- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contributors
- •Contents
- •1. Epidemiology of Pediatric Strabismus
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Forms of Pediatric Strabismus
- •1.2.1 Esodeviations
- •1.2.1.1 Congenital Esotropia
- •1.2.1.2 Accommodative Esotropia
- •1.2.1.3 Acquired Nonaccommodative Esotropia
- •1.2.1.4 Abnormal Central Nervous System Esotropia
- •1.2.1.5 Sensory Esotropia
- •1.2.2 Exodeviations
- •1.2.2.1 Intermittent Exotropia
- •1.2.2.2 Congenital Exotropia
- •1.2.2.4 Abnormal Central Nervous System Exotropia
- •1.2.2.5 Sensory Exotropia
- •1.2.3 Hyperdeviations
- •1.3 Strabismus and Associated Conditions
- •1.4.1 Changes in Strabismus Prevalence
- •1.4.2 Changes in Strabismus Surgery Rates
- •1.5 Worldwide Incidence and Prevalence of Childhood Strabismus
- •1.6 Incidence of Adult Strabismus
- •References
- •2.1 Binocular Alignment System
- •2.1.2 Vergence Adaptation
- •2.1.3 Muscle Length Adaptation
- •2.2 Modeling the Binocular Alignment Control System
- •2.2.1 Breakdown of the Binocular Alignment Control System
- •2.2.4 Changes in Basic Muscle Length
- •2.2.6 Evidence Against the “Final Common Pathway”
- •2.3 Changes in Strabismus
- •2.3.1 Diagnostic Occlusion: And the Hazard of Prolonged Occlusion
- •2.3.2.1 Supporting Evidence for Bilateral Feedback Control of Muscle Lengths
- •2.4 Applications of Bilateral Feedback Control to Clinical Practice and to Future Research
- •References
- •3.1 Dissociated Eye Movements
- •3.2 Tonus and its relationship to infantile esotropia
- •3.5 Pathogenetic Role of Dissociated Eye Movements in Infantile Esotropia
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2.1 Binocular Correspondence: Anomalous, Normal, or Both?
- •4.3 MFS with Manifest Strabismus
- •4.3.1 Esotropia is the Most Common Form of MFS
- •4.3.2 Esotropia Allows for Better Binocular Vision
- •4.3.3 Esotropia is the Most Stable Form
- •4.4 Repairing and Producing MFS
- •4.4.1 Animal Models for the Study of MFS
- •References
- •5.1 Esotropia as the Major Type of Developmental Strabismus
- •5.1.2 Early Cerebral Damage as the Major Risk Factor
- •5.1.3 Cytotoxic Insults to Cerebral Fibers
- •5.1.5 Development of Binocular Visuomotor Behavior in Normal Infants
- •5.1.6 Development of Sensorial Fusion and Stereopsis
- •5.1.7 Development of Fusional Vergence and an Innate Convergence Bias
- •5.1.8 Development of Motion Sensitivity and Conjugate Eye Tracking (Pursuit/OKN)
- •5.1.9 Development and Maldevelopment of Cortical Binocular Connections
- •5.1.10 Binocular Connections Join Monocular Compartments Within Area V1 (Striate Cortex)
- •5.1.11 Too Few Cortical Binocular Connections in Strabismic Primate
- •5.1.12 Projections from Striate Cortex (Area V1) to Extrastriate Cortex (Areas MT/MST)
- •5.1.15 Persistent Nasalward Visuomotor Biases in Strabismic Primate
- •5.1.16 Repair of Strabismic Human Infants: The Historical Controversy
- •5.1.18 Timely Restoraion of Correlated Binocular Input: The Key to Repair
- •References
- •6. Neuroanatomical Strabismus
- •6.1 General Etiologies of Strabismus
- •6.2 Extraocular Myopathy
- •6.2.1 Primary EOM Myopathy
- •6.2.2 Immune Myopathy
- •6.2.4 Neoplastic Myositis
- •6.2.5 Traumatic Myopathy
- •6.3 Congenital Pulley Heterotopy
- •6.4 Acquired Pulley Heterotopy
- •6.5 “Divergence Paralysis” Esotropia
- •6.5.1 Vertical Strabismus Due to Sagging Eye Syndrome
- •6.5.2 Postsurgical and Traumatic Pulley Heterotopy
- •6.5.3 Axial High Myopia
- •6.6 Congenital Peripheral Neuropathy: The Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders (CCDDs)
- •6.6.1 Congenital Oculomotor (CN3) Palsy
- •6.6.3 Congenital Trochlear (CN4) Palsy
- •6.6.4 Duane’s Retraction Syndrome (DRS)
- •6.6.5 Moebius Syndrome
- •6.7 Acquired Motor Neuropathy
- •6.7.1 Oculomotor Palsy
- •6.7.2 Trochlear Palsy
- •6.7.3 Abducens Palsy
- •6.7.4 Inferior Oblique (IO) Palsy
- •6.8 Central Abnormalities of Vergence and Gaze
- •6.8.1 Developmental Esotropia and Exotropia
- •6.8.2 Cerebellar Disease
- •6.8.3 Horizontal Gaze Palsy and Progressive Scoliosis
- •References
- •7.1 Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders: Facts About Ocular Motility Disorders
- •7.1.1 The Concept of CCDDs: Ocular Motility Disorders as Neurodevelopmental Defects
- •7.1.1.1 Brainstem and Cranial Nerve Development
- •7.1.1.2 Single Disorders Representing CCDDs
- •7.1.1.3 Disorders Understood as CCDDs
- •7.2 Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders: Perspectives to Understand Ocular Motility Disorders
- •7.2.1.1 Brown Syndrome
- •Motility Findings
- •Saccadic Eye Movements
- •Comorbidity
- •Epidemiologic Features
- •Laterality
- •Sex Distribution
- •Incidence
- •Heredity
- •Potential Induction of the Syndrome
- •Radiologic Findings
- •Natural Course in Brown Syndrome
- •Intra-and Postoperative Findings
- •References
- •8.1 Amblyopia
- •8.2 What Is Screening?
- •8.2.1 Screening for Amblyopia, Strabismus, and/or Refractive Errors
- •8.2.1.1 Screening for Amblyopia
- •8.2.1.2 Screening for Strabismus
- •8.2.1.3 Screening for Refractive Error
- •8.2.1.4 Screening for Other Ocular Conditions
- •8.3 Screening Tests for Amblyopia, Strabismus, and/or Refractive Error
- •8.3.1 Vision Tests
- •8.3.3 Stereoacuity
- •8.3.4 Photoscreening and/or Autorefraction
- •8.3.6 Who Should Administer the Screening Program?
- •8.4 Treatment of Amblyopia
- •8.4.1 Type of Treatment
- •8.4.2 Refractive Adaptation
- •8.4.3 Conventional Occlusion
- •8.4.4 Pharmacological Occlusion
- •8.4.5 Optical Penalization
- •8.4.7 Treatment Compliance
- •8.4.8 Other Treatment Options for Amblyopia
- •8.4.9 Recurrence of Amblyopia Following Therapy
- •8.5 Quality of Life
- •8.5.1 The Impact of Amblyopia Upon HRQoL
- •8.5.3 Reading Speed and Reading Ability in Children with Amblyopia
- •8.5.4 Impact of Amblyopia Upon Education
- •8.5.6 The Impact of Strabismus Upon HRQoL
- •8.5.7 Critique of HRQoL Issues in Amblyopia
- •8.5.8 The Impact of the Condition or the Impact of Treatment?
- •References
- •9. The Brückner Test Revisited
- •9.1 Amblyopia and Amblyogenic Disorders
- •9.1.1 Early Detection of Amblyopia
- •9.1.2 Brückner’s Original Description
- •9.2.1 Physiology
- •9.2.2 Performance
- •9.2.3 Shortcomings and Pitfalls
- •9.3.1 Physiology
- •9.3.2 Performance
- •9.3.3 Possibilities and Limitations
- •9.4.1 Physiology
- •9.4.2 Performance
- •9.4.3 Possibilities and Limitations
- •9.5 Eye Movements with Alternating Illumination of the Pupils
- •References
- •10. Amblyopia Treatment 2009
- •10.1 Amblyopia Treatment 2009
- •10.1.1 Introduction
- •10.1.2 Epidemiology
- •10.1.3 Clinical Features of Amblyopia
- •10.1.4 Diagnosis of Amblyopia
- •10.1.5 Natural History
- •10.2 Amblyopia Management
- •10.2.1 Refractive Correction
- •10.2.2 Occlusion by Patching
- •10.2.3 Pharmacological Treatment with Atropine
- •10.2.4 Pharmacological Therapy Combined with a Plano Lens
- •10.3 Other Treatment Issues
- •10.3.1 Bilateral Refractive Amblyopia
- •10.3.3 Maintenance Therapy
- •10.4 Other Treatments
- •10.4.1 Filters
- •10.4.2 Levodopa/Carbidopa Adjunctive Therapy
- •10.5 Controversy
- •10.5.1 Optic Neuropathy Rather than Amblyopia
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.1.2 Sensory or Motor Etiology
- •11.1.4 History
- •11.1.5 Outcome Parameters
- •11.2 Outcome of Surgery in the ELISSS
- •11.2.1 Reasons for the ELISSS
- •11.2.2 Summarized Methods of the ELISSS
- •11.2.3 Summarized Results of the ELISSS
- •11.2.4 Binocular Vision at Age Six
- •11.2.5 Horizontal Angle of Strabismus at Age Six
- •11.2.6 Alignment is Associated with Binocular Vision
- •11.3 Number of Operations and Spontaneous Reduction into Microstrabismus Without Surgery
- •11.3.1 The Number of Operations Per Child and the Reoperation Rate in the ELISSS
- •11.3.2 Reported Reoperation Rates
- •11.3.3 Test-Retest Reliability Studies
- •11.3.6 Spontaneous Reduction of the Angle
- •11.3.7 Predictors of Spontaneous Reduction into Microstrabismus
- •Appendix
- •References
- •12.1 Overview
- •12.1.2 Manifest Latent Nystagmus (MLN)
- •12.1.2.1 Clinical Characteristics of Manifest Latent Nystagmus (MLN)
- •12.1.3 Congenital Periodic Alternating Nystagmus (PAN)
- •12.1.3.1 Clinical characteristics of congenital periodic alternating nystagmus
- •12.2 Compensatory Mechanisms
- •12.2.1 Dampening by Versions
- •12.2.2 Dampening by Vergence
- •12.2.3 Anomalous Head Posture (AHP)
- •12.2.3.4 Measurement of AHP
- •12.2.3.6 Testing AHP at Near
- •12.3 Treatment
- •12.3.1 Optical Treatment
- •12.3.1.1 Refractive Correction
- •12.3.1.2 Spectacles and Contact Lenses (CL)
- •12.3.1.3 Prisms
- •12.3.1.4 Low Visual Aids
- •12.3.2 Medication
- •12.3.3 Acupuncture
- •12.3.4 Biofeedback
- •12.3.6 Surgical Treatment of Congenital Nystagmus
- •12.3.6.1 Management of Horizontal AHP
- •12.3.6.2 Management of Vertical AHP
- •12.3.6.3 Management of Head Tilt
- •Retro-Equatorial Recession of Horizontal Rectus Muscles
- •The Tenotomy Procedure
- •References
- •13.1 Dissociated Deviations
- •13.2 Surgical Alternatives to Treat Patients with DVD
- •13.2.1 Symmetric DVD with Good Bilateral Visual Acuity, with No Oblique Muscles Dysfunction
- •13.2.2 Bilateral DVD with Deep Unilateral Amblyopia
- •13.2.3 DVD with Inferior Oblique Overaction (IOOA) and V Pattern
- •13.2.4 DVD with Superior Oblique Overaction (SOOA) and A Pattern
- •13.2.5 Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Surgeries for DVD
- •13.3 Dissociated Horizontal Deviation
- •13.4 Dissociated Torsional Deviation. Head tilts in patients with Dissociated Strabismus
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Clinical and Theoretical Investigations
- •References
- •15.1 General Principles of Surgical Treatment in Paralytic Strabismus
- •15.1.1 Aims of Treatment
- •15.1.2 Timing of Surgery
- •15.1.3 Preoperative Assessment
- •15.1.4 Methods of Surgical Treatment
- •15.2 Third Nerve Palsy
- •15.2.1 Complete Third Nerve Palsy
- •15.2.2 Incomplete Third Nerve Palsy
- •15.3 Fourth Nerve Palsy
- •15.4 Sixth Nerve Palsy
- •References
- •16.1 Graves Orbitopathy (GO): Pathogenesis and Clinical Signs
- •16.1.1 Graves Orbitopathy is Part of a Systemic Disease: Graves Disease (GD)
- •16.1.2 Graves Orbitopathy−Clinical Signs
- •16.1.2.1 Clinical Changes Result in Typical Symptoms
- •16.1.3 Clinical Examination of GO
- •16.1.3.1 Signs of Activity
- •16.1.3.2 Assessing Severity of GO
- •16.1.3.3 Imaging
- •16.2 Natural History
- •16.3 Treatment of GO
- •16.3.1.1 Glucocorticoid Treatment
- •16.3.1.2 Orbital Radiotherapy
- •16.3.1.3 Combined Therapy: Glucocorticoids and Orbital Radiotherapy
- •16.3.1.4 Other Immunosuppressive Treatments and New Developments
- •16.3.2 Inactive Disease Stages
- •16.3.2.1 Orbital Decompression
- •16.3.2.2 Extraocular Muscle Surgery
- •16.3.2.3 Lid Surgery
- •16.4 Thyroid Dysfunction and GO
- •16.5.1 Relationship Between Cigarette Smoking and Graves Orbitopathy
- •16.5.2 Genetic Susceptibility
- •16.6 Special Situations
- •16.6.1 Euthyroid GO
- •16.6.2 Childhood GO
- •16.6.3 GO and Diabetes
- •References
66 |
6 Neuroanatomical Strabismus |
Summary for the Clinician
■ Numerous structural abnormalities of extraocular muscles and associated connective tissues
6may cause strabismus.
■Structural causes of strabismus may mimic neurological causes of strabismus.
■High-quality orbital imaging is generally necessary to diagnose structural abnormalities of extraocular muscles and associated connective tissues that cause strabismus.
syndrome in the absence of high myopia: posterior surgical ligature between the lateral margin of the SR muscle and the superior margin of the LR muscle.
6.6Congenital Peripheral Neuropathy: The Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders (CCDDs)
Certain congenital forms of strabismus occur despite normal orbital connective tissues and pulleys, as the result of deficiency or misdirection of motor nerves to the EOMs. Genetic causes of many of the CCDDs are described in chapter 7 in this volume byAntje Neugebauer and Julia Fricke, and will not be discussed here in this chapter that emphasizes the pathophysiology of strabismus. It is useful to understand two general principles in the functional anatomy of these CCDDs. First, EOMs with insu cient motor innervation are hypoplastic and hypofunctional. Second, e ectively innervated antagonists of congenitally noninnervated EOMs exhibit contracture and increased sti ness (Table 6.5).
Table 6.5. Main imaging findings in CCDDs |
|
|
Disorder |
Orbital findings |
Skull base findings |
Congenital oculomotor |
Variable hypoplasia of inferior oblique |
Profound hypoplasia of oculomotor |
palsy |
(IO), IR, medial rectus (MR), SR, and LPS; |
nerves |
|
hypoplasia of intraorbital |
|
|
oculomotor nerve branches |
|
Congenital fibrosis |
Profound hypoplasia of SR and LPS; |
Profound hypoplasia of oculomotor |
of extraocular muscles |
|
nerves |
|
± moderate MR, IO, SO hypoplasia; |
|
|
± LR dysplasia; |
|
|
hypoplasia of intraorbital motor nerves; |
|
|
mild ON hypoplasia |
|
Congenital trochlear palsy |
A ected SO hypoplasia |
None (normal trochlear nerve usually |
|
|
too small to image) |
Duane syndrome |
Hypoplasia or aplasia of superior LR; |
± Ipsilateral abducens nerve |
|
|
hypoplasia |
|
dysplasia of inferior LR; |
|
|
± longitudinal LR splitting; |
|
|
± abducens nerve aplasia; |
|
|
oculomotor nerve innervates inferior LR |
|
Moebius syndrome |
Hypoplasia of deep portions |
Normal subarachnoid cranial nerves |
|
of all myopathies of extraocular |
innervating orbit |
|
muscles (EOMs); |
|
|
curvature of anterior rectus EOMs; |
|
|
narrowing of deep bony orbits; |
|
|
ON straightening; |
|
|
Intraorbital motor nerve hypoplasia |
|
Horizontal gaze palsy with |
Normal |
Hypoplastic and fissured medulla and |
progressive scoliosis |
|
pons |
6.6 Congenital Peripheral Neuropathy: The Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders (CCDDs) |
67 |
6.6.1Congenital Oculomotor (CN3) Palsy
Congenital oculomotor (CN3) palsy is typically partial. It may appear clinically bilateral or unilateral, although on careful evaluation apparently unilateral cases may be discovered to be bilateral albeit highly asymmetrical [33]. Patients may present with variable deficiencies of adduction, supraduction, and infraduction, along with variable mydriasis and blepharoptosis. A ected EOMs are hypoplastic, corresponding to their functional deficiencies. Intraorbital motor nerves to EOMs innervated by CN3 are hypoplastic, as is the subarachnoid CN3 (Fig. 6.6).
6.6.2Congenital Fibrosis
of the Extraocular Muscles (CFEOM)
In many fundamental respects similar to congenital CN3 palsy, CFEOM is a heritable congenital CN3 hypoplasia with frequent misdirection of remaining fibers, more profoundly a ecting the superior than inferior division of CN3. Three distinct phenotypes, CFEOM1–3, are recognized. The classic form, CFEOM1 (MIM 135700), is
typified by bilateral congenital blepharoptosis and ophthalmoplegia, with the eyes restricted to infraduction below the horizontal midline [34]. Horizontal strabismus may coexist (Tables 6.5, 6.6).
Forced duction testing in CFEOM1 demonstrates restriction to passive supraduction, consistent with surgical observations of increased extraocular muscle (EOM) stiffness. Older pathologic reports of specimens of resected EOMs in CFEOM suggested replacement by fibrous tissue [35–37]. The classic concept of CFEOM as a primary myopathy, however, was challenged by autopsy findings in a subject from a pedigree with the KIF21A mutation [34]. Engle et al. alternatively suggested that CFEOM1 is a primary disorder of EOM motor neuron development, leading to hypoplasia or atrophy of the EOMs they innervate, and secondary contracture of their antagonists [34]. Older reports of “fibrosis” in EOM tendons are likely to have been artifacts of inadvertent biopsy of distal EOM tendons [34].
Orbital MRI in CFEOM1 demonstrates hypoplasia of the motor nerves normally innervated by CN3, most profound for the SR and levator palpebrae superioris corresponding to the clinically prominent hypotropia
Fig. 6.6 FIESTA MRI demonstrating hypoplasia of the subarachnoid oculomotor nerve (CN3). (a) Normal subject. (b) Dominant Duane retraction syndrome (DRS) linked to chromosome 2 (DURS2). (c) Congenital oculomotor palsy. (d) Congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles type 1 (CFEOM1)
|
|
68 |
6 Neuroanatomical Strabismus |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 6.6. Imaging features in acquired neuropathic extraocular muscle palsy |
|
|||
|
|
Muscle |
|
Size |
Contractility |
Path |
|
|
Inferior oblique |
Reduced 40% |
Reduced |
Normal |
|
6 |
|
|||||
|
IR |
|
Small posteriorly |
Reduced |
Centrifugal inflection |
|
|
|
Lateral rectus |
|
Reduced 50–90% posteriorly |
Reduced |
Centrifugal inflection |
|
|
Levator palpebrae superioris |
Small |
Cannot evaluate |
Normal |
|
|
|
Medial rectus |
|
Small posteriorly |
Reduced |
Normal |
|
|
SO |
|
Reduced 40–50% |
Reduced |
Normal |
|
|
SR |
|
Small posteriorly |
Reduced |
Normal |
and blepharoptosis (Fig. 6.7a, b) [38]. Intraorbital motor branches of CN3 are also hypoplastic (Fig. 6.7c).
MRI in CFEOM1 demonstrates marked hypoplasia of the subarachnoid CN3. Significant but usually subclinical optic nerve (ON) hypoplasia occurs in CFEOM1, as may superior oblique (SO) muscle hypoplasia presumably due to trochlear nerve (CN4) hypoplasia. The posterior parts of multiple EOMs may be dysplastic in CFEOM, although their anterior portions generally appear normal both by MRI and at EOM surgery.
The frequent occurrence of synergistic eye movements and the Marcus Gunn jaw winking phenomenon in CFEOM1 [39, 40] suggests motor axonal misrouting.
More direct evidence of this misrouting is provided by high-resolution MRI showing innervation of the inferior zone of the LR by a branch of CN3 that would normally be fated to innervate the IR. In most cases, when a patient with CFEOM1 attempts deorsumversion, the eyes abduct dye to LR contraction, increasing the exotropia present in central gaze. In CFEOM1, CN6 innervates the superior zone of the LR muscle.
Patients with CFEOM2 (OMIM 602078) have congenitally bilateral exotropic ophthalmoplegia and blepharoptosis. This rare recessive disorder occurs in consan guineous pedigrees. The orbital and cranial nerve phenotype of CFEOM2 have not been studied in detail.
Fig. 6.7 Typical orbital MRI findings in CFEOM1. (a) Sagittal view showing profound hypoplasia of the SR and levator palpebrae superioris. (b) Coronal view in mid-orbit showing profound hypoplasia of the SR. (c) Deep orbital view demonstrating proximity and presumed innervation of the inferior zone of the LR by an aberrant of the inferior division of the oculomotor nerve (CN3)
6.6 Congenital Peripheral Neuropathy: The Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders (CCDDs) |
69 |
The third CFEOM variant, CFEOM3, encompasses patients with CFEOM not classifiable as either CFEOM1 or CFEOM2. This “atypical” group includes unilateral cases who have orthotropic central gaze, or whose central gaze is hypotropic but who can supraduct above the central position. Subjects with CFEOM3 have asymmetrical blepharoptosis, limited supraduction, variable ophthalmoplegia, and are usually exotropic. MRI demonstrates asymmetrical levator palpebrae superioris and SR atrophy correlating with blepharoptosis and deficient supraduction, and small orbital motor nerves [41]. While at least one subarachnoid CN is hypoplastic, ophthalmoplegia occurs only when subarachoid CN3 width is less than the 2.5th percentile of normal. Multiple EOMs exhibit variable hypoplasia, correlating with duction in individual orbits. A-pattern exotropia is frequent in CFEOM3, correlating with LR misinnervation by CN3. ON crosssections are slightly subnormal, but rectus pulley locations are normal [42]. Some cases of CFEOM3 are associated with brain abnormalities including corpus callosum hypoplasia.
Summary for the Clinician
■CFEOM is not a primary muscle disorder, but rather a cranial nerve disorder.
6.6.3Congenital Trochlear (CN4) Palsy
While SO hypoplasia may coexist with other CCDDs such as CFEOM, SO dysfunction may not be clinically evident in the setting of di use external ophthalmoplegia or anomalous innervation of other EOMs. Isolated congenital CN4 palsy is often suspected in the presence of clinical evidence of ipsilateral hypertropia increasing on contralateral gaze, and with head tilt toward the ipsilateral shoulder. While the congenital nature of the disorder appears clear when there is a history of lifelong spontaneous head tilt to the contralateral shoulder, in many cases present after many years of compensation for what the history suggests has been a progressive condition without identifiable cause. Whether lifelong or insidious, orbital imaging in presumably congenital SO palsy demonstrates reduction in SO muscle size, and reduction in the normal contractile increase in SO cross-section due to infraduction (Fig. 6.8). Since even the normal subarachnoid CN4 cannot be reliably imaged by MRI, correlations with CN4 size have not been made in congenital CN4 palsy.
6.6.4Duane’s Retraction Syndrome (DRS)
Pure congenital abducens (CN6) palsy is exceptionally rare except as secondary to an obvious intrauterine or neonatal pathology such as tumor or hydrocephalus. Rather, in congenital developmental CN6 palsy, the LR is innervated or coinnervated by a branch of CN3, usually a motor branch ordinarily fated to innervate the MR. In this respect, the situation is similar to CFEOM. DRS is characterized by congenital abduction deficit, narrowing of the palpebral fissure on adduction, and globe retraction with occasional upshoot or downshoot in adduction [43]. Early electrophysiological studies suggested absence of normal abducens (CN6) innervation to the LR muscle as the cause of DRS, with paradoxical LR innervation in adduction [44, 45]. Absence of the CN6 nerve and motor neurons has been confirmed in one sporadic unilateral [46] and another bilateral autopsy case of DRS [47]. Parsa et al. first used MRI to demonstrate absence of the subarachnoid portion of CN6 in DRS [48], a finding that has been confirmed in 6 of 11 additional cases [49], and later correlated with the presence of residual abduction in multiple cases [50, 51].
Innervation of the LR by CN6 is deficient in both DRS and CN6 palsy, although unlike CN6 palsy, the eyes in central gaze are frequently aligned in DRS [52]. While most DRS cases are sporadic, a dominant form DURS2 is linked to chromosome 2. MRI demonstrated that DRS linked to the DURS2 locus is associated with bilateral abnormalities of many orbital motor nerves, and structural abnormalities of all EOMs except those innervated by the inferior division of CN3 [53]. Orbital motor nerves are typically small, with CN6 often nondetectable. Lateral rectus (LR) muscles are often structurally abnormal, often with MRI and motility evidence of oculomotor nerve (CN3) innervation from vertical rectus EOMs leading to A or V patterns of strabismus. Cases may include SO, SR, and LPS hypoplasia, sparing only the MR, IR, and IO EOMs. The subarachnoid CN3 may be small. Therefore, DURS2-linked DRS is a di use CCDD involving but not limited to CN6.
Summary for the Clinician
■CCDDs are nonprogressive developmental disorders featuring reduced and aberrant innervation.
■Subnormal innervation of some EOMs in CCDDs leads to secondary EOM hypoplasia, dysplasia, and weakness.
