- •The problem of morphemes: peculiarities of the morphemic structure of the English word. New approaches to the classification of morphemic structure of the English word.
- •1. According to their position in the word:
- •2. Types of affixes:
- •4. Classifying words according to morpheme structure
- •1. One form, two (or more) meanings.
- •2. Two (or more) forms, one meaning.
- •2. The problem of grouping words into words classes and distinguishing their categorical status (new concepts and approaches)
- •4.The impact of Gender policy on functioning of modern English
- •Future I Future II
- •6. The object of mini – syntax: phrase. The problem of phrase theory in English . Classification of phrases . New conception of phrase structure in English .
- •Present Past
- •8. The problem of the sentence analysis. Major types of the sentence analysis.
1. According to their position in the word:
read |
re+read |
read+ing |
Rereading |
root |
prefix + root |
root + suffix |
prefix + root + suffix |
infix: kilad (red) --> kumilad (be red)
circumfix: chokma (it is good) --> ikchokmo (it is not good)
lakna (it is yellow) --> iklakno (it is not yellow)
AFFIX TYPES: prefix, suffix, infix, circumfix,
agglutination: affixes don't change form when combined
simple fusion: at least one of the morphemes changes form:
confuse -> confus+ion, able -> abil+ity, explain -> explan+ation, electric-> electric+ity, long -> leng+th
symbolic fusion: tooth -> teeth, run -> ran, take -> took, use (the noun) -> use (the verb)
2. Types of affixes:
Derivational affixes make new words by adding concrete meanings to old words:
-er, -ess -hood, -ive, -ness, re-, un-
All English prefixes and most suffixes are derivational.
Inflectional affixes make different grammatical forms of the same word. English has only 8 productive inflections:
3 for verbs: -ed, -s, -ing |
work+ed, work+s, work+ing |
3 for nouns: -s, -'s -'s |
boys, boy's, boys' |
2 for adjectives: -er, -est |
smart+er, smart+est |
There are several unproductive inflections too, like the plural -en in oxen, and the participial -en in given.
stem + ending (inflectional suffix)
3. Classification according to whether morpheme = word
FREE |
BOUND |
most roots in English |
most prefixes and suffixes |
but: adept, inept (BOUND ROOT) |
ism (free suffix) ex, pro, con (free prefixes) |
4. Classifying words according to morpheme structure
Simple words- a single morpheme: house, I, the, off, salamander
Complex words - root + at least 1 affix: worker, reread, retelling
anti + dis + establish +ment + ari + an +ism
Compound words - 2 roots: ashtray, mailbox, lazybones
CLASSIFICATION OF MORPHEMES
I. According to distribution.
↓ ↓ ↓
Contrastive complementary non-contrastive
II. According to traditional and descriptive
↓ ↓
“free” “bound”
III. On the basis of formal presentation
↓ ↓
“overt” “covert” or “zero”
IV. On the basis of segmental relation:
↓ ↓ ↓
Supra-segmental additives replacives.
MORPHEME
‘PAST TENSE’
↓ ↓ ↓
Allomorph allomorph allomorph
↓ ↓ ↓
Morph morph morph
[id] [d] [t]
Paint/ed clean/ed pack/ed
Mend/ed open/ed kick/ed
The morphemic composition of modern English words has a wide range of varieties; in the lexicon of everyday speech the preferable morphemic types of stems are root-stems (one-root stems or two-root stems) and one-affix stems. With grammatically changeable words, these stems take one grammatical suffix {two "open" grammatical suffixes are used only with some plural nouns in the possessive case, cf.: the children's toys, the oxen's yokes). Thus, the abstract complete morphemic model of the common English word is the following: prefix + root + lexical suffix+grammatical suffix.
The syntagmatic connections of the morphemes within the model form two types of hierarchical structure. The first is characterised by the original prefixal stem (e.g. prefabricated), the second is characterised by the original suffixal stem (e.g. inheritors). If we use the symbols St for stem, R for root, Pr for prefix, L for lexical suffix, Gr for grammatical suffix, and, be-sides, employ three graphical symbols of hierarchical grouping — braces, brackets, and parentheses, then the two morphemic word-structures can be presented as follows: W1 = {[Pr + (R + L)] +Gr}; W2 = {[(Pr + R) +L] + Gr} In the morphemic composition of more complicated words these model-types form different combinations.
Problems: It would nice if there were always a neat one-to-one correspondence between form and meaning, i.e. if each meaning always had its own individual form. Unfortunately, natural human language isn't like that. Now we'll take a look at some potentially tricky situations that can arise. As we consider these problems, the important thing to keep in mind is that a morpheme is a FORM + MEANING unit; both parts of the unit must be considered when we are trying to decide if we are dealing with one morpheme or two.
