Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Carr I., Stone P. International Trade Law 2014-1.pdf
Скачиваний:
33
Добавлен:
20.12.2022
Размер:
6.5 Mб
Скачать

372 |

INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY ROAD

to go against common sense. As to why all these forced readings are needed is surprising when Art 32(1)(c) provides a tidy solution.

The limitation period applies to actions brought by the carrier as well. Actions by the carrier for freight, expenses incurred for carrying out instructions under Art 12 will fall within Art 32(1)(c).

The period of limitation is suspended where a written claim is sent to the carrier (Art 32(2)).117 However, once the carrier rejects the claim and returns all the documents attached to the claim, the suspension will no longer apply.118 Further claims on the same object will not operate to suspend the running of the period of limitation (Art 32(2)).

It would be possible for the parties to agree to extend the time limits imposed by the CMR after the claim has arisen. The question that is likely to pose a problem is whether an implicit agreement to extend the time limit will be acceptable. In some jurisdictions, it seems that this would be allowed.119

CMR – the future

Like the other transport conventions,120 the CMR is disappointing. It is inexhaustive, and central concepts are left undefined with the result that courts often resort to domestic law. For instance, delivery, central to carriage of goods, is undefined; and liability for loss or damage to goods occurring prior to taking over and delivery is not dealt with in the CMR. Given these and other shortcomings raised, it is fair to question the usefulness of international conventions in standardising the law.121 If an open-textured approach to drafting of conventions is the only way to attract states to become signatories to a convention, would it not be better to let harmonisation take place through uniform rules devised for the mercantile community by an international organisation it respects?

Further reading

Clarke, International Carriage of Goods by Road: CMR, 2009, Informa.

Hill, Messent and Glass, CMR: Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods by Road, 2000, LLP. Theunis (ed), International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR), 1987, LLP.

117It seems that the claim does not have to be formal or for that matter quantified in England. See ICI Fibres Ltd v MAT Transport Ltd [1987] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 354; William Tatton v MAT Ferrymasters [1974] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 203; Moto Vespa v MAT [1979] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 175.

118See Microfine Minerals and Chemicals Ltd v Transferry Shipping Co Ltd [1991] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 630.

119Wetter, ‘The time-bar regulations in the CMR Convention’ [1979] LMCLQ 504.

120See Chapters 8, 9, 10, 11 and 13.

121See Clarke, ‘Doubts from the dark side – the case against codes’ [2001] JBL 605, for some thought-provoking views.

Соседние файлы в предмете Коммерческое право