
- •Time-Limited Interests in Land
- •The Common Core of European Private Law
- •Contents
- •General editors’ preface
- •Preface
- •Contributors
- •Abbreviations
- •1 Setting the scene
- •1. The scene
- •2. Balancing the interests: a handful of common problems
- •3. Time-limited interests arising by operation of law
- •2 General introduction
- •1. Overview
- •2. The hybrid character of time-limited interests in land
- •3. The approach and purpose of this study
- •3.1. Background
- •3.2. Drawing a geographical map of the law of Europe
- •4. The genesis of the book
- •4.1. Narrowing down the topic
- •4.2. Terminology
- •5. Structure of the book
- •3 Historical evolution of the maxim ‘sale breaks hire’
- •1. Introduction
- •2. The Roman-law approach
- •3. The ius commune position
- •3.1. Medieval learned law
- •3.2. From medieval learned law to the Prussian Civil Code
- •3.3. From the Prussian Civil Code to the German Civil Code
- •4. Conclusions
- •4 The many faces of usufruct
- •1. Usufruct in tax and estate planning
- •1.1. Transferring assets yet retaining control and income
- •1.2. Overview
- •2. The concept of usufruct
- •3. The traditional face
- •3.1. Control
- •3.2. Income
- •4. The modern face of usufruct
- •4.1. Control
- •4.2. Income
- •5. The Janus face
- •6. The twisted face
- •6.1. Default rules
- •6.2. Contractual expansion
- •6.3. Limits
- •7. Conclusion
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •Case 3
- •Case 4
- •Case 5
- •Case 6
- •Case 7
- •Case 8
- •Case 9
- •Case 10
- •Case 11
- •Case 12
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Bibliography
- •GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHY
- •AUSTRIA
- •BELGIUM
- •DENMARK
- •ENGLAND
- •GERMANY
- •GREECE
- •HUNGARY
- •ITALY
- •THE NETHERLANDS
- •POLAND
- •PORTUGAL
- •SCOTLAND
- •SOUTH AFRICA
- •SPAIN
- •General index
- •Country index
- •Books in the series
c a s e 9 : s e l l i n g a n d i n s o l v e n c y |
405 |
for any loss suffered by reason of the non-performance of the terms of the lease. Termination of the lease also deprives the insolvent estate of any right to compensation for improvements to the leased property effected without the consent of the landlord. Although a stipulation in a lease that the lease will terminate upon the sequestration of the tenant is void, a stipulation which restricts or prohibits the transfer of any right under the lease binds the insolvency administrator. The administrator must inform creditors at their second meeting inter alia of any lease entered into by the insolvent as tenant. The creditors may direct the action to be undertaken by the administrator with regard to the lease.195 Subject to these qualifications, the lease is included in the insolvency assets of the tenant.
A usufruct may be attached in execution proceedings against B.196 The purchaser in execution will only acquire a contingent right which will expire on the usufructuary’s death. Since the holder of a right of habitation can sub-let and mortgage his/her interest, this fairly insignificant right may also be subjected to execution and sale in execution.
Both at common law and in terms of the Insolvency Act, all property of an insolvent at the date of sequestration belongs to his/her estate.197 Since a personal servitude over immovable property is regarded as incorporeal immovable property, the right of a usufructuary or habitator will also form part of his/her insolvent estate. This view is supported by the decisions that such rights are subject to execution and sale in execution. The insolvency administrator may therefore sell these rights as part of the process of realisation of assets. Since the entitlements in terms of a right of use are not subject to execution and sale in execution, it is submitted that a right of use does not form part of the insolvency assets.
Spain
Under Spanish law, the tenant can cede198 an urban lease to a third party with the landlord’s written consent (Law on Urban Leases, art. 8.1). If the landlord refuses to give his/her consent, the lease contract can be
195See Insolvency Act 24 of 1936, s. 37(1)–(5); Cooper, Landlord and Tenant, pp. 323–5; Smith, Insolvency, para. 175.
196High Court Rules r 45(8); Voet, Commentarius, 7.1.32; Ex parte BarnadoÕs Trustees 1910 CPD 78.
197Insolvency Act 24 of 1936, s. 20(2)(b); Smith, Insolvency, paras. 149, 153, 159.
198The term ‘cession’ in both the Law on Urban Leases and the Law on Agricultural Leases encompasses both sale and donation.
406 c a s e s t u d i e s
discharged for breach of contract (art. 27.2.c). The third party (cessionary) substitutes the tenant-cedent in the relationship with the landlord, with the result that the cessionary’s interest has the same content and duration as that of the cedent (art. 8.1).
B is also allowed to sub-let part of the residential property leased, with the written consent of the landlord (art. 8.2). The term of the sub-lease will be the same as the term of the principal lease and the rent payable may not be higher than the rent payable under the principal lease (art. 8.2, paras. 3 and 4).
In the case of rural leases, the possibility of cession must be provided in the lease contract and the exploitation of the entire farm must be ceded (Law on Rural Leases, art. 23). Express (not necessarily written) consent of the landlord is needed. If the latter refuses, the tenant is entitled to sue him for breach of contract (art. 25.d). The cessionary’s right has the same term as the principal lease and the rent paid may not exceed the rent of the principal lease (art. 23). The tenant of rural land is entitled to sub-let the land if it was agreed in the lease contract or if the express consent of the landlord is obtained (Law on Rural Leases, art. 23, para. 2). The object of the sub-lease must be the entire property for the remaining term of the contract and the rent payable must not exceed the rent agreed under the principal lease (Law on Rural Leases, art. 23). An amendment to the Law on Rural Lease in 2005 provides that the landlord’s consent is not required if the sub-lease is to the spouse or descendant of the tenant (Law on Rural Leases, art. 23, para. 3).
Where the lease contract is governed by the Civil Code, the tenant may sub-let the whole or a part of the property if it was not expressly forbidden in the principal contract (Civil Code, art. 1550). The relationship between the principal landlord and tenant remains intact199 and the sub-lease terminates on expiration of the principal lease.
The Law on Hypothecs contains no rule on the possibility of mortgaging the lease or the tenant’s rights, but some authors and some decisions of the General Direction of Registrars and Notaries (Direccõ«o«n General de Registros y del Notariado) resolved that the lease can be mortgaged, as it can be registered (Law on Hypothecs, arts. 2–5).200 It should be noted that the tenant’s interest can be mortgaged if the lease contract includes the stock in trade of business premises (establecimiento mercantil) (Law on Movable Hypothec and Pledge without Transfer of Possession, art. 2).201
199 Lacruz Berdejo, Elementos de Derecho civil, vol. 2.2, p. 127. 200 Ibid. 201 Ibid.
c a s e 9 : s e l l i n g a n d i n s o l v e n c y |
407 |
The usufructuary may cede his/her right of usufruct. He/she can therefore sell or donate it (Civil Code, art. 480). The cessionary will then be treated as the new usufructuary,202 liable to the nude owner (Civil Code, art. 498). The right of the cessionary will continue for the term of the usufruct or for a shorter period agreed between cedent and cessionary.203
The usufructuary may also mortgage his/her right (Law on Hypothecs, art. 107–1).204 The same article provides that the mortgage will expire when the usufruct is terminated by an act unrelated to the will of the usufructuary. It will, however, continue where the usufruct is terminated early by a voluntary act of the usufructuary. In the latter case, the mortgage will expire when the secured claim is satisfied or when the usufruct should have expired.
A right of use or a right of habitation is an extremely personal real right which is granted to a specific person as income to cater for his/her daily needs or as a place to live in during his/her lifetime. Such a right can therefore not be leased, transferred (Civil Code, art. 525) or mortgaged (Law on Hypothec, art. 108.3).
The holder of a hereditary building lease (superÞcies) may cede (sell), donate205 and also mortgage his/her right (Law on Land, art. 41; Law on Hypothecs, art. 107.5), because it is a right in rem. The Law on Land, art. 41.1 also considers the possibility of creating other personal rights or rights in rem over the hereditary building lease. The right of the new holder will last until the expiration of the term of the building lease as agreed between the parties when the right was constituted (Law on Land, art. 41.4, para. 3), or until the expiration of a shorter period agreed between assignor (cedent) and assignee (cessionary). This is not established by any rule, but it can be inferred from the general rules on rights in rem.
Under the Code of Civil Procedure, it is possible to attach any object or right with a patrimonial content (Code of Civil Procedure, art. 605–3 a contrario). This means, at least in theory, that it is possible to attach B’s right. This is quite clear and unproblematic in the case of a usufruct and a hereditary building lease (superÞcies). The rights of use and habitation,
202 Lacruz Berdejo, Elementos de Derecho civil, vol. 3.2, p. 23. 203 Ibid.
204But the Law on Hypothecs, art. 108.2 forbids the mortgage of a legal usufruct, except when it is granted to the widow/widower.
205Gonza´lez Pe´rez, Comentarios, p. 2211, includes the possibility to donate the right of superÞcies with regard to the Law on Land 1992, art. 287–3. In my opinion, it is also possible to donate the right of superÞcies under the Law on Land 2008. Art 41.1 is quite flexible, as it states that ‘the right of superÞcies can be transferred and burdened subject to the limits established in the constitutive agreement’.
408 c a s e s t u d i e s
however, cannot be attached, as they are so highly personal that they cannot be transferred. In respect of a lease, B’s right can be attached, at least in principle, but if it is sold in execution proceedings, a problem arises, as the rules regarding the cession of leases generally require the landlord’s consent for the cession of B’s right.206
The answer is the same as for the previous question. It might be added that the Law on Insolvency, art. 76 considers all property and rights included in the debtor’s estate when the insolvency is declared as part of the insolvency assets. Only the right of use or habitation will be excluded.207
206 See also Case 3. 207 Ibid.