- •On the Principles of Permissible Overunity em Power Systems
- •28 July 2001 Abstract and Summary:
- •Introduction Beginning with Magnetics Kinetic Magnets: Self-Oscillation in Magnetic Materials
- •The Researcher Must Be Aware Of Numerous Magnetic Effects { [6] }
- •A Caution on the Rare Production of Higher Polarization em Energy
- •A Heat Pump Can In Theory Be Close-Looped
- •Overunity Systems Are Already Known
- •Gabriel Kron's Negative Resistor
- •Chung's Negative Resistor Chung's Negative Resistor
- •Other Overunity Systems Lawandy's Processes and Lasing Without Population Inversion
- •Self-Powering Russian Overunity Parametric Oscillator Power Systems
- •The Seiko Kinetic Wrist Watch
- •Miscellaneous em Overunity Power Systems
- •The Mead-Nachamkin Zero Point Energy Converter
- •Open Systems Far from Thermodynamic Equilibrium
- •Energy Conservation and Its Relation to Work Obtainable
- •A Surprising Thing About Thermodynamics and Reservoirs
- •The "Final Word" On the Conservation of Energy Law
- •Seemingly Random Behavior Can Be Adaptively Controlled
- •The Unresolved Problem of the Source Charge and Its Field Energy
- •The Marvelous "Source Dipole" Overunity Power System
- •Perpetual Motion Debunkers Begrudgingly Recognize Overunity Systems
- •Generators and Batteries Do Not Output Energy to the External Circuit
- •Lorentz Arbitrarily Discarded All Overunity Maxwellian Systems
- •The Effect of Lorentz's closed Surface Integration of the em Energy Flow Vector
- •There Is No Energy Problem, Just an Energy Intercepting and Using Problem
- •How em Power Systems Enforce Symmetrical Self-Regauging
- •We Pay the Power Company for a Sumo-Wrestling Match Inside Its Generators
- •What Lorentz Symmetrical Regauging Technically Is and Does
- •For Overunity Systems, One Must First Undo the Lorentz Condition
- •Hope for the Future: Poor but Growing
- •Some of the Flaws in Foundations of Electrodynamics
- •In Summary
- •Notes and References
- •Help support Tom Bearden's work
A Heat Pump Can In Theory Be Close-Looped
The common home heat pump under ideal conditions has a COP = 4.0. Its maximum theoretical COP is 8.22, and probably a 6.0 heat pump could be designed for optimum conditions. The COP>1.0 is made possible by the heat pump extracting excess energy from its external environment (the heat energy gleaned from compressing environmental gas and extracting the heat).
In theory, one can "close loop" a motor-generator-heat pump combination of some sort, where the system will provide electrical power output while also running itself, taking its energy from the ambient heat energy of the air. That doesn't violate conservation of energy; all the energy for the outputs and the losses are in fact extracted from the external environment by the heat pump's COP>1.0 performance.
Of course the ambient air will usually not remain ideal. When the ambient air gets colder, its heat energy content reduces appreciably. The efficiency of the heat pump drops precipitously, until one must switch to the resistive heating elements to provide the necessary heating at COP<1.0. So close-looping the system isn't practical in most cases, and even when made practical by burying long air lines, etc. it is quite expensive. The complexity and maintenance also become burdensome. [8]
Overunity Systems Are Already Known
Overunity systems are quite ordinary. They are not fancy, and are conceptually similar to a waterwheel, a windmill, a sailboat, or a solar cell array. Or a little Seiko kinetic watch. The only difference is that we're trying to do it with EM power systems, and unwittingly facing the anathema of the closed-loop circuit which guarantees COP<1.0. It follows that the first requirement is to produce an operation in the circuit which violates that "single closed-loop operation".
Overunity systems are already prescribed by physics and thermodynamics. They are already in the standard physics texts, and certain overunity processes are well-known in the literature— including some EM overunity processes which we've cited in many previous publications. The skeptic should refer to lasing without population inversion, the Lawandy patents, the Letokhov publications and processes, Letokhov's negative absorption of the medium (a medium can emit more energy than we input), negative resonance absorption (a particle can collect more energy than one would think impacts on it, and then emit that excess energy, as in the Bohren experiment), the fiber fuse, Russian parametric oscillator power systems of the 1930s, Kron's negative resistor, etc.
In short, as in any field of physics, one must read the literature and find out what physics actually says and already contains about overunity processes that have been proven experimentally. It's not as simple as just having an EE degree or graduating from an electronics and motor course. None of the material taught in conventional educational institutions will explicitly tell one that an overunity EM power system is even possible, much less show what the principles of such a device are, or how to go about building one. One will have to discover the principles and methods oneself; there are no handbooks and there are no great experts—the present author included!
Also, contrary to prevailing opinion, real overunity EM systems have been built, including by leading scientists, and suppressed or abandoned for one reason or another.