Gabriel Kron's Negative Resistor

Arguably one of the greatest electrical scientists of all time was Gabriel Kron.  Working for GE, Kron built a true negative resistor in the 1930s, and it could power itself and the network analyzer at Stanford University, under a GE support contract with the U.S. Navy.  Here is a direct quote from Kron { [24] } to show what we refer to:

"When only positive and negative real numbers exist, it is customary to replace a positive resistance by an inductance and a negative resistance by a capacitor (since none or only a few negative resistances exist on practical network analyzers.)"

In that sentence, Kron was required to insert the words "none or".  In another quote, Kron { [25] } also revealed that he was not allowed to use the negative resistor to openly power the Network Analyzer.  Quoting and reading through the spin-control:

"Although negative resistances are available for use with a network analyzer, in practice it is more convenient to use a second type of circuit, in which the positive and negative resistances are replaced by inductors and capacitors and the dc currents and voltages are replaced by ac currents and voltages of fixed frequency.  The use of the second type of interpretation is equivalent to multiplying the wave equation by i = Ö-1."

In that quotation, one should just extract what is said in the first part of the first sentence:  "Negative resistances are available for use with a network analyzer."  And quoting Kron { [26] } from another publication as to what his overunity secret of the open path { [27] } was:

"...the missing concept of "open-paths" (the dual of "closed-paths") was discovered, in which currents could be made to flow in branches that lie between any set of two nodes.  (Previously—following Maxwell— engineers tied all of their open-paths to a single datum-point, the 'ground').  That discovery of open-paths established a second rectangular transformation matrix... which created 'lamellar' currents..."  "A network with the simultaneous presence of both closed and open paths was the answer to the author's years-long search."

Kron's secret has never been released by General Electric, Stanford University, or the U.S. Navy (the work was done under a Navy contract).  It has never been deciphered { [28] } outside those groups { [29] }, with the possible exception of Floyd Sweet, who worked in General Electric with Kron (but not on the Network Analyzer project).

However, we will point out that Lorentz discarded all the "open circuit" or "Kron open path" Heaviside energy flow associated with a circuit, and energy flow that normally does not strike the circuit and power loads.  It is a fact that this discarded energy flow is independent and open vis a vis the circuit ground and other parts. The entire "time current" domain is also independently an open path current that can move from one part of the circuit to another.  We assure the reader that such time-currents do exist and are met with in both underunity and overunity EM circuits and systems.  Every charge and dipole receives time-energy and converts it to 3-spatial EM energy, pouring that energy out in all directions.  We personally believe the time-domain-induced energy currents account for at least a part or all of Kron's "open circuit path" discovery.  Certainly there is enormous surplus EM energy flow there, in novel form,  to be collected and used.  It is there in every electromagnetic circuit, and it is presently just wasted and not even recognized.

The present scientific community simply will not allow funded research and publication in such "out of the box" energy research areas. No such "funded research packages" come from the National Science Foundation or the National Academy of Sciences, for research professors, post-docs, and graduate students to bid on.  From time to time university scientists still try to work in overunity systems, but are viciously attacked and suppressed for their scientific impudence.  Cold fusion research (involving transmutations at low spatial energy) is a primary example; there are many others. This is sad, because the Maxwell-Heaviside equations, prior to Lorentz's symmetrical regauging circa 1886, include both COP <1.0 and COP³ 1.0 Maxwellian systems.  Lorentz symmetrical regauging changed the equations so that the COP>1.0 systems—which are disequilibrium systems a priori—were just arbitrarily discarded.  Only equilibrium EM systems are retained in the Lorentz-regauged Maxwell-Heaviside Equations.