Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
учебный год 2023 / Jasnow, Westbrook, Security for Debt in Ancient Near Eastern Law.pdf
Скачиваний:
3
Добавлен:
21.12.2022
Размер:
13.99 Mб
Скачать

des Gläubigers" whom he supplies a "Zahlungsgarantie."69 Could we then consider him a person found (and rewarded?) by the creditor, whom the debtor had to accept as his trustee? That would imply the availability of guarantors of a different kind, ready to assume liability on the basis of an agreement with a creditor, in the knowledge that they enjoyed the right of regress against the debtor, which might offer them certain advantages (exploiting the debtor, repayment of the debt with a surcharge?). They would be comparable to some Old Babylonian capitalists, who exploited debt-slaves taken over from their original creditors. Though perhaps not too far-fetched for

the inventive and money-minded Assyrian traders,

there is no

evidence

to support it. More insight into

the

identity

and relations

between

C, D and G might help.

 

 

 

 

 

The guarantor, in order to be

able

to live

up

to his obligation of

"handing over" an (unwilling?) debtor, had to enjoy certain coercive

powers. They are nowhere stated,

but implied in EL 238, where the

debtor himself agrees to supply

a guarantor "who will not fail to

hand you over." We may assume

that the debtor in the other cases

too had to accept the legal power granted to the guarantor, but since none of these contracts was found in its envelope, we have no seal-impressions of the debtors to prove it. There was also another justification for the power of the guarantor: his liability for subsidiary

payment

must have

been

the basis for granting him powers similar

to

those

any

creditor

had

over a defaulting debtor, such as distraint

or

taking

a

pledge.

 

 

3. Guarantor and Debtor

Most debtors were members or employees of family firms and mutual guarantee must have been rather common among brothers, sons and business partners. It must have been less common for a defaulting, bad debtor than for somebody well known, who had a temporary cash shortage or had to leave for business reasons some time before his due date and needed to be helped. Further prosopographic studies in archives will probably shed more light on the relations between D and G. fn C C T 5, 8a:17ff., a daughter of the deceased Pushuken

69 Koschaker 1911: 67f.

reminds her brothers in Anatolia that they had registered as guar-

antors for a debt of thirty pounds of

silver of their father.70 In EL

227:30ff. and kt v/k 156 the debtor's

brother is his guarantor, in

EL 75 the debtor's wife, in EL

215 a

sister and son

of the

debtor,

in EL 226:46f. a member of the

same

firm, and in kt

91/k

127 and

200'1 a man for his father-in-law. The fact, noted above, that guarantors may appear as co-debtors or be included in the clause of joint liability, also implies a relationship between the two.

3.1. Risks and protection

Acting as guarantor for outsiders and strangers was unusual, and even inside the Assyrian community it could entail risks. The addressee of BIN 6, 27 voices concern when he heard that the writer was registering as guarantor: "Must I enter into debt-slavery with somebody?"72 His fear may have been somewhat exaggerated, but there are several examples of guarantors who could not escape their obligation to pay for an absent or defaulting debtor, even when this ereated problems for themselves. A well-documented case is that of a guarantor called Dadaja, who had to pay eight pounds of silver for the debtor M. and, having no silver at hand, was forced to take out a loan with a banker (tamkārum). The documentation reveals how he obtained a verdict of the City Assembly of Assur, which allowed him "to take M.'s silver wherever it is available" (also that invested in merchandise or assets). Moreover, according to a legal ruling on a

stele

with Old

Assyrian laws (referred

to in a letter), he

is author-

ized

to charge

his debtor interest and

compound interest

("interest

on interest"), apparently both the interest he was entitled to for the sum he had paid for him and that which he himself had to pay to the money-lender. The case, which I have analysed elsewhere in more detail,73 is important in showing that verdicts of the City of

70 An unpublished letter in Ankara, dealing with the financial situation of same family after the death of the father, states: "One mina of silver, for which our father had registered as guarantor of D, has been added to our debt." Refusing to consider a potential liability an actual debt, I take "our debt" as "debt owed to us." Because the father had paid as guarantor, he had the right of regress and his claim was thus an asset inherited by his sons.

71

Veenhof

1997c.

72

miššu ša aštanamme?u qātātim taltapputu, ana mamman ana wardūtim errab?

73

Veenhof

1995a: 1722ff.

Assur were passed and even regulations drafted in order to help unlucky guarantors to get back what they had lost. While the regulation may have applied to all such cases of forced borrowing for the benefit of somebody else, the authorization granted by the verdiet, which was therefore the result of a separate decision, may have taken into account specific factors which are not mentioned (we do not have the text of the verdict itself).

Guarantors

in turn

could protect

themselves against risks. From

C C T

5, 8a:15ff, mentioned above, we learn that the house in Assur

with its furniture served as security

for a debt of P., for which his

son has registered as guarantor,74 and

the same protection is recorded

in the

contract kt 91/k

173, where two Assyrians are guarantors for

a debt of 11

pounds of silver. Lines 9ff. state: "If the silver is col-

lected

to the

debit of

(issēr) the guarantors, the debtor's house in

Assur

serves

as pledge

(erubbātum) for the silver."75 Something simi-

lar may be the case in TPK 1, 170, where the question is asked whether a packet of meteoric iron, called "one pledge with my seals,"

has been given to any guarantors (mamman

bēlū qātātirri). An inter-

esting but not unique case is reported in the

letter T C 3, 67,76 where

the trader E. writes that he

has registered as guarantor of his agent

K. at a banker ("merchant's

house"), where the latter had taken out

a loan of thirty pounds of

silver. Apparently K. was in financial

difficulties, perhaps

in fact because of debts to E., and to overcome

them he had (been

allowed

to) borrow money for a business trip, if

E. served as guarantor. E.,

aware of his risk and at the same time

knowing that a profit realized by K. would enable the latter to pay off (part of) his debts, took measures to check and control K's com-

mercial activities. He established a claim ("laid his hand") on

the

silver shipped to Assur and asked his representatives in Assur to

do

the same, once the merchandise bought for it was shipped back to Anatolia. And there are other, similar cases.

74

Read

lines 15ft". bēt Aššur

ú

ú-/

16 tù-up-tù-šu 17 [erasure]

ana 30

mana 18

[/]a

qātātišu 9י [n]alputāti71i. A verb is

missing, since the next line

has to be

read:

[a-w]a-

tum

i-za-ku-wa?. "When the affair is

cleared up. . . . "

 

 

 

75

This device is already attested during the Ur ΠΙ period. According to Falkenstein

1956-7: no. 195 a slave-girl had

been pledged to a guarantor, who had problems

in actually

acquiring

her

after

he

had paid on behalf of the

debtor.

 

 

76

Edited

Larsen

1967:

10,

type 2:1.