english-c2 / english-c2

Some people think that e-learning using the Internet is a good alternative to attending classes and lectures. However, others don't agree with this idea.

ESSAY

Due to advancements in technology nowadays we have a possibility to choose between learning via the internet and attending schools. However, while some people are sure that distance learning can make the process of education more fruitful, others doubt that it is reasonable to use the internet for educational purposes.

In my opinion, e-learning has numerous advantages. Firstly, such approach to education allows students to budget their time more rationally, as it gives them an opportunity to work on their own pace. Secondly, distance learning provides better comprehension of material, because while studying via the internet students are not disturbed by their classmates and do not have to pay attention to aspects that are irrelative(()( )*+,- irrelevant?) to education. Finally, distant learning helps learners considerably to save time and energy on transportation.

Nevertheless, supporters of the opposite opinion argue that students are not responsible enough to study via the internet because they can easily yield to temptation to play computer games or to chat with their friends in social networks instead of studying. Also, it is said that students who prefer e-learning lack communication with their peers, what influence negatively their social skills.

Although it is partly true, the arguments against e-learning are not convincing, because while learning via the internet students are as controlled by teachers as those who go to school. What is more, they have enough free time to communicate with their friends and to develop social skills.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that e-learning is truly effective as it offers students individual approach and allows both quick and slow students to study on their own pace.

Some people think that in the nearest future the majority of people will live in cities and towns, not in the countryside.

ESSAY: | -

Today people mostly live in cities, but there is also a considerable number of human who prefer countryside to mega polis. So some people think that soon the urban population will increase.

To my way of thinking, this appearance is understandable. Firstly, in the cities salaries are higher. And it means that standards of living like health care system, education etc are higher too. Secondly, they have diverse selection of everything. For example, a great number of ways of spending free time or holidays such as walking in parks, visiting museums/theaters, going to the gym etc.

On the other hand, in countries you can be almost every day outdoors and breathe fresh air, enjoy beauty of the nature. Absolutely, it is all good for your health and helps to feel yourself free.

This may be partly true, but citizens can afford taking rest outdoor too. They can go out of the cities sometimes.

To sum up, I am convinced that city life much more comfortable and perspective. However, country life is suitable for those who like wilderness or cannot stand to hassles.

It is generally believed that nuclear weapons should be banned. However, some people believe they should not

.//- | -

There is no doubt that nuclear weapons pose a serious threat to people’s lives. Nevertheless, some people think that there is no reason for worrying about bad consequence of this weapon as it does not do any harm.

In my opinion, the nuclear weapon should be banned by governments. First of all, nuclear weapon negatively impacts the environment. It pollutes the air, water and soil. Secondly, many species of animals and birds could suffer from extinction if nuclear weapon is used. What is more, as long as nuclear weapon exists people will be at risk of disappearing from this planet as the power of its destruction is enormous.

However, some people suppose that nuclear weapon is not dangerous. They think that it provides the country with powerful and efficient secure from enemies from all over the world. They also believe that it will not have any bad impact until it comes into action.

I do not share this point of view. Nuclear weapon causes a real threat to society. It destroys the world around us. Besides, it causes struggle and competition between different countries which influence social tension and provoke inappropriate living conditions.

Summing up, I strongly believe that using nuclear power should be prohibited by law as quickly as possible. Not only does it deteriorate the environment, but it also leads to the planet’s destruction.

Some people think that using bicycles in the centre has many advantages while others are sure that bicycles should not be allowed in the city centres.

ESSAY | -

Nowadays using bicycle instead of a car in central districts is increasingly growing in popularity. However, while some people find such means of transportation beneficial, others claim that bicycles only block traffic.

In my opinion, it is not preferable to use bicycles in central areas. Firstly, most highways and central roads are not provided with necessary facilities for cycling. Consequently, the cyclists who choose the city centre to ride a bike run the danger of an accident, as the flow of cars is rather fast. Secondly, the downtowns are usually overcrowded, so cycling will only create substantial inconveniences for pedestrians.

Nevertheless, cyclists are sure that using a bike in the downtown is absolutely safe and allows them not to waste money on petrol. Also, cycling in metropolitan areas is often believed to reduce noise and pollution.

It is partly true, but since it is impossible to stop using cars, bicycles are unable to resolve the problem of noise and pollution in big cities and can cause many accidents as well.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that unless necessary facilities are created, cycling in the city centres should be banned.

Today some scientists claim that cloning experiments should not be subject to government scrutiny.

ESSAY | -

With the advancements in genetic biology it is not strange that scientists' attention is centered in the development of cloning. At the same time many people argue that this scientific area is rather dangerous and should be controlled by the government.

To my way of thinking, cloning should be kept under control of the government. Firstly, cloning is a relatively new scientific area, so scientists can never be sure that the process of making a genetic twin of a person or of an animal will be completely safe. Secondly, unnatural origin of clones pose a threat to their health and may result in serious health problems, including incurable illnesses. For example, cloned creatures are likely to age quicker, because their cells have already been used. In addition, there is no guarantee that clones will be mentally healthy, therefore they may have significant difficulties in adopting to society.

On the other hand, genetic biologists prove that cloning should develop without being limited by the government claiming that it can be enormously helpful in curing diseases. For example, cloning can provide cells, tissues and even organs for medical operations and consequently save thousands of human lives.

Maybe it is true to some extent, but what they forget is that cloning is still in its infancy, so the consequences of the cloning experiments are absolutely unpredictable.

To conclude, I strongly believe that cloning should be restricted by the government as the experiments with nature are extremely dangerous and we can never foretell the results they can lead.

In your opinion should the government intervene in the rights of the individual with regard to family planning.

ESSAY:

For recent years the problem of the government’s encouragement of creating family and interfering in the rights of a person has been one of the most urgent. Some people are sure that the government should influence on people’s life. However, their opponents claim that it is people’s own business to make up mind about these serious steps.

In my opinion, the government has rights to act on planning family. First of all, there is a gap between mortality and the birth rates in modern society, therefore the government should give priority to people who are going to increase the birth rates of the country. Last but not least, couples often afraid of the birthing a child because of a lack of money. Furthermore, the government’s support is able to stimulate people’s opportunities to provide the children with good education, for example. Finally, today people think about having children too late – an university, a job and so on – all these aspects put off the birth. In some cases a woman may has some diseases. In other words, promotion to the couples can show strong support.

Opponents of this view claim that regarding to people who creating a family is not a good idea. On top of that, they say that government’s encouragement can attract only irresponsible persons, who want to spend money on their best. Moreover, people should think themselves about such serious action without outside helpers.

I found myself disagreeing with this point of view. In our country the government pays attention to for what purposes people spend their grants, consequently I am convinced that it is an obstacle for irresponsible couples.

I would like to underline that my opinion is that if government takes part in planning family and encourages it, economical and educational rates will be high. Not only do the birth rates help to increase population, but young people also can create the benefits to the country.

Russian cuisine: Healthy or Unhealthy

Many people consider that Russian cuisine delicious but unhealthy.

Essay: | -

There is no doubt that Russian cuisine is one of the most popular in the world. Some people find it healthy and nutritious, whereas others suppose that Russian food is harmful for people’s health.

In my opinion, almost all Russian national meals are more than an ordinary pleasant taste. First of all, breakfast in Russia includes a wide range of fruits and porridges which help to refresh body and spirit for the whole busy day. Secondly, there are a number of vegetable soups which provide with necessary vitamins and minerals necessary for a healthy body. What is more, many Russian dishes are hearty as they consist of meat. As people know, meat is an essential element for healthy life style partly because it has proteins and helps children to grow.

However, some people suppose than Russian food does more harm than good. They think that it consumes large quantities of sugar and meat which have a negative influence on cardio system and develop diseases.

This may be partly true, but I am convinced that Russian food is much healthier than fast-food in Europe and America. In addition, people in Russia use to eat neatly prepared homemade meals which are made of high quality products.

In summary, I strongly believe that Russian meals are extremely beneficial. Not only do they delicious and cater for the tastes of foreigners, but they also very healthy and nutritious.

Teens' Independence

Some people think that when children reach the age of 18 and finish school they can and should start living on their own.

.//0:

After finishing school young people are often faced with a difficult decision whether to continue living with their parents or to start living separately. Some people argue that the eighteen-year-old are already prepared to live without parents while others claim that school-leavers are not mature enough to live on their own.

Personally, I am sure that most young people of eighteen are not ready to independent life neither financially nor psychologically. To start with, an average person of eighteen usually don't have enough money to afford his own flat or to pay a rent. Thus, the young who want to live independently are likely to have problems with the accommodation. Furthermore, lots of young people after reaching the age of eighteen do not have enough skills to manage the housekeeping themselves, so they will have to spend a great deal of time on routine activities in stead of studying. In addition, not all young people can cope with all the problems themselves and the support of their parents is necessary for them.

Nevertheless, supporters of the opposite opinion are convinced that young people should try living on their own claiming that an independent life can bring them some valuable experience which is extremely useful in building their adult life.

Although it is true to some extent, I strongly believe that after leaving school young people should focus their attention on entering university rather than on separating from their parents.

In conclusion, I am certain that a person should start independent life after ensuring a constant income, therefore it is unreasonable for the young to start their own living after leaving school.

Sports: Doing vs Watching?

Some of my friends think it's important to do sports regularly while others would rather watch a sporting event on TV.

ESSAY: | -

There is no doubt that sport is one of the most important part of our life. Some say people should do sports, but others think that they can watch any sporting show on TV and I cannot understand this point of view.

In my opinion, everybody should exercise regularly. First of all, it helps them to keep themselves healthy mentally that allows to be in a good mood every day. Secondly, it gives a chance to prevent many diseases and reduce the risk of a heart attack in the future life. Finally, getting some daily exercises allows them to get beautiful body shape and become physically strong.

On the other hand, there are those who argue that it is not worth exercising because nowadays people have an opportunity to watch sporting events on television. They claim that it spends less time, if they watch such programs at home. Also, they think that doing sports might be expensive because people have to buy necessary equipment.

Despite these arguments, I cannot agree with this opinion because watching TV shows will never replace a real physical activity. Besides, it will never regret spending money on a useful hobby.

In conclusion, I am convinced that people should do sports regularly and pay more attention to their health.

Photo albums vs storing photos on computers

Many people enjoy having a collection of photo albums while others prefer to store photos on their computers.

.//0

Nowadays photography is an extremely widespread activity and practically in every family there is at least one photo album. But thanks to modern technologies we can not only place our photos into albums, but also download them on our computers and submit them on different websites. Let's consider which way of photo storing is more beneficial.

Personally, I'm sure that those who prefer to download photo on personal computers have more advantages. To begin with, since we don't have to print photos downloaded on computer, we save both our money and natural resources expending on the production of paper and ink. More than that, computers protect photos from discoloration and allows to maintain vivid colors during a long period of time. In addition, choosing computer for storing shots enables us not only just to store photos but to process them in different programs and to improve their quality.

Nevertheless, photo albums' lovers assure that it is much more pleasant and enjoyable to collect photos in albums. Their argument against storing photos on computer is

that in case of computer's crash we can lose all our shots. It is also said that while getting together with family it is not very convenient to look through photos on computer.

But i can't agree completely. Although it is sometimes very pleasant to view photos with family in albums, I think that storing photos on computer is more beneficial as it makes possible to improve and preserve shots' quality.

Drawing a conclusion, I'd like to stress that even if it's more common to see photos in albums, opportunities which computer storing offers should be taken into account.