- •Give a definition of science. Open the three values of science.
- •2. Name the criteria (features) scientific. Determine each criterion.
- •3. Expand the example of your own science structure of scientific knowledge.
- •4. Define the object and subject of research. Open these concepts as an example of your science.
- •5. Show the difference between the scientific and religious world view as the two ways of perceiving the world.
- •6. Specify the differences between science and art as the two ways of knowing.
- •7.Formulate the concept of ‘scientism’ and ‘anti-scientism’. Arguments each of them.
- •8. Identify the difference between externalism and internalism in science. Give examples of each.
- •Identify the difference between externalism and internalism in science. Give examples of each.
- •9. Evaluate the unity and specify the differences between philosophy and science as two forms of rationality.
- •10. Expand the concept "quantifier of existence".
- •11. Display the fundamental differences between scientific, anti-scientific and extra-scientific knowledge.
- •12. A comparative analysis of the concepts: information, knowledge, wisdom.
- •13. Explain the three tasks of science.
- •14. Expand the 5 points of view on the problem of the beginning of science. Explain your position on this issue.
- •15.Explain the concept of verification and falsification in the science.
- •16 Name and define the form of non-scientific knowledge. Give examples of each.
- •17. Specify the main problems described in the text "Science without hope."
- •18. Determine the ability of the productive imagination.
- •19. Give your assessment of the text ‘The phenomenon of alternative science’.
- •20. Illustrate the essence of quasi-science and para-science.
- •21. Open the myths of your science.
- •22. Analyze "outstanding issues" of your science.
- •23. Define the concept of ‘knowledge’. Name the three characteristics of knowledge.
- •24. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Knowledge".
- •25. Define the essence of thinking and show how it differs from the mind (intellect).
- •26.Identify and expand the main features pre-science.
- •27. Formulate and expand the scientific ideas and the main program of Antiquity.
- •Identify and expand the main features pre-science.
- •28. Expand the paradigm of ancient science.
- •29. Evaluate the major achievements of science in the Middle Ages (Europe and the Arab East).
- •31.Formulate discoveries and personalities in classical science.
- •32. Formulate and expand the main ideas and principles of classical science.
- •33. Expand the paradigm of classical science.
- •34. Name and expand the main ideas and principles of non-classical science.
- •35. Name and expand the main ideas and principles of the post-non-classical science.
- •36. Make the analysis of the socio-cultural environment of Kazakhstan science (5 parameters).
- •37. Give your assessment of the intellectual level of the Kazakhstan society.
- •38. Please rate the prestige of Kazakhstan science and formulate your recommendations on this issue.
- •39. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic ‘Planet earth’. The Solar Nebular Hypothesis
- •A Cloud of Gas
- •Sun Formation
- •Planet and Asteroid Formation
- •40. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Mind & Body"
- •41. Describe the content of the videotext "Agora" and formulate your conclusions on it.
- •42. Evaluate the main issues and features an ancient science in videotext "Agora".
- •43. Expand the content of the videotext "a Beautiful Mind" and make your own conclusions on it.
- •44. Consider the problem of creativity and personality of the scientist in videotext "a Beautiful Mind."
- •45. Show in the context of the video-text "a Beautiful Mind" and other examples of the difference of genius and talent in science.
- •46. Make a glossary of basic scientific ideas and concepts in videotext "Interstellar"
- •47. Describe the content of the videotext ‘Interstellar’ and formulate your conclusion on it.
- •48. Determine the nature of scientific creativity. Formulate the paradox of creativity. Evaluate the role of intuition in scientific discovery.
- •49. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Universe"
- •Inflation
- •Inflation
- •50. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Human Evolution".
18. Determine the ability of the productive imagination.
Imagination is the basis for cultivating creative thinking, and thus the driving force of innovation. Creativity related research has progress for many years, but the understandings of imagination and its symbol still remain unclear. So far, few studies have settled distrib images imagself manifest my own Let alone developed an evaluation tool for assessing imagination. Because of the potential applicability to the profession of educational technology and various fields, some general concepts of imagination must be explained before referring to them specifically with the indicators which might still observed or isolated.
The mind – one of the forms of consciousness, self-conscious mind, aim at himself and conceptual content of his knowledge (Kant, Hegel). Mind expresses itself in the principles, ideas and ideals.
The mind as is mind, affected is itself, is not only different content with each other, but also himself with this content. In View of this, the mind can hold contradictions. Hegel believed that only reaching the mind, finally, a true expression of the truth as a concrete, that is, including the unity of their opposite characteristics. The first dimension is "creative imagination" which Is composed of five indicators: intuition, sensibility, productivity, exploration, and novelty. The second dimension is "reproductive imagination" which contains another five indicators: focusing, effective, transformation, crystallization, and dialectics. In this study, the two dimensions reveal Distinct quality, but still are co-related
Imagination is constantly on the verge of conscious and unconscious, one associative context and the other, destructive and constructive. Therefore, it always creates a wide scope for human self as artist. The process of cognition and creativity, which demands the mobilization of all of Man's intellectual and spiritual strength, is not without imagination-an ability to transform the forth given in concrete-imaginal forms, creating unusual assembly out of ordinary impressions. Imagination depends to a considerable extent on impressions which may be either linked with the present moment or Come from memory, or both. The term imagination has its root in the Latin verb imaginary, meaning "to picture oneself".
19. Give your assessment of the text ‘The phenomenon of alternative science’.
In the science of modern times, and especially in the science of the twentieth century, clear criteria for distinguishing between scientific, pre-scientific, non-scientific and non-scientific knowledge. They were worked out on the basis of philosophical and ideological foundations, ideals and norms of scientific character. These criteria together with the indicated bases ideals and norms did not remain for centuries unchanged, but were subject to change, because the western (a from the end of the XIX century. it is a world science) has passed the stages of the classical, non-classical and post-non-classical. Accordingly, philosophical and ideological bases were transformed. ideals and norms of scientific character, and, together with them, the criteria for of knowledge from other knowledge.
Supporters of pseudoscience not only do not deny, but, on the contrary, emphasize their desire to use the scientific method. They collect facts, put forward guesses and hypotheses substantiate them. But, in spite of this imitation of scientific activity,most scientists, and indeed. It is quite clear to people engaged in pseudoscience that their activity is carried out beyond the bounds of normal science ". In addition, in this work is written about the term deviant science. "The closest to ordinary scientific activity," writes V.P. Filatov, - "deviant science."... Deviant will be such cognitive activity that goes beyond the limits of the accepted at some time or other time in science paradigms (samples) of research and deviates from the methodological and ideological norms and standards, shared by most members of the scientific communities.
In my opinion, the terms "pseudoscience" and "deviant science" are somehow unsuccessful. The term "pseudoscience" is formed from the conjunction of the Greek ψευδής, which means "false, deceptive," and the term "deviant" comes from the Latin "deviatio", which means "deviation". In psychology and jurisprudence, they say about the deviant that is, deviating from the norm behavior. Became
be, both these terms carry negative evaluative connotations. It is better, in our opinion, to use the concept of "alternative science" that is neutral in terms of evaluation, the more that V.P. Filatov himself writes that "the line between science and extra-scientific knowledge is not impassable, and sometimes in pseudoscience" pseudo- "begins to gradually give way "Science", and even disappears completely. As a result, the concept of deviant science, and then recognized scientific theories ". True, in his other work he uses the concept of "Alternative science".
An alternative to the autochthonous view is that the earthly humanity has a cosmic origin walking. This point of view has two main options: but the first, terrestrial humanity - an alien from another star system (example - esoteric mythology Dogon); according to second, terrestrial humanity - a product of selection, carried out-alien creatures.
Conflict of official and alternative science occurs especially in the field of Egyptology. It's about the pyramids on the Giza plateau near modern Cairo, the time of their erection, their purpose, the technologies used in their construction, and thoseknowledge, which are objectified in them. The main structures of Giza are the three pyramids - Khufu (Greek Cheops), Khafra (Greek Khafre) and Menkaure (Greek. Mikerin), as well as the Sphinx. According to official Egyptology, all this was erected during the IV dynasty, i.e. about 4,5 thousand years ago.
