Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
акустика / self_douglas_the_design_of_active_crossovers.pdf
Скачиваний:
222
Добавлен:
04.05.2023
Размер:
60.48 Mб
Скачать

CHAPTER 14

Equalisation

The Need for Equalisation

Equalisation to attain a desired flat frequency response may be applied to correct problems in the loudspeaker itself or, moving along the audio chain, to modify the interaction of the loudspeaker with the room it is operating in. Moving along the audio chain still further, equalisation can also be used to modify the response of the room itself, by cancelling resonances with dips or notches in the overall amplitude response. However, it is not normally considered a good idea to try to combine an active crossover with a room equaliser, not least because they are doing quite different jobs. Moving the loudspeakers from one listening space to another will not require adjustment of the crossover, except

in so far as the loudspeaker placement with regard to walls and corners has changed, but would almost certainly require a room equaliser to be re-adjusted, unless the room dimensions, which determine its resonances, happen to be the same.

At low audio frequencies, normal rooms (i.e. not anechoic chambers with enormous sound absorption) have resonances at a series of frequencies where one dimension of the space corresponds to a multiple number of half-wavelengths of the sound being radiated. The half-wavelength is the basic unit because there must be a node, that is a point of zero amplitude, at each end. Sound travels at about 345 metres/second, so a room with a maximum dimension of 5 metres will have resonances from 34.5 Hz upwards. This is simply calculated from velocity/frequency = wavelength, bearing in mind that it is the half-wavelength that we are interested in. We might therefore expect a resonance at 34.5 Hz and another at about 69 Hz; this is twice the frequency, because we now need to fit in two half-wavelengths between the two reflecting surfaces. This continues for three and four times the lowest frequency, and so on. These “resonant modes” cause large peaks and dips in response, the height of which depends on the amount of absorbing material. A room with big soft sofas, thick carpeting, and heavy curtains will be acoustically fairly “dead”, and the peaks and dips of the frequency response will typically vary by something like 5–10 dB.Abare room with hard walls and an uncarpeted floor will be much more acoustically “live”, and the peaks and dips and dips are more likely to be in the range of 10 to 20 dB, though larger excursions are possible. Resonant modes at low frequencies cause the greatest problems, because they cannot be effectively damped by convenient absorption material such as curtains or wall hangings. Room equalisation that attempts to deal with this situation is a very different subject from active crossover design and is not dealt with further here.

This chapter deals only with the equalisation of the frequency response, but there is another very important form of equalisation; this is commonly called time equalisation, time-delay compensation, or phase equalisation, and while its results can be seen in the form of an improved frequency response, the circuitry involved essentially works in the time domain, and in itself has a flat frequency response. This branch of active crossover design is dealt with in detail in Chapter 13 and is not referred to further here.

385

386  Equalisation

What Equalisation Can and Can’t Do

When the word “equalisation” is used without qualification, it almost always refers to correcting the amplitude/frequency response, without attempting to simultaneously correct the phase/frequency response. Correcting both is much more difficult, but it can be done. It is important to realise that if you use the right sort of equaliser, you can put a peak into the frequency response and then cancel it out completely by using another equaliser with the reciprocal characteristic. The high-Q peak/dip equaliser described later in this chapter can perform this, as it is reciprocal—in other words its boost and cut curves are exact mirror-images of each other about the 0 dB line. Figure 14.18 shows the symmetrical 6 dB peak and dip at 1 kHz that this circuit creates. If one equaliser is set to maximum boost, and it is then followed by an otherwise identical equaliser set to maximum cut, the final

frequency response is exactly flat, as one might hope. What is much less obvious, but equally true, is that the phase-shifts introduced by the first equaliser are also cancelled out by the second equaliser, so a square wave input will emerge as a square wave output. This process is demonstrated in Figure 14.1, where the square wave with added ringing is the output from the first (peaking) equaliser.

The visually perfect square wave is not the input waveform; it is the output from the second (dip) equaliser. The rise and fall times of the input square wave were deliberately slowed down to 10 usec to avoid distracting effects due to the finite bandwidth of the opamps used.You will note that the height of the ringing takes a little while to settle down after the start at 0 ms. When applying square waves and the like to filters and other circuits with energy-storage elements, you need to allow enough cycles for the circuit to reach equilibrium; otherwise you may draw some false conclusions.

Figure 14.1: Demonstrating that two reciprocal equalisers cancel their phase-shifts as well as amplitude/frequency response changes.

Equalisation  387

Having reassured ourselves on this point, things are generally very much otherwise in crossover equalisation. If a drive unit has, say, a 2 dB peak or hump in its amplitude/frequency response, this will probably be due to some underdamped mechanical resonance or other electro-acoustic phenomenon, and while it is, in principle at least, straightforward to cancel this out, it is very unlikely that the associated phase-shifts will also cancel, because the physics behind the drive unit peak and the equaliser dip are completely different.

Loudspeaker Equalisation

Active crossovers may consist simply of frequency-dividing filters but very often also include equaliser circuits with a carefully tailored frequency response which are used to counteract irregularities in the overall response of the system. Since the active crossover and its power supply, etc, is already present, relatively little extra circuitry is needed, and the cost is low. A large number of different equaliser circuits are described later in this chapter.

There are several reasons why equalisation might be necessary:

1.Correcting irregularities in the frequency response of the drive units themselves.

2.Correcting frequency response features inherent in the driver/enclosure system, for example 6 dB/ octave equalisation of dipole LF loudspeaker units

3.Using equalisation to evade the physical limits of driver/enclosure system; most commonly extending the bass response of any kind of loudspeaker.

4.Compensation for other unwanted interactions between the loudspeaker and its enclosure. The most common application is compensation for enclosure front panel diffraction effects.

5.Compensation to deal with interactions between the loudspeaker and the listening space, such as when a loudspeaker is mounted against a wall.

1  Drive Unit Equalisation

Drive unit equalisation usually involves the correction of minor humps and dips in the frequency response. For example, a consistent 2 dB dip in drive unit response might be cancelled out by a 2 dB peak introduced by an equalisation circuit. Exact cancellation will not be possible, either because the shape of the dip is too complex to be mimicked by practical amounts of circuitry or because of

variation in the shape of the dip due to driver tolerances or aging. This kind of correction is commonly performed by peak/dip equalisers.

A classic example of drive unit equalisation is constant directivity horn equalisation. Following the work of Don Keele at Electro-Voice, [1] constant directivity (CD) high-frequency horn loudspeakers appeared in the late 1970s, Basically an initial exponential section was combined with a final conical flare, causing the shorter high-frequency wavelengths to be dispersed more effectively off axis; purely conical horns, as seen on old gramophones and phonographs, are not satisfactory because of their poor low-frequency response. Because CD horns direct more high-frequency energy off axis, the amount of high-frequency energy available directly on axis is reduced. Therefore the CD horn no longer measures flat directly on axis unless it is given equalisation that is the inverse of the horn high-frequency roll off response. This is called constant directivity horn equalisation or CDEQ.

388  Equalisation

Constant directivity horns roll off the higher frequencies at about −6 dB per octave from around 2 to 4 kHz, continuing to 20 kHz and beyond, so the equalisation therefore takes the form of a +6 dB per octave boost starting at the appropriate frequency. The equalisation curve is arranged to shelve to prevent excessive boost at frequencies above 20 kHz, which could lead to inappropriate amplification of ultrasonic signals and imperil the sound system stability. The frequency at which the equalisation

begins may be derived from measurements or from the−3 dB point of the CD horn frequency response, as provided by the manufacturer. The equalisation is typically performed by a HF-boost equaliser, as described later in this chapter.

2  6 dB/octave Dipole Equalisation

The operation of dipole loudspeakers was described in Chapter 2. To summarise it quickly, a dipole loudspeaker has a drive unit mounted on a flat panel, usually called a baffle, which prevents sound from simply sliding straight round from the front to the back of the drive unit and cancelling out. The larger the baffle, the lower the frequency down to which this is effective. The panel may be folded in various ways to save space, so it remains large acoustically but is physically smaller. The name

“dipole” is derived from the way that the polar response consists of two lobes, which have equal radiation forwards and backwards (in opposite polarities) and none at right angles to the front-back axis of the drive unit. Because the baffle is of finite size, there is a frequency at which the response begins to fall off as sound goes around the edge of the baffle (loudspeakers in sealed boxes are sometimes referred to as being mounted in an “infinite baffle”, but that does not of course mean that their response goes down to infinitely low frequencies).

Dipole speakers are therefore commonly regarded as needing equalisation in the form of a 6 dB/octave boost as frequency falls, starting from an appropriate frequency. This has to be done with great caution, as even apparently modest amounts of equalisation greatly increase both cone excursion and the amplifier power required; a dipole loudspeaker is particularly vulnerable to this because, unlike a drive unit with

a sealed box, there is no loading on the cone at low frequencies. It is essential that the bass boost ceases at a safe frequency, and it is wise to arrange for an effective subsonic roll-off if drive unit damage is to be avoided. There is often also a need to equalise away a peak in the loudspeaker response where the LF roll-off begins. The biquad equaliser, described later, can do the task effectively and economically but may need to be supplemented with further subsonic filtering to make sure that no accidents occur.

3  Bass Response Extension

As described in Chapter 2, the bass response of a loudspeaker is essentially that of a highpass filter whose characteristics are determined by the type of enclosure and the parameters of the LF drive unit. A sealed-box loudspeaker consists of a mass-compliance-damping system that gives a classical

2nd-order highpass response and can for some purposes be simulated by a highpass active filter of the Sallen & Key or other configuration.

Much thought has been given to extending the low-frequency response of such systems by adding bass boost in a controlled fashion. The presence of an active crossover makes adding this facility straightforward, though its design is not so simple. The basic principle is to counteract the downward