Ebooki / SGT-Volume2

Searl knowledge: 1946-1968: Legal: SEARL NO: 013787346: Legal: SEARLE NO: 013787451.

Another proof: photo taken in Israel, a member of my new team there, who has proven to me to be the most sincere of the lot. Sad that the money man want it patented, which the patient office advises me not to: as it is a knowhow. The UK investor and his solicitor took me to their office to show them the S.E.G. demonstration, they agreed that I could apply for patient there, but advised me that all the knowhow would have to be given, better if my interest is the planet not to patent it. Thus my backer agrees with me to continue without the patent cover.

WHAT ALGEBRA IS ABOUT?

Searl states that the rule 4 which was a(bc) = (ab)c, and it was noted that this was a very concise and compact way of avoiding such a clumsy statement in words as ‘If you multiply the product of two numbers by a third you will get the same result as you would obtain by multiplying the product of the third number and one of the others by the remaining number’. Searl says that if we must use words to express the abstract truth it would be much easier to do so by illustration, using beads or pebbles, or geometrical figures. Searl states that the mathematical statement is usually regarded as algebraic. Searl explains that algebra is merely a convenient way of discussing number without using particular numbers.

Searl says that it would be a shame to break the next block of numbers up, due to lack of space here. Searl trust that you who ask for help; are finding this document helpful! Page 396©

Searl knowledge: 1946-1968: Legal: SEARL NO: 013787346: Legal: SEARLE NO: 013787451.

Searl shows you what it takes to develop such products like the

S.E.G. and the I.G.V.

Searl states: that it is not mathematics alone, that create the S.E.G. or the I.G.V. but the support gear, components, electronic test equipment. Which also includes skill labour, which today is not cheap? But there are still a few humans around and they are finding me and joining to help the technology to the marketplace. A big push is on its way; we shall win!

I have had the pleasure to meet and talk about the I.G.V. with a pilot test examiner name Paul, I hope I shall in the near future; in fact very near future will fly with him to get to know the area from the air. That airport was Van Nuys; which is very close to me, not as close as Gillespie Field, which of course you know is at the bottom of my garden, so to speak. A number of the staff have seen me there many days, for dinner, with Mike and sometimes includes Morris as well. Some of the staff sees that I am preparing to get back to flying again. Which: clearly shows my intension in this document. A twin Jet is my line up at this time.

Here in this document you can witness the kind of questions that I will be expected to answer. There are some changes since my days of flying, but should not create any problems. If I go ahead with flying it will be from Gillespie Field, as I am only 300 metres MSL and the field is 388 feet MSL. Therefore it sits below me.

As Searl has quoted, materials play a vital part for success: The question which I put to you experts on the web; do you know in metals what these letters stand for? A, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K,L,M, N, P, R, S,T, W each of these letters have a related specification, but note that tables of related specification are a guide and are not to be taken as exact equivalents. Which represent just one problem to cope with?

Searl from time to time, break up upon what he is writing, to give you time to study what he has presented to the reader. This fill in details are showing the FACTS which goes on behind the lab doors, the sorting materials out for our next run of testing; cost money, which has to be found to pay the cost of it. One thing now; is that we are now in a position to completely produce the S.E.G. in house, from lumps of raw material to cut cost.

Page 397©

Searl knowledge: 1946-1968: Legal: SEARL NO: 013787346: Legal: SEARLE NO: 013787451.

Yes, that is my member from Canada, dear Flowerbower; A video clip was shown to me last night, Sunday 2nd November 2014; that you are still suffering from diarrhoea on YouTube. I am somewhat surprise that viewers don’t tell you what to do; like you ought to take 100 sleeping pills with your meal, which ought to stop that diarrhoea for some time, thus your anus can have a rest Flowerbower, which by now your anus must be very painful Peter

King.

Searl says let us try one more example like 1949, 1950 and 1951:

1949 x 1951 = 3,802,499

1950 x 1950 = 3,802,500 again the difference is 1.

Searl feels that he has shown proof, that it is true. Thus it cannot be assumption.

Searl informs you that the mathematician expresses the general truth underlying these relationships in a theorem. Searl states, that the theorem is of no use until it has been established by rigorous proof; thereafter it may be applied to any situation strictly comparable with those above.

Searl says that the theorem may be stated thus: If a, b and c is consecutive whole numbers:

b2 – ac = 1. Searl will test this statement out for the truth.

Page 399©

Searl knowledge: 1946-1968: Legal: SEARL NO: 013787346: Legal: SEARLE NO: 013787451.

Here again Searl shows proof, not assumptions, Here we view what Searl needs to understand for his research and development undertakings. Searl will when he find time give you more samples of his knowledge based, which most comes from his dreams. But under test proves true and not assumption.

Searl says let’s try one more in the opposite option, Searl use his year of birth as a sample:

1932 x 1934 = 3,736,488

1933 x 1933 = 3,736,489 again, we see the difference = 1.

Searl states, that again, he proves the truth, and not assumptions.

Searl stated on that he would check out the theorem for proof it works. Let’s assume that:

a = 12, b = 13 and c = 14: then:

(b2 = 169) (ac = 12 x 14 = 168) (b2 – ac) = 1 proves it’s true.

Searl states; we sure observe a lot of crap on the internet, which you may now understand that issue will turn off investors.

Page 400©

Searl knowledge: 1946-1968: Legal: SEARL NO: 013787346: Legal: SEARLE NO: 013787451.

Figure EGLK: Here at Blackbushe Airport, is where Searl was train to become a pilot. This actual image, relates to the site in 1985, time has passed, time may have made changes, if it still operating. It comes under the CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY who sets the rules by which you can get a license to fly for various ranks. I shall give more details later as, crap has appeared on the internet by Flowerbower for some years now that I am not a pilot. Through my books you can see that I was. Remember now I come under the FAA Federal

Aviation Administration.

Searl states that if the theorem is sound; and we have not tried to prove it is; Searl states then it may be applied to such a trio as 1948, 1949 and 1950 Searl agrees that it is quite a dramatic truth and leads itself to some dramatic uses. Searl points out that to take a very simple example, 299 times 301 = 89,999 may be done mentally Flowerbower by squaring 3002 = (300 x 300 = 90,000) and taking away 1 = (89,999). Searl understands that there are other theorems around, another which Searl would like to quote is concerning three consecutive numbers a, b and c is stated thus:

b = ½ (a +c)

Searl feels that it may be such an obvious truth that no proof is considered necessary. Searl says, let me think about this issue in relation to Searl school days, as it was a church school, there surely must be some saying that will fit in here; sure enough there is: Apostle Paul said, “Prove all things; hold fast that which is good”. Searl will prove the theorem, on the next page.

Page 401©

Searl knowledge: 1946-1968: Legal: SEARL NO: 013787346: Legal: SEARLE NO: 013787451.

Again, Searl is showing his world of reality, in which he understand that only a few hundred people knows about this technology, which plays a part of the Searl Technology, and for your knowledge base their control functions to a require level.

Searl state: Let b any positive integer: then (b – 1) and (b + 1) are the integers which immediately precede and follow it (corresponding with a and c above), and:

Which: is what searl set out to prove. The brackets are used like baskets simply to hold things together. Searl hopes to in a later part of this document show their use will be considered more fully to his understanding. Searl expect that the last theorem was perhaps not very exciting; Searl understand the feeling, from his experience of dating girls. Just for fun let look at the chances Searl has of a date at Saturday dance night:

A = 10 18 years old females, b = 11 18 old males and c = 12 over 50 years old females. Females = a = 10 + c = 12 = a x c = 120 females + males b = 11 x 11 = 121 options for Searl = 241 Searl chances of a date = 1 male; in fact it was zero rated.

Page 403©

Searl knowledge: 1946-1968: Legal: SEARL NO: 013787346: Legal: SEARLE NO: 013787451.

Figure 1.15: Searl says that the practical method of proving the theorem of Pythagoras is called Perigal’s Dissection.

<(i)

The cutting lines in (i) are parallel and at right angles to the hypotenuse, intersecting at the centre of the square. After cutting out the five shaded pieces refit them on the hypotenuse to form a new square.

<(ii)

Sliding only permitted: no rotation; is allowed.

<(iii)

<(iv)

This is the man who is telling you how he did it. Prof. John Roy Robert Searl. You demanded how on the web – this is how – Amen!

Searl has been badly slandered on the YouTube by mental defective idiots, who have no idea of what they are talking about. I can name quite a number of them.

Page 405©