating superior oblique palsy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 52:36–43
74.Clark RA, Rosenbaum AL, Demer JL (1999) Magnetic
resonance imaging after surgical transposition defines the anteroposterior location of the rectus muscle pulleys. J AAPOS 3:9–14
75.Clark RA, Demer JL (2002) Rectus extraocular muscle pulley displacement after surgical transposition and posterior
fixation for treatment of paralytic strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol 133:119–128
76.Demer JL (2008) Inflection in inactive lateral rectus muscle: Evidence suggesting focal mechanical e ects of connective tissues. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:4858–4864
77.Clark RA, Demer JL (2008) Posterior inflection of weakened lateral rectus path: Connective tissue factors reduce response to lateral rectus recession. Am J Ophthalmol 147(1):127–133.e2
78.Ela-Dalman N,Velez FG, Demer JL, et al (2008) High resolution MRI demonstrates reduced inferior oblique muscle
References 75
size in isolated inferior oblique palsy. J AAPOS 12(6): 602–607
79.Narasimhan A, Tychsen LT, Poukens V, et al (2007) Horizontal rectus muscle anatomy in naturally and artificially strabismic monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:2576–2588
80.Tychsen L,Wong AM, Burkhalter A (2004) Paucity of horizontal connections for binocular vision in V1 of naturally strabismic macaques: Cytochrome oxidase compartment specificity. J Comp Neurol 474:261–275
81.Takagi M, Tamargo R, Zee DS (2003) Effects of lesions of the cerebellar oculomotor vermis on eye movements in primate: binocular control. Prog Brain Res 142: 19–33
82.Durig JS, Jen JC, Demer JL (2002) Ocular motility in genetically defined autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia. Am J Ophthalmol 133:718–721
83.Williams AS, Hoyt CS (1989) Acute comitant esotropia in children with brain tumors. Arch Ophthalmol 107: 376–378
84.Jen JC, Chan WM, Bosley TM, et al (2004) Mutations in a human ROBO gene disrupt hindbrain axon pathway crossing and morphogenesis. Science 304:1509–1513
