
- •Time-Limited Interests in Land
- •The Common Core of European Private Law
- •Contents
- •General editors’ preface
- •Preface
- •Contributors
- •Abbreviations
- •1 Setting the scene
- •1. The scene
- •2. Balancing the interests: a handful of common problems
- •3. Time-limited interests arising by operation of law
- •2 General introduction
- •1. Overview
- •2. The hybrid character of time-limited interests in land
- •3. The approach and purpose of this study
- •3.1. Background
- •3.2. Drawing a geographical map of the law of Europe
- •4. The genesis of the book
- •4.1. Narrowing down the topic
- •4.2. Terminology
- •5. Structure of the book
- •3 Historical evolution of the maxim ‘sale breaks hire’
- •1. Introduction
- •2. The Roman-law approach
- •3. The ius commune position
- •3.1. Medieval learned law
- •3.2. From medieval learned law to the Prussian Civil Code
- •3.3. From the Prussian Civil Code to the German Civil Code
- •4. Conclusions
- •4 The many faces of usufruct
- •1. Usufruct in tax and estate planning
- •1.1. Transferring assets yet retaining control and income
- •1.2. Overview
- •2. The concept of usufruct
- •3. The traditional face
- •3.1. Control
- •3.2. Income
- •4. The modern face of usufruct
- •4.1. Control
- •4.2. Income
- •5. The Janus face
- •6. The twisted face
- •6.1. Default rules
- •6.2. Contractual expansion
- •6.3. Limits
- •7. Conclusion
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •Case 3
- •Case 4
- •Case 5
- •Case 6
- •Case 7
- •Case 8
- •Case 9
- •Case 10
- •Case 11
- •Case 12
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Bibliography
- •GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHY
- •AUSTRIA
- •BELGIUM
- •DENMARK
- •ENGLAND
- •GERMANY
- •GREECE
- •HUNGARY
- •ITALY
- •THE NETHERLANDS
- •POLAND
- •PORTUGAL
- •SCOTLAND
- •SOUTH AFRICA
- •SPAIN
- •General index
- •Country index
- •Books in the series
458 c a s e s t u d i e s
of land for less than the best consideration that can reasonably be obtained.27
South Africa
Unlike modern European jurisdictions which also cater for the development and use of existing buildings under the institutions of the hereditary land lease (emphyteusis) and the hereditary building lease (superÞcies), these two institutions are underdeveloped in South African law to the extent that they do not cater for existing buildings. This is also true of the institution of leasehold, which replaced the two institutions in South Africa.
If A is a public institution, in particular the State, the institutions of hereditary land lease (emphyteusis) and hereditary building lease (superÞcies) would have found some application in Roman-Dutch law but was swamped by the common law institution of leasehold in early South African law because the State was not prepared to grant full freehold title (ownership) with regard to undeveloped land. I have come across seaside cottages and timeshares being sold as thirty-year leaseholds, with the rights of the holders expiring after thirty years and the public authority or developing agency being entitled to sell or lease out the cottages or timeshares anew. However, this device is rarely used in practice.
Spain
In the case of an existing building, A may conclude a lease (governed by the Law on Urban Lease) with B for this purpose. The building will be restored to A at the end of the lease, but he/she will have no control over the structure during the term of the lease, unless otherwise agreed.
A public institution can conclude a contract by which it grants a concession to B to construct public works (contrato de concesio« n de obra pu«blica). Under this contract, the public institution (A) will have the right to recover the structure and the land at the end of the term of the concession. It must, however, be noted that such term cannot exceed forty years (Ley de Contratos de las Administraciones Pu«blicas
(Law on Contracts of Public Institutions) of 30 October 2007, art. 244).
27 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973, s. 74(2).
c a s e 1 2 : d e v e l o p m e n t b y a p u b l i c i n s t i t u t i o n |
459 |
In such a case, B will build the structure and have the right to exploit the construction for the agreed term. A will be able to retain some control over the structure (he/she can, for example, specify the price to be paid by the users of the structure as provided for in art. 238.2). The right of the concessionaire can be ceded and mortgaged (art. 228.f).28 Public institutions seldom use a hereditary building lease (superÞcies) for this purpose.
28Art. 98 of the Ley de Patrimonio de las Administraciones Pu«blicas (State Property Act) of 3 Nov. 2003 also permits the possibility to transfer the concessionary’s right (either through an inter vivos or a mortis causa agreement) or to mortgage the right. In this case, the express authorisation of the public institution is required.
part iii
Concluding remarks