
- •Благодарности
- •Указатель сокращений На русском языке
- •На иностранных языках
- •Глава 1. Приобретение крупных пакетов акций и корпоративный контроль
- •§ 1. Приобретение крупных пакетов акций
- •Как способ установления корпоративного контроля
- •§ 2. Развитие правовых режимов приобретения крупных пакетов акций как способа установления корпоративного контроля
- •§ 3. Общая характеристика и особенности правовых режимов приобретения крупных пакетов акций
- •Глава 2. Обеспечение баланса интересов при приобретении крупных пакетов акций
- •§ 1. Конфликты интересов при установлении корпоративного
- •Контроля путем приобретения крупных пакетов акций
- •§ 2. Конфликты интересов при приобретении крупных пакетов акций компаний с распыленной структурой акционерного капитала
- •§ 3. Конфликты интересов при приобретении крупных пакетов акций компаний с концентрированной структурой акционерного капитала
- •Глава 3. Сравнительно-правовой анализ правил приобретения крупных пакетов акций
- •§ 1. Правила добровольного и обязательного предложения
- •§ 2. Правило невмешательства
- •§ 3. Правило вытеснения миноритарных акционеров и правило продажи миноритарными акционерами своих акций
- •Заключение
- •Структура акционерного (уставного) капитала промышленных предприятий по данным обследований независимых организаций
- •Число оао, созданных в результате преобразования государственных и муниципальных унитарных предприятий
- •Применение правила обязательного предложения в странах ес
- •(Lbo) в сша и Европе, млрд. Долл.
- •Библиография Нормативные правовые и ненормативные акты Российская Федерация
- •Великобритания
- •Германия
- •Республика Армения
- •Республика Казахстан
- •Украина
- •Судебная практика
- •Великобритания
- •Германия
- •Специальная литература На русском языке
- •На иностранных языках
На иностранных языках
1. Advisory Committee on Tender Offers, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, "Report of Recommendations". Washington, July 1983.
2. Andersen P.K. and Sorensen K.E. Free Movement of Companies from a Nordic Perspective // 6 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (1999).
3. Andrews W.D. The Stockholder's Right to Equal Opportunity in the Sale of Shares // 78 Harvard Law Review (1965).
4. Bartman S.M. Analysis and consequences of the EC Directive on takeover bids // European Company Law, Apr. 2004. No. 1.
5. Bebchuk L.A. The Pressure to Tender: An Analysis and a Proposed Remedy // 12 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law (1987).
6. Bebchuk L.A. The Case Against Board Veto in Corporate Takeovers // 69 University of Chicago Law Review (2002).
7. Bebchuk L., Hart O. A Threat to Dual-Class Shares // Financial Times. 2002. May 31st.
8. Bebchuk L.A., Roe M.J. A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance // 52 Stanford Law Review (1999).
9. Bebchuk L.A., Kraakman R., Triantis G. Stock Pyramids, Cross-Ownership and Dual Class Equity: The Mechanisms and Agency Costs of Separating Control from Cash-Flow Rights // Concentrated Corporate Ownership / ed. by R.K. Morck (A National Bureau of Economic Research conference report). Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2000.
10. Becht M. Reciprocity in Takeovers. ECGI, Law Working Paper No. 14/2003. Oct. 2003.
11. Becht M., Bolton P., Roell A. Corporate Governance and Control. ECGI, Finance Working Paper No. 02/2002, updated Aug. 2005.
12. Berglof E., Burkart M. European takeover regulation // 18 Economic Policy (2003).
13. Berle A.A. Jr. Control // Corporate Law, 58 Columbia Law Review (1958).
14. Berle, A., Means G. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York, N.Y.: Macmillan, 1932.
15. Birk R. Germany // The Legal Basis of Corporate Governance in Publicly Held Corporations: A Comparative Approach / ed. by A.R. Pinto and G. Visentini. London, Kluwer Law International, 1998.
16. Bittlingmayer G. The Market for Corporate Control (Including Takeovers) // Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, ed. by Boudewijn, Cerrit de Geest, Edward Elgar and the University of Ghent, 1999.
17. Black's law dictionary / by Henry Campbell Black. 6th ed. / by the publisher's editorial staff; contributing authors, Joseph R. Nolan ... (et al.). St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co., 1990.
18. Bolton P., Thadden E.-L. Von. Blocks, Liquidity, and Corporate Control // 53 Journal of Finance (1998).
19. Bradley M., Sundaram A. Do Acquisitions Drive Performance or Does Performance Drive Acquisitions? Duke University Working Paper, Aug. 2004. (http:// ssrn.com/ abstract= 592761)
20. Bratton W.W., Wachter M.L. Shareholder Primacy's Corporatist Origins: Adolf Berle and The Modern Corporation // 34 Journal of Corporation Law (2008).
21. Browder W. The Threat of Minority Squeeze Outs in Russia // 15 Beyond Transition (2004).
22. Burkart M. Economics of Takeover Regulation. SITE, Stockholm School of Economics, 1999 (http://www.ssrn.com).
23. Burkart M., Lee S. The One Share - One Vote Debate: A Theoretical Perspective. ECGI, Finance Working Paper No. 176/2007, May 2007.
24. Burkart M., Panunzi F. Mandatory Bids, Squeeze-out, Sell-out and the Dynamics of the Tender Offer Process // Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe / ed. by G. Ferrarini, K.J. Hopt, J. Winter and E. Wymeersch. New York, N.Y., Oxford University Press, 2004.
25. Cernat L. The Emerging European Corporate Governance Model: Anglo-Saxon, Continental, or Still the Century of Diversity? // 11 Journal of European Public Policy (2004).
26. Cheffins B.R. Does Law Matter? The Separation of Ownership and Control in the United Kingdom // 30 Journal of Legal Studies (2001).
27. Cimilluca D., Walker M., Meichtry S. Reversals mark new auto deals // Wall Street Journal Europe. 2009. May 22.
28. Clarke B. Articles 9 and 11 of the Takeover Directive (2004/25) and the Market for Corporate Control // Journal of Business Law (2006).
29. Coats J.C., IV. Ownership, Takeovers and EU Law: How Contestable Should EU Corporations Be? // Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe / ed. by G. Ferrarini, K.J. Hopt, J. Winter and E. Wymeersch. New York, N.Y., Oxford University Press, 2004.
30. Coffee J.C., Jr. Regulating the Market for Corporate Control: A Critical Assessment of the Tender Offer's Role in Corporate Governance // 84 Columbia Law Review (1984).
31. Coffee J.C., Jr. The Rise of Dispersed Ownership: The Roles of Law and the State in the Separation of Ownership and Control // 111 Yale Law Journal (2001).
32. Commission of the European Communities. Completing The Internal Market: White Paper from the Commission to The European Council. Luxembourg, 1985, COM (85) 310 final.
33. Commission of the European Communities. Company law: Commission creates High Level Group of Experts. Press Release, Brussels, 4 Sept., 2001.
34. Commission of the European Communities. Report on the implementation of the Directive on Takeover Bids. Brussels, 21.02.2007, SEC(2007) 268 (http:// ec.europa.eu/ internal_market/ company/ docs/ takeoverbids/ 2007-02-report_en.pdf).
35. Continental AG, Use of Schaeffler Swaps' Illegal, Press Release, Hanover, Jul. 30, 2008 (http:// www.conti-online.com/ generator/ www/ com/ en/ continental/ portal/ themes/ takeover_offer/ pr_2008_07_30_steuer_en.html).
36. Continental AG. Continental advises shareholders not to accept Schaeffler offer, Press Release, Hanover, Aug. 13, 2008 (http:// www.conti-online.com/ generator/ www/ com/ en/ continental/ portal/ themes/ takeover_offer/ pr_2008_08_13_ar_en.html).
37. Continental AG. Continental concludes far-reaching Investment Agreement with Schaeffler. Press Release, Hanover, Aug. 21, 2008 (http:// www.conti-online.com/ generator/ www/ com/ en/ continental/ portal/ themes/ takeover_offer/ pr_2008_08_21_ar_ en.html).
38. Continental AG. EU Commission Issues Approval, Press Release, Hanover, Dec. 12, 2008 (http:// www.conti-online.com/ generator/ www/ com/ en/ continental/ portal/ themes/ takeover_offer/ pr_2008_12_19_en.html).
39. Continental AG. Takeover Offer is Completed, Press Release, Hanover, Jan. 8, 2009 (http:// www.conti-online.com/ generator/ www/ com/ en/ continental/ portal/ themes/ takeover_offer/ pr_2009_01_08_en.html).
40. Corporate Governance and Labour Management: An International Comparison, ed. by H. Gospel, A. Pendleton. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
41. Corporations. Liability of Stockholders. Former Controlling Shareholders Liable for Prorata Share of Difference between Sale Price and Enterprise Value of Their Shares. Perlman v. Feldmann (D. Conn. 1957), 71 Harvard Law Review (1958).
42. Council of the European Economic Community. General Programme for the abolition of restrictions on freedom of establishment // OJ L 2, 15/01/1962.
43. Davies P., Hopt K. Control Transactions // The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach / ed. by R. Kraakman, P. Davies, H. Hansmann, G. Hertig, K. Hopt, H. Kanda, E. Rock. New York, N.Y., Oxford University Press, 2004.
44. De Jong H.W. The Takeover Market in Europe: Control Structures and the Performance of Large Companies Compared. 6 Review of Industrial Organization (1991).
45. Deminor Rating. Application of the one share - one vote principle in Europe. 2005 (http:// deminor.org/ articles.do?id= 3479).
46. Dolgopyatova T. Evolution of Corporate Control Models in the Russian Companies: New Trends and Factors. Working Paper WP1/2005/04 - Moscow: State University-Higher School of Economics, 2005.
47. Dyck, A., Zingales L. Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison // 59 Journal of Finance (2004).
48. The Economist. Governing the modern corporation. 2001. May 4th.
49. The Economist. Europe's revolting shareholders. 2001. May 11th.
50. The Economist. Getting more popolari. 2006. Sep. 1st.
51. The Economist. Ecco il conto, presidente. 2006. Sep. 16th.
52. The Economist. The uneasy crown. 2007. Feb. 10th.
53. The Economist. Our company right or wrong. 2007. Mar. 17th.
54. The Economist. From David to Goliath. 2007. Mar. 31st.
55. The Economist. Well connected. 2007. May 5th.
56. The Economist. The beat goes on. 2007. May 12th.
57. The Economist. Hail, shareholder! 2007. Jun. 2nd.
58. The Economist. Tricks of the trade. 2007. June 9th.
59. The Economist. Dial L for locust. 2007. Jun. 16th.
60. The Economist. Au revoir, papa? 2007. Nov. 17th.
61. The Economist. Raising their voices. 2008. Mar. 22nd.
62. The Economist. Investment-banking deals. 2008. Nov. 8th.
63. The Economist. Losing its bearings. 2009. Mar. 14th.
64. Edwards V. The Directive on Takeover Bids - Not Worth the Paper It's Written On? // 1 European Company and Financial Law Review (2004).
65. Eisenhardt K.M. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. 14 Academy of Management Review (1989).
66. Enriques L. The Mandatory Bid Rule in the Takeover Directive: Harmonization Without Foundation? // 1 European Company and Financial Law Review (2004).
67. Enriques L., Gatti M. EC Reforms of Corporate Governance and Capital Markets Law: Do They Tackle Insiders Opportunism? June 2006 (http:// papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_ id=886345).
68. Enriques L., Volpin P. Corporate Governance Reforms in Continental Europe. 21 Journal of Economic Perspectives (2007).
69. European Markets after 1992 / by Timothy M. Devinney, William C. Hightower. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1991.
70. Fama E.F. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. 88 Journal of Political Economy (1980).
71. Fama E.F., Jensen M.C. Separation of Ownership and Control. 26 Journal of Law and Economics (1983).
72. Fanto J.A. France // The Legal Basis of Corporate Governance in Publicly Held Corporations: A Comparative Approach, ed. by A.R. Pinto and G. Visentini. London, Kluwer Law International, 1998.
73. Ferrarini G. Share Ownership, Takeover Law and the Contestability of Corporate Control // Company Law Reform in OECD Countries. A Comparative Outlook of Current Trends. Conference Proceedings (forthcoming), Stockholm, 2002 (http://www.ssrn.com).
74. Ferrarini G., Giudici P. Financial Scandals and the Role of Private Enforcement: The Parmalat Case. ECGI, Law Working Paper No. 40/2005, May 2005.
75. Forstinger C.M. Takeover Law in the EU and the USA. The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2002.
76. Franks J., Mayer C. Ownership and Control of German Corporations. 14 Review of Financial Studies (2001).
77. Franks J., Mayer C., Rossi S. Spending Less Time with the Family: The Decline of Family Ownership in the United Kingdom // A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report), ed. by R.K. Morck. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2006.
78. Garcia J.B., Torre-Enciso I.M. Mergers and Acquisitions in the European Union Frame. 1 International Advances in Economic Research (1995).
79. Gatti M. Optionality Arrangements and Reciprocity in the European Takeover Directive. 6 European Business Organization Law Review (2005).
80. Gerber D.J. System Dynamics: Toward a Language of Comparative Law? American 46 Journal of Comparative Law (1998).
81. Goergen M., Martynova M. and Renneboog L. Corporate Governance Convergence: Evidence From Takeover Regulation Reforms in Europe. 21 Oxford Review of Economic Policy (2005).
82. Greene E.F., Junewicz J.J. A Reappraisal of Current Regulation of Mergers and Acquisitions. 132 University of Pennsylvania Law Review (1984).
83. Grossman S.J., Hart O.D. Takeover bids, the free rider problem and the theory of the corporation // 11 Bell Journal of Economics (1980).
84. Grundmann S. The Structure of European Company Law: From Crisis to Boom // 5 European Business Organization Law Review (2004).
85. Hansmann H., Kraakman R. Agency Problems and Legal Strategies // The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach / ed. by R. Kraakman, P. Davies, H. Hansmann, G. Hertig, K. Hopt, H. Kanda, E. Rock. New York, N.Y., Oxford University Press, 2004.
86. Hernando-Lopez E. Bag Wars and Bank Wars, the Gucci and Banque National de Paris Hostile Bids: European Corporate Culture Responds to Active Shareholders // 9 Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law (2003).
87. Hertig G., McCahery J.A. Company and Takeover Law Reforms in Europe: Misguided Harmonization Efforts or Regulatory Competition. 4 European Business Organization Law Review (2003).
88. Hertig G., Kanda H. Creditor Protection // The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach / ed. by R. Kraakman, P. Davies, H. Hansmann, G. Hertig, K. Hopt, H. Kanda, E. Rock. New York, N.Y., Oxford University Press, 2004.
89. High Level Group of Company Law Experts. Report on Issues Related to Takeover Bids. Brussels, 10 Jan., 2002 (http:// ec.europa.eu/ internal_market/ company/ docs/ takeoverbids/ 2002-01-hlg-report_en.pdf).
90. High Level Group of Company Law Experts. Report on A Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe. Brussels, 4 Nov., 2002 (http:// ec.europa.eu/ internal_market/ company/ docs/ modern/ report_en.pdf).
91. Hilliard L. The Takeover Panel and the Courts. 50 Modern Law Review (1987).
92. Hirschman A. Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970.
93. Hirte H. The Takeover Directive - a Mini-Directive on the Structure of the Corporation: Is it a Trojan Horse? // 2 European Company and Financial Law Review (2005).
94. Hopner M., Jackson G. An Emerging Market for Corporate Control? The Mannesmann Takeover and German Corporate Governance. MPIfG Discussion Paper 01/4, 2001.
95. Hopt K.J. Labor Representation on Corporate Boards: Impacts and Problems for Corporate Governance and Economic Integration in Europe // 14 International Review of Law and Economics (1994).
96. Ikenberry D., Lakonishok J. Corporate Governance Through the Proxy Contest: Evidence and Implications // 66 Journal of Business (1993).
97. ISS Europe, Shearman & Sterling, ECGI. Report on the Proportionality Principle in the European Union. 2007 (http:// ec.europa.eu/ internal_market/ company/ docs/ shareholders/ study/ final_report_en.pdf).
98. Jenkins P., Saigol L. A bid for strength: why corporate Europe is smashing through the merger barriers // Financial Times. 2006. February 24th.
99. Jensen M.C. Takeovers: Their Causes and Consequences. 2 Journal of Economic Perspectives (1988).
100. Jensen M., Meckling W. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. 3 Journal of Financial Economics (1976).
101. Jensen M.C., Ruback R.C. The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence // 11 Journal of Financial Economics (1983).
102. Johnson S., La PortaR., Lopez-de-Silanes F. and Shleifer A. Tunneling // 90 American Economic Review (2000).
103. Kaisanlahti T. When Is a Tender Price Fair in a Squeeze-Out? // 8 European Business Organization Law Review (2007).
104. Khachaturyan A. Trapped in Delusions: Democracy, Fairness and the One-Share-One-Vote Rule in the European Union // 8 European Business Organization Law Review (2007).
105. Knudsen J.S. Is the Single European Market an Illusion? Obstacles to Reform of EU Takeover Regulation // 11 European Law Journal (2005).
106. Koke J. The Market for Corporate Control in Germany: Causes and Consequences of Changes in Ultimate Share Ownership. CEER Working Paper, Mannheim/Germany, 2000 (http://www.cass.city.ac.uk).
107. Lambrecht P. The 13th Directive on Takeover Bids - Formation and Principles // Capital Markets in the Age of the Euro: Cross-Border Transactions, Listed Companies and Regulation / ed. by G. Ferrarini, K.J. Hopt, E. Wymeersch. The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2002.
108. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. Law and Finance // 106 Journal of Political Economy (1998).
109. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. Corporate Ownership Around the World // 54 Journal of Finance (1999).
110. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. Investor Protection and Corporate Governance // 58 Journal of Financial Economics (2000).
111. Manne H.G. Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control // 73 Journal of Political Economy (1965).
112. McCahery J., Renneboog L., Ritter P., Haller S. The Economics of the Proposed European Takeover Directive. CEPS Research Report No. 32, April 2003.
113. Menjucq M. The European Regime on Takeovers // 3 European Company and Financial Law Review (2006).
114. Milne R., Hughes J., Daneshkhu S., Bryant C. Loopholes to disclosure widespread across Europe // Financial Times. 2008. October 30th.
115. Morck R., Steier L. The Global History of Corporate Governance - An Introduction. NBER Working Paper No. 11062, 2005 (http://www.nber.com).
116. Morck R., Yeung B. Dividend Taxation and Corporate Governance // 19 Journal of Economic Perspectives (2005).
117. Mulbert P.O. Make It or Break It: The Break-Through Rule as a Break-Through for the European Takeover Directive // Reforming Company Law and Takeover Law in Europe / ed. by G. Ferrarini, K.J. Hopt, J. Winter and E. Wymeersch. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004.
118. New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law / ed. by P. Newman: in three volumes. Vol. 2. New York, N.Y., Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
119. Nilsen A. The EU Takeover Directive and the Competitiveness of European Industry. OCGG, 2004 (http:// www.oxfordgovernance.org/ fileadmin/ Publications/ EY001.pdf).
120. Note. The Developing Meaning of "Tender Offer" under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 86 Harvard Law Review (1973).
121. Nuttall R. An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of the Threat of Takeover on UK Company Performance. University of Oxford Working Paper No. 5. Oxford: Nuffield College, University of Oxford, 1999 (http:// ssrn.com/ abstract=155561).
122. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, Paris, 1999.
123. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, Paris, 2004.
124. O'Sullivan M. Corporate Governance and Globalization. 570 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2000).
125. Oxera. Special Rights of public authorities in privatised EU companies: the microeconomic impact. Report prepared for the European Commission, 2005 (http:// ec.europa.eu/ internal_market/ capital/ docs/ 2005_ 10_ special_ rights_ executive_ summary_ en.pdf).
126. Panel on Takeovers and Mergers. Report on the Year Ended 31 March 1969 (1968 - 1969 Report) (http:// www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/ new/ reports/ DATA/ Report1969.pdf).
127. Panel on Takeovers and Mergers. Report on the Year Ended 31 March 1996 (1995 - 1996 Report) (http:// www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/ new/ reports/ DATA/ Report1996.pdf).
128. Panel on Takeovers and Mergers. Report on the Year Ended 31 March 1997 (1996 - 1997 Report) (http:// www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/ new/ reports/ DATA/ Report1997.pdf).
129. Panel on Takeovers and Mergers. Report on the Year Ended 31 March 1998 (1997 - 1998 Report) (http:// www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/ new/ reports/ DATA/ Report1998.pdf).
130. Panel on Takeovers and Mergers. Report on the Year Ended 31 March 1999 (1998 - 1999 Report) (http:// www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/ new/ reports/ DATA/ Report1999.pdf).
131. Paul A., Gupta J. Report from the UK. European Company Law. Apr. 2004, No. 1.
132. Pennington R.R. Takeover Bids in the United Kingdom // 17 American Journal of Comparative Law (1969).
133. Regan P.L. What's Left of Unocal? // 26 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law (2001).
134. Reitz J.C. How to Do Comparative Law // 46 American Journal of Comparative Law (1998).
135. Saigol L. Hostile bid used loophole // Financial Times. 2008. November 26th.
136. Saigol L. Schaeffler wins 16bn battle for Continental // Financial Times. 2009. January 9th.
137. Scharfstein D. The Disciplinary Role of Takeovers // 55 Review of Economic Studies (1988).
138. Schafer D. Schaeffler unleashes hostile move on Conti // Financial Times. 2008. July 31st.
139. Schafer D., Reed J. Deal for Continental sparks rift // Financial Times. 2008. August 22nd.
140. Schafer D., Wiesmann G., Wilson J. Schaeffler deal with Conti fails to break German mould // Financial Times. 2008. September 3rd.
141. Schafer D. Schaeffler may sell Conti stake // Financial Times. 2008. November 5th.
142. Schafer D. Conti shares up 50% after takeover boost // Financial Times. 2008. November 15th.
143. Schafer D. Schaeffler move for Conti set to turn hostile // Financial Times. 2008. December 13th.
144. Schafer D. Debt intensifies Conti-Schaeffler battle // Financial Times. 2008. December 19th.
145. Siems M.M. The Rules on Conflict of Laws in the European Takeover Directive // 1 European Company and Financial Law Review (2004).
146. Skog R. Does Sweden Need a Mandatory Bid Rule? A Critical Analysis. SUERF, Amsterdam, 1997.
147. Stewart C.E., Mergers and Acquisitions: Germany / by Charles E. Stewart. New York, N.Y.: Oceana Publications, Inc., 2000.
148. Stulz R.M., R.A. Walkling and Song M.H. The Distribution of Target Ownership and the Division of Gains in Successful Takeovers // 45 Journal of Finance (1990).
149. Tyson W.C. The Proper Relationship Between Federal and State Law in the Regulation of Tender Offers // 66 Notre Dame Law Review (1990).
150. Van der Elst C., L. Van den Steen. Opportunities in the M&A aftermarket: squeezing out and selling out. University of Gent, Working Paper 2006-12, Sep., 2006 (http://ssrn.com/abstract=933609).
151. Ventoruzzo M. Europe's Thirteenth Directive and U.S. Takeover Regulation: Regulatory Means and Political and Economic Ends // 41 Texas International Law Journal (2006). P. 171 - 221.
152. Veranneman, P., Grupp K. Report from Germany // European Company Law. Apr. 2004, No. 1.
153. Vernikov A. Corporate governance and control in Russian banks. Working Paper WP1/2007/02. Moscow: State University - Higher School of Economics, 2007.
154. Walkling R.A. Predicting Tender Offer Success: A Logistic Analysis // 20 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (1985).
155. Winter J. We all want to go to heaven but nobody wants to die // European Company Law. Apr. 2004, No. 1.
156. Wymeersch E. Problems of the Regulation of Takeover Bids in Western Europe: A Comparative Survey // European Takeovers: Law and Practice, ed. by K.J. Hopt and E. Wymeersch. London, Butterworths Law, 1992.
157. Wymeersch E. Company Law in Europe and European Company Law. Financial Law Institute, Universiteit Gent, 2001 (http://www.ssrn.com).
158. Yarrow G.K. Shareholder Protection, Compulsory Acquisition and the Efficiency of the Takeover Process // 34 Journal of Industrial Economics (1985).