
- •Contents
- •Acknowledgments
- •Preface
- •What a Crossover Does
- •Why a Crossover Is Necessary
- •Beaming and Lobing
- •Passive Crossovers
- •Active Crossover Applications
- •Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring
- •Loudspeaker Cables
- •The Advantages and Disadvantages of Active Crossovers
- •The Advantages of Active Crossovers
- •Some Illusory Advantages of Active Crossovers
- •The Disadvantages of Active Crossovers
- •The Next Step in Hi-Fi
- •Active Crossover Systems
- •Matching Crossovers and Loudspeakers
- •A Modest Proposal: Popularising Active Crossovers
- •Multi-Way Connectors
- •Subjectivism
- •Sealed-Box Loudspeakers
- •Reflex (Ported) Loudspeakers
- •Auxiliary Bass Radiator (ABR) Loudspeakers
- •Transmission Line Loudspeakers
- •Horn Loudspeakers
- •Electrostatic Loudspeakers
- •Ribbon Loudspeakers
- •Electromagnetic Planar Loudspeakers
- •Air-Motion Transformers
- •Plasma Arc Loudspeakers
- •The Rotary Woofer
- •MTM Tweeter-Mid Configurations (d’Appolito)
- •Vertical Line Arrays
- •Line Array Amplitude Tapering
- •Line Array Frequency Tapering
- •CBT Line Arrays
- •Diffraction
- •Sound Absorption in Air
- •Modulation Distortion
- •Drive Unit Distortion
- •Doppler Distortion
- •Further Reading on Loudspeaker Design
- •General Crossover Requirements
- •1 Adequate Flatness of Summed Amplitude/Frequency Response On-Axis
- •2 Sufficiently Steep Roll-Off Slopes Between the Filter Outputs
- •3 Acceptable Polar Response
- •4 Acceptable Phase Response
- •5 Acceptable Group Delay Behaviour
- •Further Requirements for Active Crossovers
- •1 Negligible Extra Noise
- •2 Negligible Impairment of System Headroom
- •3 Negligible Extra Distortion
- •4 Negligible Impairment of Frequency Response
- •5 Negligible Impairment of Reliability
- •Linear Phase
- •Minimum Phase
- •Absolute Phase
- •Phase Perception
- •Target Functions
- •All-Pole and Non-All-Pole Crossovers
- •Symmetric and Asymmetric Crossovers
- •Allpass and Constant-Power Crossovers
- •Constant-Voltage Crossovers
- •First-Order Crossovers
- •First-Order Solen Split Crossover
- •First-Order Crossovers: 3-Way
- •Second-Order Crossovers
- •Second-Order Butterworth Crossover
- •Second-Order Linkwitz-Riley Crossover
- •Second-Order Bessel Crossover
- •Second-Order 1.0 dB-Chebyshev Crossover
- •Third-Order Crossovers
- •Third-Order Butterworth Crossover
- •Third-Order Linkwitz-Riley Crossover
- •Third-Order Bessel Crossover
- •Third-Order 1.0 dB-Chebyshev Crossover
- •Fourth-Order Crossovers
- •Fourth-Order Butterworth Crossover
- •Fourth-Order Linkwitz-Riley Crossover
- •Fourth-Order Bessel Crossover
- •Fourth-Order 1.0 dB-Chebyshev Crossover
- •Fourth-Order Linear-Phase Crossover
- •Fourth-Order Gaussian Crossover
- •Fourth-Order Legendre Crossover
- •Higher-Order Crossovers
- •Determining Frequency Offsets
- •Filler-Driver Crossovers
- •The Duelund Crossover
- •Crossover Topology
- •Crossover Conclusions
- •Elliptical Filter Crossovers
- •Neville Thiele MethodTM (NTM) Crossovers
- •Subtractive Crossovers
- •First-Order Subtractive Crossovers
- •Second-Order Butterworth Subtractive Crossovers
- •Third-Order Butterworth Subtractive Crossovers
- •Fourth-Order Butterworth Subtractive Crossovers
- •Subtractive Crossovers With Time Delays
- •Performing the Subtraction
- •Active Filters
- •Lowpass Filters
- •Highpass Filters
- •Bandpass Filters
- •Notch Filters
- •Allpass Filters
- •All-Stop Filters
- •Brickwall Filters
- •The Order of a Filter
- •Filter Cutoff Frequencies and Characteristic Frequencies
- •First-Order Filters
- •Second-Order and Higher-Order Filters
- •Filter Characteristics
- •Amplitude Peaking and Q
- •Butterworth Filters
- •Linkwitz-Riley Filters
- •Bessel Filters
- •Chebyshev Filters
- •1 dB-Chebyshev Lowpass Filter
- •3 dB-Chebyshev Lowpass Filter
- •Higher-Order Filters
- •Butterworth Filters up to 8th-Order
- •Linkwitz-Riley Filters up to 8th-Order
- •Bessel Filters up to 8th-Order
- •Chebyshev Filters up to 8th-Order
- •More Complex Filters—Adding Zeros
- •Inverse Chebyshev Filters (Chebyshev Type II)
- •Elliptical Filters (Cauer Filters)
- •Some Lesser-Known Filter Characteristics
- •Transitional Filters
- •Linear-Phase Filters
- •Gaussian Filters
- •Legendre-Papoulis Filters
- •Laguerre Filters
- •Synchronous Filters
- •Other Filter Characteristics
- •Designing Real Filters
- •Component Sensitivity
- •First-Order Lowpass Filters
- •Second-Order Filters
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Lowpass Filters
- •Sallen & Key Lowpass Filter Components
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Lowpass: Unity Gain
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Lowpass Unity Gain: Component Sensitivity
- •Filter Frequency Scaling
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Lowpass: Equal Capacitor
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Lowpass Equal-C: Component Sensitivity
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Butterworth Lowpass: Defined Gains
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Lowpass: Non-Equal Resistors
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Lowpass: Optimisation
- •Sallen & Key 3rd-Order Lowpass: Two Stages
- •Sallen & Key 3rd-Order Lowpass: Single Stage
- •Sallen & Key 4th-Order Lowpass: Two Stages
- •Sallen & Key 4th-Order Lowpass: Single-Stage Butterworth
- •Sallen & Key 4th-Order Lowpass: Single-Stage Linkwitz-Riley
- •Sallen & Key 5th-Order Lowpass: Three Stages
- •Sallen & Key 5th-Order Lowpass: Two Stages
- •Sallen & Key 5th-Order Lowpass: Single Stage
- •Sallen & Key 6th-Order Lowpass: Three Stages
- •Sallen & Key 6th-Order Lowpass: Single Stage
- •Sallen & Key Lowpass: Input Impedance
- •Linkwitz-Riley Lowpass With Sallen & Key Filters: Loading Effects
- •Lowpass Filters With Attenuation
- •Bandwidth Definition Filters
- •Bandwidth Definition: Butterworth Versus Bessel
- •Variable-Frequency Lowpass Filters: Sallen & Key
- •First-Order Highpass Filters
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Filters
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Highpass Filters
- •Sallen & Key Highpass Filter Components
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Highpass: Unity Gain
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Highpass: Equal Resistors
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Butterworth Highpass: Defined Gains
- •Sallen & Key 2nd-Order Highpass: Non-Equal Capacitors
- •Sallen & Key 3rd-Order Highpass: Two Stages
- •Sallen & Key 3rd-Order Highpass in a Single Stage
- •Sallen & Key 4th-Order Highpass: Two Stages
- •Sallen & Key 4th-Order Highpass: Butterworth in a Single Stage
- •Sallen & Key 4th-Order Highpass: Linkwitz-Riley in a Single Stage
- •Sallen & Key 4th-Order Highpass: Single-Stage With Other Filter Characteristics
- •Sallen & Key 5th-Order Highpass: Three Stages
- •Sallen & Key 5th-Order Butterworth Filter: Two Stages
- •Sallen & Key 5th-Order Highpass: Single Stage
- •Sallen & Key 6th-Order Highpass: Three Stages
- •Sallen & Key 6th-Order Highpass: Single Stage
- •Sallen & Key Highpass: Input Impedance
- •Bandwidth Definition Filters
- •Bandwidth Definition: Subsonic Filters
- •Bandwidth Definition: Combined Ultrasonic and Subsonic Filters
- •Variable-Frequency Highpass Filters: Sallen & Key
- •Designing Filters
- •Multiple-Feedback Filters
- •Multiple-Feedback 2nd-Order Lowpass Filters
- •Multiple-Feedback 2nd-Order Highpass Filters
- •Multiple-Feedback 3rd-Order Filters
- •Multiple-Feedback 3rd-Order Lowpass Filters
- •Multiple-Feedback 3rd-Order Highpass Filters
- •Biquad Filters
- •Akerberg-Mossberg Lowpass Filter
- •Akerberg-Mossberg Highpass Filters
- •Tow-Thomas Biquad Lowpass and Bandpass Filter
- •Tow-Thomas Biquad Notch and Allpass Responses
- •Tow-Thomas Biquad Highpass Filter
- •State-Variable Filters
- •Variable-Frequency Filters: State-Variable 2nd Order
- •Variable-Frequency Filters: State-Variable 4th-Order
- •Variable-Frequency Filters: Other Orders of State-Variable
- •Other Filters
- •Aspects of Filter Performance: Noise and Distortion
- •Distortion in Active Filters
- •Distortion in Sallen & Key Filters: Looking for DAF
- •Distortion in Sallen & Key Filters: 2nd-Order Lowpass
- •Distortion in Sallen & Key Filters: 2nd-Order Highpass
- •Mixed Capacitors in Low-Distortion 2nd-Order Sallen & Key Filters
- •Distortion in Sallen & Key Filters: 3rd-Order Lowpass Single Stage
- •Distortion in Sallen & Key Filters: 3rd-Order Highpass Single Stage
- •Distortion in Sallen & Key Filters: 4th-Order Lowpass Single Stage
- •Distortion in Sallen & Key Filters: 4th-Order Highpass Single Stage
- •Distortion in Sallen & Key Filters: Simulations
- •Distortion in Sallen & Key Filters: Capacitor Conclusions
- •Distortion in Multiple-Feedback Filters: 2nd-Order Lowpass
- •Distortion in Multiple-Feedback Filters: 2nd-Order Highpass
- •Distortion in Tow-Thomas Filters: 2nd-Order Lowpass
- •Distortion in Tow-Thomas Filters: 2nd-Order Highpass
- •Noise in Active Filters
- •Noise and Bandwidth
- •Noise in Sallen & Key Filters: 2nd-Order Lowpass
- •Noise in Sallen & Key Filters: 2nd-Order Highpass
- •Noise in Sallen & Key Filters: 3rd-Order Lowpass Single Stage
- •Noise in Sallen & Key Filters: 3rd-Order Highpass Single Stage
- •Noise in Sallen & Key Filters: 4th-Order Lowpass Single Stage
- •Noise in Sallen & Key Filters: 4th-Order Highpass Single Stage
- •Noise in Multiple-Feedback Filters: 2nd-Order Lowpass
- •Noise in Multiple-Feedback Filters: 2nd-Order Highpass
- •Noise in Tow-Thomas Filters
- •Multiple-Feedback Bandpass Filters
- •High-Q Bandpass Filters
- •Notch Filters
- •The Twin-T Notch Filter
- •The 1-Bandpass Notch Filter
- •The Bainter Notch Filter
- •Bainter Notch Filter Design
- •Bainter Notch Filter Example
- •An Elliptical Filter Using a Bainter Highpass Notch
- •The Bridged-Differentiator Notch Filter
- •Boctor Notch Filters
- •Other Notch Filters
- •Simulating Notch Filters
- •The Requirement for Delay Compensation
- •Calculating the Required Delays
- •Signal Summation
- •Physical Methods of Delay Compensation
- •Delay Filter Technology
- •Sample Crossover and Delay Filter Specification
- •Allpass Filters in General
- •First-Order Allpass Filters
- •Distortion and Noise in 1st-Order Allpass Filters
- •Cascaded 1st-Order Allpass Filters
- •Second-Order Allpass Filters
- •Distortion and Noise in 2nd-Order Allpass Filters
- •Third-Order Allpass Filters
- •Distortion and Noise in 3rd-Order Allpass Filters
- •Higher-Order Allpass Filters
- •Delay Lines for Subtractive Crossovers
- •Variable Allpass Time Delays
- •Lowpass Filters for Time Delays
- •The Need for Equalisation
- •What Equalisation Can and Can’t Do
- •Loudspeaker Equalisation
- •1 Drive Unit Equalisation
- •3 Bass Response Extension
- •4 Diffraction Compensation Equalisation
- •5 Room Interaction Correction
- •Equalisation Circuits
- •HF-Cut and LF-Boost Equaliser
- •Combined HF-Boost and HF-Cut Equaliser
- •Adjustable Peak/Dip Equalisers: Fixed Frequency and Low Q
- •Adjustable Peak/Dip Equalisers With High Q
- •Parametric Equalisers
- •The Bridged-T Equaliser
- •The Biquad Equaliser
- •Capacitance Multiplication for the Biquad Equaliser
- •Equalisers With Non-Standard Slopes
- •Equalisers With −3 dB/Octave Slopes
- •Equalisers With −3 dB/Octave Slopes Over Limited Range
- •Equalisers With −4.5 dB/Octave Slopes
- •Equalisers With Other Slopes
- •Equalisation by Filter Frequency Offset
- •Equalisation by Adjusting All Filter Parameters
- •Component Values
- •Resistors
- •Through-Hole Resistors
- •Surface-Mount Resistors
- •Resistors: Values and Tolerances
- •Resistor Value Distributions
- •Obtaining Arbitrary Resistance Values
- •Other Resistor Combinations
- •Resistor Noise: Johnson and Excess Noise
- •Resistor Non-Linearity
- •Capacitors: Values and Tolerances
- •Obtaining Arbitrary Capacitance Values
- •Capacitor Shortcomings
- •Non-Electrolytic Capacitor Non-Linearity
- •Electrolytic Capacitor Non-Linearity
- •Active Devices for Active Crossovers
- •Opamp Types
- •Opamp Properties: Noise
- •Opamp Properties: Slew Rate
- •Opamp Properties: Common-Mode Range
- •Opamp Properties: Input Offset Voltage
- •Opamp Properties: Bias Current
- •Opamp Properties: Cost
- •Opamp Properties: Internal Distortion
- •Opamp Properties: Slew Rate Limiting Distortion
- •Opamp Properties: Distortion Due to Loading
- •Opamp Properties: Common-Mode Distortion
- •Opamps Surveyed
- •The TL072 Opamp
- •The NE5532 and 5534 Opamps
- •The 5532 With Shunt Feedback
- •5532 Output Loading in Shunt-Feedback Mode
- •The 5532 With Series Feedback
- •Common-Mode Distortion in the 5532
- •Reducing 5532 Distortion by Output Stage Biasing
- •Which 5532?
- •The 5534 Opamp
- •The LM4562 Opamp
- •Common-Mode Distortion in the LM4562
- •The LME49990 Opamp
- •Common-Mode Distortion in the LME49990
- •The AD797 Opamp
- •Common-Mode Distortion in the AD797
- •The OP27 Opamp
- •Opamp Selection
- •Crossover Features
- •Input Level Controls
- •Subsonic Filters
- •Ultrasonic Filters
- •Output Level Trims
- •Output Mute Switches, Output Phase-Reverse Switches
- •Control Protection
- •Features Usually Absent
- •Metering
- •Relay Output Muting
- •Switchable Crossover Modes
- •Noise, Headroom, and Internal Levels
- •Circuit Noise and Low-Impedance Design
- •Using Raised Internal Levels
- •Placing the Output Attenuator
- •Gain Structures
- •Noise Gain
- •Active Gain Controls
- •Filter Order in the Signal Path
- •Output Level Controls
- •Mute Switches
- •Phase-Invert Switches
- •Distributed Peak Detection
- •Power Amplifier Considerations
- •Subwoofer Applications
- •Subwoofer Technologies
- •Sealed-Box (Infinite Baffle) Subwoofers
- •Reflex (Ported) Subwoofers
- •Auxiliary Bass Radiator (ABR) Subwoofers
- •Transmission Line Subwoofers
- •Bandpass Subwoofers
- •Isobaric Subwoofers
- •Dipole Subwoofers
- •Horn-Loaded Subwoofers
- •Subwoofer Drive Units
- •Hi-Fi Subwoofers
- •Home Entertainment Subwoofers
- •Low-Level Inputs (Unbalanced)
- •Low-Level Inputs (Balanced)
- •High-Level Inputs
- •High-Level Outputs
- •Mono Summing
- •LFE Input
- •Level Control
- •Crossover In/Out Switch
- •Crossover Frequency Control (Lowpass Filter)
- •Highpass Subsonic Filter
- •Phase Switch (Normal/Inverted)
- •Variable Phase Control
- •Signal Activation Out of Standby
- •Home Entertainment Crossovers
- •Fixed Frequency
- •Variable Frequency
- •Multiple Variable
- •Power Amplifiers for Home Entertainment Subwoofers
- •Subwoofer Integration
- •Sound-Reinforcement Subwoofers
- •Line or Area Arrays
- •Cardioid Subwoofer Arrays
- •Aux-Fed Subwoofers
- •Automotive Audio Subwoofers
- •Motional Feedback Loudspeakers
- •History
- •Feedback of Position
- •Feedback of Velocity
- •Feedback of Acceleration
- •Other MFB Speakers
- •Published Projects
- •Conclusions
- •External Signal Levels
- •Internal Signal Levels
- •Input Amplifier Functions
- •Unbalanced Inputs
- •Balanced Interconnections
- •The Advantages of Balanced Interconnections
- •The Disadvantages of Balanced Interconnections
- •Balanced Cables and Interference
- •Balanced Connectors
- •Balanced Signal Levels
- •Electronic vs Transformer Balanced Inputs
- •Common-Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR)
- •The Basic Electronic Balanced Input
- •Common-Mode Rejection Ratio: Opamp Gain
- •Common-Mode Rejection Ratio: Opamp Frequency Response
- •Common-Mode Rejection Ratio: Opamp CMRR
- •Common-Mode Rejection Ratio: Amplifier Component Mismatches
- •A Practical Balanced Input
- •Variations on the Balanced Input Stage
- •Combined Unbalanced and Balanced Inputs
- •The Superbal Input
- •Switched-Gain Balanced Inputs
- •Variable-Gain Balanced Inputs
- •The Self Variable-Gain Balanced Input
- •High Input Impedance Balanced Inputs
- •The Instrumentation Amplifier
- •Instrumentation Amplifier Applications
- •The Instrumentation Amplifier With 4x Gain
- •The Instrumentation Amplifier at Unity Gain
- •Transformer Balanced Inputs
- •Input Overvoltage Protection
- •Noise and Balanced Inputs
- •Low-Noise Balanced Inputs
- •Low-Noise Balanced Inputs in Real Life
- •Ultra-Low-Noise Balanced Inputs
- •Unbalanced Outputs
- •Zero-Impedance Outputs
- •Ground-Cancelling Outputs
- •Balanced Outputs
- •Transformer Balanced Outputs
- •Output Transformer Frequency Response
- •Transformer Distortion
- •Reducing Transformer Distortion
- •Opamp Supply Rail Voltages
- •Designing a ±15 V Supply
- •Designing a ±17 V Supply
- •Using Variable-Voltage Regulators
- •Improving Ripple Performance
- •Dual Supplies From a Single Winding
- •Mutual Shutdown Circuitry
- •Power Supplies for Discrete Circuitry
- •Design Principles
- •Example Crossover Specification
- •The Gain Structure
- •Resistor Selection
- •Capacitor Selection
- •The Balanced Line Input Stage
- •The Bandwidth Definition Filter
- •The HF Path: 3 kHz Linkwitz-Riley Highpass Filter
- •The HF Path: Time-Delay Compensation
- •The MID Path: Topology
- •The MID Path: 400 Hz Linkwitz-Riley Highpass Filter
- •The MID Path: 3 kHz Linkwitz-Riley Lowpass Filter
- •The MID Path: Time-Delay Compensation
- •The LF Path: 400 Hz Linkwitz-Riley Lowpass Filter
- •The LF Path: No Time-Delay Compensation
- •Output Attenuators and Level Trim Controls
- •Balanced Outputs
- •Crossover Programming
- •Noise Analysis: Input Circuitry
- •Noise Analysis: HF Path
- •Noise Analysis: MID Path
- •Noise Analysis: LF Path
- •Improving the Noise Performance: The MID Path
- •Improving the Noise Performance: The Input Circuitry
- •The Noise Performance: Comparisons With Power Amplifier Noise
- •Conclusion
- •Index

How Loudspeakers Work 39
away from the pulpit were delayed by 5, 10, and 15 ms, explicitly making use of the Haas effect. The delays were implemented by tape heads contacting a rotating magnetic disc. For the time it was a remarkable system.
CBT Line Arrays
CBT stands for “constant beamwidth transducer”. It is a technique developed by Don Keene [27] [28] and is proprietary to JBL. CBT combines amplitude tapering with steadily increasing time delays to the outer loudspeakers in the array, giving a much wider and smoother coverage off-axis than amplitude tapering alone. The technology originated in beam-forming systems for submarine sonar. The tapering and delays can be conveniently implemented as a passive lossy delay line, which means much less hardware than differing digital delays feeding multiple power amplifiers. JBLhave produced an excellent introductory guide to this technology. [29] One of the patents that cover it is EP2247120A2, [30] which is assigned to Harman International.
Figure 2.7 shows an eight-box CBT array, similar to the JBLCBT-40 array. The undelayed signal directly feeds boxes 4 and 5, which are connected in series. Boxes 3 and 6 are fed in series with a delayed signal after L1 and C1, boxes 2 and 7 are in series after the second delay stage L2-C2, and the outer boxes 1 and 8 are fed in series after the final delay section L3-C3. The European patent gives a full description of the delay process, but is rather vague about how the amplitude tapering is done; it seems likely that in part at least it relies on losses in the series resistance of the inductors. The inductance and capacitor values increase steadily from the input to the end of the delay line.
Diffraction
Diffraction affects loudspeaker operation for the simple reason that high frequencies have shorter wavelengths than long frequencies. At high frequencies, a loudspeaker cone radiates sound mostly in a forward direction, into what is called “half-space”: a hemisphere facing forwards.At low frequencies, the longer wavelengths of the sound bend, or diffract, around the sides and rear of the enclosure, so radiation occurs into “full-space”, which is a sphere with the loudspeaker at its centre. In other words the loudspeaker becomes more or less omnidirectional. The difference between these two modes appears as a lower output on the forward axis at low frequencies. In the quite unrealistic conditions of an anechoic chamber the low-frequency loss is 6 dB, halving the SPL. In the special case where the loudspeaker enclosure is spherical, the transition between the two modes is smooth and can be approximated by a 1st-order shelving response, as shown in Figure 2.8, which is derived from the classic paper on the subject by Olson in 1969. [31]
This effect is sometimes called the “6 dB baffle step” or the “diffraction loss” of the enclosure (“step” is not a very good description—it is actually a very gentle rise). The frequency at which this occurs is proportional to the enclosure dimensions, and the effect can be compensated for by simple shelving equalisation.
While spherical loudspeaker enclosures are perfectly practical, a notable example being the Cabasse
La Sphère, [32] which claims to be “Atrue 4-way co-axial point source”, they are never likely to be very popular. Apart from anything else, they need special stands to stop them rolling around the room.

40 How Loudspeakers Work
Figure 2.7: CBT line array with passive delay line gives wider and smoother coverage off-axis. Based on European Patent EP2247120A2.
There are also problems because the internal reflection paths are all the same length. I once knew a chap who built a pair of spherical loudspeakers out of GRP, using full-range drive units. He was unable to resist the temptation to paint them like a giant pair of eye-balls, which did not create a restful effect.
For any shape other than spherical, or perhaps ellipsoidal, the diffraction business becomes more complicated. Any other shape has some sort of edge or edges, and when the sound waves from the drive unit strike them, a negative pressure wave is formed which radiates forward and sums with the direct output from the drive unit. This creates an interference effect which adds wobbles to the basic frequency response with its 6 dB rise; these wobbles can be as large as the step itself. This edge effect is illustrated in Figure 2.9.

How Loudspeakers Work 41
dB
+15
+10
+5 0
−5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−10 |
200 |
300 |
400 |
600 |
800 1k |
2k |
3k |
4k |
100 |
Hz
Figure 2.8: HF rise of 6 dB due to diffraction around a spherical loudspeaker enclosure 24 inches in diameter (after Olson, 1969).
Figure 2.9: Extra sound waves generated by diffraction at the corners of a loudspeaker enclosure.
About the worst thing you can do when choosing an enclosure for a loudspeaker is to mount it in the end of a cylinder, as in Figure 2.10. This has an equal distance from the drive unit to every part of the edge at the front, and so produces the most accentuated response deviations, exceeding 10 dB. You will note that the horizontal distance between peaks or between dips on the graph decreases

42 How Loudspeakers Work
Figure 2.10: Serious response disturbances due to corners, superimposed on 6 dB rise; cylindrical loudspeaker enclosure 24 inches in diameter and 24 inches long (after Olson, 1969).
Figure 2.11: Reduced response disturbances due to corners, superimposed on 6 dB rise; cubic loudspeaker enclosure 24 inches on a side (after Olson, 1969).
as the frequency increases; this is simply because the graph has a logarithmic frequency scale, but the diffraction effect, being based on multiples of wavelength, is linear. Although the response to be corrected should be constant, because it depends on the mechanical dimensions of the enclosure, clearly any attempt to equalise away these variations would take quite a bit of doing. The obvious conclusion is that this shape of enclosure is of no use to man or beast, and should be shunned.
Rectangular (or to be strictly accurate, rectangular parallelepiped, i.e. with all edges parallel) boxes are of course much easier to fabricate than spheres or cylinders, and are correspondingly more popular. The simplest shape is the cube, which has the advantage over the cylinder that the path length from the drive unit to the front edges varies. This helps to smooth out the response wobbles, but as Figure 2.11 shows, they are still substantial, the difference between the first peak and the first dip being about 8 dB.

How Loudspeakers Work 43
Figure 2.12 shows the result of converting the flat face of the forward baffle into a truncated pyramid, to make the edges less sharp. The frequency response deviations are now much less pronounced, not exceeding 2 dB, apart from the inherent 6 dB rise. Olson gives the following information about its dimensions:
The length of the edges of the truncated surface is 1 ft. The height of the truncated pyramid is
6 in. The lengths of the edges of the rectangular parallelepiped are 1 ft. and 2 ft. The loudspeaker mechanism is mounted in the centre of the truncated surface. The lengths of the edges of the rectangular parallelepiped are 2 ft. and 3 ft. The loudspeaker mechanism is mounted midway between two long edges and 1 ft. from one short edge.
The vast majority of loudspeakers are of course rectangular boxes, as shown in Figure 2.13.
These give a much worse response than the previous example because of the sharp edges of the front baffle, with deviations of up to 6 dB. The lengths of the edges of the rectangular box were
Figure 2.12: Much-reduced response disturbances superimposed on 6 dB rise; truncated pyramid and rectangular parallelepiped loudspeaker enclosure; dimensions given in text (after Olson, 1969).
Figure 2.13: Response disturbances due to sharp corners, superimposed on 6 dB rise; rectangular loudspeaker enclosure; dimensions given in text (after Olson, 1969).