- •CONTENTS
- •PREFACE
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2.1. Differential Geometry of Space Curves
- •2.2. Inverse Problem Formulation
- •2.3. Reconstruction of Unique Space Curves
- •3. Rigid Motion Estimation by Tracking the Space Curves
- •4. Motion Estimation Using Double Stereo Rigs
- •4.1. Single Stereo Rig
- •4.2. Double Stereo Rigs
- •5.1. Space-Time or Virtual Camera Generation
- •5.2. Visual Hull Reconstruction from Silhouettes of Multiple Views
- •5.2.1. Volume Based Visual Hull
- •5.2.1.1. Intersection Test in Octree Cubes
- •5.2.1.2. Synthetic Model Results
- •5.2.2. Edge Base Visual Hull
- •5.2.2.1. Synthetic Model Results
- •Implementation and Exprimental Results
- •Conclusions
- •Acknowledgment
- •References
- •Abstract
- •Introduction: Ocular Dominance
- •Demography of Ocular Dominance
- •A Taxonomy of Ocular Dominance
- •Is Ocular Dominance Test Specific?
- •I. Tests of Rivalry
- •II. Tests of Asymmetry
- •III. Sighting Tests
- •Some Misconceptions
- •Resolving the Paradox of Ocular Dominance
- •Some Clinical Implications of Ocular Dominance
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Basic Teory
- •3. Bezier Networks for Surface Contouring
- •4. Parameter of the Vision System
- •5. Experimental Results
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Abstract
- •Introduction
- •Terminology (Definitions)
- •Clinical Assessment
- •Examination Techniques: Motility
- •Ocular Motility Recordings
- •Semiautomatic Analysis of Eye Movement Recordings
- •Slow Eye Movements in Congenital Nystagmus
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •EVOLUTION OF COMPUTER VISION SYSTEMS
- •Abstract
- •Introduction
- •Present-Day Level of CVS Development
- •Full-Scale Universal CVS
- •Integration of CVS and AI Control System
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •1. Advantages of Binocular Vision
- •2. Foundations of Binocular Vision
- •3. Stereopsis as the Highest Level of Binocular Vision
- •4. Binocular Viewing Conditions on Pupil Near Responses
- •5. Development of Binocular Vision
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Abstract
- •Introduction
- •Methods
- •Results
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Preferential Processing of Emotional Stimuli
- •1.1. Two Pathways for the Processing of Emotional Stimuli
- •1.2. Intensive Processing of Negative Valence or of Arousal?
- •2. "Blind" in One Eye: Binocular Rivalry
- •2.1. What Helmholtz Knew Already
- •2.3. Possible Influences from Non-visual Neuronal Circuits
- •3.1. Significance and Predominance
- •3.2. Emotional Discrepancy and Binocular Rivalry
- •4. Binocular Rivalry Experiments at Our Lab
- •4.1. Predominance of Emotional Scenes
- •4.1.1. Possible Confounds
- •4.2. Dominance of Emotional Facial Expressions
- •4.3. Inter-Individual Differences: Phobic Stimuli
- •4.4. Controlling for Physical Properties of Stimuli
- •4.5. Validation of Self-report
- •4.6. Summary
- •References
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Algorithm Overview
- •3. Road Surface Estimation
- •3.1. 3D Data Point Projection and Cell Selection
- •3.2. Road Plane Fitting
- •3.2.1. Dominant 2D Straight Line Parametrisation
- •3.2.2. Road Plane Parametrisation
- •4. Road Scanning
- •5. Candidate Filtering
- •6. Experimental Results
- •7. Conclusions
- •Acknowledgements
- •References
- •DEVELOPMENT OF SACCADE CONTROL
- •Abstract
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Fixation and Fixation Stability
- •2.1. Monocular Instability
- •2.2. Binocular Instability
- •2.3. Eye Dominance in Binocular Instability
- •3. Development of Saccade Control
- •3.1. The Optomotor Cycle and the Components of Saccade Control
- •3.4. Antisaccades: Voluntary Saccade Control
- •3.5. The Age Curves of Saccade Control
- •3.6. Left – Right Asymmetries
- •3.7. Correlations and Independence
- •References
- •OCULAR DOMINANCE
- •INDEX
Ocular Dominance within Binocular Vision |
75 |
|
|
A naturally occurring version of monovision might temporarily appear in patients affected by physiological age-related lens opacities (cataracts). The visual deterioration usually occurs in both eyes, but often to differing degrees and progresses at different rates, eventually requiring first then frequently second eye surgery with artificial lens implantation to restore reasonable visual acuity. However, it has been reported (Talbot & Perkins, 1998) that following the improvement in binocular function after second eye treatment the laterality of OD may change.
It has also been recorded (Waheed & Laidlaw, 2003) that the debilitating effects of monocular injury or pathology may more markedly impair mobility or quality of life if it is the performance of the hitherto sighting dominant eye that is primarily compromised. However, again, the possibility of sighting dominance switching in patients with unilaterally acquired macular disease cannot be discounted (Akaza et al., 2007).
Conclusion
It might be that a conclusion drawn by Warren & Clark (1938: p. 302) seventy years ago remains pertinent today: “eye dominance as a single unitary factor does not exist”.
Perhaps OD is no more than a “demonstrable habit” (Miles, 1930) in binocular vision, adopted when viewing circumstances demand that only one eye can conveniently be used (Porac & Coren, 1976). Since classical times the paradoxical question of why, under binocular conditions, unilateral sighting might be considered an advantage compared to the continued use of two eyes has continued to be asked (Wade, 1998). Allied to this, what could be the oculo-visual purpose or benefit to the individual of a dominant eye whose laterality can apparently be modified by test conditions (Carey, 2001), by vision training (Berner & Berner, 1953), and by attentional factors (Ooi & He, 1999)?
While the functional basis of OD remains uncertain in a species with a highly evolved binocular visual system, its demonstrable existence in the majority of normally sighted individuals has been linked to a number of perceptual and clinical phenomena. Unfortunately, the years of burgeoning knowledge have perhaps tended to obscure rather than clarify many issues surrounding OD and its relation to oculo-visual performance. What can be stated is that OD must be recognised as a dynamic concept, fluid and deformable in the context of specific viewing conditions and with regard to the methods used to identify it.
76 |
Jonathan S. Pointer |
|
|
References
Akaza, E., Fujita, K., Shimada, H. & Yuzawa, M. (2007). Sighting dominance in patients with macular disease. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi, 111, 322-325 [in Japanese].
Annett, M. (1999). Eye dominance in families predicted by the right shift theory.
Laterality, 4, 167-172.
Banks, M. S., Ghose, T. & Hillis, J. M. (2004). Relative image size, not eye position, determines eye dominance switches. Vision Res., 44, 229-234.
Barbeito, R. (1981). Sighting dominance: an explanation based on the processing of visual direction in tests of sighting dominance. Vision Res., 21, 855-860.
Barbeito, R. (1983). Sighting from the cyclopean eye: the Cyclops effect in preschool children. Percept. Psychophys., 33, 561-564.
Barbeito, R., Tam, W. J. & Ono, H. (1986). Two factors affecting saccadic amplitude during vergence: the location of the cyclopean eye and a left-right bias. Ophthalmic Physiol.Opt., 6, 201-205.
Berner, G. E. & Berner, D. E. (1953). Relation of ocular dominance, handedness and the controlling eye in binocular vision. A. M. A. Arch. Ophthalmol. 50, 603-608.
van Biervlet, J. J. (1901). Nouvelle contribution a l’étude de l’asymetrie sensorielle. Bull. l’Acad. Roy. Sci. Belgique, 3, 679-694.
Carey, D. P. (2001). Vision research: Losing sight of eye dominance. Curr. Biol., 11, R828-R830.
Cohen, J. (1952). Eye dominance. Am. J. Psychol., 65, 634-636.
Cole, J. (1957). Laterality in the use of the hand, foot, and eye in monkeys. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 50, 296-299.
Coren, S. & Kaplan, C. P. (1973). Patterns of ocular dominance. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom., 50, 283-292.
Coren, S. & Porac, C. (1975). Ocular dominance: an annotated bibliography. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 5, 229-230. (Ms. No. 922).
Coren, S., Porac, C. & Duncan, P. (1979). A behaviourally validated self-report inventory to assess four types of lateral preference. J. Clin. Neuropsychol., 1, 55-64.
Crider, B. (1944). A battery of tests for the dominant eye. J. Gen. Psychol., 31, 179-190.
Delacato, C. H. (1959). The Treatment and Prevention of Reading Problems (The Neuropsychological Approach). Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.
Dengis, C. A., Simpson, T. L., Steinbach, M. J. & Ono, H. (1998). The Cyclops effect in adults: sighting without visual feedback. Vision Res., 38, 327-331.
Ocular Dominance within Binocular Vision |
77 |
|
|
Dengis, C. A., Steinbach, M. J., Goltz, H. C. & Stager, C. (1993). Visual alignment from the midline: a declining developmental trend in normal, strabismic, and monocularly enucleated children. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus, 30, 323-326.
Dengis, C. A., Steinbach, M. J., Ono, H., Gunther, L. N., Fanfarillo, R., Steeves, J. K. & Postiglione, S. (1996). Learning to look with one eye: the use of head turn by normals and strabismics. Vision Res., 36, 3237-3242.
Duke-Elder, W. S. (1952). Textbook of Ophthalmology, Vol. 4. London: Henry Kimpton.
Durand, A. C. & Gould, G. M. (1910). A method of determining ocular dominance. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 55, 369-370.
Ehrenstein, W. H., Arnold-Schulz-Gahmen, B. E. & Jaschinski, W. (2005). Eye preference within the context of binocular functions. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol., 243, 926-932.
Erickson, P. & McGill, E.C. (1992). Role of visual acuity, stereoacuity, and ocular dominance in monovision patient success. Optom. Vis. Sci., 69, 761764.
Erickson, P. & Schor, C. (1990). Visual function with presbyopic contact lens correction. Optom. Vis. Sci., 67, 22-28.
Eser, I., Durrie, D. S., Schwendeman, F. & Stahl, J. E. (2008). Association between ocular dominance and refraction. J. Refract. Surg., 24, 685-689.
Evans, B. J. (2007). Monovision: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., 27, 417439.
Flax, N. (1966). The clinical significance of dominance. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom., 43, 566-581.
Gilchrist, J. M. (1976). Dominance in the visual system. Br. J. Physiol. Opt., 31, 32-39.
Gronwall, D. M. & Sampson, H. (1971). Ocular dominance: a test of two hypotheses. Br. J. Psychol., 62, 175-185.
Henriques, D. Y., Medendorp, W. P., Khan, A. Z. & Crawford, J. D. (2002). Visuomotor transformation for eye-hand coordination. Prog. Brain Res., 140, 329-340.
Hering, E. (1977). The Theory of Binocular Vision (B. Bridgeman & L. Stark, Eds. and trans.). New York: Plenum. (Originally published 1868).
Humphrey, G. M. (1861). The Human Foot and the Human Hand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201 et seq.
Jain, S., Arora, I. & Azar, D. T. (1996). Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery. Surv. Ophthalmol., 40, 491-499.
78 |
Jonathan S. Pointer |
|
|
Jain, S., Ou, R. & Azar, D. T. (2001). Monovision outcomes in presbyopic individuals after refractive surgery. Ophthalmology, 108, 1430-1433.
Jasper, H. H. & Raney, E. T. (1937). The phi test of lateral dominance. Am. J. Psychol., 49, 450-457.
Khan, A. Z. & Crawford, J. D. (2001). Ocular dominance reverses as a function of horizontal gaze angle. Vision Res., 41, 1743-1748.
Kommerell, G., Schmitt, C., Kromeier, M. & Bach, M. (2003). Ocular prevalence versus ocular dominance. Vision Res., 43, 1397-1403.
Lam, A. K. C., Chau, A. S. Y., Lam, W. Y., Leung, G. Y. O. & Man, B. S. H. (1996). Effect of naturally occurring visual acuity differences between two eyes in stereoacuity. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., 16, 189-195.
Lederer, J. (1961). Ocular dominance. Aust. J. Optom., 44, 531-539; 570-574. Levelt, W. J. M. (1968). On Binocular Rivalry. Paris: Mouton.
Mallett, R. F. J. (1988a). Techniques of investigation of binocular vision anomalies. In K. Edwards & R. Llewellyn (Eds.), Optometry (p. 266). London: Butterworths.
Mallett, R. F. J. (1988b). The management of binocular vision anomalies. In K. Edwards & R. Llewellyn (Eds.), Optometry (pp. 281-282). London: Butterworths.
Mapp, A. P., Ono, H. & Barbeito, R. (2003). What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contentious review. Percept. Psychophys., 65, 310-317.
McManus, I. C., Porac, C., Bryden, M. P. & Boucher, R. (1999). Eye dominance, writing hand, and throwing hand. Laterality, 4, 173-192.
McMonnies, C. W. (1974). Monocular fogging in contact lens practice. Aust. J. Optom., 57, 28-32.
Menon, R. S., Ogawa, S., Strupp, J. P. & Ugurbil, K. (1997). Ocular dominance in human V1 demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurophysiol., 77, 2780-2787.
Merrell, D. J. (1957). Dominance of eye and hand. Human Biology, 29, 314-328. Miles, W. R. (1928). Ocular dominance: methods and results. Psychol. Bull., 25,
155-156.
Miles, W. R. (1929). Ocular dominance demonstrated by unconscious sighting. J. Exp. Psychol., 12, 113-126.
Miles, W. R. (1930). Ocular dominance in human adults. J. Gen. Psychol., 3, 412420.
Mills, L. (1925). Eyedness and handedness. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 8 (Series 3), 933941.
Ocular Dominance within Binocular Vision |
79 |
|
|
Nitta, M., Shimizu, K. & Niida, T. (2007). The influence of ocular dominance on monovision – the interaction between binocular visual functions and the state of dominant eye’s correction. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi, 111, 434-440 [in Japanese].
Ono, H. & Barbeito, R. (1982). The cyclopean eye vs. the sighting-dominant eye as the centre of visual direction. Percept. Psychophys., 32, 201-210.
Ooi, T. L. & He, Z. J. (1999). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: the role of attention. Perception, 28, 551-574.
Pickwell, L. D. (1972). Hering’s law of equal innervation and the position of the binoculus. Vision Res., 12, 1499-1507.
Pointer, J. S. (2001). Sighting dominance, handedness, and visual acuity preference: three mutually exclusive modalities? Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., 21, 117-126.
Pointer, J. S. (2007). The absence of lateral congruency between sighting dominance and the eye with better visual acuity. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., 27, 106-110.
Porac, C. & Coren, S. (1975). Is eye dominance a part of generalized laterality?
Percept. Mot. Skills, 40, 763-769.
Porac, C. & Coren, S. (1976). The dominant eye. Psychol. Bull., 83, 880-897. Porac, C. & Coren, S. (1977). The assessment of motor control in sighting
dominance using an illusion decrement procedure. Percept. Psychophys. 21, 341-346.
Porac, C. & Coren, S. (1981). Lateral Preferences and Human Behaviour. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Porac, C. & Coren, S. (1986). Sighting dominance and egocentric localization.
Vision Res., 26, 1709-1713.
Porac, C., Coren, S. & Duncan, P. (1980). Life-span age trends in laterality. J. Gerontol., 35, 715-721.
Porta, G. B. (1593). De Refractione. Optices Parte. Libri Novem. Naples: Salviani.
Quartley, J. & Firth, A. Y. (2004). Binocular sighting ocular dominance changes with different angles of horizontal gaze. Binocul. Vis. Strabismus Q., 19, 2530.
Reiss, M. R. (1997). Ocular dominance: some family data. Laterality, 2, 7-16. Rombouts, S. A., Barkhof, F., Sprenger, M., Valk, J. & Scheltens, P. (1996). The
functional basis of ocular dominance: functional MRI (fMRI) findings.
Neurosci. Lett., 221, 1-4.
Ross, W. D. (1927). The Works of Aristotle: Volume 3 (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
80 |
Jonathan S. Pointer |
|
|
Sheard, C. (1926). Unilateral sighting and ocular dominance. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom., 7, 558-567.
Shneor, E. & Hochstein, S. (2006). Eye dominance effects in feature search.
Vision Res., 46, 4258-4269.
Shneor, E. & Hochstein, S. (2008). Eye dominance effects in conjunction search.
Vision Res., 48, 1592-1602.
Smith, L. (1970). Eye dominance in a monkey. Percept. Mot. Skills, 31, 657-658. Snyder, A. M. & Snyder, M. A. (1928). Eye preference tendencies. J. Ed.
Psychol., 19, 431-433.
Talbot, E. M. & Perkins, A. (1998). The benefit of second eye cataract surgery. Eye, 12, 983-989.
Wade, N. J. (1987). On the late invention of the stereoscope. Perception, 16, 785818.
Wade, N. J. (1998). Early studies of eye dominances. Laterality, 3, 97-108. Waheed, L. & Laidlaw, D. A. H. (2003). Disease laterality, eye dominance, and
visual handicap in patients with unilateral full thickness macular holes. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 87, 626-628.
Walls, G. L. (1951). A theory of ocular dominance. A. M. A. Arch. Ophthalmol., 45, 387-412.
Warren, N. & Clark, B. (1938). A consideration of the use of the term ocular dominance. Psychol. Bull., 35, 298-304.
Washburn, M. F., Faison, C. & Scott, R. (1934). A comparison between the Miles A-B-C method and retinal rivalry as tests of ocular dominance. Am. J. Psychol., 46, 633-636.
Wolff, E. (1968). The Visual Pathway. In R. J. Last (Ed.), Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit (6th edition, pp. 341-344). London: H. K. Lewis.
Woo, T. L. & Pearson, K. (1927). Dextrality and sinistrality of hand and eye.
Biometrika, 19, 165-199.
Yang, Z., Lan, W., Liu, W., Chen, X., Nie, H., Yu, M. & Ge, J. (2008). Association of ocular dominance and myopia development: a 2-year longitudinal study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 49, 4779-4783.