- •Irina kamensky stylistic of the english language student workbook
- • Department of Foreign Languages, 2013 content
- •1. Preface
- •2. Criteria for assessing students’ learning activity
- •2.1. Rating points calculation
- •Rating points calculation
- •2.2. Criteria for assessing talks on theoretical issues
- •Criteria for assessing talks on theoretical issues
- •2.3. Criteria for assessing practical tasks
- •Criteria for assessing practical tasks
- •2.4. Criteria for assessing complementing peers’ talks
- •2.5. Criteria for assessing reviews of peers’ talks
- •2.6. Criteria for assessing blitz-control tests
- •2.7. Criteria for assessing module tests
- •Module tests: rating points calculation
- •A plan of your report
- •Seminar 2. The publicists and newspaper styles
- •Seminar 3. The scientific prose and official documents styles
- •A plan of your report
- •3.2. Content module 2 Expressive means and stylistic devices Seminar 4. Stylistic classification of the English vocabulary
- •A plan of your report
- •Seminar 5. Phonetic stylistic devices
- •Seminar 6. Graphical and morphological expressive means
- •A plan of your report
- •Seminar 7. Metaphor. Metonymy. Irony
- •A plan of your report
- •Seminar 8. Zeugma. Pun. Figures of opposition
- •A plan of your report
- •A plan of your report
- •A plan of your report
- •Seminar 11. Stylistic use of structural meaning
- •5. Tips on getting ready for seminar classes
- •2 Sevastopol Str., Yalta, Crimea, Ukraine, 98635
- •In the printing house Subject of Entrepreneurial Activity Kharitonov o.O.
Rating points calculation
Mark |
Learning activity type (points) |
||||
National scale |
ECTS |
Theoretical talk |
Practical task |
Complementing peers’ talks |
Reviewing peers’ talks |
Excellent |
A |
4,5 - 5,0 |
4,5 - 5,0 |
0,9 - 1,0 |
1,9 - 2,0 |
Good |
B |
4,2 - 4,4 |
4,2 - 4,4 |
0,8 |
1,7 - 1,8 |
C |
3,8 - 4,1 |
3,8 - 4,1 |
0,7 |
1,5 - 1,6 |
|
Satisfactory |
D |
3,8 - 4,1 |
3,8 - 4,1 |
0,6 |
1,3 - 1,4 |
E |
3,4 - 3,7 |
3,4 - 3,7 |
0,5 |
1,1 - 1,2 |
|
2.2. Criteria for assessing talks on theoretical issues
Theoretical issues for you to get ready to dwell on are enumerated in the seminar plan. The quality of your talk will be assessed after two criteria: its content and the quality of your English.
Table 2.2
Criteria for assessing talks on theoretical issues
Criteria |
Mark |
|||
content |
language |
National scale |
ECTS |
points |
I know and can freely use all the terms; disclose fully and correctly the content of all notions; report my knowledge confidently and logically; distinguish essential and secondary information; I am |
I make 1-2 minor mistakes (using articles or prepositions), and have 1-2 speech faults speaking in the natural tempo |
excellent |
A |
4,5-5,0 |
Table 2.2 continued
Criteria |
Mark |
|||
content |
language |
National scale |
ECTS |
points |
able to analyze, generalize and systematize information; to illustrate theoretical aspects with examples of my own and to prove my own opinion on the issue |
|
excellent |
A |
4,5-5,0 |
I know and can freely use all the terms; disclose fully and correctly the content of all notions; I sound confident but am not quite sure of my logics; I distinguish essential and secondary information; I am able to analyze, generalize and systematize information, but have difficulty in formulating my own opinion on the issue; I illustrate theoretical aspects with correct examples |
I make 1-2 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes and have 1-2 speech faults speaking in the natural tempo |
good |
В |
4,2-4,4 |
I know and can use all the terms; disclose correctly though not fully the content of the notions; I sound confident enough but I haven’t tried to distinguish essential and secondary information; I am able to analyze, generalize and systematize information, but don’t have any personal opinion on the issue; I illustrate theoretical aspects with correct examples |
I make 2-3 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes and have 2-3 speech faults speaking in the tempo close to natural |
С |
3,8-4,1 |
|
I remember and can reproduce theoretical information; I don’t remember every term; I can’t disclose the content of every notion to the full; I haven’t tried to structure my talk logically; I am not able to analyze, generalize and systematize information; I am not sure whether my examples are correct |
I make 3-4 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes and have 3-4 speech faults speaking rather slowly |
satisfactory |
D |
3,4-3,7 |
Table 2.2 continued
Criteria |
Mark |
|||
content |
language |
National scale |
ECTS |
points |
I remember and can reproduce theoretical information; I don’t remember every term; I can’t disclose the content of every notion to the full; I haven’t tried to structure my talk logically; I am not able to analyze, generalize and systematize information; I can’t provide any examples |
I make 4-5 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes and have 3-4 speech faults speaking slowly |
satisfactory |
Е |
3,0-3,3 |
I don’t know the terms; I am not sure if I understand the notions correctly; I remember and can reproduce part of theoretical information; I am not able to analyze, generalize and systematize information; I can’t provide any examples; I can answer questions on part of theoretical information |
I make 5-6 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes speaking slowly |
bad |
FX |
1,8-2,9 |
I don’t know the terms; I don’t understand the notions; I can’t reproduce any part of theoretical information; I can’t answer any questions on the issue |
I make over 6 phonetic, grammatical, lexical, or stylistic mistakes speaking slowly |
F |
>1,8 |
|
