- •Land Transport and Postal Service
- •Enterprises in Competitive Environments
- •Regulatory Authorities
- •Key Terms and Common Collocations
- •Developing Professional Language Competencies
- •Study the Key Terms and Common Collocations section. Read Text c and define its main idea.
- •Explain the meaning of the expressions from Text c in English, and then translate the expressions into Russian.
- •3. Find in the text English equivalents to the following words and phrases:
- •5. Translate the sentences into Russian in writing paying special attention to the highlighted words and collocations.
- •6.Translate into Russian the part of the text describing regulatory authorities in writing.
- •Part III Text d The Future of Public Enterprise
- •1. Translate the text into Russian in writing using the relevant terms.
- •Translate the text into English in writing using the relevant terms.
6.Translate into Russian the part of the text describing regulatory authorities in writing.
7.Summarize text C in 50-60 words.
Part III Text d The Future of Public Enterprise
In any discussion about public enterprise, it is necessary to address questions of organization and management as well as ownership. Both have been problematic in practice and have led to governments reducing their reliance on public enterprise as an instrument of policy. There are really two options for the future. The first is to improve the sector, aiming for greater efficiency and better public control, hopefully permitting enterprises some independence, while retaining the benefits of public ownership. Improvements can be made, particularly in accountability, and public enterprise can continue.
The second perspective is that whatever is done, public enterprise is still just that, public and enterprise and from this inherent conflict between government and market stems inefficiency and endemic problems of accountability. The option then is to dispose of assets. There were some public enterprises that could be privatized with little adverse effect. There seems to be little point in hindsight for governments owning banks, insurance companies or airlines. On the other hand, the privatization of public utilities has not reduced demands on government to regulate them. In many countries there were political consequences long after the relevant utilities were taken from the public sector. Indeed, there was little public support or political pressure in favor of privatization, but governments saw the opportunity to raise some discretionary income. This was probably a more important motivation than ideology. The response of most governments to the question of public enterprise has been to privatize in those circumstances where it could be done, so to a great extent, the experiment with government ownership of enterprises is finishing. There may even be benefits for consumers in the long run, although they have been slow in arriving.
The public enterprise sector is interesting for public management as a topic in its own right, and also as the area of government to change the most dramatically over the 1980s and 1990s. Economic theorists carried out studies which purported to show that public enterprises were inherently less efficient than private enterprise. Although the evidence was mixed and far from conclusive, this change in the theory led to the adoption of policies by governments to reduce or even eliminate enterprises from the public sector. The full effects of this are not yet apparent, although when privatization has been carried out hastily and with insufficient thought as to the regulatory and the competitive environment, outcomes for the consumers have not been markedly better. Perhaps there is a lesson in this for public management in general. The privatization of public enterprise may be a general test case for the whole public sector, but it is one which shows that care needs to be taken in developing clear objectives, and implementation is crucial for desirable outcomes.
In the final analysis it seems difficult to see any long-term future for the public enterprise sector in any advanced or developing country, especially for those enterprises supplying goods or services on a large scale. There may be a continued existence for small enterprises or ones set up in cooperation with the private sector, but that will be all. The reduction of the public enterprise sector in the 1980s and 1990s says something about the public sector in general. The fact that government entities may have lasted a long time is no guarantee of continued existence. The shrinking of government through privatization occurred through a process of economic theory feeding into policy-making. The same process is occurring in the core public sector, where the results may be even more significant than in the once-important public enterprise sector. Except for small-scale activities, it is likely that public enterprise will eventually disappear as an acceptable way of delivering private goods and services.
Developing Professional Language Competencies
1. Translate the last two paragraphs of Text D into Russian in writing.
PART IV
Consolidation
