- •Give a definition of science. Open the three values of science.
- •2. Name the criteria (features) scientific. Determine each criterion.
- •3. Expand the example of your own science structure of scientific knowledge.
- •4. Define the object and subject of research. Open these concepts as an example of your science.
- •5. Show the difference between the scientific and religious world view as the two ways of perceiving the world.
- •6. Specify the differences between science and art as the two ways of knowing.
- •7.Formulate the concept of ‘scientism’ and ‘anti-scientism’. Arguments each of them.
- •8. Identify the difference between externalism and internalism in science. Give examples of each.
- •Identify the difference between externalism and internalism in science. Give examples of each.
- •9. Evaluate the unity and specify the differences between philosophy and science as two forms of rationality.
- •10. Expand the concept "quantifier of existence".
- •11. Display the fundamental differences between scientific, anti-scientific and extra-scientific knowledge.
- •12. A comparative analysis of the concepts: information, knowledge, wisdom.
- •13. Explain the three tasks of science.
- •14. Expand the 5 points of view on the problem of the beginning of science. Explain your position on this issue.
- •15.Explain the concept of verification and falsification in the science.
- •16 Name and define the form of non-scientific knowledge. Give examples of each.
- •17. Specify the main problems described in the text "Science without hope."
- •18. Determine the ability of the productive imagination.
- •19. Give your assessment of the text ‘The phenomenon of alternative science’.
- •20. Illustrate the essence of quasi-science and para-science.
- •21. Open the myths of your science.
- •22. Analyze "outstanding issues" of your science.
- •23. Define the concept of ‘knowledge’. Name the three characteristics of knowledge.
- •24. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Knowledge".
- •25. Define the essence of thinking and show how it differs from the mind (intellect).
- •26.Identify and expand the main features pre-science.
- •27. Formulate and expand the scientific ideas and the main program of Antiquity.
- •Identify and expand the main features pre-science.
- •28. Expand the paradigm of ancient science.
- •29. Evaluate the major achievements of science in the Middle Ages (Europe and the Arab East).
- •31.Formulate discoveries and personalities in classical science.
- •32. Formulate and expand the main ideas and principles of classical science.
- •33. Expand the paradigm of classical science.
- •34. Name and expand the main ideas and principles of non-classical science.
- •35. Name and expand the main ideas and principles of the post-non-classical science.
- •36. Make the analysis of the socio-cultural environment of Kazakhstan science (5 parameters).
- •37. Give your assessment of the intellectual level of the Kazakhstan society.
- •38. Please rate the prestige of Kazakhstan science and formulate your recommendations on this issue.
- •39. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic ‘Planet earth’. The Solar Nebular Hypothesis
- •A Cloud of Gas
- •Sun Formation
- •Planet and Asteroid Formation
- •40. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Mind & Body"
- •41. Describe the content of the videotext "Agora" and formulate your conclusions on it.
- •42. Evaluate the main issues and features an ancient science in videotext "Agora".
- •43. Expand the content of the videotext "a Beautiful Mind" and make your own conclusions on it.
- •44. Consider the problem of creativity and personality of the scientist in videotext "a Beautiful Mind."
- •45. Show in the context of the video-text "a Beautiful Mind" and other examples of the difference of genius and talent in science.
- •46. Make a glossary of basic scientific ideas and concepts in videotext "Interstellar"
- •47. Describe the content of the videotext ‘Interstellar’ and formulate your conclusion on it.
- •48. Determine the nature of scientific creativity. Formulate the paradox of creativity. Evaluate the role of intuition in scientific discovery.
- •49. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Universe"
- •Inflation
- •Inflation
- •50. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Human Evolution".
9. Evaluate the unity and specify the differences between philosophy and science as two forms of rationality.
Science and philosophy based on mind. They are rational. Science deals with cognition when, as philosophy is engaged in understanding. The purpose of philosophy is thought and purpose of science is evidence.
Science and philosophy reflect the world in the form of concepts of laws and principles.
The unity of the origin of philosophy and science, philosophical, ideological, scientific and theoretical knowledge is not in doubt. Philosophy and science as "links in a single chain" in the direction of the human intellect to comprehend the basics of life, in the sphere of natural philosophy, cosmology, ontology coincide with each other.
Philosophy is not a science of all sciences, ie it is not necessary over the private disciplines, as well as it can not be one of the special sciences among others.
But philosophy, unlike science, it makes a universal judgment and strives to reveal the metaphysical laws of the whole world as a whole. Another difference from the philosophy of science is that science has traditionally been abstracted from the problem of values and from making value judgments. She seeks the truth - that there is in the things themselves, not wanting to talk, good or bad is the fact that it finds. In other words, science is responsible mainly on the questions of "why?", "How?" And "What for?", But prefers not to ask metaphysical questions such as "why?"
Can philosophy develop by itself, without the support of science? Can science "work" without philosophy? Some people think that the sciences can stand apart from philosophy, that the scientist should actually avoid philosophising, the latter often being understood as groundless and generally vague theorising. If the term philosophy is given such a poor interpretation, then of course anyone would agree with the warning "Physics, beware of metaphysics!" But no such warning applies to philosophy in the higher sense of the term. The specific sciences cannot and should not break their connections with true philosophy.
Science and philosophy have always learned from each other. Philosophy tirelessly draws from scientific discoveries fresh strength, material for broad generalisations, while to the sciences it imparts the world-view and methodological im pulses of its universal principles. Many general guiding ideas that lie at the foundation of modern science were first enunciated by the perceptive force of philosophical thought. One example is the idea of the atomic structure of things voiced by Democritus. Certain conjectures about natural selection were made in ancient times by the philosopher Lucretius and later by the French thinker Diderot. Hypothetically he anticipated what became a scientific fact two centuries later. We may also recall the Cartesian reflex and the philosopher's proposition on the conservation of motion in the universe. On the general philosophical plane Spinoza gave grounds for the universal principle of determinism. The idea of the existence of molecules as complex particles consisting of atoms was developed in the works of the French philosopher Pierre Gassendi and also Russia's Mikhail Lomonosov. Philosophy nurtured the hypothesis of the cellular structure of animal and vegetable organisms and formulated the idea of the development and universal connection of phenomena and the principle of the material unity of the world.