- •Outlines of english lexicology
- •Introduction
- •Two Approaches to Language Study
- •Lexical Units
- •Referential Approach to meaning
- •Meaning in the Referential Approach
- •Functional Approach to Meaning
- •Types of meaning
- •Part-of-Speech Meaning
- •Emotive charge
- •Stylistic Reference
- •Change of meaning
- •Causes of semantic changes
- •Linguistic causes
- •Nature of Semantic Change
- •Results of Semantic Change
- •Changes in the denotational meaning
- •Changes in the connotational meaning
- •Interrelation of Causes, Nature and Results of Semantic Change
- •Meaning and polysemy
- •The semantic structure of polysemantic words
- •Diachronic Approach
- •Synchronic Approach
- •Polysemy and homonymy
- •Homonymy of Words and Homonymy of Word-Forms
- •Classification of homonyms
- •Graphic and Sound-Form of Homonyms
- •Sources of Homonymy
- •Word-meaning in syntagmaTlCs and paradigmatics
- •Polysemy and Context
- •Lexical context
- •Grammatical Context
- •Extra-Linguistic Context (Context of situation)
- •Common Contextual Associations. Thematic Groups
- •Meaning relations in paradigmatics and semantic classification of words
- •Conceptual (or Semantic) Fields
- •Semantic Equivalence and Synonymy
- •Patterns of Synonymic Sets in Modern English
- •Connotations of synonyms
- •Dominant synonym
- •Euphemisms
- •Semantic contrast and Antonymy
- •Word groups
- •Some basic features of word-groups
- •Grammatical Valency
- •Structure of word-groups Distribution as the Criterion of Classification
- •Meaning of word-groups
- •Lexical Meaning
- •Structural Meaning
- •Interrelation of Lexical and Structural Meaning in Word Groups
- •Motivation in Word Groups
- •Phraseological units
- •Free Word-Groups Versus Set-Phrases. Phraseological Units, Idioms, Word-Equivalents
- •1. Criteria of Stability and Lack of Motivation (Idiomaticity)
- •2. Criterion of Function
- •3. Criterion of Context
- •Phraseological Units and Idioms Proper
- •Classification
- •Word-structure Segmentation of Words into Morphemes
- •Principles of Morphemic Analysis. Types of Word Segmentability
- •Classification of morphemes
- •Morphemic Types of Words
- •Word-formation
- •Various ways of forming words
- •Word-formation: definition
- •Conversion
- •Synchronic Approach
- •Typical Semantic Relations
- •I. Verbs converted from nouns (denominal verbs).
- •II. Nouns converted from verbs (deverbal substantives).
- •Diachronic Approach of Conversion. Origin
- •Word-composition
- •Structure
- •Meaning
- •Structural Meaning of the Pattern
- •The Meaning of Compounds. Motivation
- •Classification
- •Relations between the iCs of Compounds
- •Different Parts of Speech
- •Means of Composition
- •Correlation between Compounds and Free Phrases
- •Productive Types of Compound Adjectives
- •Sources of Compounds
Grammatical Valency
Words are used also in grammatical contexts. The minimal grammatical context in which words are used when brought together to form word-groups is usually described as the pattern of the word-group. For instance, the adjective heavy discussed above can be followed by a noun (e.g. heavy storm) or by the infinitive of a verb (e.g. heavy to lift), etc. The aptness of a word to appear in specific grammatical (or rather syntactic) structures is termed grammatical valency.
The grammatical valency of words may be different. To begin with, the range of grammatical valency is delimited by the part of speech the word belongs to. It follows that the grammatical valency of each individual word is dependent on the grammatical structure of the language.
This is not to imply that grammatical valency of words belonging to the same part of speech is necessarily identical. This can be best illustrated by comparing the grammatical valency of any two words belonging to the same part of speech, e.g. of the two synonymous verbs suggest and propose. Both verbs can be followed by a noun (to propose or suggest a plan, a resolution). It is only propose, however, that can be followed by the infinitive of a verb (to propose to do smth). The adjectives clever and intelligent are seen to possess different grammatical valency as clever can be used in word-groups having the pattern: Adjective+Preposition at+Noun (clever at mathematics), whereas intelligent can never be found in exactly the same word-group pattern.
Specific linguistic restrictions in the range of grammatical valency of individual words imposed on the lexical units by the inner structure of the language are also observed by comparing the grammatical valency of correlated words in different languages. The English verb influence, for example, can be followed only by a noun (to influence a person, a decision, choice, etc.). The grammatical valency of its Bulgarian counterpart влияя is different. The Bulgarian verb can be combined only with a prepositional group (cf. влияя на настроението, на човека, etc.).
No departure from the norm of grammatical valency is possible as this can make the word-group unintelligible to English speakers. Thus e.g. the word-group mathematics at clever is likely to be felt as a meaningless string of words because the grammatical valency of English nouns does not allow of the structure Noun+at+Adjective.
It should also be pointed out that the individual meanings of a polysemantic word may be described through its grammatical valency. Thus, different meanings of the adjective keen may be described in a general way through different structures of the word-groups keen+N, — keen sight (hearing, etc.), keen + on + N — keen on sports (on tennis, etc.), keen + V (inf.) — keen to know (to find out, etc.).
From this point of view word-groups may be regarded as minimal syntactic (or syntagmatic) structures that operate as distinguishing clues for different meanings of a polysemantic word.