Библиографический список
1.Ревзин Г. И. Считайте меня классицистом [Электронный ресурс] / Г. И. Ревзин Коммерсантъ-Власть №33, 22.08.2005. – Режим доступа: https://www.kommersant.ru
2.Бондаренко И. А. Теория в истории архитектуры и градостроительства. Публикации разных лет / От стилей эпох к стилям вещей//Издательский дом «Коло», 2017, 830 с.
3.Боков А. В. Город – пространство компромиссов // Континент Сибирь Online / интервью корреспонденту «КС».– Режим доступа:http://www.ksonline.ru/240803
4. |
Каплун А. М. Стиль и архитектура / А. М. Каплун. - М.: Стройиздат, 1985. - |
232с.
5.Бондаренко И. А. Внеисторические оценки в истории архитектуры / Проблемы истории архитектуры. Тезисы докл. Всесоюзной научной конф. //Суздаль, 1991, 151с.
6.Витрувий. Десять книг об архитектуре/ глава II Витрувий – Москва: Издательство Архитектура-Спереиздание 2006, 328 с.
7.Ю.Д. Колпинский. Всеобщая история искусств/ Ю.Д. Колпинский Том III. Искусство эпохи Возрождения. Под общей редакцией Ю.Д. Колпинского и Е.И. Ротенберга - Москва, Государственное издательство «Искусство», 1962. – 1003 с.
8.А. Палладио. Четыре книги об архитектуре/ Андреа Палладио/ В переводе академика И.В. Жолтовского – издательство Москва, 1936. – 352 с.
9.Ревзин Г. И. Русская архитектура рубежа XX-XXIвв. / Г. И. Ревзин, М., Новое издательство, 2013.– 532 с.
Bibliography list
1.Revzin G. I. Consider me a classicist [Electronic resource] / G. I. Revzin KommersantPower №33, 22.08.2005. – Mode of access: https://www.kommersant.ru
2.Bondarenko I. A. Theory in the history of architecture and urban planning. Publications of different years / from era styles to styles of things / / Kolo Publishing house, 2017, 830 p.
3.Bokov A.V. City-space of compromises / / Continent Siberia Online / interview with "KS".
–Mode of access: http://www.ksonline.ru/240803
4.Kaplun, A. M. architecture and architecture / A.M.Kaplun. - Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1985. -
232 p.
5.Bondarenko I. A. non-Historical estimates in the history of architecture / problems of the history of architecture. Doc's thesis. All-Union scientific Conf. // Suzdal, 1991, 151 p.
6.Vitruvius. Ten books on architecture/ Vitruvius Chapter II – Moscow: Publishing house Architecture-S reissue 2006, 328 p.
7.Yu. D. Kolpinsky. General history of art/ Kolpinskiy Y. D. Volume III. renaissance art. Under the General editorship of Yu. d. Kolpinsky and E. I. Rotenberg - Moscow, state publishing house
"Art", 1962. - 1003 p.
8.A. Palladio. The four books on architecture/ Andrea Palladio/ the translation of academician I.
V. Zholtovsky – the publishing house, Moscow, 1936. - 352 p.
9.Revzin G. I. Russian architecture of the turn of XX-XXI centuries / G. I. Revzin, M., New publishing house, 2013. - 532 p.
18
THE CONTINUITY OF THE CLASSIC TRADITION IN ARCHITECTURE
S.N. Gurev, N.Y. Iwannikova
_____________________________________________________________________________
Voronezh State Technical University, Dept. of Project Fundamentals and Architectural Graphics, Ph. D. in Architecture, Prof. Gurev S. e-mail: gurudesign@mail.ru
A master student in an urban planning, in program "Architecture and Urban studies and design ecological systems " the population
– environment" N. Iwannikova
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statement of the problem. The authors of this article raise the question: is classical architecture possible today? The answer is quite obvious: of course not, because each historical epoch must leave its own unique trace in the development of world and domestic architecture, in accordance with historical, political, technological conditions and cultural, artistic and aesthetic Outlook. However, the intrigue of the task is, it would seem, a paradoxical answer: classical architecture is possible today, not only does it exist.
The results and conclusions. The brief analytical review of the well-known, textbook facts and the main stages of the development of the classical tradition from its origin in Ancient Greece to "Stalin's classicism" allows to speak about its stable cyclicity. In turn, this fact gives the opportunity to hypothesize that the modern neoclassical movement may well become a new architectural paradigm, appealing to the faceless architecture of Soviet and post-Soviet modernism.
Keywords: classic tradition, classicism, architectural styles.
19