Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

VanTonderJT

.pdf
Скачиваний:
6
Добавлен:
13.02.2015
Размер:
812.13 Кб
Скачать

42

Table 4.6 Leaf area (cm2cm-2) at different growth stages as affected by K-humate

applications to three soils

Growth stage

Soil

 

K-humate application (L ha-1)

 

 

 

 

0 - control

3 - single

3 - split

6 - split

 

 

S1

18644.4

19228.1

19143.6

22102.8

19779.7

Tillering

S2

19982.1

13532.4

18298.2

17449.7

17315.6

 

S3

13699.5

17572.9

19051.8

14972.6

16324.2

 

 

17442.0

16777.8

18831.2

18175.1

 

Stem

S1

42653.1

36646.0

30081.6

37533.2

36728.5

elongation

S2

36359.2

39423.9

37838.0

34690.6

37077.9

 

S3

34589.0

35775.7

32518.2

30790.5

33418.4

 

 

37867.1

37281.9

33479.3

34338.1

 

Tillering S

=

LSDT≤0.05 = 2376.0

Stem elongation S

=

ns

R =

ns

R =

ns

SxR

=

LSD T≤0.05 = 6860.9

SxR

=

ns

As mentioned earlier an increase in the photosynthetic area especially during early growth stages resulted in higher yields. Hence, to increase the incident radiation intercepted by crops and the total biomass produced, leaf area has to be increased. This was achieved at tillering with the 6 L K-humate ha-1 split application. It is known that the leaf area increases rapidly to a maximum 17 weeks after planting, followed by a sudden decrease to half the maximum size three weeks after ear emergence. It is also known that the green mainly derive it’s carbohydrates from the ear leaves (flag leaf) and stem (Davidson, 1965). Therefore, increasing the photosynthetic area will increase a crop’s canopy and thus the leaf area index which is vital for higher biomass and yield production (Lawless et al., 2004). Haboudane et al. (2004) also stated that variables such as crop and soil factors influence leaf area index, e.g. nutrient balances and disease occurrences.

Delfine et al. (2005) found that humic acid had a marginal positive effect on growth when applied to plants grown in a relatively poor soil while plants that were adequately supplied with nutrients had a limited response to humic acid. They also suggested that a positive effect can be expected when humic acid is applied to wheat leaves in a period of water shortage and in the final stages of the crop’s growth cycle.

4.3.1.3 Tiller/ear number

Appendix 4.6 and 4.7 clearly indicated a significant difference in the number of tillers per square meter at tillering on account of soil textures, and at stem elongation on account of both soil textures and K-humate applications. At tillering and stem elongation the greatest

43

number of tillers was produced by the loamy sand soil, followed by the sandy clay loam soil and then the clay loam soil. Thus, with an increase in clay content the number of tillers produced decreased. Contrasting but not significantly (Appendix 4.8) at maturity a smaller number of ears were produced by the loamy sand than the two other soils (Table 4.7).

Table 4.7 Tillering and/or ear number at different growth stages as affected by K-humate applications to three soils

Growth stage

Soil

 

K-humate application (L ha-1)

 

 

 

 

0 - control

3 - single

3 – split

6 - split

 

 

S1

317.185

325.836

331.603

351.787

331.603

Tillering

S2

354.671

297.001

305.651

348.904

326.556

 

S3

268.166

322.952

262.399

282.583

284.025

 

 

313.340

315.263

299.884

327.758

314.061

Stem

S1

472.894

374.855

380.622

346.02

393.598

elongation

S2

395.040

360.438

377.739

374.855

377.018

 

S3

322.952

308.535

299.884

294.117

306.372

 

 

396.962

347.942

352.748

338.331

358.995

 

S1

175.894

207.612

175.894

198.962

189.590

Maturity

S2

219.146

233.564

190.311

253.748

224.192

 

S3

224.913

213.379

236.447

213.379

222.030

 

 

206.651

218.185

200.884

222.030

211.937

Tillering S

=

LSD T≤0.05=43.604

Stem elongation S

=

LSD T≤0.05=37.417

Maturity S

=

ns

R =

ns

R =

LSD T≤0.05=47.727

R =

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

Earlier mentioned, K-humate affected the number of tillers at stem elongation significantly (Appendix 4.7). The control yielded the greatest number of tillers and this was significantly more than the number of tillers obtained with the 6 L K-humate ha-1 split application.

The number of tillers increased from tillering (314 tillers m-2) to the stem elongation (359 tillers m-2), but dramatically decreased to 212 ears m-2 at maturity. This reduction is a natural occurring phenomenon in wheat. Wheat plants, depending on the cultivar, have the ability to produce numerous tillers but with resource limitations not all tillers reach maturity (Miralles & Slafer, 1999). Therefore, some tillers will either stop to develop into mature ears or will be absisiced depending on the severity of stress or resource limitations.

44

4.3.2 Below-ground plant parameters

4.3.2.1 Root mass in the fertilised zone

Root mass in the fertilised zone showed no significant differences as a result of either the K-humate application by soil texture interaction or K-humate application at any of the growth stages (Appendix 4.9 – 4.11). At tillering r oot mass of the control was the greatest with the K-humate treatments showing a decrease of approximately 30% in root mass. At stem elongation and maturity the mentioned tendency was not observed.

At tillering no significant differences as a result of soil texture was observed (Appendix 4.9). Though insignificant, the loamy sand and sand clay loam soils produced greater root masses in the fertilised zone than the clay loam soil. This was not observed at stem elongation and maturity (Appendix 4.10 and 4.11). At these growth stages the mass of roots grown in the fertilised zone decreased with an increase in clay content and the loamy sand soil had a greater root mass than the clay loam soil (Table 4.7).

Table 4.8 Root mass in the fertilised zone (g m-2) at different growth stages as affected by K-humate applications to three soils

Growth stage

Soil

 

K-humate application (L ha-1)

 

 

 

 

0 - control

3 - single

3 - split

6 - split

 

 

S1

1.2883

1.2696

1.2578

1.0257

1.2103

Tillering

S2

1.8593

1.2010

1.1332

1.3962

1.3974

 

S3

1.3849

0.7373

0.8518

0.6750

0.9123

 

 

1.5109

1.0693

1.0809

1.0323

1.1733

Stem

S1

3.1646

3.2275

3.0533

2.4683

2.9784

elongation

S2

2.2223

1.6251

2.4417

2.2777

2.1417

 

S3

1.8155

1.5003

2.1032

2.5314

1.9876

 

 

2.4008

2.1176

2.5328

2.4258

2.3693

 

S1

4.0450

4.2367

3.1122

5.0934

4.1218

Maturity

S2

2.9118

2.8555

3.5545

4.5450

3.4667

 

S3

2.2376

3.1796

2.9302

1.9833

2.5827

 

 

3.0648

3.4240

3.1990

3.8739

3.3904

Tillering S

=

ns

Stem elongation S

=

LSD T≤0.05=0.89917

Maturity S

=

LSD T≤0.05=1.27023

R =

ns

R =

ns

R =

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

4.3.2.2 Root mass in the unfertilised zone

Similarly to root mass in the fertilised zone root mass in the unfertilised zone also did not differ on account of either the K-humate application by soil interaction or K-humate application at any of the growth stages (Appendix 4.12 – 4.14). However, soil texture

45

significantly influenced root mass in the unfertilised zone at stem elongation and maturity. At both these stages the loamy sand soil produced a significantly greater root mass than the clay loam soil (S3) (Table 4.9).

In comparison, root mass in the fertilised zone was on average three times greater than in the unfertilised zone at stem elongation and maturity. At tillering the difference was smaller with root mass of the unfertilised zone half that of the fertilised zone (Tables 4.8 and 4.9).

Table 4.9 Root mass in the unfertilised zone (g m-2) at different growth stages as affected by K-humate applications to three soils

Growth stage

Soil

 

K-humate application (L ha-1)

 

 

 

 

0 - control

3 - single

3 - split

6 - split

 

 

S1

0.8097

0.5533

0.7416

0.6522

0.6892

Tillering

S2

0.6719

0.8552

0.9665

0.4438

0.7344

 

S3

0.6300

0.3385

0.4908

0.5288

0.4970

 

 

0.7039

0.5824

0.7330

0.5416

0.6402

Stem

S1

1.7976

1.8192

1.9097

2.1551

1.9204

elongation

S2

1.2223

1.2483

1.4418

1.1681

1.2701

 

S3

1.0084

1.2056

1.2491

1.8397

1.3257

 

 

1.3428

1.4244

1.5335

1.7210

1.5054

 

S1

2.9412

3.1632

4.2546

3.2102

3.3923

Maturity

S2

2.0574

1.9354

1.5274

2.6693

2.0474

 

S3

0.9452

1.1649

1.7056

1.4071

1.3057

 

 

1.9813

2.0878

2.4959

2.4289

2.2485

Tillering S

=

ns

Stem elongation S

=

LSD T≤0.05=0.6259

Maturity S

=

LSD T≤0.05=0.9165

R =

ns

R =

ns

R =

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

4.3.2.3 Root mass in remaining soil

Root mass in the remaining soil was not significantly affected by the K-humate application and soil texture interaction or K-humate application as a main factor. Only soil texture significantly affected root mass (Appendix 4.15 – 4 .17) at maturity. It is worth mentioning that at maturity root mass tended to be higher with K-humate application.

Interestingly, soil texture influenced root mass differently in the remaining soil than in either the fertilised or unfertilised zones. The root mass in the remainder of the sandy clay loam soil was the greatest at stem elongation and maturity (Table 4.10). This root mass

46

was however only significantly different from the loamy sand soil at maturity (Appendix 4.17).

Table 4.10 Root mass in the remaining soil (g) at different growth stages as affected by K-humate applications to three soils

Growth stage

Soil

 

K-humate application (L ha-1)

 

 

 

 

0 - control

3 - single

3 - split

6 - split

 

 

S1

39.8318

28.9982

34.1925

27.4639

32.6216

Tillering

S2

38.6366

36.9757

47.0037

31.4319

38.5120

 

S3

40.8999

32.0461

36.7577

55.2770

41.2452

 

 

39.7894

32.6733

39.3180

38.0576

37.4596

Stem

S1

132.4905

115.1278

122.1552

127.6771

124.3627

elongation

S2

147.6476

120.5170

160.0262

95.7530

130.9859

 

S3

110.8464

100.8963

121.3685

141.3982

118.6274

 

 

130.3282

112.1804

134.5166

121.6094

124.6587

 

S1

93.8723

143.5784

130.7388

117.1811

121.3427

Maturity

S2

142.1038

186.5636

258.8734

158.3811

186.4805

 

S3

154.1069

141.9458

101.6760

127.6301

131.3397

 

 

130.0277

157.3626

163.7627

134.3974

146.3876

Tillering S

=

ns

Stem elongation S

=

ns

Maturity S

=

LSD T≤0.05=62.0099

R =

ns

R =

ns

R =

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

Trials on maize with humic acids showed significant increases in shoot and root growth (Tan & Nopamornbodi, 1979). Lulakis and Petsas (1995) also found positive results with humic acid application on tomato seedling roots. They reported that the highest number of roots were produced at concentrations of 50 to 100 ppm humic acid but an inhibitory effect was obtained when humic acid was applied at concentrations of 1000 to 2000 ppm. Vaughan and Linehan (1976) found similar results for wheat and according to Atiyeh et al. (2002) humic acids increased tomato and cucumber growth significantly. In contrast this experiment did not show a positive effect on root mass of wheat with the addition of K- humate to soil.

4.3.2.4 Root length in the fertilised zone

Root length was not significantly affected by the K-humate application and soil texture interaction, nor the main factor K-humate application (Appendix 3.18 – 3.20). However, at stem elongation a split application of 3 L K-humate increased root length with 38% compared to the control. At maturity a single application of 3 L K-humate increased root length with 33% over the control (Table 4.11).

47

Root length in the fertilised zone was significantly affected at maturity by soil texture. The loamy sand soil showed a significantly greater root length (almost double) than either the sandy clay loam or clay loam soils. However, one suspects roots to develop better in sandy than more clayey soils (Pietola, 2005). At tillering root length was greatest in the sandy clay soil but at the stem elongation root length was greatest in the loamy sand soil.

Table 4.11 Root length of the fertilised zone (mm) at different growth stages as affected by K-humate applications to three soils

Growth stage

Soil

 

K-humate application (L ha-1)

 

 

 

 

0 - control

3 - single

3 - split

6 - split

 

 

S1

705.7704

658.9238

523.6179

555.6235

610.9839

Tillering

S2

777.0099

522.2617

497.1725

867.2564

665.9251

 

S3

686.0594

400.4775

617.5519

457.9792

540.5170

 

 

722.9465

527.2210

546.1141

626.9530

 

Stem

S1

1365.6470

1276.8300

1428.3640

1152.8510

1305.9230

elongation

S2

851.7490

944.6678

1369.8090

1111.1620

1069.3470

 

S3

748.1607

698.5483

1290.8970

1344.1720

1020.4440

 

 

988.5190

973.3488

1363.0230

1202.7280

 

 

S1

1736.3700

2581.3240

1707.6810

2373.9080

2099.8210

Maturity

S2

1407.7090

1000.3920

1141.2690

1503.6480

1263.2540

 

S3

670.5283

1473.7260

1343.7440

596.4258

1021.1060

 

 

1271.5360

1685.1470

1397.5650

1491.3270

 

Tillering S

=

ns

Stem elongation S

=

ns

Maturity S

=

LSDT≤0.05= 723.63

R =

ns

R =

ns

R =

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

4.3.2.5 Root length in the unfertilised zone

Root length in the unfertilised zone was not significantly influenced by the different K- humate applications or the interaction of K-humate application and soil texture (Appendix 4.21 to 4.23). However, at tillering the greatest root length was obtained with a split application of 3 L K-humate ha-1 in the sandy clay loam soil. At stem elongation and maturity a split application of 6 L K-humate ha-1 increased root length by 25 and 29.6% respectively to the control (Table 4.12).

Root length of the unfertilised zone like that of the fertilised zone responded similar to soil texture for the same reasons (Pietola, 2005) mentioned earlier. It had to be noted that root length of the unfertilised zone was much shorter than that of the fertilised zone.

48

Table 4.12 Root length in the unfertilised zone (mm) at different growth stages as affected by K-humate applications to three soils

Growth stage

Soil

 

K-humate application (L ha-1)

 

 

 

 

0 - control

3 - single

3 - split

6 - split

 

 

S1

452.9613

316.8017

412.4118

458.2504

410.1063

Tillering

S2

387.7295

456.4874

503.9323

317.2085

416.3394

 

S3

295.3742

165.0461

373.2184

385.1834

304.7055

 

 

378.6883

312.7784

429.8542

386.8808

 

Stem

S1

815.5069

954.9988

1023.4610

962.7506

939.1794

elongation

S2

482.1658

617.4884

643.1071

490.6114

558.3431

 

S3

587.3579

665.7825

668.5630

903.1107

706.2036

 

 

628.3436

746.0899

778.3771

785.4909

 

 

S1

1442.7840

1252.6590

1541.0930

1528.1560

1441.1730

Maturity

S2

814.0221

427.7365

470.0491

1122.3700

708.5443

 

S3

322.2264

484.0605

474.1176

692.7627

493.2918

 

 

859.6776

721.4853

828.4199

1114.4300

 

Tillering S

=

ns

Stem elongation S

=

LSD T≤0.05=254.88

Maturity S

=

LSD T≤0.05=430.63

R =

ns

R =

ns

R =

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

4.3.2.6 Root length in remaining soil

The root length in the remaining soil was not significantly affected by the K-humate applications nor soil texture at any of the growth stages (Appendix 4.24 – 4.26). At tillering and stem elongation the greatest root length was obtained with a split application of 3 L K-humate ha-1, but at maturity a single application of 3 L K-humate ha-1 induced the greatest root length (Table 4.13). At the forementioned growth stages the clay loam soil produced the greatest root length followed by the sandy clay loam soil and then the loamy sand soil. However, at maturity the loamy sand soil produced the largest root length, followed by the sandy clay loam soil and then the clay loam soil.

It was reported that the incorporation of humic acids into soils stimulated root growth (Cooper et al., 1998). According to Atiyeh et al. (2002) humic acids stimulated the proliferation, branching and initiation of root hairs and could partially be attributed to enhanced nutrient uptake. The results that evolved from this experiment did not verify these researchers’ observations.

49

Table 4.13 Total root length in the remaining soil (mm) at different growth stages as affected by K-humate applications to three soils

Growth stage

Soil

 

K-humate application (L ha-1)

 

 

 

 

0 - control

3 - single

3 - split

6 - split

 

 

S1

11801.4200

9277.3080

10632.2200

8258.6050

9992.3890

Tillering

S2

11217.7900

13499.1700

11125.0500

8885.1880

11181.8000

 

S3

12027.7400

9706.5630

15721.0200

18851.9800

14076.8300

 

 

11682.3200

10827.6800

12492.7700

11998.5900

 

Stem

S1

21979.2400

22504.3400

28422.0700

28645.9600

25387.9000

elongation

S2

30635.9600

37902.0600

36021.2700

20929.1200

31372.1000

 

S3

38203.7300

24060.4600

44465.1000

36580.9700

35827.5700

 

 

30272.9800

28155.6200

36302.8200

28718.6800

 

 

S1

24457.1000

40108.7400

36661.9900

23584.0200

31202.9600

Maturity

S2

29380.1500

31823.8200

23924.0500

23825.1800

27238.3000

 

S3

31017.61

31772.9900

16783.0800

23767.1800

25835.2100

 

 

28284.9500

34568.5200

25789.7100

23725.4600

 

Tillering S

=

ns

Stem elongation S

=

ns

Maturity S

=

ns

R =

ns

R =

ns

R =

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

4.3.2.7 Root length index

Root length index was estimated by expressing the total root length of a pot in mm mm-2. As could be expected this index showed almost the same pattern as root mass and root length. Application of K-humate had no significant effect on root length index. The greatest root length index was once more been obtained with the split application of 3 L K-humate ha-1 at the tillering and stem elongation growth stages while at maturity a single application of 3 L K-humate yielded the greatest root length index (Table 4.14 and Appendix 4.27 - 4.29). In contrast to root mass and root length soil texture had no significant effect on root length index although that the three parameters showed similar trends.

Several studies showed that humic acid incrase root length, root number and root branching. These increases varied from single percentage digits but usually amounted to between 25 and 50% (Cooper et al., 1998). This was also supported by other researchers, but root growth inhibition was also established at high humic acids concentrations (Mylonas & McCants, 1980: Baraldi et al., 1991; Rajala & Peltonen-Sainio, 2001). In this study increases in root growth as manifested in the different parameters were mainly minute. In some instances however increases of 18% were recorded. The reason for not

50

being significant could be the result of a high coefficient of variance that is typical of root studies.

Table 4.14 Root length index (mm mm-2) at different growth stages as affected by K- humate applications to three soils

Growth stage

Soil

 

K-humate application (L ha-1)

 

 

 

 

0 - control

3 - single

3 - split

6 - split

 

 

S1

1.1211

0.8869

1.0007

0.8021

0.9527

Tillering

S2

1.0712

1.2524

1.0489

0.8711

1.0609

 

S3

1.1254

0.8886

1.4457

1.7037

1.2908

 

 

1.1059

1.0093

1.1651

1.1256

 

Stem

S1

2.0899

2.1398

2.6707

2.6610

2.3904

elongation

S2

2.7656

3.4139

3.2901

1.9490

2.8546

 

S3

3.4203

2.1994

4.0159

3.3588

3.2486

 

 

2.7586

2.5843

3.3256

2.6530

 

 

S1

2.3907

3.8013

3.4525

2.3777

3.0055

Maturity

S2

2.7337

2.8765

2.2089

2.2882

2.5268

 

S3

2.7691

2.9179

1.6091

2.1675

2.3659

 

 

2.6312

3.1985

2.4235

2.2778

 

Tillering S

=

ns

Stem elongation S

=

ns

Maturity S

=

ns

R =

ns

R =

ns

R =

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

SxR

=

ns

4.3.3 Yield and yield components

All yield and yield components were measured at maturity.

4.3.3.1 Seed yield

Seed yield was not significantly affected by the application of K-humate (Appendix 4.30). Soil texture however significantly influenced seed yield. The loamy sand soil and sandy clay loam soil producing significantly higher yields than the clay loam soil (Table 4.14). Though insignificant, the greatest yield was obtained with a split application of 6 L K- humate ha-1 that was 3.5% more than the control. This may seem like a small percentage but it was a yield increase of 200 kg per hectare.

51

Table 4.15 Seed yield (g m-2) as affected by different K-humate applications to three soils

Soil

 

K-humate application (L ha-1)

 

 

 

0 - control

3 - single

3 - split

6 - split

 

S1

631.0520

679.4818

655.6687

664.3893

657.6480

S2

667.8731

666.5213

582.7940

715.6974

658.2215

S3

586.1801

575.4771

578.9581

573.9140

578.6323

 

628.3684

640.4934

605.8069

651.3336

631.5006

S = LSDT≤0.05 = 76.3810

 

R = ns

 

SxR = ns

4.3.3.2 Number of ears

Number of ears was not significantly influenced by the K-humate applications or soil textures (Appendix 4.31). Even though not significant, the number of ears was greater with a split application of 6 L K-humate ha-1 (3.9%) and a single application of 3 L K- humate (3%) when compared to the control (Table 4.16). The sandy clay loam and clay loam soils produced the greatest number of ears that exceeded the loamy sand soil with 9.1 to 9.8%.

Table 4.16 Number of ears (m-2) as affected by different K-humate applications to three soils

 

Soil

 

K-humate application (L ha-1)

 

 

 

 

0 - control

3 - single

3 - split

6 - split

 

 

S1

340.2530

371.9715

340.2530

363.3210

353.9496

 

S2

383.5055

397.9230

354.6705

418.1075

388.5516

 

S3

389.2725

377.7385

400.8065

377.7385

386.3890

 

 

371.0103

382.5443

365.2433

386.3890

376.2968

S = ns

 

 

R = ns

 

SxR = ns

4.3.3.3 Spikelets per ear

The application of K-humate had no significant effect on the spikelets per ear (Table 4.17; Appendix 4.32).

Table 4.17 Number of spikelets per ear as affected by different K-humate applications to three soils

Soil

 

K-humate application (L ha-1)

 

 

 

0 - control

3 - single

3 - split

6 - split

 

S1

14.9062

15.1778

15.4788

15.7173

15.3200

S2

15.0738

14.6586

14.2256

15.3910

14.8372

S3

13.5966

14.2305

13.8765

13.3412

13.7612

 

14.5255

14.6890

14.5270

14.8165

14.6395

S = LSDT≤0.05=1.3045

R = ns

SxR = ns

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]