
Lesson topic №25. Нарушения ритма (Cardiac arrhythmia in the outpatient setting)
.pdf
Atrial fibrillation: better symptom management
Rate control is an integral part of AF management, and is often sufficient to improve AF-related symptoms.
Lenient rate control (heart-rate target <110 bpm) is an acceptable initial approach, regardless of HF status (with the exception of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy), unless symptoms call for stricter rate control.
Pharmacological rate control can be achieved with beta-blockers, digoxin, diltiazem, and verapamil, or combination therapy.

Atrial fibrillation: better symptom management
Beta-blockers are often first-line rate-controlling agents, largely based on better acute rate control.
Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NDCC) verapamil and diltiazem provide reasonable rate control.
Amiodarone can be useful as a last resort when heart rate cannot be controlled with combination therapy.
Ablation of the atrioventricular node and pacemaker implantation can control ventricular rate when medication fails.

Atrial fibrillation: better symptom management
The «rhythm control strategy» refers to attempts to restore and maintain sinus rhythm, and may engage a combination of treatment approaches, including cardioversion, antiarrhythmic medication, and catheter ablation.
The primary indication for rhythm control is to reduce AF-related symptoms and improve quality of life.

Atrial fibrillation: better symptom management
Synchronized cardioversion is recommended for haemodynamically unstable patients.
Synchronized direct current electrical cardioversion is the preferred choice in haemodynamically compromised AF patients as it is more effective than pharmacological cardioversion.
In stable patients, either pharmacological cardioversion or electrical cardioversion can be attempted; pharmacological cardioversion is less effective but does not require sedation.
A wait-and-watch approach with rate control medication only and cardioversion when needed within 48 h of symptom onset was as safe as and non-inferior to immediate cardioversion of paroxysmal AF, which often resolves spontaneously within 24 h.
Pre-treatment with amiodarone, sotalol or propafenone should be considered to facilitate the success of electrical cardioversion.

Atrial fibrillation: better symptom management

Atrial fibrillation: better symptom management
«Pill in the pocket»
In selected outpatients with rare paroxysmal AF episodes, a self-administered oral dose of propafenone (450-600 mg) may be preferred (permitting an earlier conversion), provided that the drug safety and efficacy has previously been established in the hospital setting.
Should not be used in ischemic heart disease and/or significant structural heart disease.

Atrial fibrillation: better symptom management
Antiarrhythmic drugs used for long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm in AF patients
Drug |
Dose |
|
Contraindications/precautions/comments |
|
|
|
|
Amiodarone |
3 × 200 mg daily |
• |
The most effective AAD |
|
over 4 weeks, |
• Lower AF recurrence compared with sotalol and dronedarone |
|
|
then 200 mg daily |
• |
Also reduces ventricular rate (for 10 − 12 bpm), safe in patients |
|
|
|
with HF |
|
|
• Concomitant use with other QT-prolonging drugs with caution |
|
|
|
• Concomitant use with VKAs or digitalis (their dose should be |
|
|
|
|
reduced) |
|
|
• Increased risk of myopathy when used with statins |
|
|
|
• Requires regular surveillance for liver, lung, and thyroid toxicity |
|
|
|
• Has atrioventricular nodal-slowing properties, but should not be |
|
|
|
|
used as first intention for rate control |
|
|
• QT prolongation is common but rarely associated with torsades |
|
|
|
|
de pointes (<0.5%) |
|
|
• Torsades de pointes occurs infrequently during treatment with |
|
|
|
|
amiodarone (the proarrhythmia caution requires QT-interval and |
|
|
|
TU-wave monitoring) |
|
|
|
|

Atrial fibrillation: better symptom management
Antiarrhythmic drugs used for long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm in AF patients
Drug |
Dose |
Contraindications/precautions/comments |
|
|
|
•Should be discontinued in case of excessive QT prolongation (>500 ms)
•ECG at baseline, after 4 weeks
•Contraindicated in manifest hyperthyroidism
•Numerous and frequent extracardiac side-effects may warrant discontinuation of amiodarone, thus making it a second-line treatment when other choices are possible

Atrial fibrillation: better symptom management
Antiarrhythmic drugs used for long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm in AF patients
Drug |
Dose |
Contraindications/precautions/comments |
|
|
|
Propafenone |
150 - 300 mg |
• Should not be used in patients with significant renal or liver |
|
three times daily |
disease, ischaemic heart disease, reduced LV systolic function, or |
|
|
asthma |
|
|
• Should be discontinued in case of QRS widening >25% above |
|
|
baseline and in patients left bundle-branch block and any other |
|
|
conduction block >120 ms |
|
|
• Caution when sinoatrial/atrioventricular conduction disturbances |
|
|
presenta |
|
|
• Increases concentration of warfarin/acenocoumarin and digoxin |
|
|
when used in combination |
|
|
• May increase AFL cycle length, thus promoting 1:1 |
|
|
atrioventricular conduction and increasing ventricular rate |
|
|
• ECG at baseline and after 1 - 2 weeks |
|
|
|

Atrial fibrillation: better symptom management
Antiarrhythmic drugs used for long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm in AF patients
Drug |
Dose |
|
Contraindications/precautions/comments |
|
|
|
|
Sotalol |
80 - 160 mg twice |
• |
Only class III effects if dosing >160 mg daily |
|
a day |
• |
Considering its safety and efficacy and potential drug |
|
|
|
alternatives, sotalol should be used with a caution |
|
|
• Should not be used in patients with HFrEF, significant LVH, |
|
|
|
|
prolonged QT, asthma, hypokalaemia, or CrCl <30 mL/min. |
|
|
• Dose-related torsades de pointes may occur in >2% of patients |
|
|
|
• Should be discontinued in case of excessive QT prolongation |
|
|
|
|
(>500 ms or >60 ms increase) |
|
|
• The potassium channel-blocking effect increases with increasing |
|
|
|
|
dose and, consequently, the risk of ventricular proarrhythmia |
|
|
|
(torsades de pointes) increases |
|
|
• |
Observational data and a recent meta-analysis revealed a |
|
|
|
correlation with an increased all-cause mortality, whereas a |
|
|
|
nationwide registry analysis and two RCTs found no evidence for |
|
|
|
increased safety concerns with sotalol |
|
|
• ECG at baseline, after 1 day and after 1 - 2 weeks |
|
|
|
|
|