- •Irina kamensky stylistic of the english language student workbook
- • Department of Foreign Languages, 2013 content
- •1. Preface
- •2. Criteria for assessing students’ learning activity
- •2.1. Rating points calculation
- •Rating points calculation
- •2.2. Criteria for assessing talks on theoretical issues
- •Criteria for assessing talks on theoretical issues
- •Criteria for assessing practical tasks
- •2.3. Criteria for assessing practical tasks
- •2.4. Criteria for assessing complementing peers’ talks
- •2.5. Criteria for assessing reviews of peers’ talks
- •2.6. Criteria for assessing blitz-control tests
- •2.7. Criteria for assessing module tests
- •Module tests: rating points calculation
- •A plan of your report
- •Seminar 2. The publicists and newspaper styles
- •Seminar 3. The scientific prose and official documents styles
- •A plan of your report
- •3.2. Content module 2 Expressive means and stylistic devices Seminar 4. Stylistic classification of the English vocabulary
- •A plan of your report
- •Seminar 5. Phonetic stylistic devices
- •Seminar 6. Graphical and morphological expressive means
- •A plan of your report
- •Seminar 7. Metaphor. Metonymy. Irony
- •A plan of your report
- •Seminar 8. Zeugma. Pun. Figures of opposition
- •A plan of your report
- •A plan of your report
- •A plan of your report
- •Seminar 11. Stylistic use of structural meaning
- •5. Tips on getting ready for seminar classes
- •2 Sevastopol Str., Yalta, Crimea, Ukraine, 98635
- •In the printing house Subject of Entrepreneurial Activity Kharitonov o.O.
2.3. Criteria for assessing practical tasks
Practical tasks are provided in the seminar plan. The quality of your work will be assessed after two criteria: its content and the quality of your English.
Table 2.3
Criteria for assessing practical tasks
Criteria |
Mark |
|||
content |
language |
National scale |
ECTS |
points |
I remember and can freely employ my theoretical knowledge while analyzing |
I make 1-2 minor mistakes (using |
|
А |
|
Table 2.3 continued
Criteria |
Mark |
|||
content |
language |
National scale |
ECTS |
points |
an original text; I can employ the techniques of descriptive, functional and contextual stylistic analysis; I define the type and function of all the author’s stylistic devices and expressive means correctly; I know how to determine the semantic field of language units with the help of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries; I can rely on my knowledge of other linguistic disciplines in the process of stylistic analysis; my conclusions are provided with sound arguments. |
articles or prepositions), and have 1-2 speech faults speaking in the natural tempo |
Excellent |
А |
4,5-5,0 |
I can employ my theoretical knowledge while analyzing an original text; I can employ the techniques of descriptive, functional and contextual stylistic analysis though I make 1 mistake, which doesn’t impair my final conclusion; I make 1 mistake defining the type and function of the author’s stylistic devices and expressive means, which doesn’t impair my final conclusion; I miss few stylistic devices and expressive means used by the author; I know how to determine the semantic field of language units with the help of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries; I can rely on my knowledge of other linguistic disciplines in the process of stylistic analysis though I can make 1 minor mistake; my conclusions are provided with arguments. |
I make 1-2 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes and have 1-2 speech faults speaking in the natural tempo |
good |
B |
4,2-4,4 |
I can employ my theoretical knowledge while analyzing an original text; I can employ the techniques of descriptive, functional and contextual stylistic |
I make 2-3 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes and have |
C |
3,8-4,1 |
|
Table 2.3 continued
Criteria |
Mark |
|||
content |
language |
National scale |
ECTS |
points |
analysis though I make 2 mistakes, which don’t impair my final conclusion; I make 2 mistakes defining the type and function of the author’s stylistic devices and expressive means, which don’t impair my final conclusion; I single out most of stylistic devices and expressive means used by the author; I know how to determine the semantic field of language units with the help of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries; I can rely on my knowledge of other linguistic disciplines in the stylistic analysis though I can make 2 minor mistakes; my conclusions are provided with arguments. |
2-3 speech faults speaking in the tempo close to natural |
good |
C |
3,8-4,1 |
I cannot confidently rely on my theoretical knowledge while analyzing an original text and make 3 mistakes, which impair my final conclusion; my conclusions are not provided with arguments; I have difficulty employing my knowledge of other linguistic disciplines in the stylistic analysis and make 3 mistakes, which impair my final conclusion; I single out the better part of stylistic devices and expressive means used by the author but I make 3 mistakes defining their type and function; I have difficulty defining the semantic field of language units with the help of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries |
I make 3-4 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes and have 3-4 speech faults speaking rather slowly |
satisfactory |
D |
3,4-3,7 |
I cannot confidently rely on my theoretical knowledge while analyzing an original text and make 4 mistakes, which impair my final conclusion; my |
I make 4-5 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes and have |
E |
3,0-3,3 |
|
Table 2.3 continued
Criteria |
Mark |
|||
content |
language |
National scale |
ECTS |
points |
conclusions are not provided with arguments; I have difficulty employing my knowledge of other linguistic disciplines in the stylistic analysis and make 4 mistakes, which impair my final conclusion; I single out half of stylistic devices and expressive means used by the author but I make 4 mistakes defining their type and function; I have difficulty defining the semantic field of language units with the help of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries |
3-4 speech faults speaking slowly |
satisfactory |
E |
3,0-3,3 |
I cannot use my theoretical knowledge while analyzing an original text and make 5 gross mistakes; I have difficulty employing my knowledge of other linguistic disciplines in the stylistic analysis and make 5 gross mistakes; I single out some of stylistic devices and expressive means used by the author but I make 5 mistakes defining their type and function; I have difficulty defining the semantic field of language units with the help of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries; I am not able to arrive at any conclusion |
I make 5-6 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes speaking slowly |
bad |
FX |
1,8-2,9 |
I cannot use my knowledge of stylistics or other linguistic disciplines in the process of stylistic and make 6 gross mistakes in defining type and function of stylistic devices and expressive means; I single out few of stylistic devices and expressive means used by the author; I am not able to arrive at any conclusion |
I make over 6 phonetic, gram-matical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes speaking slowly |
F |
>1,8 |
|
