- •On the Principles of Permissible Overunity em Power Systems
- •28 July 2001 Abstract and Summary:
- •Introduction Beginning with Magnetics Kinetic Magnets: Self-Oscillation in Magnetic Materials
- •The Researcher Must Be Aware Of Numerous Magnetic Effects { [6] }
- •A Caution on the Rare Production of Higher Polarization em Energy
- •A Heat Pump Can In Theory Be Close-Looped
- •Overunity Systems Are Already Known
- •Gabriel Kron's Negative Resistor
- •Chung's Negative Resistor Chung's Negative Resistor
- •Other Overunity Systems Lawandy's Processes and Lasing Without Population Inversion
- •Self-Powering Russian Overunity Parametric Oscillator Power Systems
- •The Seiko Kinetic Wrist Watch
- •Miscellaneous em Overunity Power Systems
- •The Mead-Nachamkin Zero Point Energy Converter
- •Open Systems Far from Thermodynamic Equilibrium
- •Energy Conservation and Its Relation to Work Obtainable
- •A Surprising Thing About Thermodynamics and Reservoirs
- •The "Final Word" On the Conservation of Energy Law
- •Seemingly Random Behavior Can Be Adaptively Controlled
- •The Unresolved Problem of the Source Charge and Its Field Energy
- •The Marvelous "Source Dipole" Overunity Power System
- •Perpetual Motion Debunkers Begrudgingly Recognize Overunity Systems
- •Generators and Batteries Do Not Output Energy to the External Circuit
- •Lorentz Arbitrarily Discarded All Overunity Maxwellian Systems
- •The Effect of Lorentz's closed Surface Integration of the em Energy Flow Vector
- •There Is No Energy Problem, Just an Energy Intercepting and Using Problem
- •How em Power Systems Enforce Symmetrical Self-Regauging
- •We Pay the Power Company for a Sumo-Wrestling Match Inside Its Generators
- •What Lorentz Symmetrical Regauging Technically Is and Does
- •For Overunity Systems, One Must First Undo the Lorentz Condition
- •Hope for the Future: Poor but Growing
- •Some of the Flaws in Foundations of Electrodynamics
- •In Summary
- •Notes and References
- •Help support Tom Bearden's work
Lorentz Arbitrarily Discarded All Overunity Maxwellian Systems
Lorentz found that enormous amount of energy—most of it missing the circuit and just wasted—to be very disconcerting! It was perhaps irritating to him that we build such puny "intercepting and collecting" electrical power systems. We build them with a laughable energy collection efficiency of some 10-13 or so (Figure 6). Hardly something to brag about!
If the truth hurts, or the facts contradict something one feels absolute about, it is often buried with a non sequitur. That is a human trait, and it applies to scientists as well as to lay persons. In modern times it's called "spin control".
So Lorentz fixed the problem with a little scientific spin control! He placed a little spherical surface mathematically around each element of those conductors, and integrated the EM energy flow vector around that surface (Figure 18). Voila! All the Heaviside energy flowmissing the circuit and therefore wasted, gets mathematically cancelled in that neat little mathematical trick { [53] }. It is not canceled in thereal world, just in Lorentz's little mathematical trick. The result of the Lorentz surface integration of the EM energy flow vector is that only the tiny Poynting component of that energy flow—the component that struck the surface charges and got diverged into the circuit, creating the Slepian vector jf, is retained mathematically and accounted.
All the rest is just arbitrarily discarded. It's "out of sight, out of mind!" Now there was no necessity to explain the source of that startlingly large Heaviside nondiverged energy flow component, because "it didn't even exist anymore".
Of course our instruments measure dissipation of energy. They indirectly measure how much energy is diverged into the circuit and collected (intercepted) there, because they measure the energy dissipation from the circuit. What is dissipated from an otherwise inert circuit must first have entered it. The instruments measuring the circuit do not measure anything of the non-intercepted, nondiverged Heaviside energy flow that does not enter the circuit but remains outside it.
So Lorentz's trick does retain how much energy is intercepted, diverged into the circuit, collected on the electrons to power them, and dissipated in the loads and losses. And that does match our instrumental measurements in the circuit. However, that is not the total EM energy flow connected with a circuit, but only a small component of it.
Classical electrodynamicists dutifully continue to follow Lorentz's little trick and call that Poynting component the "entire energy flow". Then they caution against thinking too deeply about the energy flow subject. [28]
As a result of this faux pas by Lorentz, physicists are politely debating even today about just what the "Poynting" vector really is, and what it should be, and questioning whether it is really the Slepian vector, and so on. [29] They've been quietly doing that in American Journal of Physics, e.g., for more than 30 years now.