- •FOREWORD
- •CONTENTS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •1.1. BACKGROUND
- •1.2. OBJECTIVE, SCOPE AND INTENDED AUDIENCE
- •1.3. PREPARATION AND STRUCTURE OF THIS PUBLICATION
- •3.1. ACTIVITIES RELATED TO INFRASTRUCTURE AND LAYOUT FOR SITE CONSTRUCTION
- •3.2. METHODS FOR PREPARING SITE INFRASTRUCTURE AND LAYOUT FOR SITE CONSTRUCTION
- •4.1. CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL WORKS
- •4.2. MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS
- •4.3. ELECTRICAL AND I&C INSTALLATIONS
- •4.4. MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
- •4.5. ECO-FRIENDLY (GREEN BUILDING) DESIGN
- •5.1. CONTAINMENT BUILDING — CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND TECHNOLOGIES
- •5.2. DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING — CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND TECHNOLOGIES
- •5.3. CONTROL ROOM COMPLEX — CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND TECHNOLOGIES
- •5.4. FUEL BUILDING — CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND TECHNOLOGIES
- •6.1. EXCAVATION
- •6.2. SETTING UP OF DEWATERING SYSTEM
- •6.3. CONSTRUCTION OF BASE SLAB
- •6.4. CONSTRUCTION OF CONDENSER COOLING WATER PIPING
- •6.5. INSTALLATION OF CONDENSER
- •6.6. CASTING OF TURBOGENERATOR PEDESTAL
- •6.7. ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL
- •7.1. INTAKE AND DISCHARGE STRUCTURES
- •7.2. CATHODIC PROTECTION
- •8. MODULARIZATION
- •8.1. DEFINITIONS
- •8.2. DESCRIPTION
- •8.4. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
- •8.5. REQUIRED PLANNING
- •8.6. POTENTIAL FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS
- •9. OPEN TOP CONSTRUCTION METHOD
- •9.1. VERY HEAVY LIFTING OPEN TOP CONSTRUCTION
- •9.2. LIFT TOWERS
- •10. QUALITY ASSURANCE, INSPECTION AND TESTING
- •10.1. DEPLOYMENT PLANNING FOR INSPECTION AND TESTING
- •10.2. RADIOGRAPHIC AND ULTRASONIC INSPECTION AND IMAGING
- •10.3. INSPECTION TOOLS
- •10.4. RETRIEVABILITY OF TEST AND CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION
- •10.5. AS-BUILT AND BUILDING INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
- •10.6. SHOP INSPECTION AND QUALITY CONTROL FOR MODULE FABRICATION
- •10.7. DOCUMENTATION
- •11. INTEGRATED PROJECT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- •11.1. BACKGROUND
- •11.2. PROJECT CONTROLS PROCESS
- •12. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
- •12.1. SUMMARY
- •12.2. CONCLUSION
- •I.1. INTEGRATED PROJECT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- •I.2. SITE CONSTRUCTION INFRASTRUCTURE AND LAYOUT FOR CONSTRUCTION
- •I.3. CIVIL WORKS
- •I.4. STRUCTURAL WORKS
- •I.5. MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS
- •I.6. ELECTRICAL AND CONTROLS INSTALLATIONS
- •I.7. TESTING MANAGEMENT
- •REFERENCES
- •BIBLIOGRAPHY
- •ABBREVIATIONS
- •CONTRIBUTORS TO DRAFTING AND REVIEWING
- •Structure of the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series
FIG. 111. Configuration of containment dome liner plates, Shin-Wolsong 1 and 2, Republic of Korea.
FIG. 112. Modularization of containment dome liner plate assembly, Shin-Wolsong 1 and 2, Republic of Korea.
13.7 m) and upper dome. The lower dome module was lifted using the Manitowoc M-1200 ringer crane. The application of dome liner plate modularization shortened the overall plant construction schedule by half a month.
As an example of modularization, at Tarapur (India), the prefabrication of piping was increased to 60-70%, as opposed to approximately 40% for previous plants in India. This reduced the field welding by 30–40%.
An example of modularization of equipment in the Balance of Plant is the main steam and feedwater piping module designed by Mitsubishi, Japan, illustrated in Fig. 113.
Figure 114 shows an example of modular construction of gas insulated switchgear in India. In this case, the construction was completed with 50% saving in time as compared to conventional construction methods.
8.4. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
Prefabrication and preassembly of modules are construction techniques used in many industries, including NPPs.
135
FIG. 113. Large module structure — main steam and feedwater piping module (credit: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd).
FIG. 114. Modularized gas insulated switchgear in India on steel-plate reinforced concrete structure construction (NPCIL).
8.4.1.Advantages
Modules may be fabricated in a controlled environment in a factory or in a workshop on the plant site. Multiple modules can be fabricated in factories or workshops, while the civil work is progressing on the site in preparation to receive the modules. On the site, only sequential assembly of the modularized assemblies is required.
136
This reduces on-site congestion, improves accessibility for personnel and materials, and can improve the construction schedule. It can also significantly reduce the manpower needs for the site work at an NPP.
Other important attributes and advantages of modularization include:
—Capability for mass production of modules for several units, with the associated benefit of reducing production time and labour requirements;
—Provision of a controlled environment for module production;
—Manufacturing of modules before the site becomes available;
—Potential to utilize accelerated curing techniques for concrete modules;
—Reduced schedule (if the module is applied to the critical path);
—Reduced field work and levelized on-site manpower;
—Increased productivity and quality under factory environment;
—Increased safety and efficiency at ground level work.
The chief benefit of modularization is that it shortens schedules by:
—Creating parallel construction activities;
—Increasing the productivity of workers by allowing assembly in controlled shop environments as opposed to construction sites;
—Reducing work-site congestion so that on-site craft is more productive;
—Allowing construction of modules at grade and in easy-to-reach positions (e.g. vertical wall reinforcement constructed in horizontal position on ground);
—Removing or reducing the effects of weather at the construction site (if module assembly occurs in indoor facilities);
—Reducing construction time of some systems and equipment, since testing may be conducted within the shop.
With the application of modularization techniques, a reduction of four to five months could be achieved in the construction schedule.
The decision as to whether to apply the modular approach should be made in the conceptual design stage, and it must be then followed throughout the project: from detailed design, engineering, procurement, fabrication and installation, to completion of commissioning. In this way, equipment can be designed to be located so that it conveniently fits into a module. In addition to the capacity of the VHL crane, considerations in sizing modules include whether the site is accessible from the sea, or if it is necessary to fabricate sub-modules to be shipped by rail to the site. Examples of modules include structural modules; containment liner modules; electrical equipment modules with their own structural frames; cable tray modules; piping and valve modules; and stairwell modules. Modularization can also influence testing procedures, as preliminary tests can be done on many components at the fabrication facility to help eliminate potential sources of error before conducting formal tests after installation at the construction site.
8.4.2.Disadvantages
The use of modularization places several requirements on the project schedule. Engineering design must be complete prior to module procurement. The quality of the modules off-site and on-site must be strictly ensured for successful modularization to take place. The schedule for component procurements will also be affected: materials required for modules will have to be ordered earlier than was necessary for conventional stick-build construction. The use of multiple module vendors will also require strict coordination to ensure proper delivery times. Finally, modularization will require a detailed plan for how to sequence and schedule connections between adjoining modules.
Modularization does introduce challenges to project schedules. These challenges include, but are not restricted to:
—Design schedules may increase because of additional upfront work;
—Extensive design effort may be required;
137
—Each module might have a unique rigging strategy;
—In some cases, the size and weight of large modules require that modules be delivered by barge to the site;
—Construction of temporary transportation infrastructure and lay-down areas will be required during the site preparation phase to stage and move large modules once delivered on-site;
—Late delivery of modules can cause schedule delays and setbacks;
—Installation of modules must be highly structured and prioritized so connections can be made expeditiously;
—Damage to modules during shipment to the site can cause delays.
In addition to the impact on construction schedule and reduction of site labour requirements, some important factors which need to be examined in making the decision to modularize include:
—The necessity to complete the total design of the plant before module fabrication;
—Construction of factories or workshops for fabrication of modules;
—The qualification of separate vendors has an influence on nuclear quality programmes and thus influences and complicates module fabrication;
—The necessity for earlier outlay of funds for engineering, materials and components before module fabrication;
—Increased engineering for modules regarding transportability and handling at site;
—Increased engineered temporary support steels;
—The need for expensive heavy lift cranes and the complexity due to placement, movement and establishing these cranes at site;
—Transportation costs due to size of modules.
8.5.REQUIRED PLANNING
In addition to the impact on construction schedule and reduction of site labour requirements, some important factors which need to be examined in making the decision to modularize include:
—The necessity to complete the total design of the plant before module fabrication;
—Construction of factories or workshops for fabrication of modules;
—The necessity for earlier outlay of funds for engineering, materials and components before module fabrication;
—Increased engineering for modules;
—Increased temporary bracing steels;
—The need for expensive heavy lift cranes;
—Increased transportation costs.
8.6.POTENTIAL FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS
Modularization has a great potential to significantly reduce the construction schedule. The steel–plate reinforced structure (SC structure described in Paragraph 0) allows bulk commodities to be fitted on the surface plate when the steel plate is reinforced with structural steels attached to the inner surface of the steel plates. The composite large scale module can be manufactured using the SC structure. The composite module comprises walls and slabs welded together, and components outfitted along the walls and below the slab, including piping, cable tray and HVAC ducts. The module can be enlarged according to the capacity of the VHL crane, which could be 500–1000 t. The concrete is to be placed into the wall and slabs after the installation of the modules. This method of plant construction is similar to assembling toy building blocks. Figure 115 shows the concept of the composite large scale module method, Figs 116 and 117 show examples of the SC structure technique, and Fig. 118 indicates early engineering requirements on SC structure construction.
138
FIG. 115. Concept of composite large scale module construction method as being implemented on China AP1000 plants.
Structure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5HEDU |
|
SC |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
)RUP |
|
structure |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FRQFUHWHConcrete
Concrete
Steel plate
Headed stud
Tie bar
SC wall
Sleeve for piping
(PEHGGHG SODWH
Half SC slab
Basemat
(RC)
Joint rebar 
FIG. 116. Steel-plate reinforced concrete technique (Toshiba).
139
FIG. 117. Steel-plate reinforced concrete structure technique being applied to nuclear related buildings and facilities (Tepco).
FIG. 118. Early engineering requirements on steel-plate reinforced concrete structure construction (Toshiba).
140
