- •Give a definition of science. Open the three values of science.
- •2. Name the criteria (features) scientific. Determine each criterion.
- •3. Expand the example of your own science structure of scientific knowledge.
- •4. Define the object and subject of research. Open these concepts as an example of your science.
- •5. Show the difference between the scientific and religious world view as the two ways of perceiving the world.
- •6. Specify the differences between science and art as the two ways of knowing.
- •7.Formulate the concept of ‘scientism’ and ‘anti-scientism’. Arguments each of them.
- •8. Identify the difference between externalism and internalism in science. Give examples of each.
- •Identify the difference between externalism and internalism in science. Give examples of each.
- •9. Evaluate the unity and specify the differences between philosophy and science as two forms of rationality.
- •10. Expand the concept "quantifier of existence".
- •11. Display the fundamental differences between scientific, anti-scientific and extra-scientific knowledge.
- •12. A comparative analysis of the concepts: information, knowledge, wisdom.
- •13. Explain the three tasks of science.
- •14. Expand the 5 points of view on the problem of the beginning of science. Explain your position on this issue.
- •15.Explain the concept of verification and falsification in the science.
- •16 Name and define the form of non-scientific knowledge. Give examples of each.
- •17. Specify the main problems described in the text "Science without hope."
- •18. Determine the ability of the productive imagination.
- •19. Give your assessment of the text ‘The phenomenon of alternative science’.
- •20. Illustrate the essence of quasi-science and para-science.
- •21. Open the myths of your science.
- •22. Analyze "outstanding issues" of your science.
- •23. Define the concept of ‘knowledge’. Name the three characteristics of knowledge.
- •24. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Knowledge".
- •25. Define the essence of thinking and show how it differs from the mind (intellect).
- •26.Identify and expand the main features pre-science.
- •27. Formulate and expand the scientific ideas and the main program of Antiquity.
- •Identify and expand the main features pre-science.
- •28. Expand the paradigm of ancient science.
- •29. Evaluate the major achievements of science in the Middle Ages (Europe and the Arab East).
- •31.Formulate discoveries and personalities in classical science.
- •32. Formulate and expand the main ideas and principles of classical science.
- •33. Expand the paradigm of classical science.
- •34. Name and expand the main ideas and principles of non-classical science.
- •35. Name and expand the main ideas and principles of the post-non-classical science.
- •36. Make the analysis of the socio-cultural environment of Kazakhstan science (5 parameters).
- •37. Give your assessment of the intellectual level of the Kazakhstan society.
- •38. Please rate the prestige of Kazakhstan science and formulate your recommendations on this issue.
- •39. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic ‘Planet earth’. The Solar Nebular Hypothesis
- •A Cloud of Gas
- •Sun Formation
- •Planet and Asteroid Formation
- •40. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Mind & Body"
- •41. Describe the content of the videotext "Agora" and formulate your conclusions on it.
- •42. Evaluate the main issues and features an ancient science in videotext "Agora".
- •43. Expand the content of the videotext "a Beautiful Mind" and make your own conclusions on it.
- •44. Consider the problem of creativity and personality of the scientist in videotext "a Beautiful Mind."
- •45. Show in the context of the video-text "a Beautiful Mind" and other examples of the difference of genius and talent in science.
- •46. Make a glossary of basic scientific ideas and concepts in videotext "Interstellar"
- •47. Describe the content of the videotext ‘Interstellar’ and formulate your conclusion on it.
- •48. Determine the nature of scientific creativity. Formulate the paradox of creativity. Evaluate the role of intuition in scientific discovery.
- •49. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Universe"
- •Inflation
- •Inflation
- •50. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Human Evolution".
44. Consider the problem of creativity and personality of the scientist in videotext "a Beautiful Mind."
One hallmark of creativity is the ability to discern complex patterns, for which Nash seems to have had a truly extraordinary talent. This facility enabled him to come up with theories of far-reaching consequence. However, his thirst foropportunities to apply his unique abilities often seems to have led him into misapplications of his gifts. Somewhat like finding that one has been typing on the wrong keys, we may know the format and yet discover that we have been working in the wrong register: believing we have been making sense and yet producing gibberish, cryptically encoded by the persistence of our error. The factor that seems to have made Nash so intensely vulnerable in this way seems to have been his narcissism, which required him to produce something grand enough to win recognition and admiration at a very high level but also made him disdainful of the types of experiences that might have provided greater reality testing. At university, for example, Nash did not attend classes. He was not interested in building a foundation, but rather was awaiting inspiration. However, when inspiration finally struck, it did not strike in a vacuum but was grounded in his observations of events in the social world.
Nash’s narcissism may be seen as the other side of his extraordinary talents and his intense interpersonal isolation. Extreme giftedness often goes hand in hand with an idiosyncratic way of viewing the universe that can impede the individual’s ability to find a ‘home’ in the interpersonal world (Gedo, 1996). Nash seems to have found it very difficult to engage with others and from an early age had learned first hand how cruel peers could be (Nasar, 1998). The resulting solitude and isolation probably exacerbated his desire for recognition and also served as an impetus for the ‘companions’ he devised as he became further and further divorced from reality.
Isolation is a two-edged sword: innovation requires the ability to tolerate isolation, but it is also important to be able to be recognized by one’s peers. Nash’s reactive hostility made it difficult for him to receive this recognition. At times, the idiosyncratic nature of an individual’s perceptions may interfere with the normalizing and containing functions of caretakers, thereby further attenuating the fine line between self and other and inhibiting the ability to take the perspective of the other. In this way, empathic attune ment is obstructed, not built, thereby reinforcing a paranoid-schizoid mode of relating characterized by difficulties in interpersonal relating that too easily become self-perpetuating.
In a theme that is to be repeated throughout the film, an early conversation with his ‘roommate,’ Charlie, shows Nash jokingly linking his brilliance in math to his avoidance of the interpersonal world: “People don’t like me,” he says, with apparent equanimity. At another level, however, the isolation itself is a dilemma for the creative individuals, who must negotiate between protecting his or her vision and time versus fulfilling interpersonal needs (Gedo, 1996). Even Nash ultimately comes to appreciate his deep need for others: “Away from contact with a few special sorts of individuals Iamlost, lost completely in the wilderness...so,it’s been a hard life in many ways” (Nasar, 1998, p. 169)
