- •Time-Limited Interests in Land
- •The Common Core of European Private Law
- •Contents
- •General editors’ preface
- •Preface
- •Contributors
- •Abbreviations
- •1 Setting the scene
- •1. The scene
- •2. Balancing the interests: a handful of common problems
- •3. Time-limited interests arising by operation of law
- •2 General introduction
- •1. Overview
- •2. The hybrid character of time-limited interests in land
- •3. The approach and purpose of this study
- •3.1. Background
- •3.2. Drawing a geographical map of the law of Europe
- •4. The genesis of the book
- •4.1. Narrowing down the topic
- •4.2. Terminology
- •5. Structure of the book
- •3 Historical evolution of the maxim ‘sale breaks hire’
- •1. Introduction
- •2. The Roman-law approach
- •3. The ius commune position
- •3.1. Medieval learned law
- •3.2. From medieval learned law to the Prussian Civil Code
- •3.3. From the Prussian Civil Code to the German Civil Code
- •4. Conclusions
- •4 The many faces of usufruct
- •1. Usufruct in tax and estate planning
- •1.1. Transferring assets yet retaining control and income
- •1.2. Overview
- •2. The concept of usufruct
- •3. The traditional face
- •3.1. Control
- •3.2. Income
- •4. The modern face of usufruct
- •4.1. Control
- •4.2. Income
- •5. The Janus face
- •6. The twisted face
- •6.1. Default rules
- •6.2. Contractual expansion
- •6.3. Limits
- •7. Conclusion
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Comparative observations
- •Austria
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •France
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •The Netherlands
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •Case 3
- •Case 4
- •Case 5
- •Case 6
- •Case 7
- •Case 8
- •Case 9
- •Case 10
- •Case 11
- •Case 12
- •Belgium
- •Denmark
- •England
- •Germany
- •Greece
- •Hungary
- •Italy
- •Poland
- •Portugal
- •Scotland
- •South Africa
- •Spain
- •Bibliography
- •GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHY
- •AUSTRIA
- •BELGIUM
- •DENMARK
- •ENGLAND
- •GERMANY
- •GREECE
- •HUNGARY
- •ITALY
- •THE NETHERLANDS
- •POLAND
- •PORTUGAL
- •SCOTLAND
- •SOUTH AFRICA
- •SPAIN
- •General index
- •Country index
- •Books in the series
Bibliography
Bibliographies for the individual countries can be found after the General bibliography
general bibliography
Ayne`s, L., ‘Observation Cour Cassation 12 Novembre 1998’, Recueil Dalloz Jurisprudence (1999), p. 168
Barbaix, R., Het contractuele statuut van de schenking (Antwerp, 2008)
Bashier, R., ‘Disinheritance and the Modern Family’, Case Western Law Review 45 (1994), p. 83
Berenschot, E. B., ‘Enige aspecten van de plaats van vruchtgebruik in het vermogensrechtelijke systeem’, WPNR 5730 (1985), p. 178
Bodenstein, H. D. J., ‘Huur van huizen en landen volgens het hedendaagsch Romeinsch-Hollandsch recht’ (doctoral thesis, University of Leiden, 1907)
Borkowski, A., and Du Plessis, P. J., Textbook on Roman Law, 4th edn (Oxford, 2004) Bos, E. C., ‘Vruchtgebruik op aandelen: over de grenzen van goederenrecht,
erfrecht en vennootschapsrecht’ (dissertation, University of Maastricht, 2005)
Bougle, F., and Gouthiere, B., ‘Patrimoine’, in Me«mento Pratique Francis Lefebvre
(Paris, 2009–10), p. 134
Brault, J.-C., ‘Un convention de quasi-usufruit ge´ne´ralise´e apre`s le de´ce`s?’, Defre«nois (1997), p. 480
Buckland, W. W., A Textbook of Roman Law (Oxford, 1966)
Caroni, P., and Dilcher, G. (eds.), Norm und Tradition: Welche Geschichtlichkeit fu¬r die Rechtsgeschichte? (Cologne, Weimar and Vienna, 1998), pp. 77–108
Chappert, A., ‘La Donation avec re´serve de quasi-usufruit: une possibilite´ a` utiliser avec mode´ration en matie`re fiscal’ Defre«nois (1997), art. 36617, pp. 907–8
Coke, E., The Second Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England Containing the Exposition of Many Ancient and Other Statutes, 1590Ð1640, 2 vols. (London, 1797)
Crook, J. A., Law and Life in Rome, 90 BCÐAD 212 (New York, 2006)
De Brabandere, A., ‘Usufruit, Usage, Habitation’, Re«pertoire du Notariat Defre«nois
(Brussels, 1977), vol. 2, bk. 11, no. 127
de Page, H., Traite« e«le«mentaire de droit civil belge (Brussels, 1982), vol. 6
507
508 b i b l i o g r a p h y
de Page, P., ‘Le Quasi-usufruit’, in F. Ackerman-Van Ommeslaghe, J.-P. Bours, et al.,
La Fiscalite« des donations et ses incidences civiles: re«gion de Bruxelles-Capitale, re«gion ßamande et re«gion wallonne (Louvain-la-Neuve, 2005), p. 157
‘Les Donations: actualite«s de certaines clauses’, in C. Biquet-Mathieu (ed.), Liber Amicorum Paul Delnoy (Brussels, 2005), p. 139
De Wet, J. C., ‘Huur Gaat voor Koop (1)’ THRHR, (1944), p. 74 ‘Huur Gaat voor Koop (2)’ THRHR, (1944), p. 166
de Wulf, C., ‘Schenking van roerend goed. Bedenkingen en formulieren’, in C. Castelein, A. Verbeke and L. Weyts (eds.), Liber amicorum Professor Johan Verstraete
(Antwerp, 2007), p. 213
Dekkers, R., and Dirix, E., Handboek Burgerlijk Recht (Antwerp, 2005), vol. 2 Derine, R., Vanneste, F., and Vandenberghe, H., Zakenreht (Ghent, 1984), vol. 2 Dockes, E., ‘Essai sur la notion d’usufruit’, RTDciv (1995), p. 482
Du Mongh, J., De erfovergang van aandelen (Antwerp, 2004)
Du Plessis, P. J., ‘The Hereditability of Locatio Conductio’, in J. W. Cairns and P. J. Du Plessis (eds.), Beyond Dogmatics: Law and Society in the Roman World (Edinburgh Studies in Law Series, 2007), vol. 3
Enneccerus, L., Lehrbuch des Bu¬rgerlichen Rechts (Marburg, 1908), vol. 1 Ewald, W., ‘Legal History and Comparative Law’, ZEuP (1999), p. 553
Feenstra, R., Romeinsrechtelijke grondslagen van het Nederlands privaatrecht (Leiden, 1990) Ferid, M., ‘Review of the Louisiana Practice’, American Journal of Comparative Law
22:3 (1974), p. 582
Fiorina, D., ‘L’usufruitier d’un portefeuille de valeurs mobilie`res’, RTDciv (1995), p. 48
Fitting, H., Lo Codi Ð Eine Summa Codicis in Provenzalischer Sprache aus der Mitte des XII. Jahrhunderts (Halle, 1906), vol. 1
Frier, B. W., Landlords and Tenants in Imperial Rome (Palo Alto, 1980)
Gordley, J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment
(Oxford, 2006)
Graziadei, M., ‘Tuttifrutti’, in P. Birks, and A. Pretto (eds.), Themes in Comparative Law: In Honour of Bernard Rudden (Oxford, 2002)
Grimaldi, M., ‘LÕemploi des deniers greve«s dÕusufruit’, Re«pertoire du notariat Defre«nois
(Brussels, 1999), art. 36939, p. 493
Grimaldi, M., and Roux, J.-F., ‘La Donation de valeurs mobilie`res avec re´serve de quasi-usufruit’, Defre«nois (1994), art. 35677, p. 12
Grossi, P., Locatio ad longum tempus Ð locazione e rapporti reali di godimento nella problematica del diritto comune (Naples, 1963)
Guerts, T. G., ‘The Historical Development of Leases in Residential Real Estate’,
Real Estate Law Journal 32 (2004), p. 356
Hahlo, H. R., and Kahn, E., Union of South Africa: The Development of its Laws and Constitution (Cape Town, 1960)
Hansenne, J., Les Biens: pre«cis, Collection Scientifique de la Faculte´ de Droit de Lie`ge, vol. 2 (Brussels, 1996), p. 1025
Jamar, J. F., Les Novelles: droit civil (Brussels, 1941), vol. 3 Johnston, D., Roman Law in Context (Cambridge, 1999)
b i b l i o g r a p h y |
509 |
‘Successive Rights and Successive Remedies: Life Interests in Roman Law’, in P. Birks (ed.), New Perspectives in the Roman Law of Property: Essays for Barry Nicholas
(Oxford, 1989), p. 153
Johnston, W. R., ‘“Emphyteusis”: A Roman Perpetual Tenure’, U Toronto LJ 3 (1940), p. 323
Kehoe, D. P., Investment, ProÞt and Tenancy: The Jurists and the Roman Agrarian Economy (Ann Arbor, MI, 1991)
Kleyn, D., ‘Die Mandament van Spolie in die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg’ (LLD thesis, University of Pretoria, 1986)
Kluyskens, A., Beginselen van Burgerlijk Recht, vol. 5, Zakenrecht (Antwerp, 1940) Laurent, F., Principes de droit civil, 31 vols. (Brussels and Paris, 1878), vol. 6 Lawson, F. H., and Rudden, B., The Law of Property (2nd edn, Oxford, 2002) Lubbers, A. G., ‘Vruchtgebruik naar huidig en toekomstig recht’, Preadvies
Broederschap der Notarissen (1959), p. 144
Mackeldey, F., Lehrbuch des heutigen ro¬mischen Recht (12th edn, Giessen, 1833) Mayer-Maly, T., Locatio Conductio: Eine Untersuchung zum klassischen ro¬mischen Recht
(Vienna and Munich, 1956)
McClean, A. J., ‘The Common Law Life Estate and the Civil Law Usufruct: A Comparative Study’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 12:2 (1963), p. 651
Megarry, R., and Wade, W., The Law of Real Property (6th edn, London, 2000) Mellema-Kranenburg, T. J., ‘Twee buitenbeentjes binnen het vruchtgebruik’,
WPNR 6687 (2006), pp. 777–8
Mijnssen, F. H. J., Van Velten, A. A., and Bartels, S. E. (eds.), AsserÕs Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands Burgerlijk Recht, Part 5, Eigendom en beperkte rechten (Deventer, 2008)
Goederenrecht, Zakelijke Rechten in Mr. C. AsserÕs Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands Burgerlijk Recht (Deventer, 2008)
Motive zu dem Entwurfe eines Bu¬rgerlichen Gesetzbuches fu¬r das Deutsche Reich (Berlin and Leipzig, 1888), vol. 2
Mu¨ hlenbruch, C. F., Lehrbu¬ch des Pandekten-Rechts (2nd edn, Halle, 1840), vol. 2 Mugdan, B., Die gestammten Materialen zum Bu¬rgerlichen Gesetzbuch fu¬r das Deutsche
Reich (Berlin, 1899), vol. 2
Nicholas, B., An Introduction to Roman Law (Oxford, 1990)
Nijs, A., van Zantbeek, A., and Verbeke, A., ‘Schenken met behoud van bezit: acht clausules’, Tijdschrift voor Estate Planning 3 (2005), p. 197
Nudelholc, S., and Karadsheh, D., ‘Re´flexions sur une nouvelle de´finition de l’usufruit et ses rapports avec le droit des successions et des libe´ralite´s’, Rev Dr ULB (2003), p. 409
Osler, D. J., ‘The Fantasy Men’, Rechtsgeschichte 10 (2007), p. 169
‘The Myth of European Legal History’, Rechtshistorisches Journal 16 (1997), p. 393
Otte, G., ‘Die dingliche Rechtsstellung des Mieters nach ALR und BGB’, in O. Berendts, et al. (eds.), Festschrift fu¬r Franz Wieacker (Go¨ ttingen, 1978), p. 463
Patault, A.-M., Introduction historique au droit des biens (Paris, 1989)
510 b i b l i o g r a p h y
Pitlo, A., ‘Goederenrecht’, in W. H. M. Reehuis, A. H. T. Heisterkamp, G. E. van Maanen and G. T. de Jong (eds.), Het Nederlands Burgerlijk Recht (11th edn, Deventer, 2001)
Planiol, M., and Ripert, G., Traite« pratique de droit civil francüais, 14 vols. (Paris, 1952) Posner, R. A., Economic Analysis of Law (4th edn, Boston, 1992)
Pretto-Sakmann, A., Boundaries of Personal Property: Shares and Sub-shares (Oxford and Portland, 2005)
Prutting, H., Sachenrecht (Munich, 2008)
Pugliese, G., ‘On Roman Usufruct’, Tulane Law Review 40 (1965–6), p. 538 Radding, C. M., ‘Reviving JustinianÕs Corpus: The Case of the Code’, in P. Andersen,
M. Mu¨ nster-Swendsen and H. Vogt (eds.), Law Before Gratian: Law in Western Europe c.500Ð1100 (Copenhagen, 2007), p. 35
Raynaud, P., Les Biens (2nd edn, Paris, 1980)
Robinson, O. F., The Sources of Roman Law (London, 1997)
Rome, G. W., ‘An Elegy for Emphyteusis’, Civil Law Commentaries 1:2 (2008), p. 1 Sagaert, V., ‘Oude zakenrechtelijke Þguren met nut voor een moderne familiale
vermogensplanning’. In W. Delva (ed.), Familiale Vermogensplanning XXXste Postuniversitaire cyclus (10th edn, Mechelen, 2004), p. 212
Schrage, E. J. H., ‘Emptio (nondum) tollit locatum’, Acta Juridica (1978), p. 1 ‘Sale Breaks Hire – Or Does It? Medieval Foundations of the Roman-Dutch
Concept’, TvR 54:2 (1986), pp. 294 ff.
Scott, S. P., The Civil Law Translation (Cincinnati, 1932)
Stein, P. G., Roman Law in European History (Cambridge, 1999) Struycken, T. H. D., ‘Erfpacht en de redelijkheid en billijkheid in het
goederenrecht’, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Burgerlijk Recht 3 (2000), p. 91 Swadling, W. J., ‘Property: General Principles’, in P. Birks (ed.), English Private Law, 2
vols. (Oxford, 2000), vol. 1
Thomas, J. A. C., ‘The Sitting Tenant’, TvR 41:1 (1973), p. 35
van Gaalen, M. S., ‘Vruchtgebruik’ (dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 2001)
van Laere, D., ‘De civielen fiscaalrechterlijke grenzen van schenking met voorbehoud van quasivruchtgebruik’, Not Fisc M (2002), p. 188
van Neste, F., Beginselen van Belgisch Privaatrecht, vol. 1, Zakenrecht: Goederen, bezit en eigendom (Ghent, 1990)
van Oevelen, A., ‘Actuele ontwikkelingen inzake het recht van erfpacht en het recht van opstal’, in Het Zakenrecht: absoluut niet een rustig bezit, Kluwer rechtswetenskappen, 10:16 (1992), pp. 342–3
van Oven, J. C., ‘Het Vruchtgebruik in het Ontwerp Nieuw BW’, WPNR 4595 (1959), p. 361
van Sinay, T., ‘Vruchtgebruik op een algemeenheid en quasivruchtgebruik: vergelijking en toepassing’, in C. Castelein and A. Verbeke (eds.), Notarie¬le clausules: Liber amicorum Professor Johan Verstraete (Antwerp and Oxford, 2007), p. 736
van Zeben, C. J., and Dupun, J. W., Parlementaire geschiedenis van het Nieuwe Burgerlijk Wetboek (Deventer, 1990–)
Vandenberghe, H.,‘Actuele problemen van het vruchtgebruik’, TPR (1983), p. 59
