- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Introduction
- •Resistance to Antimicrobials
- •Bacterial Cells That Persist
- •Markers of Cell Viability
- •Surface Coating
- •Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •A Brief History of the First Studies on Root Canal Anatomy
- •Computational Methods for the Study of Root Canal Anatomy
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Syringes
- •Needles
- •Physical Properties of Irrigants
- •Irrigant Refreshment
- •Wall Shear Stress
- •Apical Vapor Lock
- •Anatomical Challenges
- •Summary: Clinical Tips
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Challenges of Root Canal Irrigation
- •In Vitro: Direct Contact Tests
- •In Vivo Models
- •Sampling Methods
- •Models to Study Cleaning of Isthmus Areas
- •Dentin Canals
- •Lateral Canals
- •Smear Layer
- •New Models to Study Irrigation
- •Measuring Antibacterial Activity
- •Inaccessible Root Canal Areas
- •Particle Image Velocimetry
- •Irrigation Pressure in the Apical Canal
- •Wall Shear Stress/Wall Velocity
- •Needle Design
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Antiseptic Solutions
- •Sodium Hypochlorite
- •Mode of Action
- •Concentration
- •Volume
- •Time
- •Effect on the Dentin
- •Depth of Penetration
- •Limitations
- •Clinical Recommendation
- •Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHX) [6]
- •Molecular Structure
- •Mode of Action
- •Substantivity
- •Chlorhexidine as an Endodontic Irrigant
- •Allergic Reactions to Chlorhexidine
- •Limitations
- •Clinical Recommendations
- •Decalcifying Agents
- •Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid
- •History
- •Mode of Action
- •Applications in Endodontics
- •Interaction Between CHX and NaOCl
- •Interaction Between CHX and EDTA
- •Interaction Between EDTA and NaOCl
- •Clinical Recommendations
- •HEBP
- •Effect of Temperature
- •NaOCl + Heat
- •EDTA + Heat
- •CHX + Heat
- •Combinations and Solutions with Detergents
- •BioPure MTAD and Tetraclean
- •Mode of Action
- •Smear Layer Removal
- •Clinical Trials
- •Protocol for Use
- •QMiX
- •Protocol
- •Smear Layer Removal
- •Clinical Trials
- •Disinfection Protocol Suggested
- •References
- •Microbial Control: History
- •NaOCl: Cytotoxicity
- •NaOCl: Complications
- •Maxillary Sinus Considerations
- •Intraosseous Injection
- •The Peck Case History
- •Informed Consent
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •On Apical Transportation
- •Role of the Patency File on Irrigant Penetration into the Apical Third of Root Canals
- •The Use and Effect of the Patency File in Cleaning of the Root Canals in Teeth with Vital Pulps
- •References
- •Static Versus Dynamic Irrigation
- •The Vapor Lock Effect
- •MDA Mode of Use
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Apical Negative Pressure
- •The EndoVac System
- •Method of Use
- •Debris Removal
- •Microbial Control
- •Smear Layer Removal
- •Apical Vapour Lock
- •Calcium Hydroxide Removal
- •Sodium Hypochlorite Incidents
- •Safety
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •10: Sonic and Ultrasonic Irrigation
- •Introduction
- •Ultrasonic Activation
- •Ultrasonic Energy Generation
- •Debris and Smear Layer Removal
- •Safety
- •Laser-Activated Irrigation (LAI)
- •Sonic Activation
- •Debris and Smear Layer Removal
- •Safety
- •Summary
- •References
- •The Self-Adjusting File (SAF) System
- •The Self-Adjusting File (SAF)
- •The RDT Handpiece Head
- •EndoStation/VATEA Irrigation Pumps
- •Mode of Irrigation by the SAF System
- •Positive Pressure Irrigation
- •Negative Pressure Irrigation
- •No-Pressure Irrigation
- •Mode of Action of EDTA
- •Mode of Cleaning with the SAF System
- •Disinfection of Oval Canals
- •Effect of Cleaning on Obturation
- •The Challenge of Isthmuses
- •The Challenge of Immature Teeth
- •References
- •12: Ozone Application in Endodontics
- •Introduction
- •Applications of Ozone in Medicine
- •Ozone in Dentistry
- •Effects on Dentin Bonding
- •Ozone in Endodontics
- •Antibacterial Activity
- •Antifungal Activity
- •Ozone and Endotoxin
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Newer Laser Technology
- •PIPS
- •PIPS Protocol
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •History
- •The Rationale for Local Application of Antibiotics
- •Tetracyclines
- •Structure and Mechanisms of Action
- •Properties
- •Applications in Endodontics
- •Substantivity of Tetracyclines
- •MTAD
- •Antimicrobial Activity
- •Substantivity of MTAD
- •Smear Layer Removal and Effect on Dentin
- •Toxicity of MTAD
- •Tetraclean
- •Antibacterial Activity
- •Substantivity of Tetraclean
- •Smear Layer Removal Ability
- •Ledermix Paste
- •Triple Antibiotic Paste
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •16: Intracanal Medication
- •The Infectious Problem
- •Calcium Hydroxide
- •Vehicles for Calcium Hydroxide
- •Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Effects
- •Combination with Biologically Active Vehicles
- •Paste in CPMC
- •Paste in CHX
- •Chlorhexidine Alone for Intracanal Medication
- •Other Intracanal Medicaments
- •Other Indications for Intracanal Medication
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Missing Canals
- •Vertical Root Fracture
- •Infection
- •Removal of Filling Material
- •Carrier-Based Filling Materials
- •Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl)
- •Chelants
- •Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA)
- •Chlorhexidine Digluconate (CHX)
- •Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Irrigation Techniques
- •Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •19: Conclusion and Final Remarks
- •Index
296 |
R.S. Cunha and C.E. da Silveira Bueno |
|
|
dissolve the smear layer and concomitantly disinfect the root canal system [16, 36, 67].
Chlorhexidine Digluconate (CHX)
Chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) should be used as the final irrigant. The use of CHX as an auxiliary irrigant in endodontic treatment has been suggested due to its antimicrobial nature and its ability to remain and have a long-lasting effect on the dentin, therefore preventing or delaying recontamination. This long-lasting effect is termed “substantivity.” In an in vivo study, Leonardo et al. [34] evaluated the antimicrobial substantivity of 2 % CHX in teeth with pulp necrosis and radiographically visible chronic periradicular lesions. The authors demonstrated that CHX prevented microbial activity in the root canal system with residual effects lasting for up to 48 h after application. When used as a supplemental irrigating solution, CHX has the capacity to reduce the bacterial load inside the root canals [47, 79].
Although CHX is effective against bacterial biofilms, NaOCl is still the only irrigation solution with the capacity of disrupting biofilms [41].
Concluding Remarks
In order to achieve optimal disinfection in retreatment cases, clinicians should be prepared to remove as much of the previous filling material as possible. This removal process may be tiring and time consuming. Solvents may be used if needed; however, caution is advised due to their toxicity. The combined use of the dental operating microscope (DOM) and ultrasonics may enhance the removal of filling material and increase the area of dentin that comes into contact with the disinfecting solutions. A combination of irrigating solutions is important to achieve the objective of ideal disinfection.
References
1. AAE – glossary of endodontic terms. American Association of Endodontics, Chicago, IL, USA. 8th ed. 2012.
2. Ahmetoglu F, Keles A, Yalcin M, Simsek N. Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: a scanning electron microscopic study. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(1):53–7.
3.Arslan H, Ayrancı LB, Karatas E, Topçuoğlu HS, Yavuz MS, Kesim B. Effect of agitation of EDTA with 808-nanometer diode laser on removal of smear layer. J Endod. 2013;39(12):1589–92.
4. Baratto Filho F, Ferreira EL, Fariniuk LF. Efficiency of the 0.04 taper ProFile during the re-treatment of gutta-percha-filled root canals. Int Endod J. 2002;35: 651–4.
5.Barbosa SV, Burkard DH, Spångberg LS. Cytotoxic effects of gutta-percha solvents. J Endod. 1994;20(1): 6–8.
6. Basrani BR, Manek S, Sodhi RN, Fillery E, Manzur A. Interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. J Endod. 2007;33(8):966–9.
7. Beasley RT, Williamson AE, Justman BC, Qian F. Time required to remove guttacore, thermafil plus, and thermoplasticized gutta-percha from moderately curved root canals with ProTaper files. J Endod. 2013;39:125–8.
8. Brul S, Coote P. Preservative agents in foods. Mode of action and microbial resistance mechanisms. Int J Food Microbiol. 1999;50(1–2):1–17.
9. Bueno CE, Delboni MG, de Araújo RA, Carrara HJ, Cunha RS. Effectiveness of rotary and hand files in gutta-percha and sealer removal using chloroform or chlorhexidine gel. Braz Dent J. 2006;17(2):139–43.
10.Carr GB, Schwartz RS, Schaudinn C, Gorur A, Costerton JW. Ultrastructural examination of failed molar retreatment with secondary apical periodontitis: an examination of endodontic biofilms in an endodontic retreatment failure. J Endod. 2009;35(9): 1303–9.
11.Cavenago BC, Ordinola-Zapata R, Duarte MA, del Carpio-Perochena AE, Villas-Bôas MH, Marciano MA, Bramante CM, Moraes IG. Efficacy of xylene and passive ultrasonic irrigation on remaining root filling material during retreatment of anatomically complex teeth. Int Endod J. 2014;47(11):1078–83.
12.Chutich MJ, Kaminski EJ, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP. Risk assessment of the toxicity of solvents of gutta-percha used in endodontic retreatment. J Endod. 1998;24(4):213–6.
13.Crump MC, Natkin E. Relationship of broken root
canal instruments to endodontic case prognosis: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc. 1970;80: 1341–7.
14. Cunha RS, De Martin AS, Barros PP, da Silva FM, Jacinto Rde C, Bueno CE. In vitro evaluation of the cleansing working time and analysis of the amount of gutta-percha or Resilon remnants in the root canal walls after instrumentation for endodontic retreatment. J Endod. 2007;33(12):1426–8.
15.De Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR, Marquis V, Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study–phases 3 and 4: orthograde retreatment. J Endod. 2008;34(2):131–7.
17 Disinfection in Nonsurgical Retreatment Cases |
297 |
|
|
16. De-Deus G, Souza EM, Marins JR, Reis C, Paciornik S, Zehnder M. Smear layer dissolution by peracetic acid of low concentration. Int Endod J. 2011;44(6): 485–90.
17. De Mello Junior JE, Cunha RS, Bueno CE, Zuolo ML. Retreatment efficacy of gutta-percha removal using a clinical microscope and ultrasonic instruments: part I – an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(1):e59–62.
18. Di Fiore PM, Genov KA, Komaroff E, Li Y, Lin L. Nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture: a clinical practice assessment. Int Endod J. 2006;39:700–8.
19. Du T, Wang Z, Shen Y, Ma J, Cao Y, Haapasalo
M.Effect of long-term exposure to endodontic disinfecting solutions on young and old Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in dentin canals. J Endod. 2014;40(4): 509–14.
20.Dugas NN, Lawrence HP, Teplitsky PE, Pharoah MJ, Friedman S. Periapical health and treatment quality assessment of root-filled teeth in two Canadian populations. Int Endod J. 2003;36(3):181–92.
21.Edgar SW, Marshall JG, Baumgartner JC. The antimicrobial effect of chloroform on Enterococcus faecalis after gutta-percha removal. J Endod. 2006;32(12): 1185–7.
22.European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod
J.2006;39(12):921–30.
23.Falk KW, Sedgley CM. The influence of preparation size on the mechanical efficacy of root canal irrigation in vitro. J Endod. 2005;31(10):742–5.
24.Faria-Júnior NB, Loiola LE, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Berbert FL, Tanomaru-Filho M. Effectiveness of three solvents and two associations of solvents on guttapercha and resilon. Braz Dent J. 2011;22(1):41–4.
25.Filipo-Perez C, Bramante CM, Villas-Boas MH, Húngaro Duarte MA, Versiani MA, Ordinola-Zapata
R.Micro-computed tomographic analysis of the root canal morphology of the distal root of mandibular first molar. J Endod. 2015;41(2):231–6.
26.Fruchi Lde C, Ordinola-Zapata R, Cavenago BC,
Hungaro Duarte MA, Bueno CE, De Martin AS. Efficacy of reciprocating instruments for removing filling material in curved canals obturated with a single-cone technique: a micro-computed tomographic analysis. J Endod. 2014;40(7):1000–4.
27.Gordon MPJ. The removal of gutta-percha and root canal sealers from root canals. N Z Dental J. 2005;101: 44–52.
28.Gorni FG, Gagliani MM. The outcome of endodontic retreatment: a 2-yr follow-up. J Endod. 2004;30(1): 1–4.
29.Grischke J, Müller-Heine A, Hülsmann M. The effect of four different irrigation systems in the removal of a root canal sealer. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(7): 1845–51.
30.Hunter KR, Doblecki W, Pelleu Jr GB. Halothane and eucalyptol as alternatives to chloroform for softening gutta-percha. J Endod. 1991;17(7):310–1.
31. Karapinar-Kazandag M, Basrani BR, Friedman S. The operating microscope enhances detection and negotiation of accessory mesial canals in mandibular molars. J Endod. 2010;36(8):1289–94.
32.Keleş A, Köseoğlu M. Dissolution of root canal sealers in EDTA and NaOCl solutions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(1):74–9.
33.Kerekes K, Tronstad L. Long-term results of endodontic treatment performed with a standardized technique. J Endod. 1979;5:83–90.
34.Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LAB, et al. In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2 % chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution. J Endod. 1999;25:167–71.
35.Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Damião de Sousa-Neto M. Micro-computed tomographic analy-
sis of the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. J Endod. 2014;40(5):710–6.
36. Lottanti S, Gautschi H, Sener B, Zehnder M. Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic and peracetic acid irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer. Int Endod J. 2009;42(4):335–43.
37.Marquis VL, Dao T, Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto Study. Phase III: initial treatment. J Endod. 2006;32(4):299–306.
38.Martos J, Ferrer Luque CM, González-Rodríguez MP, Arias-Moliz MT, Baca P. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and chloroform alone and combinated with cetrimide against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2013;3(1):44–8.
39.McDonald MN, Vire DE. Chloroform in the endodontic operatory. J Endod. 1992;118(6):301–3.
40. Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R, Hof
R.The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 1: respecting the root canal anatomy–a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod. 2010;36(4):679–90.
41.Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int Endod
J.2009;42:288–302.
42.Nair PN. Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15(6):348–81.
43.Nevares G, Cunha RS, Zuolo ML, Bueno CE. Success rates for removing or bypassing fractured instruments: a
prospective clinical study. J Endod. 2012;38(4):442–4. 44. Nevares G, Albuquerque DS, Zuolo ML, Bueno CES, Cunha RS. Efficacy of retreatment in root canals filled with thermoplasticized techniques. In: 92nd International Association for Dental Research General Session – IADR, 2014, Cape Town. J Dent Res.
93(Special Issue B):1498.
45.Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Aprecio RM, Handysides R, Jaramillo DE. Biofilm removal by 6 % sodium hypochlorite activated by different irrigation techniques. Int Endod J. 2014;47(7):659–66.
46.Ordinola-Zapata R, Monteiro Bramante C, Gagliardi
Minotti P, Cavalini Cavenago B, Gutmann JL, Moldauer BI, Versiani MA, Hungaro Duarte MA. Micro-CT evaluation of C-shaped mandibular first premolars in a Brazilian subpopulation. Int Endod J. 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
298 |
R.S. Cunha and C.E. da Silveira Bueno |
|
|
47.Paiva SS, Siqueira Jr JF, Rôças IN, Carmo FL, Ferreira DC,CurveloJA,SoaresRM,RosadoAS.Supplementing the antimicrobial effects of chemomechanical debride-
ment with either passive ultrasonic irrigation or a final rinse with chlorhexidine: a clinical study. J Endod. 2012;38(9):1202–6.
48. Panitvisai P, Parunnit P, Sathorn C, Messer HH. Impact of a retained instrument on treatment outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2010;36: 775–80.
49. Paqué F, Ganahl D, Peters OA. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by microcomputed tomography. J Endod. 2009;35(7):1056–9.
50. Paqué F, Peters OA. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular molars with the self-adjusting file. J Endod. 2011;37(4):517–21.
51.Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J Endod. 2004;30:722–5.
52. Peters OA, Boessler C, Paqué F. Root canal preparation with a novel nickel-titanium instrument evaluated with micro-computed tomography: canal surface preparation over time. J Endod. 2010;36(6):1068–72.
53.Ricucci D, Siqueira Jr JF, Lopes WS, Vieira AR, Rôças IN. Extraradicular infection as the cause of persistent symptoms: a case series. J Endod. 2015;41(2):
265–73.
54. Rios Mde A, Villela AM, Cunha RS, Velasco RC, De Martin AS, Kato AS, Bueno CE. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal. J Endod. 2014;40(4): 543–6.
55.Sae-Lim V, Rajamanickam I, Lim BK, Lee HL. Effectiveness of ProFile.04 taper rotary instruments in endodontic retreatment. J Endod. 2000;26(2):100–4.
56. Sağlam BC, Koçak MM, Türker SA, Koçak
S.Efficacy of different solvents in removing guttapercha from curved root canals: a micro-computed tomography study. Aust Endod J. 2014;40(2):76–80.
57.Salehrabi R, Rotstein I. Endodontic treatment outcomes in a large patient population in the USA: an epidemiological study. J Endod. 2004;30(12):846–50.
58.Salehrabi R, Rotstein I. Epidemiologic evaluation of the outcomes of orthograde endodontic retreatment.
JEndod. 2010;36(5):790–2.
59. Scelza MF, Coil JM, Maciel AC, Oliveira LR, Scelza P. Comparative SEM evaluation of three solvents used in endodontic retreatment: an ex vivo study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16(1):24–9.
60.Schirrmeister JF, Meyer KM, Hermanns P, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT. Effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for removing a new synthetic poly- mer-based root canal obturation material (Epiphany) during retreatment. Int Endod J. 2006;39(2):150–6.
61.Signoretti FG, Endo MS, Gomes BP, Montagner F, Tosello FB, Jacinto RC. Persistent extraradicular infection in root-filled asymptomatic human tooth:
scanning electron microscopic analysis and microbial investigation after apical microsurgery. J Endod. 2011;37(12):1696–700.
62.Siqueira Jr JF, Rôças IN. Diversity of endodontic microbiota revisited. J Dent Res. 2009;88(11): 969–81.
63. Siqueira Jr JF. A etiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod
J. 2001;34(1):1–10.
64.Só MVR, Saran C, Magro ML, Vier-Pelisser FV, Munhoz M. Efficacy of ProTaper retreatment system in root canals filled with gutta-percha and two endodontic sealers. J Endod Oct. 2008;34(10):1223–5.
65. Solomonov M, Paqué F, Kaya S, Adigüzel O, Kfir A, Yiğit-Özer S. Self-adjusting files in retreatment: a high-resolution micro-computed tomography study. J Endod. 2012;38(9):1283–7.
66. Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2005;31:845–50.
67. Subha N, Prabhakar V, Koshy M, Abinaya K, Prabu M, Thangavelu L. Efficacy of peracetic acid in rapid disinfection of Resilon and gutta-percha cones compared with sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, and povidone-iodine. J Endod. 2013;39(10):1261–4.
68.Takahashi CM, Cunha RS, de Martin AS, Fontana CE, Silveira CF, da Silveira Bueno CE. In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of ProTaper universal rotary
retreatment system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent. J Endod. 2009;35(11):1580–3.
69. Tamse A, Fuss Z, Lustig J, Kaplavi J. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertically fractured teeth. J Endod. 1999;25:506–8.
70.Tamse A, Unger U, Metzger Z, Rosenberg M. Guttapercha solvents—a comparative study. J Endod. 1986;12(8):337–9.
71.Torabinejad M, Corr R, Handysides R, Shabahang S. Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review. J Endod. 2009;35(7):930–7.
72. Tsesis I, Rosen E, Tamse A, Taschieri S, Kfir A. Diagnosis of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth based on clinical and radiographic indices: a systematic review. J Endod. 2010;36(9): 1455–8.
73. Vieira AR, Siqueira Jr JF, Ricucci D, Lopes WS. Dentinal tubule infection as the cause of recurrent disease and late endodontic treatment failure: a case report. J Endod. 2012;38(2):250–4.
74.Weiger R, ElAyouti A, Löst C. Efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals. J Endod. 2002;28(8):580–3.
75.Wilcox LR. Endodontic retreatment with halothane versus chloroform solvent. J Endod. 1995;21(6):305–7.
76.Wourms DJ, Campbel AD, Hicks ML, Pelleu Jr GB. Alternative solvents to chloroform for guttapercha removal. J Endod. 1990;16(5):224–6.
77. Wu MK, R’oris A, Barkis D, Wesselink PR. Prevalence and extent of long oval canals in the apical third. Oral
17 Disinfection in Nonsurgical Retreatment Cases |
299 |
|
|
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;89(6):739–43.
78. Yeung W, Raldi DP, Cunha RS, Mello I. Assessment of smear layer removal protocols in curved root canals. Aust Endod J. 2014;40(2):66–71.
79. Zamany A, Safavi K, Spangberg LS. The effect of chlorhexidine as an endodontic disinfectant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96:578–81.
80.Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod. 2006; 32(5):389–98.
81. Zehnder M, Paqué F. Disinfection of the root canal system during root canal re-treatment. Endod Topics. 2011;19:58–73.
82. Zuolo AS, Mello Jr JE, Cunha RS, Zuolo ML. Bueno CE Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary techniques for removing filling material during root canal retreatment. Int Endod J. 2013;46(10):947–53.
83. Zuolo ML, Kherlakian D, Mello Jr JE, de Carvalho MC. Fagundes MIRC. Reintervention in Endodontics. São Paulo, Brazil. 1st ed. Quintessence; 2014. p. 314.
