- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Introduction
- •Resistance to Antimicrobials
- •Bacterial Cells That Persist
- •Markers of Cell Viability
- •Surface Coating
- •Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •A Brief History of the First Studies on Root Canal Anatomy
- •Computational Methods for the Study of Root Canal Anatomy
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Syringes
- •Needles
- •Physical Properties of Irrigants
- •Irrigant Refreshment
- •Wall Shear Stress
- •Apical Vapor Lock
- •Anatomical Challenges
- •Summary: Clinical Tips
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Challenges of Root Canal Irrigation
- •In Vitro: Direct Contact Tests
- •In Vivo Models
- •Sampling Methods
- •Models to Study Cleaning of Isthmus Areas
- •Dentin Canals
- •Lateral Canals
- •Smear Layer
- •New Models to Study Irrigation
- •Measuring Antibacterial Activity
- •Inaccessible Root Canal Areas
- •Particle Image Velocimetry
- •Irrigation Pressure in the Apical Canal
- •Wall Shear Stress/Wall Velocity
- •Needle Design
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Antiseptic Solutions
- •Sodium Hypochlorite
- •Mode of Action
- •Concentration
- •Volume
- •Time
- •Effect on the Dentin
- •Depth of Penetration
- •Limitations
- •Clinical Recommendation
- •Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHX) [6]
- •Molecular Structure
- •Mode of Action
- •Substantivity
- •Chlorhexidine as an Endodontic Irrigant
- •Allergic Reactions to Chlorhexidine
- •Limitations
- •Clinical Recommendations
- •Decalcifying Agents
- •Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid
- •History
- •Mode of Action
- •Applications in Endodontics
- •Interaction Between CHX and NaOCl
- •Interaction Between CHX and EDTA
- •Interaction Between EDTA and NaOCl
- •Clinical Recommendations
- •HEBP
- •Effect of Temperature
- •NaOCl + Heat
- •EDTA + Heat
- •CHX + Heat
- •Combinations and Solutions with Detergents
- •BioPure MTAD and Tetraclean
- •Mode of Action
- •Smear Layer Removal
- •Clinical Trials
- •Protocol for Use
- •QMiX
- •Protocol
- •Smear Layer Removal
- •Clinical Trials
- •Disinfection Protocol Suggested
- •References
- •Microbial Control: History
- •NaOCl: Cytotoxicity
- •NaOCl: Complications
- •Maxillary Sinus Considerations
- •Intraosseous Injection
- •The Peck Case History
- •Informed Consent
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •On Apical Transportation
- •Role of the Patency File on Irrigant Penetration into the Apical Third of Root Canals
- •The Use and Effect of the Patency File in Cleaning of the Root Canals in Teeth with Vital Pulps
- •References
- •Static Versus Dynamic Irrigation
- •The Vapor Lock Effect
- •MDA Mode of Use
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Apical Negative Pressure
- •The EndoVac System
- •Method of Use
- •Debris Removal
- •Microbial Control
- •Smear Layer Removal
- •Apical Vapour Lock
- •Calcium Hydroxide Removal
- •Sodium Hypochlorite Incidents
- •Safety
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •10: Sonic and Ultrasonic Irrigation
- •Introduction
- •Ultrasonic Activation
- •Ultrasonic Energy Generation
- •Debris and Smear Layer Removal
- •Safety
- •Laser-Activated Irrigation (LAI)
- •Sonic Activation
- •Debris and Smear Layer Removal
- •Safety
- •Summary
- •References
- •The Self-Adjusting File (SAF) System
- •The Self-Adjusting File (SAF)
- •The RDT Handpiece Head
- •EndoStation/VATEA Irrigation Pumps
- •Mode of Irrigation by the SAF System
- •Positive Pressure Irrigation
- •Negative Pressure Irrigation
- •No-Pressure Irrigation
- •Mode of Action of EDTA
- •Mode of Cleaning with the SAF System
- •Disinfection of Oval Canals
- •Effect of Cleaning on Obturation
- •The Challenge of Isthmuses
- •The Challenge of Immature Teeth
- •References
- •12: Ozone Application in Endodontics
- •Introduction
- •Applications of Ozone in Medicine
- •Ozone in Dentistry
- •Effects on Dentin Bonding
- •Ozone in Endodontics
- •Antibacterial Activity
- •Antifungal Activity
- •Ozone and Endotoxin
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Newer Laser Technology
- •PIPS
- •PIPS Protocol
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •History
- •The Rationale for Local Application of Antibiotics
- •Tetracyclines
- •Structure and Mechanisms of Action
- •Properties
- •Applications in Endodontics
- •Substantivity of Tetracyclines
- •MTAD
- •Antimicrobial Activity
- •Substantivity of MTAD
- •Smear Layer Removal and Effect on Dentin
- •Toxicity of MTAD
- •Tetraclean
- •Antibacterial Activity
- •Substantivity of Tetraclean
- •Smear Layer Removal Ability
- •Ledermix Paste
- •Triple Antibiotic Paste
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •16: Intracanal Medication
- •The Infectious Problem
- •Calcium Hydroxide
- •Vehicles for Calcium Hydroxide
- •Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Effects
- •Combination with Biologically Active Vehicles
- •Paste in CPMC
- •Paste in CHX
- •Chlorhexidine Alone for Intracanal Medication
- •Other Intracanal Medicaments
- •Other Indications for Intracanal Medication
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Missing Canals
- •Vertical Root Fracture
- •Infection
- •Removal of Filling Material
- •Carrier-Based Filling Materials
- •Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl)
- •Chelants
- •Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA)
- •Chlorhexidine Digluconate (CHX)
- •Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Irrigation Techniques
- •Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •19: Conclusion and Final Remarks
- •Index
Intracanal Medication |
16 |
|
|
José F. Siqueira Jr. and Isabela N. Rôças |
|
Abstract
Intracanal medication comprises application of a chemical substance into the root canal in order to exert some desired therapeutic effect. The most common indication for intracanal medication is to improve disinfection after chemomechanical preparation. Calcium hydroxide is the most commonly recommended antimicrobial agent to be used as an interappointment dressing. However, it has some limitations and it seems advantageous to combine it with a biologically active vehicle. Other substances, such as chlorhexidine and antibiotics, have also been used as intracanal medicaments. This chapter reviews the rationale for using an intracanal medication, the indications of use, and the mechanisms of action and clinical outcomes of the most commonly used substances.
J.F. Siqueira Jr., DDS, MSc, PhD (*) PostGraduate Program in Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Estácio de Sá University,
Av. Alfredo Baltazar da Silveira, 580/cobertura, Recreio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22790-710, Brazil e-mail: jf_siqueira@yahoo.com
I.N. Rôças, DDS, MSc, PhD PostGraduate Program in Endodontics and Molecular Microbiology Laboratory,
Faculty of Dentistry, Estácio de Sá University, Av. Alfredo Baltazar da Silveira, 580/cobertura, Recreio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22790-710, Brazil e-mail: isabela.siqueira@estacio.br
The Infectious Problem
In a nutshell, clinicians face basically two conditions that require endodontic treatment: uninfected and infected root canals. The former are represented by teeth with vital pulps, which usually need root canal treatment because of irreversible pulpitis. The latter include teeth with necrotic pulps and usually associated with primary apical periodontitis and root canal-treated teeth that require retreatment because of posttreatment apical periodontitis. In teeth with irreversible pulpitis, infection is generally restricted to the area of exposure or the coronal pulp, with the radicular pulp being inflamed or not, but not infected [1, 2]. In these cases, root canal treatment should be completed as soon as possible, with asepsis as the key element to
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 |
267 |
B. Basrani (ed.), Endodontic Irrigation: Chemical Disinfection of the Root Canal System, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16456-4_16
268 |
J.F. Siqueira Jr. and I.N. Rôças |
|
|
a |
b |
Fig. 16.1 Biofilm is the main form that bacteria are found in endodontic infections. (a) Bacterial biofilm covering the entire perimeter of the canal in cross section. (b) Higher magnification showing the biofilm attached to the canal walls. An accumulation of polymorphonuclear
neutrophils can be seen close to the biofilm. These defense cells are usually ineffective in eliminating the endodontic biofilm (Taylor’s modified Brown & Brenn staining, courtesy of Dr. Domenico Ricucci)
influence a successful outcome [3]. It seems consensual that treatment of uninfected teeth should be accomplished in a single visit, provided time, professional skills, and equipment are favorable.
Infected root canals are a completely different problem. Intraradicular infection is the primary cause of both primary and posttreatment apical periodontitis [4–7]. In infected cases, endodontic procedures need to focus not only on asepsis but also on eliminating bacteria from the canal system [8–10]. An optimal outcome of the endodontic treatment will depend on how effective the clinician is in accomplishing these goals.
The success rate of the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis is 10–25 % lower than vital teeth or necrotic teeth with no detectable disease [11–17]. Nonetheless, the outcome of treatment of infected teeth filled in the absence of detectable cultivable bacteria (negative culture) is very high and matches that of vital teeth [18]. One can thereby infer that for treatment of infected teeth (necrotic and retreatment cases) to reach a success rate comparable to that of uninfected teeth (vital cases), bacteriologic conditions within the root canals should be similar. This means that maximal bacterial reduction must be achieved in infected teeth before filling.
Bacteria colonizing the infected root canal associated with either primary or posttreatment apical
periodontitis are usually organized in biofilm structures attached to the dentinal walls (Fig. 16.1) [6, 7, 19–23]. In addition to the main root canal, bacterial biofilms can be disclosed in anatomical variations including apical ramifications, lateral canals, and isthmuses [2, 24–26]. Biofilms adhered to the apical root surface (extraradicular biofilms) have also been described in some teeth evincing posttreatment apical periodontitis [27–29]. Bacteria that invade and colonize dentinal tubules are a challenge to disinfection procedures and may affect the treatment outcome [20, 30, 31].
The main steps of endodontic treatment involved with infection control are represented by chemomechanical preparation and intracanal medication. Chemomechanical preparation is of paramount importance for root canal disinfection, since instruments and irrigants act primarily in the main canal, which is the most voluminous area of the system and consequently harbors the largest bacterial density. Bacterial elimination from the root canal is carried out by means of the mechanical action of instruments and irrigation as well as the chemical (antibacterial) action of the irrigant solutions. Although substantial amounts of bacteria are eliminated by chemomechanical preparation, studies have demonstrated that 40–60 % of the root canals still present detectable levels of bacteria after instrumentation
