- •CONTENTS
- •PREFACE
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2.1. Differential Geometry of Space Curves
- •2.2. Inverse Problem Formulation
- •2.3. Reconstruction of Unique Space Curves
- •3. Rigid Motion Estimation by Tracking the Space Curves
- •4. Motion Estimation Using Double Stereo Rigs
- •4.1. Single Stereo Rig
- •4.2. Double Stereo Rigs
- •5.1. Space-Time or Virtual Camera Generation
- •5.2. Visual Hull Reconstruction from Silhouettes of Multiple Views
- •5.2.1. Volume Based Visual Hull
- •5.2.1.1. Intersection Test in Octree Cubes
- •5.2.1.2. Synthetic Model Results
- •5.2.2. Edge Base Visual Hull
- •5.2.2.1. Synthetic Model Results
- •Implementation and Exprimental Results
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgment
- •References
- •Abstract
- •Introduction: Ocular Dominance
- •Demography of Ocular Dominance
- •A Taxonomy of Ocular Dominance
- •Is Ocular Dominance Test Specific?
- •I. Tests of Rivalry
- •II. Tests of Asymmetry
- •III. Sighting Tests
- •Some Misconceptions
- •Resolving the Paradox of Ocular Dominance
- •Some Clinical Implications of Ocular Dominance
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Basic Teory
- •3. Bezier Networks for Surface Contouring
- •4. Parameter of the Vision System
- •5. Experimental Results
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Abstract
- •Introduction
- •Terminology (Definitions)
- •Clinical Assessment
- •Examination Techniques: Motility
- •Ocular Motility Recordings
- •Semiautomatic Analysis of Eye Movement Recordings
- •Slow Eye Movements in Congenital Nystagmus
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •EVOLUTION OF COMPUTER VISION SYSTEMS
- •Abstract
- •Introduction
- •Present-Day Level of CVS Development
- •Full-Scale Universal CVS
- •Integration of CVS and AI Control System
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •1. Advantages of Binocular Vision
- •2. Foundations of Binocular Vision
- •3. Stereopsis as the Highest Level of Binocular Vision
- •4. Binocular Viewing Conditions on Pupil Near Responses
- •5. Development of Binocular Vision
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Abstract
- •Introduction
- •Methods
- •Results
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Preferential Processing of Emotional Stimuli
- •1.1. Two Pathways for the Processing of Emotional Stimuli
- •1.2. Intensive Processing of Negative Valence or of Arousal?
- •2. "Blind" in One Eye: Binocular Rivalry
- •2.1. What Helmholtz Knew Already
- •2.3. Possible Influences from Non-visual Neuronal Circuits
- •3.1. Significance and Predominance
- •3.2. Emotional Discrepancy and Binocular Rivalry
- •4. Binocular Rivalry Experiments at Our Lab
- •4.1. Predominance of Emotional Scenes
- •4.1.1. Possible Confounds
- •4.2. Dominance of Emotional Facial Expressions
- •4.3. Inter-Individual Differences: Phobic Stimuli
- •4.4. Controlling for Physical Properties of Stimuli
- •4.5. Validation of Self-report
- •4.6. Summary
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Algorithm Overview
- •3. Road Surface Estimation
- •3.1. 3D Data Point Projection and Cell Selection
- •3.2. Road Plane Fitting
- •3.2.1. Dominant 2D Straight Line Parametrisation
- •3.2.2. Road Plane Parametrisation
- •4. Road Scanning
- •5. Candidate Filtering
- •6. Experimental Results
- •7. Conclusions
- •Acknowledgements
- •References
- •DEVELOPMENT OF SACCADE CONTROL
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Fixation and Fixation Stability
- •2.1. Monocular Instability
- •2.2. Binocular Instability
- •2.3. Eye Dominance in Binocular Instability
- •3. Development of Saccade Control
- •3.1. The Optomotor Cycle and the Components of Saccade Control
- •3.4. Antisaccades: Voluntary Saccade Control
- •3.5. The Age Curves of Saccade Control
- •3.6. Left – Right Asymmetries
- •3.7. Correlations and Independence
- •References
- •OCULAR DOMINANCE
- •INDEX
Three-Dimensional Vision Based on Binocular Imaging… |
99 |
|
|
5. Experimental Results
The approach of the Binocular imaging in this technique is to avoid the line occlusions. When an occlusion appears, the object contour is not completed. However, in a binocular imaging one of two images provides the occluded line and the object contour is completed. Based on the network, the parameters of the binocular setup are computed and physical measurements are avoided. In this manner, the computational performance provides all parameters to reconstruct the object shape. Figure 1 shows the experimental setup. The object is moved in the x- axis by means of the electromechanical device in steps of 1.77 mm. A laser line is projected on the target by a 15 mW laser diode to perform the scanning. The line is captured by two CCD cameras and digitized by a frame grabber of 256 gray levels. By means of image processing, the displacement as and es are computed. Then, the object depth h(x,y) is computed via Eq.(9) or Eq.(10). From each pair of the binocular images, a transverse section of the object is produced. The information of all transverse sections is stored in array memory to construct the complete object shape.
The experiment is performed with three objects. The first object to be profiled is a dummy face see figure 9(a) and 9(b). The object surface produces stripe occlusions shown in figure 9(a). In this case, the second image figure 9(b) provides the area of the occluded stripe. Therefore, the object reconstruction can be done by means of the binocular imaging. To perform the contouring, the dummy face is scanned in x-axis in steps of 1.27 mm and binocular images of the line are captured. From each pair of images, the first image is used to detect the stripe displacement as. If the first image contains line occlusions, the second image will be used to detect the stripe displacement es. The line occlusion is detected based pixel of the stripe. If the pixels of high intensity is minor than three in a row, a line occlusion is detected in the image. By image processing, the stripe displacement as or es is calculated via Eq.(1) or Eq(2) respectively. Then, the values u and v are deduced via Eq.(6) and Eq.(7). By means of the network Eq.(9) or Eq.(10), the object depth is computed via u or v, respectively. Thus, the network produces a transverse section based on the binocular images. To know the accuracy of the data provided by the network, the root mean squared error (rms) is calculated [18] based on a contact method. To carry it out, the object is measured by a coordinate measure machine (CMM). The rms is described by the next equation
100 |
J. Apolinar Muñoz-Rodríguez |
|
|
|
1 |
n |
|
rms = |
∑ (hoi − hci )2 , |
(30) |
|
|
n |
i=1 |
|
where hoi is the data measured by the CMM, hci is the calculated data h(x,y) by network and n is the number of data. The rms was computed using n=1122 data and the result is a rms = 0.155 mm for the dummy face. In this case, sixty eighty lines were processed to determine the complete object shape shown in figure 9(c). The scale of this figure is mm.
The second object to be profiled is a metallic piece figure 10(a). The contouring is performed by scanning the metallic piece in steps of 1.27 mm. In this case, Fifty eight lines were processed to determine the complete object shape shown in figure 10(b). The metallic piece was measured by the CMM to determine the accuracy provided by the network. The rms was computed using n=480 data, which were provided by the network and by the CMM as reference. The rms is calculated for this object is a rms = 0.114 mm.
Figure 9(a). First image of the dummy face whit line occlusion.
Three-Dimensional Vision Based on Binocular Imaging… |
101 |
|
|
Figure 9(b). Second image of the dummy face with out line occlusion.
Figure 9(c). Three-dimensional shape of the dummy face.
102 |
J. Apolinar Muñoz-Rodríguez |
|
|
Figure 10(a). Metallic piece with to be profiled.
Figure 10(b). Three-dimensional shape of the metallic piece.
The value n has an influence in the confidence level respect to the precision of the error calculated. To determine if the value n is according to the desired precision, the confidence level is calculated by the next relation [19]
|
σ |
|
2 |
(31) |
|
n = zα |
|
x |
, |
||
|
e |
|
|
|
|
