Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
workbook1.doc
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
01.07.2025
Размер:
753 Кб
Скачать
☆

2.3. Criteria for assessing practical tasks

Practical tasks are provided in the seminar plan. The quality of your work will be assessed after two criteria: its content and the quality of your English.

Table 2.3

Criteria for assessing practical tasks

Criteria

Mark

content

language

National scale

ECTS

points

I remember and can freely employ my theoretical knowledge while analyzing

I make 1-2 minor mistakes (using

А

Table 2.3 continued

Criteria

Mark

content

language

National scale

ECTS

points

an original text; I can employ the techniques of descriptive, functional and contextual stylistic analysis; I define the type and function of all the author’s stylistic devices and expressive means correctly; I know how to determine the semantic field of language units with the help of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries; I can rely on my knowledge of other linguistic disciplines in the process of stylistic analysis; my conclusions are provided with sound arguments.

articles or prepositions), and have 1-2 speech faults speaking in the natural tempo

Excellent

А

4,5-5,0

I can employ my theoretical knowledge while analyzing an original text; I can employ the techniques of descriptive, functional and contextual stylistic analysis though I make 1 mistake, which doesn’t impair my final conclusion; I make 1 mistake defining the type and function of the author’s stylistic devices and expressive means, which doesn’t impair my final conclusion; I miss few stylistic devices and expressive means used by the author; I know how to determine the semantic field of language units with the help of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries; I can rely on my knowledge of other linguistic disciplines in the process of stylistic analysis though I can make 1 minor mistake; my conclusions are provided with arguments.

I make 1-2 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes and have 1-2 speech faults speaking in the natural tempo

good

B

4,2-4,4

I can employ my theoretical knowledge while analyzing an original text; I can employ the techniques of descriptive, functional and contextual stylistic

I make 2-3 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes and have

C

3,8-4,1

Table 2.3 continued

Criteria

Mark

content

language

National scale

ECTS

points

analysis though I make 2 mistakes, which don’t impair my final conclusion; I make 2 mistakes defining the type and function of the author’s stylistic devices and expressive means, which don’t impair my final conclusion; I single out most of stylistic devices and expressive means used by the author; I know how to determine the semantic field of language units with the help of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries; I can rely on my knowledge of other linguistic disciplines in the stylistic analysis though I can make 2 minor mistakes; my conclusions are provided with arguments.

2-3 speech faults speaking in the tempo close to natural

good

C

3,8-4,1

I cannot confidently rely on my theoretical knowledge while analyzing an original text and make 3 mistakes, which impair my final conclusion; my conclusions are not provided with arguments; I have difficulty employing my knowledge of other linguistic disciplines in the stylistic analysis and make 3 mistakes, which impair my final conclusion; I single out the better part of stylistic devices and expressive means used by the author but I make 3 mistakes defining their type and function; I have difficulty defining the semantic field of language units with the help of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries

I make 3-4 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes and have 3-4 speech faults speaking rather slowly

satisfactory

D

3,4-3,7

I cannot confidently rely on my theoretical knowledge while analyzing an original text and make 4 mistakes, which impair my final conclusion; my

I make 4-5 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes and have

E

3,0-3,3

Table 2.3 continued

Criteria

Mark

content

language

National scale

ECTS

points

conclusions are not provided with arguments; I have difficulty employing my knowledge of other linguistic disciplines in the stylistic analysis and make 4 mistakes, which impair my final conclusion; I single out half of stylistic devices and expressive means used by the author but I make 4 mistakes defining their type and function; I have difficulty defining the semantic field of language units with the help of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries

3-4 speech faults speaking slowly

satisfactory

E

3,0-3,3

I cannot use my theoretical knowledge while analyzing an original text and make 5 gross mistakes; I have difficulty employing my knowledge of other linguistic disciplines in the stylistic analysis and make 5 gross mistakes; I single out some of stylistic devices and expressive means used by the author but I make 5 mistakes defining their type and function; I have difficulty defining the semantic field of language units with the help of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries; I am not able to arrive at any conclusion

I make 5-6 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes speaking slowly

bad

FX

1,8-2,9

I cannot use my knowledge of stylistics or other linguistic disciplines in the process of stylistic and make 6 gross mistakes in defining type and function of stylistic devices and expressive means; I single out few of stylistic devices and expressive means used by the author; I am not able to arrive at any conclusion

I make over 6 phonetic, gram-matical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes speaking slowly

F

>1,8

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]