- •Collision
- •I Look through the slides with key words,listen to their pronunciation and translation :
- •II Read the key expressions to the topic,listen to their translation,try to remember them.
- •III Study the definition
- •IV Study the expressions with the key words,guess their meanings,listen to their translation into native language.
- •V Rearrange the following words into sentences,check your answers with the keys below.
- •VI Study the extended version of key words and word combinations in two Dozes: Doze 1 and Doze 2
- •VII Work through the word families(clusters)with the topical words:
- •VIII Match the term (verb, noun) with the right definition.
- •IX Check-questions
- •X Read the following words and expressions to Text 1. Try to guess their meanings listen to their translation.
- •XVI Make as many sentences as possible using the following verbs or give as exact example from the text as possible with the following words and expressions.
- •XVII Read Case Study 3 very attentively
- •In the 2nd variant of the text choose the correct grammar from, (tense and voice) for the verbs in the brackets.
- •XVIII Transform the following affirmative sentences from the text into negative ones or vice versa.
- •XIX Show the condition of proper professional actions of (master,watchkeeper) or Describe the necessary modality of the following actions( their insistency)
- •XX Play the dialogues
- •Indicating working vhf channel Agree/disagree working vhf channel
- •Collision Part II
- •XXI. Study the key words and expressions from Doze 3 and Doze 4
IX Check-questions
Translate the following words and expressions from English language into native one and vice verse
track, to identify,imminent.
to take over the course,to overhaul,to assess risk of collision,to identify,to maintain situational awareness,near miss,to comply with the collision regulations.
X Read the following words and expressions to Text 1. Try to guess their meanings listen to their translation.
to be outbound from
to have the con
to see the target
inbound
response
to commit to the manoeuvre
to cause extensive damage to
Text 1
Case-VHF assisted collision
A cargo vessel was outbound from River Humber in poor visibility. The master of the cargo vessel had the con, a helmsman was steering and the bosun was stationed on the forecastle as a lookout. The master saw the target of an inbound vessel on his radar ,and he called the unknown fishing vesel using VHF with the intention of requesting to pass «green-to-green» in the channel.He received an instant response but,by then,it was too late. His ship was committed to the manoeuvre, and the fishing vessel was trying to pass red-to-red. They collided,causing extensive damage to the fishing vessel.
XI Answer the questions to the text.
1.What were the weather conditions in the area of the case described?
2. What were the stations of the watch?
3.What were the master’s actions?
When did he see the inbound vessel on the radar?
4.How was the fishing vessel manoeuvring?
5. What was the extent of the damage after collision?
XII Complete the sentences
1. A cargo vessel was outbound from ……
2.He called the unknown fishing vessel with the intention of requesting ……
3.The fishing vessel was trying ……
XIII Give the beginning of the sentences.
1. ……. had the con.
2. ……. on the forecastle as a lookout.
3. …….. ,causing extensive damage to the fishing vessel.
XIV Guess the term or give the definition of the term.
Keys
target,n |
the act of controlling a ship’s movements while at sea |
forecastle,n |
a person,object or a place selected as the aim of an attack |
con,conn |
the forward part of a ship below the deck,traditionally used as the crew’s living quarters,(historically) a raised deck at the front of a ship |
target,n |
a person,object or a place selected as the aim of an attack |
forecastle,n |
the forward part of a ship below the deck,traditionally used as the crew’s living quarters,(historically) a raised deck at the front of a ship |
con,conn |
the act of controlling a ship’s movements while at sea |
XV Read the extended Text 2 on the topic. Answer the questions to the text .
1.How are tanker’s and «Atlantic’s» actions /movements classified according to COLREGS?
2. Which courses were the vessels proceeding?
3. What were their maneuvers?
4. Who held the communication between two vessels?
5. What did the investigation identify?
Study Text 2
Small tanker Arngast was the give-way vessel in accordance with Rule 15 and Atlantic was a vessel «constrained by her draught» in accordance with Rule 3 of the COLREGS. In good visibility two vessels were navigating parallel courses, and then Atlantic changed course to port in accordance with her voyage plan. After this maneuver Arngast was closing Atlantic on her port side. Chief Officer on watch on the bridge of Arngast established VHF contact with Atlantic 5 min before collision to clarify Atlantic’s intentions.Pilot on Atlantic held the communication with Arngast and informed her Chief Officer that Atlantic is restricted by her draft and instructed him to alter the course to port as the only way to avoid collision. Chief Officer on Arngast took the wheel and put it to starboard. In a minute the vessels collided. Investigation identified that the Chief Officer on Arngast,as OOW,apparenty misunderstood the VHF request from Atlantic to turn to port and slow down,and instead turned to starboard shorly before the collision.
