vaipan_g_v_disser

183

132.Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge (MA), 1996.

133.Habermas J. Reply to Symposium Participants, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law // Cardozo Law Review. 1996. P. 1477-1557.

134.Hall W.E. A Treatise on International Law. Oxford, 1895.

135.Hall W.E. A Treatise on International Law. 8th ed. Oxford, 1924.

136.Hampson F.J. Proportionality and Necessity in the Gulf Conflict // American Society of International Law. Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meeting. Washington, 1992.

137.Hart H.L.A. The Concept of Law. Oxford, 1961.

138.Higgins R. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. N.Y.; Oxford, 1994.

139.International Committee of the Red Cross. Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law. Geneva, 2009.

140.Jackson V.C. Constitutional Law in an Age of Proportionality // Yale Law Journal. 2015. P. 3094-3196.

141.Jütersonke O. Morgenthau, Law and Realism. N.Y., 2010.

142.Kalshoven F. Implementing Limitations on the Use of Force: Proportionality and Necessity // American Society of International Law. Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meeting. Washington, 1992.

143.Kammerhofer J. International Legal Positivism // The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law / Ed. by A. Orford, F. Hoffman. Oxford, 2016. P. 407-426.

144.Kelsen H. Principles of International Law. N.Y., 1952.

145.Kennedy, David. Primitive Legal Scholarship // Harvard International Law Journal. 1986. P. 1-98.

146.Kennedy, David. International Law in the Nineteenth Century: History of an Illusion // Nordic Journal of International Law. 1996. P. 385-420.

184

147.Kennedy, David. The “Rule of Law,” Political Choices, and Development

Common Sense // D.M. Trubek, A. Santos. N.Y.; Cambridge, 2006. P. 95-173.

148.Kennedy, David, Fisher III W.W. Introduction // The Canon of American Legal Thought / Ed. by D. Kennedy, W.W. Fisher III. Princeton, Oxford, 2006.

P.1-16.

149.Kennedy, David. Lawfare and Warfare // The Cambridge Companion to International Law / Ed. by J. Crawford, M. Koskenniemi. N.Y.; Cambridge, 2012. P. 158-184.

150.Kennedy, Duncan. A Semiotics of Legal Argument // Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law. 1994. Vol. III. Book 2. P. 309-365.

151.Kennedy, Duncan. A Critique of Adjudication (Fin de Siècle). Cambridge (MA), 1997.

152.Kennedy, Duncan. The Disenchantment of Logically Formal Legal Rationality, or Max Weber’s Sociology in the Genealogy of the Contemporary Mode of

Western Legal Thought // Hastings Law Journal. 2003–2004. P. 1031-1076.

153.Kennedy, Duncan. Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850-2000 // The New Law and Development: A Critical Appraisal / Ed. by D.M. Trubek,

A.Santos. N.Y.; Cambridge, 2006. P. 19-73.

154.Kennedy, Duncan. A Left Phenomenological Alternative to the Hart/Kelsen Theory of Legal Interpretation // Kennedy, Duncan. Legal Reasoning. Collected Essays. Aurora, 2008. P. 153-173.

155.Kennedy, Duncan. A Transnational Genealogy of Proportionality in Private Law // The Foundations of European Private Law / Ed. by R. Brownsword, H.-W. Micklitz, L. Niglia. Oxford; Portland, 2011. P. 185-220.

156.Kingsbury B., Schill S. Investor-State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality, and the Emerging Global Administrative Law // 50 Years of the New York Convention / Ed. by A.J. van Den Berg. Alphen aan den Rijn, 2009. P. 5-68.

185

157.Klatt M., Meister M. Proportionality – A Benefit to Human Rights? Remarks on the I.CON Controversy // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2012. P. 687-708.

158.Koskenniemi M. The Effect of Rights on Political Culture // The European Union and Human Rights / Ed. by P. Alston. N.Y., 1999. P. 99-116.

159.Koskenniemi M. Letter to the Editors of the Symposium // American Journal of International Law. 1999. P. 351-361.

160.Koskenniemi M. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960. N.Y.; Cambridge, 2002.

161.Koskenniemi M. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. 2nd ed. N.Y.; Cambridge, 2005.

162.Koskenniemi M. Occupied Zone – “A Zone of Reasonableness?” // Israel Law

Review. 2008. P. 13-40.

163.Koskenniemi M. Human Rights Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Institutional Power // Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development. 2010. Vol. 1(1). P. 47-58.

164.Koskenniemi M. The Function of Law in the International Community: Introduction // Lauterpacht H. The Function of Law in the International Community. Oxford, 2011. P. xxix-xlvii.

165.Koskenniemi M. What is Critical Research in International Law? Celebrating Structuralism // Leiden Journal of International Law. 2016. P. 727-735.

166.Koskenniemi M. History of International Law, World War I to World War II // Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. URL: http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law- 9780199231690-e715.

167.Koskenniemi M., Leino P. Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties // Leiden Journal of International Law. 2002. P. 553-579.

168.Kretzmer D. The Inherent Right to Self-Defence and Proportionality in Jus Ad Bellum // European Journal of International Law. 2013. P. 235-282.

186

169.Kumm M. Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2004. Vol. 2(3). P. 574-596.

170.Kumm M. The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review // Law & Ethics of Human Rights. 2010. P. 142-175.

171.Lachenmann F. Legal Positivism // Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. URL: opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law- 9780199231690-e1856.

172.Lauterpacht H. The Function of Law in the International Community. Oxford, 1933. P. 80.

173.Lauterpacht H. “Resort to War” and the Interpretation of the Covenant during the Manchurian Dispute // American Journal of International Law. 1934. P. 43-60.

174.Lauterpacht H. General Rules of the Law of Peace // International Law, Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht / Ed. by Elihu Lauterpacht. Vol. 1. Cambridge, 1970 [1937]. P. 179-444.

175.Lauterpacht H. Sovereignty over Submarine Areas // British Yearbook of International Law. 1950. P. 376-433.

176.Lauterpacht H. The Problem of the Revision of the Law of War // British Yearbook of International Law. 1952. P. 360-382.

177.Lauterpacht H. On Realism, Especially in International Relations // International Law, Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht / Ed. by Elihu Lauterpacht. Vol. 2. Cambridge, 1975 [1953]. P. 52-66.

178.Lauterpacht H. The Development of International Law by the International Court. L., 1958.

179.Legg A. The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality. Oxford, 2012.

187

180.Letsas G. Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2006. P. 705-732.

181.Letsas G. A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford; N.Y., 2007.

182.Luteran M. Towards Proportionality as a Proportion Between Means and Ends

// Law and Outsiders: Norms, Processes and “Othering” in the 21st Century /

Ed. by C.C. Murphy, P. Green. Oxford; Portland, 2011. P. 3-22.

183.Luteran M. The Lost Meaning of Proportionality // Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning / ed. by G. Huscroft, B.W. Miller, G. Webber. N.Y., 2014. P. 21-42.

184.Marks S. The European Convention on Human Rights and its “Democratic Society” // British Yearbook of International Law. 1995. P. 209-238.

185.Mathews J., Stone Sweet A. Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism // Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 2008. P. 72-164.

186.Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society / Ed. by M. Rheinstein. Cambridge (MA), 1954 [1925].

187.Mälksoo L. Russian Approaches to International Law. Oxford, 2015.

188.McBride J. Proportionality and the European Convention on Human Rights // The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe / Ed. by E. Ellis. Oxford, 1999. P. 23-35.

189.McDougal M., Feliciano F. Law and Minimum World Public Order. New Haven, 1961.

190.McHarg A. Reconciling Human Rights and the Public Interest: Conceptual Problems and Doctrinal Uncertainty in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights // The Modern Law Review. Vol. 62(5). 1999. P. 671-696.

191.Melzer N. Targeted Killing in International Law. Oxford, 2010.

192.Meron T. The Humanization of Humanitarian Law // American Journal of International Law. 2000. P. 239-278.

188

193.Möller K. Balancing and the Structure of Constitutional Rights // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2007. Vol. 5(3). P. 453-468.

194.Möller K. The Global Model of Constitutional Rights. Oxford, 2012.

195.Morgenthau H. Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law // American Journal of International Law. 1940. P. 260-284.

196.Morgenthau H. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago, 1946.

197.Morgenthau H. Politics among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace. N.Y., 1948.

198.Morgenthau H. Another “Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United

States // American Political Science Review. 1952. P. 961-988.

199.Newton M., May L. Proportionality in International Law. N.Y., 2014.

200.Nolte G. Thin or Thick? The Principle of Proportionality and International Humanitarian Law // Law & Ethics of Human Rights. 2010. P. 243-255.

201.Nolte G. Multipurpose Self-Defence, Proportionality Disoriented: A Response to David Kretzmer // European Journal of International Law. 2013. P. 283-290.

202.O’Connell M.E. Historical Development and Legal Basis // The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law / Ed. by D. Fleck. 3rd ed. Oxford, 2013.

203.O’Donovan O. The Just War Revisited. Cambridge, 2003.

204.O’Keefe R. Proportionality // The Law of International Responsibility / Ed. by J. Crawford, A. Pellet, S. Olleson. N.Y., 2010. P. 1157-1168.

205.Oeter S. Methods and Means of Combat // The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law / Ed. by D. Fleck. 3rd ed. Oxford, 2013.

206.Oppenheim L. International Law. Vol. II. 2nd ed. L.; N.Y., 1912.

207.Oppenheim L. International Law. Vol. II. 3rd ed. L.; N.Y., 1921.

208.Oppenheim L. International Law. Vol. II. 7th ed. / Ed. by H. Lauterpacht. N.Y., 1948.

209.Orakhelashvili A. The Impact of Peremptory Norms on the Interpretation and Application of United Nations Security Council Resolutions // European Journal of International Law. 2005. P. 59-88.

189

210.Pavlakos G. Constitutional Rights, Balancing and the Structure of Autonomy // Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. Vol. 24(1). 2011. P.129-153.

211.Pictet J. Development and Principles of International Humanitarian Law. The

Hague; Geneva, 1985.

212. Pound R. Mechanical Jurisprudence // Columbia Law Review. 1908.

P. 605-623.

213.Rao N. On the Use and Abuse of Dignity in Constitutional Law // Columbia Journal of European Law. 2008. P. 201-256.

214.Rivers J. Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review // Cambridge Law Journal. 2006. P. 174-207.

215.Roberts A. Is International Law International? Oxford; N.Y., 2017.

216.Rogers A.P.V. “Zero-Casualty Warfare” // International Review of the Red

Cross. 2000. P. 165-181.

217.Rogers A.P.V. Law on the Battlefield. 2nd ed. Manchester, 2004.

218.Scalia A. The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules // The University of Chicago Law Review. 1989. P. 1175-1188.

219.Schachter O. Dag Hammarskjold and the Relation of Law to Politics // American Journal of International Law. 1962. P. 1-8.

220.Schachter O. International Law in Theory and Practice // Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Vol. 178. 1982.

221.Schauer F. A Comment on the Structure of Rights // Georgia Law Review. 1993. P. 415-434.

222.Schauer F. Balancing, Subsumption, and the Constraining Role of Legal Text // Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy / Ed. by M. Klatt. Oxford, 2012. P. 307-316.

223.Schmitt M.N. Fault Lines in the Law of Attack // Testing the Boundaries of International Humanitarian Law / Ed. by S.C. Breau, Agnieszka Jachec-Neale. L., 2006. P. 277-307.

190

224.Shue H., Wippman D. Limiting Attacks on Dual-Use Facilities Performing Indispensable Civilian Functions // Cornell International Law Journal. 2002. P. 559-579.

225.Simmonds N.E. Rights at the Cutting Edge // A Debate Over Rights / M. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds, H. Steiner. Oxford; N.Y., 1998. P. 113-232.

226.Solnit R. Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities. 3rd ed. Chicago, 2016.

227.Spaight J.M. Air Power and War Rights. L., 1924.

228.Spaight J.M. Air Power and War Rights. 3rd ed. L., 1947.

229.Sullivan K.M. The Supreme Court, 1991 Term – Foreword: The Justices of Rules and Standards // Harvard Law Review. 1992. P. 22-123.

230.Sunstein C. Incompletely Theorized Agreements in Constitutional Law // Chicago Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper. 2007. Vol. 147.

231.Tanaka Y. Predictability and Flexibility in the Law of Maritime Delimitation. Oxford; Portland, 2006.

232.Unger R. The Critical Legal Studies Movement // Harvard Law Review. 1983. P. 561-675.

233.Urbina F. A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing. Cambridge, 2017.

234.Webber G. The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights. Cambridge; N.Y., 2009.

235.Wight M. Why Is There no International Theory? // International Relations. 1960. P. 35-48.

236.Zemanek K. The Unilateral Enforcement of International Obligations // Max- Planck-Institut für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht. 1987.

Vol. 42. P. 32-43.

237.Zoller E. Peacetime Unilateral Remedies: An Analysis of Countermeasures. N.Y., 1984.

191

[In Russian:]

238.Arnold R. Yevropeyskaya konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod i yeyo vliyaniye na gosudarstva Tsentral’noy i Vostochnoy Yevropy // Rossiya i Sovet Yevropy: perspektivy vzaimodeystviya. Sbornik dokladov. M., 2001. S. 60-68.

239.Belov S.A. Ratsional’nost’ sudebnoy balansirovki konstitutsionnykh tsennostey s pomoshch’yu testa na proportsional’nost’ // Peterburgskiy yurist. 2016. No. 1. S. 63-75.

240.Blishchenko I.P. Obychnoye oruzhiye i mezhdunarodnoye pravo. M., 1984.

241.Chernichenko S.V. Kontury mezhdunarodnogo prava. Obshchiye voprosy. M., 2014.

242.Chestnov I.L. Diskurs-analiz kak postklassicheskaya paradigma interpretatsii prava // Yuridicheskaya germenevtika v XXI veke: monografiya / pod obshch. red. E.N. Tonkova, Yu.Yu. Vetyutneva. SPb., 2016. S. 171-198.

243.David E. Printsipy prava vooruzhonnykh konfliktov. M., 2011.

244. Dedov D.I. Sorazmernost’ ogranicheniya svobody predprinimatel’stva.

M., 2002.

245.Dolzhikov A.V. Osnovnyye prava i printsip proportsional’nosti v prave Yevropeyskogo Soyuza // Rossiyskiy yezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2008. SPb., 2009. S. 228-233.

246.Entin K.V. Pravo Yevropeyskogo Soyuza i praktika Suda Yevropeyskogo Soyuza: ucheb. posobiye. M., 2015.

247.Gadzhiyev G.A. Konstitutsionnyye printsipy rynochnoy ekonomiki. M., 2004.

248.Golubok S.A. Rasprostraneniye mezhdunarodnykh sudov i tribunalov: priznak fragmentatsii ili ukrepleniya sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava? // Mezhdunarodnoye pravosudiye. 2011. No. 1. S. 4-11.

249.Ispolinov A.S. Ekvivalentnost’ sanktsiy v VTO: ponyatiye i praktika opredeleniya // Zakon. 2014. No. 11. S. 80-85.

192

250.Kalamkaryan R.A. Mezhdunarodnyy sud v miroporyadke na osnove gospodstva prava. M., 2012.

251.Karapetov A.G. Politika i dogmatika grazhdanskogo prava: istoricheskiy ocherk // Vestnik VAS. 2010. No. 4. S. 9-14.

252.Kelsen H. Chistoye ucheniye o prave. 2-ye izd. / Per. s nem. M.V. Antonova i S.V. Lyozova. SPb., 2015 [English versions: Kelsen H. Pure Theory of Law / Translation from the second (revised and enlarged) German edition by M. Knight. Berkeley, 1978 [1960]; Kelsen H. What Is Justice? // Essays in Legal and Moral Philosophy / Translated by P. Heath. Dordrecht; Boston, 1974 [1953]. P. 1-26].

253.Kelsen H. Chistoye ucheniye o prave: vvedeniye v problematiku nauki o prave

// Hans Kelsen: chistoye ucheniye o prave, spravedlivost’ i yestestvennoye

pravo / Per. s nem., angl., fr.; Sost. i vstup. st. M.V. Antonova. SPb., 2015 [English version: Kelsen H. Natural Law Doctrine and Legal Positivism // General Theory of Law and State / Translated by A. Wedberg, W.H. Kraus. Cambridge (MA), 1945 [1928]. P. 391-446].

254.Keshner M.V. Ekonomicheskiye sanktsii v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave. M., 2015.

255.Khosla M. Proportsional’nost’: posyagatel’stvo na prava cheloveka? Otvet Stavrosu Tsakyrakisu // Sravnitel’noye konstitutsionnoye obozreniye. 2011.

No. 5. S. 58-66 [Translated from: Khosla M. Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?: A Reply // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2010.

P.298-306].

256.Kovler A.I. Sootnosheniye yevropeyskogo konventsionnogo i natsional’nogo konstitutsionnogo prava – obostreniye problemy (prichiny i sledstviya) // Rossiyskiy yezhegodnik Yevropeyskoy konventsii po pravam cheloveka / Russian Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights. No. 1 (2015): Yevropeyskaya konventsiya: novyye “staryye” prava. M., 2015.

S.19-64.