Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
акустика / self_douglas_the_design_of_active_crossovers.pdf
Скачиваний:
222
Добавлен:
04.05.2023
Размер:
60.48 Mб
Скачать

Lowpass and Highpass Filter Performance  303

Distortion in Sallen & Key Filters: Looking for DAF

It is evident that if DAF theory is correct, we are going to see a large peak in distortion at some frequency.

This will not occur at the cutoff frequency but at sub-multiples of it, which have harmonics falling at the cutoff frequency. If cutoff is at 1 kHz, and we have second-harmonic distortion in the amplifier, we will see a distortion peak at an input frequency of 500 Hz, as the second harmonic of 500 Hz is 1 kHz. Likewise, with third-harmonic distortion we will see a peak when the input frequency is 333 Hz.

Perhaps rather belatedly (after working out all the DAFs) Idecided to see this effect for real. In Peter Billam’s second paper on active filter distortion [4] he uses as an example an S&K lowpass filter with a Q of 5, as shown in Figure11.3a.The response has a +14 dB peak, shown in Figure11.4.AQ of 5 is higher than any we are likely use in crossover design; even an 8th-order Butterworth filter uses a maximum Qof only 2.56. Note the high capacitor ratio of 100 needed to get Q= 5 with this type of filter. For the standard circuit, the DAF peaks at a frightening 50.9, labelled DAF 1 in Figure11.4. Itried the Billam optimisation procedure, as described in [4], which gives the modified filter shown at Figure11.3b, which has the same frequency response but a much reduced DAF peak of 11.0; it is labelled DAF 2 in Figure 11.4. The optimised filter has a much lower ratio of capacitors; 9.1 times instead of 100 times, which if nothing else will save a good deal of money on C1. But. . . to get the correct response the optimised filter has to be configured with a good deal more than unity gain; 1.91 times or+5.6 dB in fact.This is likely to be very inconvenient, causing significant problems with noise and headroom.

Trying this optimisation process with the rather more popular Butterworth 2nd-order lowpass, the peak

DAF is reduced from 2 to 1.709, which is a less than impressive improvement.Again of 1.336 times is required to get the correct response, and this is likely to be unhelpful.

Figure 11.3: Second-order lowpass Sallen & Key filters with Q = 5. Standard filter at a, after Billam optimisation at b. Cutoff frequency is 1 kHz for both.

304  Lowpass and Highpass Filter Performance

Figure 11.4: Second-order lowpass Sallen & Key filters with Q = 5; DAF 1 is for standard circuit, DAF 2 after Billam optimisation. Cutoff frequency is 1 kHz for both. DAF and dB share the same scale on the y-axis.

Going back to the Q = 5 filter, the frequency response of the optimised version is the same as for the original filter, but the gain is higher. The question is, have we actually managed to reduce the filter distortion?

The filter in Figure 11.3a was built using a 5532 section and measured with input levels of 1 Vrms and 2 Vrms. Considering that S&K filters are regularly criticised as being unsuitable for anything other than low Q’s, I was pleasantly surprised at how well this Q = 5 version behaved. The cutoff frequency and response peaking were as calculated.

And now for the distortion behaviour. Figure 11.5 shows no trace of a big distortion peak. The 1 Vrms input shows no measurable distortion, but for a 2 Vrms input there is a small distortion peak at 500 Hz, indicating that some second harmonic is being produced. This only reaches 0.0007% at its peak.

The distortion residual at this frequency could be seen to be fairly pure second harmonic as expected, while at all other frequencies only noise could be seen. Since the Q of 5 gives a +14 dB (5x) gain peak at cutoff, and the clipping level is about 10 Vrms, a 2 Vrms input is about the most demanding test possible.

Having read the Billam and Bonello papers, it was rather a surprise to find in my measurements no evidence of DAF in action at all. The conclusion at this point must be that DAF theory need not be taken into account when designing crossover filters for low distortion, and the “optimisation” process is dubious if it requires extra filter gain. Choosing a low-distortion amplifier such as the 5532 seems to be all that is necessary.

Lowpass and Highpass Filter Performance  305

Figure 11.5: Second-order lowpass Sallen & Key filters with Q = 0.7071 for Butterworth response. Cutoff frequency is 1 kHz.

Distortion in Sallen & Key Filters: 2nd-Order Lowpass

We now turn from the effect of the amplifiers to the effect of capacitor non-linearity on active filter distortion performance.

The capacitor-induced distortion behaviours of the 2nd-order lowpass and highpass Sallen & Key filters are rather different. The examples shown in Figure 11.6 both have a cutoff at 510 Hz, this frequency resulting from the convenient component values used. The frequency response of the

Butterworth 510 Hz lowpass filter in Figure 11.6a is shown in Figure 11.7, while the distortion performance is shown in Figure 11.8. With 220 nF 100 V polyester capacitors there is a pronounced peak in distortion around 200 Hz, more than an octave below the cutoff frequency. All the distortion in this region is fairly pure third harmonic and clearly comes from the capacitors and not the opamp.

This is demonstrated by replacing them with 220 nF 160 V polypropylene capacitors; the distortion is eliminated, as shown by the lower trace in Figure 11.8. Note that the test level is almost as high as opamps are capable of at 10 Vrms, and practical internal levels such as 3 Vrms will give much lower levels of distortion.

As expected, the Noise + THD reading in Figure 11.8 climbs rapidly as the cutoff frequency is exceeded and the output amplitude starts to fall at 12 dB/octave; in fact the Noise + THD reading climbs more rapidly than 12 dB/octave, which is a clear warning sign that the residual is not entirely composed of noise.At 1 kHz the reading is only 0.00037%, but crossover-ish distortion from the

306  Lowpass and Highpass Filter Performance

Figure 11.6: Second-order highpass and lowpass Butterworth Sallen & Key filters for distortion and noise tests. Cutoff frequency is 510 Hz for both.

Figure 11.7: The frequency response of the second order 510 Hz lowpass S&K filter in Figure­ 11.6a.

opamp is clearly visible on the THD residual, well above the noise level. This condition persists as frequency rises, with opamp distortion still clear above the noise even at 10 kHz when the output has fallen below 24 mVrms. This is quite different behaviour from that of the highpass filter, where

below the cutoff frequency the Noise + THD reading goes up at the 12 dB/octave rate, which would be expected if it was composed only of noise.

Lowpass and Highpass Filter Performance  307

Figure 11.8: THD plot from the 2nd-order 510 Hz S&K lowpass filter; input level 10 Vrms. The upper trace shows distortion from polyester capacitors; the lower trace, with polypropylene capacitors, shows noise and opamp distortion above 1 kHz.

Removing the capacitors to get a flat frequency response much reduces the distortion seen at these frequencies, even though the output level is now much higher, which might perhaps be an example of the distortion aggravation factor at work. These are deep waters, Watson.

The signal voltage across the capacitors in these filters varies strongly with frequency, and I thought it might be instructive to see how this relates to their distortion behaviour. In a lowpass Sallen & Key filter, the voltage across C1 peaks at one half of the output voltage at the turnover frequency rolling off either side at 6 dB/octave. The voltage across C2 is the input voltage up to the turnover frequency; it then rolls off at 12 dB/octave, as illustrated in Figure 11.9. The capacitor voltages for the equivalent highpass filter are exactly the same, but with C1 and C2 swapped over.

Figure 11.9 tells us that the differing signal voltages across the capacitors are not the critical factor, because if it was C1 would be making a definite, if somewhat smaller, contribution to the distortion. Instead it contributes nothing. It is both one of the joys and one of the anguishes of electronics that a circuit made up of only five components can be so enigmatic in its behaviour.