
- •The Acoustical Society of America
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •About the Authors
- •1 Introduction
- •1.2 Specialized Areas within Acoustics
- •1.3 About the History of Acoustics
- •1.4 Relevant Quantities in Acoustics
- •1.5 Some Numerical Examples
- •1.6 Logarithmic Level Ratios and Logarithmic Frequency Ratios
- •1.7 Double-Logarithmic Plots
- •1.8 Exercises
- •2 Mechanic and Acoustic Oscillations
- •2.1 Basic Elements of Linear, Oscillating, Mechanic Systems
- •2.2 Parallel Mechanic Oscillators
- •2.3 Free Oscillations of Parallel Mechanic Oscillators
- •2.4 Forced Oscillation of Parallel Mechanic Oscillators
- •2.5 Energies and Dissipation Losses
- •2.6 Basic Elements of Linear, Oscillating, Acoustic Systems
- •2.7 The Helmholtz Resonator
- •2.8 Exercises
- •3.1 The Electromechanic Analogies
- •3.2 The Electroacoustic Analogy
- •3.3 Levers and Transformers
- •3.4 Rules for Deriving Analog Electric Circuits
- •3.5 Synopsis of Electric Analogies of Simple Oscillators
- •3.6 Circuit Fidelity, Impedance Fidelity and Duality
- •3.7 Examples of Mechanic and Acoustic Oscillators
- •3.8 Exercises
- •4.2 The Carbon Microphone—A Controlled Coupler
- •4.3 Fundamental Equations of Electroacoustic Transducers
- •4.4 Reversibility
- •4.5 Coupling of Electroacoustic Transducers to the Sound Field
- •4.6 Pressure and Pressure-Gradient Receivers
- •4.7 Further Directional Characteristics
- •4.8 Absolute Calibration of Transducers
- •4.9 Exercises
- •5 Magnetic-Field Transducers
- •5.1 The Magnetodynamic Transduction Principle
- •5.2 Magnetodynamic Sound Emitters and Receivers
- •5.3 The Electromagnetic Transduction Principle
- •5.4 Electromagnetic Sound Emitters and Receivers
- •5.5 The Magnetostrictive Transduction Principle
- •5.6 Magnetostrictive Sound Transmitters and Receivers
- •5.7 Exercises
- •6 Electric-Field Transducers
- •6.1 The Piezoelectric Transduction Principle
- •6.2 Piezoelectric Sound Emitters and Receivers
- •6.3 The Electrostrictive Transduction Principle
- •6.4 Electrostrictive Sound Emitters and Receivers
- •6.5 The Dielectric Transduction Principle
- •6.6 Dielectric Sound Emitters and Receivers
- •6.7 Further Transducer and Coupler Principles
- •6.8 Exercises
- •7 The Wave Equation in Fluids
- •7.1 Derivation of the One-Dimensional Wave Equation
- •7.3 Solutions of the Wave Equation
- •7.4 Field Impedance and Power Transport in Plane Waves
- •7.6 The Acoustic Measuring Tube
- •7.7 Exercises
- •8 Horns and Stepped Ducts
- •8.2 Conical Horns
- •8.3 Exponential Horns
- •8.4 Radiation Impedances and Sound Radiation
- •8.5 Steps in the Area Function
- •8.6 Stepped Ducts
- •8.7 Exercises
- •9.1 The Spherical Wave Equation
- •9.2 Spherical Sound Sources of the First Order
- •9.3 Spherical Harmonics
- •9.4 Higher-Order Spherical Sound Sources
- •9.5 Line Arrays of Monopoles
- •9.6 Analogies to Fourier Transform in Signal Theory
- •9.7 Directional Equivalence of Sources and Receivers
- •9.8 Exercises
- •10.1 The Rayleigh Integral
- •10.3 The Far-Field of Piston Membranes
- •10.4 The Near-Field of Piston Membranes
- •10.5 General Remarks on Diffraction and Scattering
- •10.6 Exercises
- •11.1 Dissipation During Sound Propagation in Air
- •11.2 Sound Propagation in Porous Media
- •11.4 Wall (Surface) Impedance and Degree of Absorption
- •11.5 Porous Absorbers
- •11.6 Resonance Absorbers
- •11.7 Exercises
- •12.1 Mirror Sound Sources and Ray Tracing
- •12.2 Flutter Echoes
- •12.3 Impulse Responses of Rectangular Rooms
- •12.4 Diffuse Sound Fields
- •12.5 Reverberation-Time Formulas
- •12.6 Application of Diffuse Sound Fields
- •12.7 Exercises
- •13.1 Sound in Solids—Structure-Borne Sound
- •13.2 Radiation of Airborne Sound by Bending Waves
- •13.3 Sound-Transmission Loss of Single-Leaf Walls
- •13.4 Sound-Transmission Loss of Double-Leaf Walls
- •13.5 The Weighted Sound-Reduction Index
- •13.6 Insulation of Vibrations
- •13.7 Insulation of Floors with Regard to Impact Sounds
- •13.8 Exercises
- •14 Noise Control—A Survey
- •14.1 Origins of Noise
- •14.2 Radiation of Noise
- •14.3 Noise Reduction as a System Problem
- •14.4 Noise Reduction at the Source
- •14.5 Noise Reduction Along the Propagation Paths
- •14.6 Exercises
- •15 Solutions to the Exercise Problems
- •16 Appendices
- •16.1 Complex Notation of Sinusoidal Signals
- •16.2 Complex Notation of Power and Intensity
- •16.3 Supplementary Textbooks for Self Study
- •16.4 Letter Symbols, Notations, and Units
- •Index

5.2 Magnetodynamic Sound Emitters and Receivers |
73 |
range. The following two construction features distinguish cardioid microphones. Both of them decrease the proximity effect—compare Sect. 4.7.
–The variable-distance principle uses delay lines with different effective lengths for different frequencies to increase the driving force at low frequencies.
–The double-path principle uses two transducers with different delay lines, one for the high frequencies and one for the low. The two transducers are connected by an appropriate cross-over network.
5.3The Electromagnetic Transduction Principle
The Inner Transducer
Figure 5.12 illustrates the fundamental arrangement for the inner-transducer principle. To derive the transducer equation, we compute the force on the movable armature by imagining a small virtual shift of the armature, dx.
We start with a fundamental relation from electrodynamics, Ampere’s law, which states that in an arrangement as shown in Fig. 5.12, the electric current, i, and the magnetic-flux density, B, are proportional as follows,
i ν = (B/µ0) 2 x , ν . . . |
number of turns in the coil |
(5.12) |
whereby it is assumed that the iron cores of the yoke and the movable armature are highly permeable, so that the energy of the magnetic field is concentrated in the air-gap, 2 x. Multiplication with the cross-sectional area of the air-gap, A, renders
A · i · ν = ( A · B/µ0) 2 x = (Φ/µ0) 2 x , |
(5.13) |
Φ is the magnetic flux. By inserting the definition of the inductance, L = ν Φ/ i, into (5.13), we get the inductance of our arrangement in the form of
Fig. 5.12 Electromagnet with a movable armature
74 5 Magnetic-Field Transducers
|
|
|
|
|
L = ν2 |
µ0 A |
|
|
|
|
(5.14) |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 x |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Referring to (5.1) and (5.14), we now compute the contracting force as |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
d |
1 |
|
1 |
|
i2 ν2 |
B2 A |
|
Φ2 |
|
||||||||||
F(x) = − |
|
|
|
L(x) i2 |
= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
µ0 A = |
|
= |
|
. |
(5.15) |
||
dx |
2 |
2 |
2 x2 |
µ0 |
µ0 A |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
(B |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/µ |
)2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is clearly a quadratic power law. To linearize it, we add a permanent magnetic flux, Φ−, as a magnetic bias—either by applying a permanent magnet or due to a constant current, i−. This flux is large as compared to the alternating flux, Φ , and the two result in Φ = Φ− + Φ , leading to
F(x) ≈ |
2 Φ− Φ |
= |
|
2 Φ− |
|
ν µ0 A |
, |
(5.16) |
|||||||
|
|
µ0 A |
|
|
µ0 A |
|
|
2 x |
|||||||
with |
|
|
L i |
|
= ν |
|
µ0 A |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Φ = |
|
i . |
|
(5.17) |
|||||||||||
ν |
|
|
2 x |
|
|||||||||||
In this way, we obtain the first transducer equation, |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
F i |
≈ ν |
x − i i . |
|
|
|
(5.18) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Φ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The second equation is easily derived by considering the equality of the inand output power in (5.9), resulting in
u i ≈ ν |
x − v i . |
(5.19) |
|
|
|
Φ |
|
Note that the permanent flux, Φ−, and the number of turns, ν, appear in the relationship for the transducer coefficient, M = (ν Φ−)/x. This means that the transducer becomes more efficient and, therefore, more sensitive with increasing magnetic bias and an increasing number of coil turns.
The Real Transducer
The equivalent circuit of the real electromagnetic transducer corresponds to the magnetodynamic transducer circuit, with the addition of one very interesting feature. The mechanic compliance is supplemented by a negative compliance called the field com-

5.3 The Electromagnetic Transduction Principle |
75 |
pliance, nf = dx/dF|i− , which results from decreasing the air-gap4. The decreasing gap increases the force attracting the armature and opposing the reversing mechanic force. For large displacements this may cause the membrane to bounce to one of the magnet poles and cling there. This is a very undesired effect that becomes more likely with increasing permanent magnetic bias—compare the solutions to problem 5.2.
5.4 Electromagnetic Sound Emitters and Receivers
Electromagnetic transducers come in very small and efficient form. Yet, nonlinear distortions are harder to manage than with magnetodynamic transducers because of the intrinsically quadratic force law. Examples of traditional applications include telephone-receiver capsules, miniature microphones for hearing aids, pick-up transducers for record players, and free-swinging loudspeakers. An electromagnetic telephone-receiver capsule and a hearing-aid microphone are shown in Figs. 5.13 and 5.14 for historical reasons.
In the traditional telephone capsule, a Helmholtz resonator tuned to the middle of the speech spectrum is put on top of the membrane to improve the capsules sensitivity for speech signals. Note that low-frequency tuning supports membrane clinging— undesired as explained above.
Fig. 5.13 Telephone-receiver capsule
4 The field compliance is derivable by a virtual shift as follows,
|
1 |
i− = |
dF |
= |
2Φ− dΦ− |
= |
|
2Φ− −νi− µ0 A |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
nf |
dx |
µ0 A dx |
|
µ0 A |
2x2 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
−2x |
(5.20) |
||||
|
|
|
2Φ− |
|
Φ− |
|
νΦ− |
|
|
|
M2 |
. |
||||||
= |
µ0 A −x |
= x |
|
|
µ0 Aν2 |
|
||||||||||||
|
= − L |

76 |
5 Magnetic-Field Transducers |
Fig. 5.14 Hearing-aid microphone
Table 5.1 Magnetization coefficients of different magnetostrictive materials
Material |
Magnetization Coefficient |
|
|
|
|
Iron |
l |
/ l = −8 · 10−6 |
Cobalt |
l |
/ l = −55 · 10−6 |
Nickel |
l |
/ l = −35 · 10−6 |
Ferrite |
l |
/ l = −100 to + 40 · 10−6 |
A special construction trick—shown in Fig. 5.14—has long been used to manufacture efficient miniature microphones. The reed is very thin. This is possible as it is not pre-magnetized. The result is a microphone that is less than 1 cm large and has a sensitivity on the order of T up ≈ 1 mV/Pa.
5.5 The Magnetostrictive Transduction Principle
Rods made of ferromagnetic material experience a variation of their lengths when exposed to magnetic fields. A common model of this effect considers the distances between the molecules as forming a fictive air-gap. Such a model leads to the same transducer equations as those of the electromagnetic transducer. The force law is intrinsically quadratic and requires linearization for transducer use.
Table 5.1 lists one-dimensional magnetization coefficients, l / l, for a number of magnetostrictive materials. A negative sign means that the rod length decreases when the material is magnetized. Yet, increases do also occur, for example, in ferrite rods. More sophisticated models than the simple air-gap model are able to explain this effect.