![](/user_photo/19115_OVnlY.jpg)
Экзамен зачет учебный год 2023 / The independence principle of letters of credit and demand guarantees
.pdfTABLE OF CASES
AE Lindsay & Co Ltd v Cook [1953] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 328 ............................................................................ |
|
|
2.47 |
Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson [1990] 1 Ch 265................................................................................... |
|
|
1 L20, 11.21 |
Agnew Lansforsakringsbolagens AB [2001] 1 AC 2 2 1 .............................................................................. |
|
|
13.17 |
Agra and Masterman s Bank v Leighton (1866) L R 2 Ex 5 6 ....................................................................... |
|
|
4.24 |
Aiglon Ltd v Gau Shan Co Ltd [1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 1 6 4 ....................................................................... |
|
|
10.71 |
Akerhielm v De Mare [1956] AC 7 8 9 .............................................................................................................. |
|
|
5.63 |
Alaska Textile Co Inc v Chase Manhattan Bank 982 F 2d 813(2d Cir. 19 9 2 )................. |
|
2 .53,4 . 02,4 .08 |
|
Alex Focas Pty Ltd v Skodaexport Co Ltd [1998] 3 VR 3 80 ............................................................. |
|
|
7 .47, 7.48 |
Alexander vRayson [1936] 1 KB 1 6 9 .................................................................................................... |
|
|
8.38, 8.52 |
Algeme Bank Nederland vSoysen Tarim Urunleri DisTicaret 748 F. Supp. 177 (1 9 9 0 ) |
................... 5.95 |
||
Ali Shipping Corporation v Shipyard Trogir [1998] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 643................................................. |
|
12.47 |
|
All Services Exportacao Comercio SAv Banco Bamerindus Do Brazil SA (1990) |
|
|
|
921 F 2d 3 2 .................................................................................................................................................. |
|
|
5.95 |
American Bell International Inc v Islamic Republic of Iran, 474 F. Supp. 420 (1979)............ |
5 .43,10.25 |
||
American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 3 9 6 ...................................................... |
|
5.66 -5.72,10.17, |
|
|
|
|
10 .25,10.71 |
American Home Assurance Co v Hong Lam Marine Pte Ltd [1999] 3 SLR 682............ |
|
7 .50, 8.35, 8.52 |
|
Amin Rasheed Corp v Kuwait Insurance Co [1984] AC 5 0 ........................................................ |
|
|
13.45, 13.55 |
Anglo Austrian Bank, Re [1920] l C h 6 9 .................................................................................................... |
|
|
13.55 |
Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1978] AC 728............................. |
i .......................... |
|
10.51, 10.52 |
Anwar vTeo Нее Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd [2003] 1 SLR 394....................................... |
|
7.33, 7.34 |
|
Arab Bank v Barclays Bank DCO [1954] AC 495 ..................................................................................... |
|
|
13.32 |
Armfea Pic v The Bank of Scotland [2004] ScotCS 132............................................................................ |
|
|
10.26 |
Arnea Pic v Bank of Scotland [2004] ScotCS 1 3 2 ........................................................................................ |
|
|
4.15 |
Aspen Planners Ltd v Commerce Masonry & Forming Ltd (1979) 100 DLR (3d) 546 .................... |
5.75 |
||
Associated British Ports v Ferryways NV [2009] EWCA Civ 206 ............................................................. |
|
3.70 |
|
Assunzione, The [1954] P 1 5 0 ....................................................................................................................... |
|
|
13.55 |
Astro Exito Navigacion SAv Chase Manhattan BankNA [1983] 2 AC 7 8 7 ....................................... |
|
10.01 |
|
Astro Exito Navegacion SA v Chase Manhattan Bank, The Messiniaki Tolmi |
|
|
|
[1986] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 455 ............................................................................................... |
|
2.24,5.112,10.01 |
|
Attock Cement Co Ltdv Romanian Bank for Foreign Trade [1989] |
|
|
|
1 W LR 1147 .................................................................................................................. |
|
13.49,13.72, 13.96 |
|
Australasian Conference Association Ltd v Mainline Constructions Proprietary Ltd |
|
|
|
(in liquidation) (1978) 141 C LR335 ................................ |
12.04, 12.05,12 .25,12 .27,12 .37,12 .39 |
||
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v CG Berbatis |
|
|
|
Holdings Pty Ltd (2003) 214 CLR 51 ........................................................................................... |
|
|
7 .43, 7.44 |
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Samton |
|
|
|
Holdings Pty Ltd (2002) 117 FC.R 3 01 ........................................................................................ |
|
|
7 .45, 7.48 |
Australian Winch and Haulage Co Pty Ltd v Walter Construction |
|
|
|
Group Ltd [2002] FCA 1181 ....................................................................... |
9.15,9.30, 9.41, 9.43,10.38 |
||
В (Minor), Re [2008] UKHL 35........................................................................................................................ |
|
|
5.63 |
BOC Group Pic v Centeon LLC [1999] 1 All ER (Comm) 53.................................................................. |
|
|
3.65 |
Bache & Co (London) Ltd v Banque Vernes et Commerciale de Paris SA [1973] |
|
|
|
2 Lloyd’s Rep 4 3 7 ............................................................................................................................ |
|
|
3 .83,12.14 |
Bachmann Pty Ltd v ВНР Power New Zealand Ltd [1999] 1 VR 420 ............................. |
|
9.28, 9 .29, 9.41 |
xv
Table o f Cases |
|
|
|
|
Bains Harding (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Arab-Malaysian Merchant Bank Bhd |
|
|
|
|
[1996] 1 M JL425 ...................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
|
7.56 |
Baldessari v Soc. Bordelaise de Credit Industriel et Commercial, Cass. Comm. |
|
|
|
|
13 December 1983, D. 1984. J. 4 2 0 ...................................................................................................... |
|
|
|
8.55 |
Balfour Beatty Civil Engineering v Technical & General Guarantee |
|
|
|
|
Co Ltd (1999) 68 Con LR 180; [2000] CLC 252 ............................................ |
|
3.77, 5.55, 5.57, 5.81, |
||
|
|
5.125, |
11.03, |
12.20 |
Banco National de Commercio Exterior SNC v Empresa de Telecommunicationes |
|
|
||
de Cuba SA [2007] EWCA Civ 662; [2007] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 484, C A ......................................... |
|
|
10.02 |
|
Banco Santander SA v Bayern Ltd [2000] 1 All ER (Comm) 776, C A ........................... |
|
5.92, 5.103, 8.44 |
||
Banco Santander v Banque Paribas [2000] 1 All ER (Comm) 7 7 6 ................................................. |
|
|
2.35, 5.97 |
|
Bank Melli Iran v Barclays Bank D CO [1951] 2 Lloyds Rep 367 .............................................. |
|
|
2.60, 5.116 |
|
Bank of Baroda v Vysya Bank Ltd [1994] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 87 ............................. |
13.45,13.71, 13.83, 13.92 |
|||
Bank of Credit and Commerce Hong Kong Ltd (in liquidation) v |
|
|
|
|
Sonali Bank [1995] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 227........................................................... |
13.44,13.78,13.90, 13.94 |
|||
Bank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd v Akindele |
|
|
|
|
[2001] Ch 437 ........................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
П .25 |
|
Bank of Montreal v Wilder [1986] 2 SCR 551 ............................................................................................ |
|
|
|
3.68 |
Bankof Nova Scotia v Angelica-Whitewear Ltd [1987] 1 SC R59; |
|
|
|
|
[1987] DLR 161 ............................................................................................ |
2.53, 4.45,4.07, 5.01, 5.05, |
|||
|
5 .2 1 ,5 .61,5 .65,5 .75,5 .92 |
|||
Bank of Scotland v A Ltd [2000] Lloyd’s Rep Bank 271........................................................................... |
|
|
10.06 |
|
Bank Russo-Iran v Gordon Woodroffe & Co Ltd (1972) 116 Sol Jo 9 2 1 ............................................ |
|
|
11.17 |
|
BankTejarat v HSBC [19951 1 Lloyd’s Rep 239 ......................................................................... |
|
|
11.17,11.19, |
|
|
|
|
11.21,11.23 |
|
Banque de 1’lndochine v JH Rayner (Mincing Lane) Ltd [1982] 2 Lloyds Rep 476; |
|
|
||
[1983] QB 7 1 1 ................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
4.32,4.45 |
|
Banque de Paris et des Pays Bas v SA Omnium Technique des Transport par Pipelines |
|
|
||
et Commercial Bank of Syria, Paris, 26 April 1983, D. 1983.IR.485 .................................. |
|
|
3.46,3.55 |
|
Banque des Merchands de Moscou, Re (No 2) [1954] 1 W LR 1 1 0 8 ................................................. |
|
|
13.107 |
|
Banque Financiere de la Cite v Parc (Battersea) Ltd [1999] 1 AC 221 ..................................... |
|
|
12.61, 12.73 |
|
Banque Francaise de Commerce Exterieur c. SA Desse, Com. 19 May 1992, D. 1993 ...................... |
|
5.52 |
||
Banque Indosuez v Ste Entrepose Com. 2 decembre 1997, D. aff. 1998, 107, obs. |
|
|
||
A.-R.; JCP 1998, ed. E, 1 7 8 1 .................................................................................................................. |
|
|
|
7.62 |
Banque Saudi Fransi v Lear Siegler Services Inc [2006] EWCA Civ 1130; |
|
|
|
|
[2007] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 47; [2005] All ER (D ) 142 ........................................... |
|
3.53, 3.98, 5 .51,5.52, |
||
|
|
5 .65,5 . 83,5.86 |
||
Barclay Mowlem Construction Ltd v Simon Engineering (Australia) |
|
|
|
|
Pty Ltd (1991) 23 NSWR 451 .......................................................................................... |
|
9.26, 9 .28, 9.31, |
||
|
|
9 .42,9 . 43, 10.33 |
||
Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd [1970] AC 5 6 7 .............................................. |
|
|
12.25, 12.26 |
|
Barclays Bank Ltd v WJ Simms Son and Cooke (Southern) Ltd [1980] QB 677 |
............................. |
|
12.02 |
|
Basse and Selve v Bank of Australasia (1904) 90 LT 618........................................................................... |
|
|
5.117 |
|
Bavins & Sims v London & South Western Bank Ltd [1900] 1 QB 270, C A .................................... |
|
|
11.22 |
|
Bean Technology (Mfg) Pte Ltd v Standard Chartered Bank [2003] 1 SLR 597 ...................... |
|
6.14-6.17, |
||
|
|
6 .21,6 . 23,6 .29 |
||
Bechervaise v Lewis (1872) LR 7 CP 372 ...................................................................................................... |
|
|
|
3.65 |
Belgian Grain 8c Produce Co Ltd v Cox & Co (France) Ltd (1919) 1 LI L R. 256 ............................. |
|
|
2.55 |
|
Beresford v Royal Insurance Co Ltd [1937] 2 KB 1 9 7 ................................................................................ |
|
|
|
8.28 |
Berhad v Bandar Subang Sdn Bhd [1998] 650M LJU 1.............................................................................. |
|
|
|
4.54 |
Beyerne v Irving Trust Co, 762 F 2d 4 (US Ct of Apps (2d Cir.)(l 9 8 5 ) ................................................. |
|
|
|
4.45 |
Bocotra Construction Pte Ltd & Others v Attorney General (No 2) [1995] |
|
|
|
|
2 SLR 733 ............................................................................................................................ |
|
5 .75,7 . 50, 10.25 |
xvi
Table o fCases |
|
|
Bolivinter Oil SA v Chase Manhattan Bank NA [1984] 1 WLR 392; [1984] |
||
1 Lloyds Rep 2 5 1 ......................................................................................... |
|
3.02, 4.04,4.18, 5.30, 5.58, |
|
|
5.60,5.61,5.65, |
|
|
6 .30,7 .27,9 .18, 10.10, |
|
|
10.12, 10.60, 10.63,10.66 |
Bonython v Commonwealth of Australia [1951] AC 2 0 1 ....................................................................... |
13.55 |
|
Boral Formwork & Scaffolding Pty Ltd v Action Makers Ltd [2003] |
|
|
NSWSC 557 ..................................................................................... |
.................................. |
7.42, 9.42, 10.33 |
Boscawanv Bajwa [1996] 1 W LR 328 ......................................................................................................... |
|
12.73 |
BossevMastercraft(1995) 123 DLR (4th) 161 (Ont. C A )....................................................................... |
8.30 |
|
Bowmakers Ltd v Barnet Instruments Ltd [1945] KB 6 5 ............................................................................ |
|
8.34 |
Bradford Old Bank Ltd v Sutcliffe [1918] 2 KB 833 ................................................................................... |
|
3.66 |
Brennan v Bolt Burdon [2005] QB 303 ......................................................................................................... |
|
5.13 |
Brightside Mechanical and E,ngineering Services Group Ltd v Standard |
|
|
Chartered Bank [1989] 3 MLJ 1 3 ....................................................................... |
|
4.52, 4.54, 10.26, 10.31 |
Brink’s Mat Ltd vElcombe [1988] 1 W LR 1350 ............................................................................ |
|
10.05, 10.06 |
Bristol Meci Australasia Pty Ltd v Ericsson Business Networks AB [1996] |
|
|
EWCA Civ 807 ........................................................................................................................................... |
|
7.26 |
British America Assurance Co. v Redekopp (1973) 38 DLR (3d) 6 3 1 ................................................... |
3.64 |
|
British Imex Industries Ltd v Midland Bank Ltd [1958] 1 QB 542 ........................................................ |
2.55 |
|
Britten Norman Ltd (in liquidation) v State Ownership Fund of |
|
|
Romania [2000] Lloyd’s Rep Bank 3 1 5 ........................................................ |
|
3.67, 10.14, 10.70, 10.73, |
|
|
10.78,13 .33,13.34,13.37 |
Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd v Xenakis [1982] 2 Lloyds Rep 304 .................................................................. |
13.72 |
|
Brooks Exim Pte Ltd v Bhagwandas [1995] 2 SLR 1 3 ............................................................................ |
|
13.105 |
Brown’s Estate, Re [1893] 2 Ch. 3 0 0 ................................................................................................................ |
|
3.66 |
Bruns v Colocotronis [1979] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 412............................................................................................. |
|
3.64 |
Buller v Harrison (1777) 2 Cowp 565 ........................................................................................................... |
|
11.22 |
Butler’s Wharf Ltd, Re [1995] B C C 7 1 7 ...................................................................................................... |
|
12.28 |
CDN Research & Dev. Ltd v Bank of Nova Scotia (1980) 18 CPC 62, |
|
|
Ontario High Court.......................................................................................................................... |
|
5.30, 5.75 |
CTN Cash and Carry Ltd v Gallaher Ltd [1994] 4 All E R 7 1 4 ............................................................. |
12.65 |
|
Cadre SAv Astra Asigurari [2005] EW H C 2626............... |
i ...................................................................... |
13.58 |
Caisse Franco-Neerlandaise de Cautionnements c. Soc. Borie SAE, Paris, |
|
|
1 March 1989, D. 1990. Somm. 1 9 6 .................................................................................................... |
|
3.94 |
Caledonia Subsea Ltd v Microperi Sri, 2002 SLT 1022 ............................................................................ |
|
13.66 |
Camner International Inc v U К Mutual Steamship Assurance Association |
|
|
(Bermuda) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1694 (C om m )................................................................................... |
|
3.98 |
Campbell Discount Co Ltd v Bridge [1961] 1 QB 445; [1962] AC 600 ............................................ |
12.09 |
|
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Drutz (1996) ACWS (3d) 2 5 8 .............................................. |
8.30 |
|
Cantieri Navali Riuniti SpA v NV Omne Justitia, The Stolt Martnaro [1985] |
||
2 Lloyd’s Rep 4 2 8 ...................................................................................................................................... |
|
13.55 |
Cape Asbestos Co Ltd v Lloyd’s Bank Ltd [1921] WN 274 ....................................................................... |
2.29 |
|
Carey Value Added SI, (Formerly Losan Hotels World Value Added 1 SI,) |
|
|
v Grupo Urvasco SA [2010] EWHC 1905 (C om m ).......................................... |
1.08, 3.04, 3.85, 3.87 |
|
Cargill International SA v Bangladesh Sugar & Food Industries |
|
|
Corporation [1996] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 524 ............................................................... |
|
3.19,7.20, 7.21, 7.35, |
10.31, 12.04, 12.08,12.11,12.13, 12.15,12.29, 12.30,12.46-12.49, |
||
|
12 .56,12 .59,12 .61,12 .75,12 .80 |
|
Carvill America Inc v Camperdown UK Ltd [2005] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 457 .............................................. |
13.50 |
|
Catlin v Bell (1815) 4 Camp. 1 8 3 ..................................................................................................................... |
|
8.31 |
Caulfield v Board of Education, 583 F 2d 605, 610 (2d Cir. 1 9 7 8 )...................................................... |
10.25 |
xvii
Table o fCases
Cauxell Ltd v Lloyd’s Bank pic The Times, 26 December 1995 ............................................................... |
|
|
|
3.56 |
Centri-Force Engineering Limited v Bank of Scotland 1993 SLT 1 9 0 ................................................... |
|
|
|
5.38 |
Centrifugal Casting Mach. Co, Inc v American Bank & Trust Co 966 |
|
|
|
|
F 2d 1348, 1 3 5 2 (1 9 9 2 )............................................................................................................................ |
|
|
|
8.49 |
Chailease Finance Corporation v Credit Agricole Indosuez [2000] |
|
|
|
|
1 Lloyd’s Rep 3 4 8 ........................................................................................................... |
|
13.16,13.17,13.25 |
||
Chartered Electronics Industries Pte Ltd v Development Bank of |
|
|
|
|
Singapore [1999] 4 SLR 655 ........................................................................... |
3.57, 3.94,4.54, 5.75, 7.55 |
|||
Chase Manhattan Bank NA v Israel-British Bank (London) Ltd |
|
|
|
|
[1981] Ch 1 0 5 ............................................................................................................................................. |
|
|
|
12.02 |
Chemische Fabrik Vormals Sandoz v Badische Anlin und Soda Fabriks |
|
|
|
|
(1904) 90 LT 7 3 3 ...................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
|
13.50 |
China Airlines Ltd v Maltran Air Corp Sdn Bhd [1996] 2 MLJ 517........................................................ |
|
|
|
4.56 |
Chudian v Philippine National Bank, 734 F. Supp. 415, afif’d 976 |
|
|
|
|
F 2d 561 (1 9 9 2 )...................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
13.107 |
|
Cineplex Odeon Corp v 100 Bloor Street West General Partnership Inc |
|
|
|
|
[1993] O J No 1 1 2 ........................................................................................................................................ |
|
|
|
8.51 |
Clough Engineering Ltd v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd |
|
|
|
|
[2008] FCAFC 136 .......................................................................................................... |
|
7 .42,7 .48,9 .23 |
||
Cogentra AG v Sixteen Thirteen Marine SA [2008] EWHC 1615 (Comm) |
....................................... |
|
10.04 |
|
Colin Buchanan & Partners Ltd v Marcus de Berg [2003] EW HC 839 .............................................. |
|
|
|
11.15 |
Color Drack GmbH v Lexx International Vertriebs GmbH (C-386/05) |
|
|
|
|
[2007] I L P r 3 5 ........................................................................................................................................ |
|
|
13.22 |
|
Comdel Commodities Ltd v SiporexTrade SA [1997] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 4 2 4 ................. |
|
12.15, 12.46, 12.80 |
||
Commercial Banking Co of Sydney Ltd v Jalsard [1973] AC 279 .............................................. |
|
|
4.34, 5.114 |
|
Commercial Marine Piling Ltd vPierse Contracting Ltd [2009] EW HC2241 . . . |
13.16, 13.17, 13.25 |
|||
Commonwealth Bank ofAustralia v White (Sup Ct ofVictoria, 22 October 1 9 9 9 )........................... |
|
|
7.42 |
|
Compagnie des Signaux et d’Equipement Electroniques c. Credit Populaire |
|
|
|
|
d’Algerie, Paris 27 November 1990. Soinm. 2 0 0 ................................................................................ |
|
|
|
5.52 |
Compagnie Tunisienne de Navigation SA v Compagnie d’Armement Maritime |
|
|
|
|
SA [1971] AC 572 ................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
|
13.55 |
Conelly v RTZ Corp Pic [1998] AC 854 ...................................................................................................... |
|
|
|
13.43 |
CongentraAG v Sixteen Thirteen Marine SA [2008] EW HC 1615 (Comm)........................ |
|
10.06, 10.75 |
||
Consolidated Oil Ltd v American Express Bank Ltd [2002] C LC 488 ............... |
3.98, 5.58, 5.73, 10.25, |
|||
|
10.39, |
10.56, |
10.60, |
10.63 |
Continental Enterprises Ltd v Shandong Zhucheng Foreign Trade Group |
|
|
|
|
Co [2005] EWHC. 92 (C om m )......................................................................................................... |
|
|
13.104 |
|
Contronic Distributors Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) v Bank of |
|
|
|
|
New South Wales (1984) 3N SW LR 1 1 0 ................... ........................................................................ |
|
|
|
5.01 |
Credit Agricole Indosuez v Banque Nationalede Paris [2001] 2 SLR 1 ........................ |
|
5.91, 5.96, 5.103 |
||
Credit Industriel et Commercial v China Merchants Bank [2002] EW HC 973 |
|
|
|
|
(Comm); [2002] 2 All ER (Comm) 427 ..................................................................................... |
|
|
2.24, 4.38 |
|
Credit Lyonnais v New Hampshire Insurance Co [1997] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1............................................ |
|
|
13.66 |
|
Credit Suisse Fides Trust SA v Coughi [1997] 3 All ER 724; [1998] |
|
|
|
|
QB 818, CA .................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
10.71,10.76 |
|
Credit Suisse v Borough Council ofAllerdale [1995] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 315 ................................................. |
|
|
|
3.69 |
Custom Made Commercial Ltd v Stawa Metallbau GmbH [1994] E C R I-2 9 1 3 ............................. |
|
13.17 |
||
Cygal Berhad v Bandar Subang Sdn Bhd [1998] 650 MLJU 1 .................................................................. |
|
|
|
7.56 |
Czarnikow-Rionda v Standard Bank [1999] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 187 ................... |
2.35,4.16, 5 .06,5 .19,5.52, |
|||
5 .59,5.84,5.88, |
10.05, 10.06, |
|||
|
10.14,10.41, 10.45,10.46, |
|||
|
10.52, 10.60-10.64,12.30 |
xviii
Table o fCases
DBS Bank Ltd v Carrier Singapore (Pte) Ltd [2008] SGHC 5 3 |
.................................. |
11.10, 11.13, 11.29 |
DCD Factors Pic v Ramada Trading Ltd [2008] Bus LR 6 5 4 ..................................... |
2.37, 5.89, 5.91, 5.93 |
|
Dadourian Group International v Simms [2006] EWHC 2973 ............................................................... |
|
5.48 |
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co Ltd v The Titular Roman Catholic |
|
|
Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur [2007] 7 ML] 136.................................................................... |
|
9.36, 10.37 |
Damatar Paints (P) Ltd v Indian Oil Corp AIR 1982 Delhi 5 7 ............................................................... |
|
3.63 |
Dauphin Offshore Engineering & Trading Pte Ltd v The Private Office of |
|
|
HRH Sheikh Sultan Bin Khalifa Bin Zayed A1 Nahyan |
|
|
[2000] 1 SLR 6 5 7 ....................................................................................................... |
|
5 .75,7 .31,7 .33,7 .52, |
|
|
7.53,7.55 |
De Beeche v South American Stores Ltd [1935] AC 1 4 8 ....................................................................... |
|
13.107 |
Derby v Weldon [1990] C h 4 8 ....................................................................................................................... |
|
10.71 |
Derby & Co Ltd v Weldon (Nos 3 and 4) [1990] Ch. 6 5 ......................................................................... |
|
10.76 |
Deripaska vCherney [2009] EWCA Civ 849 ................................................................................ |
|
13.46, 13.51 |
Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App. Cas. 337 .................................................................................................. |
|
5.28, 5.46 |
Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Pic v Inland Revenue Commissioners |
|
|
[2006] UKHL49; [2007] 1 AC 5 5 8 ........................................................................................ |
|
12.64, 12.65 |
Deutsche Ruckversicherung AG v Walbrook Insurance Co Ltd [1995] |
|
|
1 W LR 1 0 1 7 .................................................................................................................................... |
|
5.60,8.15, |
|
9 .16,10.13, 10.41, 10.46 |
|
Discount Records Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd [1975] 1 W LR 315 .................... |
5.01, 5.43, 5.52, 5.92,10.58 |
|
Doherty v Allman (1878) 3 App. Cas. 709 ........................................................................................ |
|
9.15, 10.34 |
Donal H. Scot & Co Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd [ 1923] 2 KB 1.................................................................... |
|
2.52 |
Dongjin Metal Co Ltd v Raymet Ltd, 13 July 1993 ....................................................................... |
|
5.73, 10.13 |
Domach Ltd v Mauritius Union Assurance Co Ltd [2006] Lloyds .......................................Rep 475 |
13.58 |
|
Dubai Bank v Galadari [1990] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 1 2 0 ...................................................................................... |
|
10.06 |
ED and F Man Ltd v Nigerian Sweets and Confectionary Co Ltd [1977] |
|
|
2 Lloyds Rep 5 0 ................................................................................................................................. |
|
2.13,2.14 |
Edgington v Fitzmaurice (1885) 29 Ch. 4 5 9 ................................................................................................. |
|
5.48 |
Edward Owen Engineering Ltd v Barclays Bank International |
|
|
Ltd [1978] QB 159................................................................................. |
3 .03, 3 .17, 3.44, 3.62, 3.65,4.05, |
|
|
4 .15,4 . 17,4 .63, 5.01, 5.16, 5.42, 5.43, |
|
|
5.49, 5.50, 5.52, 5.55, 5.58, 5.60, 5.68, |
|
|
5 .72 - 5 .74, 5.80, 7.19, 7.24, 7.27, 7.31, |
|
|
8 .42, 10 .44,10.63, 12.01,12.08 |
|
Egbert v National Crown Bank [1918] AC 9 0 3 ............................................................................................. |
|
3.68 |
Egon Oldendorff v Liberia Corpn [1995] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 64; [1996] |
|
|
1 Lloyds Rep 3 8 0 ...................................................................................................................................... |
|
13.58 |
Egyptian International Foreign Trade Co v Soplex Wholesale Supplies |
|
|
(The Raffaelia) [1984] 1 Lloyds Rep 102............................................................................................... |
|
6.02 |
Elder Dempster Lines Ltd v Ionic Shipping Agency Inc [1968] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 529 |
.................2.24, 5.112 |
|
Elder, The [1893] P I 1 9 ...................................................................................................................................... |
|
13.32 |
Elena D ’Amico, The [1980] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 7 5 ............................................................................................. |
|
11.11 |
Elian and Rabbath v Matsas [1966] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 495.............................................. |
7.06,7.17, 7.19, 10.39 |
|
Eltraco International Pte Ltd v CGH Developments Pte Ltd [2000] |
|
|
4 SLR 290 ............................................................................................... |
7 .2 1 ,7 .3 1 ,7 .3 3 ,7 .3 4 ,7 .5 2 ,7 .5 3 |
|
English, Scottish and Australian Bank Ltd v Bank of South Africa |
|
|
(1922) 13 LI LR. 2 1 ................................................................................................................................... |
|
4.42 |
Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v Banca Popolare Dell’Alto Adige Spa [2009] |
|
|
EWHC 2410 (Com m)................................................................................... |
3 .25, 3.58, 5.64, 5.76, 5.84, |
|
|
5.126, 12.01, 12.04,12.22 |
xtx
Table o fCases
Ennstone Building Products Ltd v Stanger Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 3059, CA............................................ |
13.66 |
|
Equitable Trust Co ofNewYorkv Dawson Partners Ltd (1926) 27 LI L R. 49 ........................ |
2.50, 2.60, |
|
|
|
4.41,4.44 |
Ermis Skai Radio & Television v Banque Indosuez SA |
|
|
26 February 1997 ........................................................................................................................................ |
|
4.49 |
Esal (Commodities) Ltd v Oriental Credit Ltd and Wells Fargo Bank |
|
|
[1985] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 546 .............................................................................. |
3.54, 3.57, 3.64, 3.65, 3.77, |
|
|
4 .5 4 ,4 .61,5 .15,5 .26,5 .41 |
|
Esso Petroleum Malaysia Inc v Kago Petroleum Sdn Bhd [1995] 1 MLJ 1 4 9 ........................ |
10.25, 10.39 |
|
Etablisseinent A De Bloos sprl v Societe en Commandite Par Actions |
|
|
Bouyer (14/76) [1976] ECR 1497 ...................................................................................................... |
|
13.17 |
Etablisseinent Esefka International Anstalt v Central Bank of Nigeria |
|
|
[1979] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 445 ................................................................................................. |
|
4.26,6 .28,11 .03 |
Euro London Appointments Ltd v Classens International Ltd [2006] |
|
|
EWCA Civ 385; [2006] Lloyd’s Rep 436 .......................................................................................... |
|
12.09 |
Euro-Diam Ltd v Bathurst [1990] 1 QB 1....................................................................... |
|
8.37,13.105, 13.117 |
European Asian Bank A.G. v Punjab v Sind Bank [1981] |
|
|
2 Lloyds Rep 6 5 1 ...................................................................................................................................... |
|
13.77 |
European Asian Bank AG v Punjab & Sind Bank (No 2) [1983] |
|
|
1 W LR 642 ................................................................................................................................................. |
|
5.88 |
Evans v Richardson (1817) 3 Mer. 469 ........................................................................................................... |
|
8.46 |
Export Credits Guarantee Department v Universal Oil Products |
|
|
Co [1983] I WLR 399 ............................................................................................................................ |
|
12.09 |
Falco Privatstiftung v Weller-Lindhorst (C-533/07) [2009] ECDR 14..................................... |
13.13, 13.17 |
|
Farrow’s Bank Ltd, Re [1923] 1 Ch 41 ................................................................................................. |
|
5.87, 5.91 |
Fellowes & Son v Fisher [1976] QB 1 2 2 ......................................................................................................... |
|
5.66 |
Ficom SA v Sociedad Cadex Ltd [ 1980] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1 1 8 ....................................................................... |
2.46 |
|
First Commercial Bank v Gotham Originals Inc 486 NYS 2d 715 (1 9 8 5 )............................................ |
5.95 |
|
Fisher v Bridges (1854) 3 E 8c В 6 4 2 ................................................................................................................ |
|
8.09 |
Fitzgerald vE J. Leonardt (1997) 71 ALJR 653 ............................................................................................. |
|
8.28 |
Fletcher Construction Australia Ltd v Varnsdorf Pty Ltd [1998] |
|
|
3 V R 8 1 2 ................................................................................................................................... |
|
5 .42,5 .64,5 .74, |
|
|
8 .50,9.29,9.30, |
|
|
9 .43,9 .41,9 .44 |
Fonderie Officine MeccanicheTacconi SpA v Heinrich Wagner Sinto |
|
|
Maschinenfabrik GmbH (HWS)( C-334/00) [2002] ECR 1-7357 ............................................ |
13.16 |
|
Forestal Mimosa Ltd v Oriental Credit Ltd [1986] |
1 WLR 6 3 1 ...................................................... |
2.17,2.55 |
Fords Bank SA/NV v Indian Overseas Bank [2009] EWHC 2303 (Comm); |
|
|
[2010] EW HC 84 (C om m )................................................................................... |
|
2.16, 2.49, 4.36,4.45, |
|
|
4 .46,5 .106,5.124 |
Fortune Hong Kong Trading Ltd v Cosco-Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2002] |
|
|
EW HC 79 (Com m)...................................................................................................................................... |
|
8.36 |
Foster v Driscoll [1929] 1 KB 470 ................................................................................................................ |
|
13.105 |
Four Seas Communication Bank Ltd v Sim See Kee [1990] 3 MLJ 2 2 6 ............................................ |
13.105 |
|
Fourie vLe Roux [2007] UKHL 1; [2007] 1 WLR 3 2 0 ............................................................... |
10.41, 10.72 |
|
Framatone v Atomic Flnergy Organisation of Iran, 1983 Outlet 9 1 4 ................................................... |
10.03 |
|
Frank Maas (UK) Ltd v Habib Bank Ag Zurich [2001] Lloyd’s Rep Bank 1 4 ....................................... |
4.57 |
|
GEC Marconi Systems Pty Ltd (t/a EASAMS Australia) v ВНР Information |
|
|
Technology Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 5 0 ........................................................................................................ |
|
9.29 |
GHL Pte Ltd v Unitrack Building Constructions Pte Ltd [1999] 4 SLR 604 ................. |
7.25, 7.30, |
|
|
|
7.51,7.53 |
xx
Table o f Cases
GKN Contractors Ltd v Lloyds Bank Pic (1985) 30 BLR 4 8 .............................................. |
3.15, 5.10, 5.34, |
|
5 .49,5.58,10.44, |
|
10.52,10.63 |
GPA Group Pic v Bank of Ireland [1992] 2 IR 408 ....................................................................... |
5.112, 5.113 |
GPG (Australia Trading) Pry Ltd v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (2001) |
|
1 1 7 F C R 2 3 .................................................................................................................................................... |
7.44 |
Gan Insurance Co Ltd vTai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [1999] IL Pr 7 2 9 ................................................. |
13.58 |
Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd (1998) 194C L R 395....................................................................... |
7.02 |
Geismar v Sun Alliance and London Insurance Ltd [1978] QB 383........................................................ |
8.28 |
General Produce Co v United Bank Ltd [1979] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 255 ..................................... |
3.62, 3 .81,3.93 |
General Surety and Guaranty Co Ltd v Francis Parker Ltd [1977] |
|
BLR 16, 21 ..................................................................................................................................................... |
12.79 |
Gian Singh v Banque de l’lndochine [1974] 1 W LR 1324; [1974] |
|
2 Lloyds Rep 1 ....................................................................................................................... |
2 .58,4 .35,4 .42, |
|
5.51,5.119 |
Gilbert-Ash (Northern) Ltd v Modern Engineering (Bristol) Ltd [1974] |
|
AC 689.......................................................................................................................................................... |
12.10 |
Glasier v Rolls (1889) 42 C h D 436 ................................................................................................................ |
5.63 |
Glencore Grain Rotterdam BV v Lebanese Organisation for International |
|
Commerce [1997] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 386 .................................................................................................... |
2.46 |
Gold Coast Ltd v Caja de Ahorros del Mediterraneo [2003] 1 All ER |
|
(Comm) 142 .......................................................................................................................... |
3.25, 3.63, 3.65, |
|
3 .7 1 ,3 .77,3 .90,3 .99 |
GordonvSelico Ltd(1986) 18 H L R 2 1 9 ........................................................................................................ |
5.13 |
Government of Malaysia v South East Asia Insurance Bhd [2000] |
|
3 MLJ 6 2 5 ....................................................................................................................................................... |
4-56 |
Gowers v Lloyds & National Provincial Foreign Bank Ltd [1938] |
|
1 All ER 766, C A ........................................................................................................................................ |
11.22 |
Gray v Thames Trains [2009] 3 W LR 1 6 7 ...................................................................................................... |
5.05 |
Greenland Bank Ltd v American Express Bank Ltd [2008] EW HC 421 ; |
|
[2009] EWCA Civ 14..................................................................................................... |
3.01, 3.76, 12.69 |
Greenore Port Ltd v Technical & General Guarantee Company Ltd [2006] |
|
EW HC 3 1 1 9 .T C C .......................................................................................................................... |
3.76, 3.98 |
Group Josi Re v Walbrook Insurance [1996] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 345 ............................. |
5.09, 5.19, 5.34, 5.72, |
5 .73,7 .1 9 ,7 .2 5 ,8 .0 1 ,8 .1 5 -8 .1 8 , |
|
|
8.20, 8.23, 8.36, 8.37, |
|
10.14,10.20,10.52 |
Guaranty Trust Co of New York v Van Den Berghs Ltd (1925) 22 LI L R. 4 4 7 ..................................... |
4.48 |
Gulf Bank KSC v Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd (No 2) [1994] |
|
2 Lloyd’s Rep 145 ................................................................................................................................ |
3.49,4.18 |
Gulf International Bank BSC v Albaraka Islamic Bank BSC [2003] |
|
All ER (D) 4 6 0 ............................................................................................................................................. |
2.35 |
HCC International Insurance Pic v Conway [2006] All ER (D) 192 (Ju l)............................................ |
3.17 |
HLC Engenharia E Gesto de Projectos SA v AMN Amro Bank NV [2005 ] |
|
EW HC 2074 ................................................................................................................................................ |
7.28 |
HRH Maharanee Seethaderi Gaekwar of Baroda v Wildenstein |
|
[1972] 2 QB 283 ...................................................................................................................................... |
13.43 |
Habib Bank Ltd v Central Bank of Sudan [2006] 2 Lloyds Rep 4 1 2 ....................................... |
13.46, 13.75 |
Halesowen Presswork & Assemblies Ltd v Westminster Bank Ltd [1971] 1 QB 1................................ |
4.29 |
Hamble Fisheries Ltd v L. Gardner Ы Sons Ltd, The Rebecca Flame [1999] |
|
2 Lloyd’s Rep 1 ........................................................................................................................................... |
11.29 |
Hampshire Land, Re [1896] 2 Ch 743 ........................................................................................................... |
5.35 |
xxt
Table o f Cases
Hampton v Minns [2002] 1 W LR 1 ...................................................................................................... |
|
|
3.63, 3.66 |
Hamzeh Malas & Sons v British Imex Industries Ltd [1958] 2 QB 127 ........................... |
2 .53,4 .05,4 .17 |
||
Harburg India Rubber Comb Co v Martin [1902] 1 KB 778 .................................................................... |
|
|
3.62 |
Harris Corporation v National Iranian Radio and Television, 691 F.2d 1344, 1357 (1 9 8 2 ) |
.......... 10.25 |
||
Heald v O ’Connor [1971] 1 W LR 4 9 7 ........................................................................... |
|
3.62,3.65, 3.81,3.93 |
|
Henderson v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (1982) 40 B C L R 318 ......................................... |
|
5.21 |
|
Hiap Tian Soon Construction Pte Ltd v Hola Development Pte Ltd [2003] |
|
|
|
1 SLR 667 ..................................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
7.53 |
HillvVanErp [1991] 188 CLR 159 (High Court of Australia)............................................................. |
|
|
12.62 |
HingHip Hing Fat Co Ltd v Daiwa Bank Ltd [1991] 2 H KLR35 |
|
|
|
(Hong K ong).................................................................................................................................................. |
|
|
4.45 |
Holman v Johnson (1775)1 Cowp341 .................................................................................................. |
|
|
5.05,8.02 |
Holme v Brunskill (1877) 3 QBD 495 ................................................................................................. |
|
|
3.68, 3.69 |
HoltvEly (1853) 1 E & B 7 9 5 ....................................................................................................................... |
|
|
12.62 |
Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation v Kloeckner & Co AG [1990] |
|
|
|
2 QB 5 1 4 ....................................................................................................................... |
|
4.04, 4.16, 4.24, 4.29 |
|
Hornal v Newberger Products Ltd [1957] 1 QB 2 4 7 ................................................................................... |
|
|
5.63 |
Hortico (Australia) Pty Ltd v Energy Equipment Co (Australia) Pty Ltd (1985) |
|
|
|
1 NSW LR 5 4 5 ............................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
7.38 |
Howe Richardson Scale Co Ltd v Polimex-Cekop and National Westminster |
|
|
|
Bank Ltd [1978] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 161....................................................................... |
|
3.25, 3.79, 4.05,4.14, |
|
|
|
4.17,7.19, 8.42 |
|
Hughes Bros Pty Ltd vTelede Pty Ltd (1989) 7 BCL 2 1 0 ............................................................... |
|
|
9.29,9.43 |
Huillerie L’Abelle v Societe des Huileries du Niger (The Kasteilon) [1978] |
|
|
|
2 Lloyds Rep. 203 ........................................................................................................................................ |
|
|
6.27 |
ICE (Intercontainer Interfrigo) SC v Balkenende Oosthuizen BV (C-133/08), |
|
|
|
6 October 2009 ......................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
13.66 |
IE Contractors v Lloyds Bank Pic [1990] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 496 .................................. |
|
3.53, 3.64, 3.77, 3.82, |
|
|
3 .9 2,4 .32,4 .35,4 .37,4 .49, |
||
|
4 .51,4 .54,5 .15,5 .26,5 .41 |
||
IIG Capital LLC v Van Der Merwe [2008] EWCA Civ 542 ........................ |
1.08, 3.17, 3.71, 3.77, 3.90, |
||
|
12.17,12 .24,12.70,12.73 |
||
Indian Overseas Bank v United Coconut Oil Mills Inc, 24 September 1992 ....................................... |
|
4.49 |
|
IndustrieTessili Italiano Como v Dunlop A.G. [1976] ECR 1473........................................................ |
|
|
13.25 |
Inflatable Toy Company Pty Ltd v State Bank of New South Wales [1994] |
|
|
|
34 NSWLR 2 4 3 ..................................................................................................................... |
|
5 .33,5.93,7.38 |
|
Insurance Co v Lloyd’s Syndicate [1995] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 2 7 2 .......................................................... |
|
|
9.15, 10.35 |
International Dairy Queen, Inc v Bank of Wadley, 407 F. Supp. 1270 |
|
|
|
(M .D.Ala. 19 7 6 )........................................................................................................................................ |
|
|
8.03 |
Intraco Ltd v Notis Shipping Corporation (The Bhoja Trader) [1981] |
|
|
|
2 Lloyd’s Rep 2 5 6 ............................................................................ |
4.15, 7.27, 8.42, 10.29,10.76,10.77 |
||
Invensys Pic v Automotive Sealing Systems Ltd, 8 November 2001 ........................................................ |
|
3.84 |
|
Irene’s Success, The [1982] 1 QB 481, [1981] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 635 .......................................................... |
|
|
Ю .51 |
Ispahani v Bank Melli Iran [1998] Lloyd’s Rep Bank 133....................................................................... |
|
|
13.105 |
1SS Machinery Services Ltd v Aeolian Shipping SA [2001] Lloyd’s Rep 641 ....................................... |
|
13.58 |
|
Itek Corporation v First National Bank of Boston, 730 F 2d 19 (1 9 8 4 ).............................................. |
|
10.33 |
|
Itramas Technology Sdn Bhd v AmBank (M) Berhad [2009] MLJU 0855 ............................................ |
|
7.57 |
|
J H Rayner & Co Ltd v Hambro’s Bank Ltd [1943] KB 3 7 ...................................................................... |
|
|
4.43 |
] H Evans Industries (NT) Pty Ltd v Diano Nominees Pty Ltd and Anor |
|
|
|
(Supreme Court of Northern Territory, 30 January 1 9 8 9 )............................................................... |
|
|
9.31 |
Jacobs v Credit Lyonnais (1884) 12 QBD 589 .......................................................................................... |
|
|
13.55 |
xxii
Table o f Cases
Jakob Handte & Co GmbH vTraitements Mecano-Chimiques des Surfaces |
|
|
|
SA (TMCF) ( C-26/91) [1992] ECR 1-3967..................................................................................... |
|
|
13.16 |
Jaks (UK) Ltd v Cera Investment BankSA [1998] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 8 9 ........................................................ |
|
|
2.53 |
James Finlay & Co Ltd v Kwik HooTong [1929] 1 KB 400 ....................................................................... |
|
|
6.27 |
Joachim v Swiss Bank Corporation [1921] 3 KB 110................................................................................... |
|
|
3.66 |
Jones v Abbey National Pic [2009] EW HC 722 ........................................................................................ |
|
|
11.22 |
KBC Bank v Industrial Steels (UK) Ltd [2001] 1 All ER (Comm) 409......................... |
|
2.37, 5.124, 11.05, |
|
|
|
11 .09,11 . 10,11.13 |
|
KMW International v Chase Manhattan Bank, 606 F 2d 10 (1 9 7 9 ) ...................................................... |
|
|
8.49 |
Kahlerv Midland Bank Ltd [1950] AC 24 ................................................................................ |
|
13 .105,13.107 |
|
Karya Lagenda Sdn Bhd v Kejuteraan Bintai Kindenko Sdn Bhd [2008] 6 M LJ |
.................................. |
4.56 |
|
Khan v Permeyer [2001] BPIR 9 5 ...................................................................................................... |
|
|
12.63, 12.64 |
Kheng Bee Construction Sdn Bhd v Standard Warehousing Sdn Bhd [2000] |
|
|
|
M L JU 7 6 7 .................................................................................................................................................. |
|
|
10.25 |
Kidurong L.and Sdn Bhd v Lim Gaik Hua [1990] 1 MLJ 485 .................................................................. |
|
|
3.68 |
Kilpatrick Green Pty Ltd vState Supply Board (1991) 5 6 S A S R 5 9 1 ...................................................... |
|
|
9.41 |
Kirkham v Chief Constable of Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 .................................................................. |
|
|
8.10 |
Kleinjan & Holst NV Rotterdam v Bremer Handelsgesellschaft mbH [1972] |
|
|
|
2 Lloyd’s Rep 1 1 ............................................................................................................................................. |
|
|
6.27 |
Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Glasgow City Council [1999] 1 AC 1 5 3 ........................................................ |
|
|
13.17 |
Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council [1999] 2 A C 3 4 9 ...................... |
5.13, 11.17, 11.26, 12.02 |
||
Kleinwort, Sons & Co v Ungarische Baumwolle Industrie Aktiengesellschaft |
|
|
|
[1939] 2 KB 678 ..................................................................................................................... |
|
13 .105,13.117 |
|
Komercni Banka AS v Stone and Rolls [2003] 1 Lloyds Rep 383..................................... |
|
5.48, 5.56, 11.05, |
|
|
|
11 .08,11 . 11, 11.14 |
|
Korea Industry Co Ltd v Andoll Ltd [1990] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 183 (Sing. CA).................................. |
|
|
5.37, 5.75 |
Krediebank Antwerp v Midland Bank Pic [1999] Lloyd’s Rep 219; [1999] |
|
|
|
CLC 1108 ............................................................................................................................ |
|
4 .44,4 . 46,5.115 |
|
Kriti Palm, The [2007] 1 All ER (Comm) 667............................................................................................... |
|
|
5.46 |
Kronos Worldwide v Sempra Oil Trading SARI. [2004] 1 All ER (Comm) 9 1 5 |
.................................. |
2.47 |
|
Kronprinsessan Margareta [1921] 1 AC 4 8 6 .................................................................................................... |
|
|
2.07 |
Kumgai-Zenecon Construction Pte Ltd vArab Bank Ltd [1997] 3 SLR 7 7 0 ....................................... |
|
|
2.17 |
Kvaerner John Brown Ltd v Midland Bank Pic [1998] CLC 4 4 6 ................................................. |
|
|
3.22, 5.73, |
|
|
10.20, |
10.39, 10.64 |
Kvaerner Singapore v UDL Shipbuilding (Singapore) [1993] 3 SLR 3 5 0 ............... |
|
4 .54, 5.41, 7 .24, 9.35 |
|
Kvarner Singapore Pte Ltd v UDL Shipbuilding (Singapore) Pte Ltd |
|
|
|
(1993) SLR 350 .................................................................................................................................. |
|
|
7.25,7.31 |
Kwei Тек Chao v British Traders and Shippers Ltd [1954] 2 KB 459 ................................ |
|
5.35, 6 .02, 6.03 |
|
KweiTek Chao v British Traders Ltd [1954] 2 QB 459 .............................................................................. |
|
|
6.27 |
Kydon Cia Naviera SA v National Westminster Bank Ltd, The Lena [1981] |
|
|
|
1 Lloyds Rep6 8 ............................................................................................................................................. |
|
|
2.27 |
LEC Contractors (M) Sdn Bhd v Castle Inn Sdn Bhd [2000] 3 MLJ 339............................................ |
|
|
10.25 |
Lakeman v Mountstephen (1874) LR 7 HL 1 7 ............................................................................................. |
|
|
3.62 |
Lambias (Importers & Exporters) Co Pte Ltd v Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking |
|
||
Corp [1993] 2 SLR 751 (Singapore High C o u rt)................................................... |
|
5 .112,5 . 120,6 .33 |
|
Lancore Services Ltd v Barclays Bank Pic [2008] EWHC 1264 (Ch), aff’d [2009] |
|
||
EWCA Civ 752; [2009] 2 CLC 306....................................................................................................... |
|
|
8.21 |
Lane-Mullins v Warrenby Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 817............................................ |
|
9.23, 9 .41, 9 .43,12.64 |
|
Leathertex Divisions Sinetici v Bodetex BVBA (C-420/97) [1999] CLC 1976.................................. |
|
13.25 |
|
Lechmere v Hawkins (1798) 2 Esp. 626 ......................................................................................................... |
|
|
4.29 |
Libyan Arab Foreign Bank v Bankers Trust Co [1989] Q B 728 ................................ |
|
13.61, 13.93, 13.102 |
xxiii
Table o fCases
Libyan Arab Foreign Bank v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co [1988] 2 Lloyds |
|
|
Rep 494 .................................................................................................................................................... |
13-102 |
|
Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548 ..................................................................................... |
|
11.23 |
Lloyds v Grace Smith [1912] AC 7 1 6 ............................................................................................................. |
|
5.35 |
Lloyds Bank Pic v Independent Insurance Co Ltd [1999] 2 W LR 9 8 6 ................................................. |
|
12.02 |
Lome Stewart Pic v Hermes Kreditversicherungs AG and Amey Asset Services |
|
|
Ltd [2001] All ER (D) 2 8 6 ................................................................................................. |
3.52. 4.49, 5.42. |
|
|
10.01. |
10.64 |
Lotterworld Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd v Castle Inn Sdn Bhd [1998] |
|
|
7 MLJ 1 0 5 .................................................................................................................................................. |
Ю.39 |
|
Loumiet v Veuve Gardon D. 1894.11.528 ...................................................................................................... |
|
8.54 |
Lubbe vCape Pic [2000] 1 W LR 1545 ......................................................................................................... |
|
13.43 |
Lumcorp Ltd v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce [1977] CS 993 ................................................. |
|
5.75 |
Lumley v Wagner (1852) 1 De. GM & G 6 0 4 ............................................................................................... |
|
9.15 |
M & J Polymers Ltd v Imerys Minerals Ltd [2008] EWHC 344 (Comm); [2008] |
|
|
1 Lloyd’s Rep 5 4 1 .................................................................................................................................. |
12.09 |
|
M Golodetz & Co Inc v Czarnikow-Rionda Co Inc [1980] 1 WLR 495 .............................................. |
|
2.17 |
MA Sassoon & Sons, Ltd v International Banking Corporation [1927] AC 711.................................. |
|
2.27 |
MS Fashions Ltd v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1993] Ch. 4 2 5 ........................ |
3.66 |
|
MSG v Les Gravieres Rhenanes SARI, (C-106/95) [1997] ECR 1-911................................................. |
13.28 |
|
Mackender v Feldia AG [1967] 1 QB 590 ................................................................................................. |
13.117 |
|
Mahonia Ltd vJP Morgan Chase Bank [2003] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 911 ..................................... |
1.10,5.57, 8.08, |
|
8.11, 8.18, 8.21, 8.26, 8.39, 13.106 |
||
Mahonia v West [2004] EW HC 1938 (C om m ).......................................................................................... |
|
8.49 |
Malaysia Hotel (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sabemo Pty Ltd (1993) 11 BCL 5 0 .............................................. |
|
9.29 |
Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1998] AC 20.............................................. |
12.47 |
|
Mallett v Bateman (1865) LR 1 CP 1 6 3 ......................................................................................................... |
|
3.62 |
Mannesman Handel AG v Kaunlaren Shipping Corporation [1993] |
|
|
1 Lloyd’s Rep 8 9 ................................................................................................................................. |
2.42,4.48 |
|
Manulife Bank of Canada vConlin [1996] 3 S C R 4 1 5 .............................................................................. |
|
3.68 |
Manx Electricity Authority vJP Morgan Chase Bank [2003] EWCA |
|
|
Civ 1324 ......................................................................................................................... |
4 .22,4 .5 8 ,4 .6 0 ,4 .6 3 |
|
Maple Leaf Macro Volatility Master Fund v Jacques Rouvroy [2009] EWHC 257 |
|
|
(Comm); [2009] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 475...................................................................................................... |
|
12.09 |
Maran Road Saw Mills v AustinTaylor & Co Ltd [1975] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 156................................ |
2.13,2.14 |
|
Marathon Electrical Manufacturing Corp v Mashreqbank PSC [ 1997] |
|
|
2 B C L C 4 6 0 ............................................................................................................................ |
4 .24,4 .27,4 .30 |
|
Marc Rich & Co Holding GmbH v Krasner [1999] CLY 487 ................................................................ |
|
10.05 |
Marconi Communications International Ltd v Pt Pan Indonesia Bank Ltd |
|
|
TBK [2004] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 5 9 4 ................................................................................... |
13.41,13.46, 13.74 |
|
Mareva Compania Naviera SA v International Bank Carriers SA [1980] |
|
|
1 All ER 213.................................................................................................................................................. |
|
Ю.66 |
Mari v Stefani S. 1886.1.205............................................................................................................................... |
|
8.54 |
Maridive & Oil Services (SAE) v CAN Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd [2002] EWCA |
|
|
Civ 369 ................................................................................................................................................. |
3.17,4.52 |
|
Marino Ind. Corp v Chase Manhattan Bank, NA 686 F 2d 112, 155(2dCir. 1 9 8 2 )........................ |
4.08 |
|
Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (1998) 196C L R 494 ....................................................................... |
|
7.43 |
Maries v PhilipTrant & Sons Ltd [1954] 1 QB 29 ........................................................................................ |
|
8.28 |
Marubeni Hong Kong v Government of Mongolia [2005] EWCA Civ 395; [2005] |
|
|
2 AUER (Comm) 289; [2004] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 198 ............................................ |
1.08, 3.03, 3.04, 3.10, |
3.64, 3.69, 3.75, 3.76, 3.78,
3 .82,3 .93,3 .94,3 .95
xxtv