- •For course design
- •3 Selection of route, type of cable and transmission systems
- •3.1 Short characteristic of terminal points
- •3.2 The choice of fiber optic transmission lines route
- •3.3 Selection and justification of optic fiber type
- •3.4 Selection and justification the construction and type of optical cable
- •3.5 Selection and justification of fiber optic transmission system
- •3.6 Control questions
- •4.2 Choice and substantiation of the type of optical fibers
- •4.3 Choice and substantiation of the optical cable
- •4.2 Choice and substantiation of the Fiber optic transmission system (fots)
- •5 Calculation of optical properties of fibers and parameters of cable transfer
- •5.1 Determination of optical fiber parameters
- •5.2 Determination of losses in optical fiber
- •5.3 Calculation of running dispersion of the signal in single mode optical fiber
- •6 Calculation of regeneration length of optical fiber transmission lines, chart of energy levels
- •6.1 Calculation of the length of the regeneration section by attenuation
- •6.2 Calculate the length of the regeneration section by dispersion
- •6.3 Placement regeneration points along the route of focl
- •6.4 Constructing a chart levels of energy potential fots at the length of one area of regeneration
- •7 Protection of optical cable from the influence of external electromagnetic fields
- •Protection of optical cables from lightning strikes
- •Calculation of the dangerous effects of magnetic influences
- •Calculation of reliability of linear structures fots
- •9 Organization of works on construction and installation project lines. Budget and financial calculation of linear structures of focl
- •9.1 Organization of construction works
- •9.2 Budget and financial calculations
Calculation of reliability of linear structures fots
For FOCL length L parameter flow failure is determined by the expression [14]:
, (8.1)
where
– failure rate of i-th homogeneous section of the line, 1/hr;
– length
of the i-th section
of FOCL
with the appropriate intensity of failures.
Failure rates depends on the terrain laying OF (Table 8.1), according to [12] Ukraine is divided into 3-parts (Carpathians mountains, plains, the Black and Azov Seas).
In
Table. 8.1 there are the average characteristics of reliability
(failure rate (λ) and recovery time communication (
)
on the cable lines) derived from the results of a transport
telecommunications network in Ukraine from 2001 to 2005.
Table 8.1 - Values of failure rate per kilometer and average recovery time for connection of armorless underground OF
Region of Ukraine
|
Інтенсивність відмов на один кілометр траси ( ·10-7, 1/год) і середній час відновлення зв'язку, год |
|||||||
armored cable in the ground |
armorless cable in a polymer tube (subchannel) |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mountain Carpathians |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
plain area |
18,90 |
32,30 |
5,49 |
3,520 |
15,30 |
26,8 |
3,68 |
3,71 |
the coasts of Black and Azov Seas |
9,22 |
13,90 |
4,54 |
3,850 |
7,45 |
11,40 |
3,52 |
4,93 |
Mean
time between failures (h) on FOCL is calculated using the expression
[14, 15]:
. (8.2)
Average communication recovery time (h), the mean values for different regions of Ukraine (eg, plain and Black) kept by the expression:
, (8.3)
where
–
the average recovery time due to the plain and the Black Sea regions
respectively, h.
Availability index of FOCL is determined by the expression [14, 15]:
, (8.4)
In
this case, there is a case where the statistical material in a very
limited volume is not possible in advance to find unknown
distribution law of the random variable
and
.
To characterize the accuracy assessment of these random variables using the concept of probability confidence γ .
If you put that data statistical studies on the specific gravity bounce FOCL correspond in practice exponential distribution law developments that are widely used to refuse
Confidence limits of the mean values and is determined by the expression:
, (8.5)
where
,
– upper and lower limits of the mean values of
statistical characteristics;
,
–
coefficients of upper and lower limits for a given probability of
confidence respectively;
– середнє
average quantitative reliability characteristics.
In this chapter equals:
,
or
(8.6)
The
obtained values of
reliability
and
,
for example, by the expressions (8.1) - (8.3) indicate on that the
basis of statistical data can be expected that fiber optic will be
within
та
.
Compare
the obtained values of
the coefficient of readiness cable line with a value that is required
(
).
For
determination of
according
to [14,
15]
it
is necessary to calculate the mean time between failures
(
)on
the length of the cable line, based on the standards of the average
time between failures
=
340,5 hours in length range of hypothetical reference length L = 2500
km and regulations mean time to reconnect
h
from
equation:
, (8.7)
. (8.8)
Than
. (8.9)
If
,
it means that the reliability of
FOCL
meet norms.
