- •Ian McLeod
- •7Th March [1991] 532
- •XXXIV Table of Cases
- •Interact with constitutional concerns.
- •1688 Conceded power to Parliament and is effectively appointed by
- •Independence, legislators, like judges, could claim to be insulated from
- •In its ideal form, treats all persons equally and releases the individual
- •Ireland. Until the Union with Ireland in 1801, Britain was a state, as
- •Incommensurables are the two freedoms identified by Sir Isaiah Berlin
- •Vices and the regulation of private activities.
- •22 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •26 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Ing laws (Postema 1986, p. 46).
- •Idea which Hegel (1770–1831) ridiculed on the ground that the people
- •2.5 Rousseau: Communitarianism
- •Irrelevant (a view that is problematic when it comes to voting). This
- •36 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •3 All er 400 at 412, Lord Hoffman remarked that ‘the courts of the
- •Views of each state within the federation. In the uk any constitutional
- •Its actual output happens to have put great stress on individual rights
- •In the Ministerial Code (Cabinet Office, July 2001) may well furnish an
- •50 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •52 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •It is arguable that the cabinet has ceased to play a significant con-
- •56 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Importance of constitutional checks and balances. From this perspec-
- •Individually responsible to Parliament and that Parliament must be
- •70 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •In the nineteenth century Bagehot claimed that the cabinet was the
- •2000A), recommended that the civil service be placed on a statutory
- •4.10 The Judiciary
- •4.2 The historical development of the constitution has been evolutionary in
- •Into line where rules are enforced in accordance with a predictable
- •5.4 Dicey’s Version of the Rule of Law
- •In body or goods except for a distinct breach of law established in the
- •Value of non-retrospectivity.
- •5.7 The Separation of Powers
- •5.7.1 The mixed constitution
- •In X Ltd V. Morgan Grampian Publishers Ltd [1990] 2 All er 1 at 13
- •Ing out of opinion within the legal profession (Judicial Appointments,
- •Ing, characteristically out of particular historical circumstances.
- •Independence could be compromised by a narrow ‘executive-centred’
- •114 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •It can dismiss superior court judges (Chapter 4).
- •Into account extra parliamentary remarks made by ministers, in for
- •3 All er 65 at 77–79; r. V. Khan (1996)). The courts will certainly take a
- •6.2 Historical Development
- •124 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Ishing itself, having first created a body with more limited powers.
- •6.8 Note: Delegated Legislation
- •Ing the nineteenth century. Also during the nineteenth century the
- •158 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Includes a ‘Ministerial Code of Conduct’ (see sched. 4). The code
- •Ities in England and Wales.
- •168 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •In particular transport policy is specifically subject to central govern-
- •176 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •In one sense supported by dicta in Prescott V. Birmingham Corporation
- •View that the fiduciary duty implies that special weight must be given
- •178 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Increasingly important in view of the flexible nature of judicial review
- •In police and judicial affairs. Matters relating to immigration and asy-
- •184 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •186 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Increase in the powers of the European Assembly can be ratified by the
- •Implementing an ec Directive do not apply to future amendments of
- •Version to uk law, usually in the form of a statutory instrument (ibid.,
- •198 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Interpret ‘so far as possible’ in the light of the aims and purposes of the
- •In English law, in the absence of bad faith, damages cannot normally
- •4 (1) (C) of the Act, which provides a defence to such an action where ‘the state
- •10 Parliament
- •10.1 Historical Development
- •Ing the constitution only because its members were easily corrupted by
- •214 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Is dominated by government business. This is why Bagehot thought
- •Is that it acts as a revising chamber to scrutinise the detail of legislation
- •10.4.2 Composition and procedure: ‘exclusive cognisance’
- •Injunction (see hc 365, 1986–7). In Rivlin V. Bilankin (1953) a libellous
- •242 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Vented ministers from sitting, and the uk Constitution would have
- •In a script other than roman, or containing words prohibited by the
- •In all the circumstances be taken to be at that time (a) resident there if
- •Vidual standing separately. The party list system is crude and has
- •In the case of a ‘money bill’ the Lords can delay only for one month
- •1957, Naa 1983 s. 1). The Comptroller is an Officer of the Commons
- •Independent bodies outside the central government.
- •X where another hospital has been closed?’. Conversely sycophantic
- •12.5.1 Scrutiny of delegated legislation
- •Inability of an individual mp to force disclosure of information. Early
- •In r. V. Preston [1993] 4 All er 638 at 663 Lord Mustill said ‘the
- •In each case she has a separate title and responsibilities. This is prob-
- •1936 (His Majesty’s Declaration of Abdication Act 1936). By conven-
- •In 1611 it was made clear that the King can legislate only within
- •Imply a power to tax directly or indirectly without very clear statutory
- •In Council relating to the civil service are legally enforceable, whereas
- •Industry was held to be bound by a statute regulating the licensing of
- •It, arguing that the decision is an unprecedented example of the courts
- •1997 S. 9; Intelligence Services Act 1994 s. 2; National Minimum Wages
- •In theory the prime minister may appoint anyone to the cabinet, but in
- •Is maintained by the Treasury. In cases of doubt the Attorney-General
- •324 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •1. Ministers of the Crown are expected to behave according to the high-
- •Is that it ensures that government explains its actions. It concluded that
- •Ing adverse publicity about his private life). Even in cases of personal
- •V. R. (1896)). This is consistent with the view that there is no contract.
- •In recent years concern has been expressed because of their involve-
- •View that there should be no distinction between the constitutional
- •Immunities and this may also apply to police officers while on duties on
- •Inquiry (s. 49). For example the Macpherson Inquiry into the death
- •In the relevant statute (for example the Attorney-General, or a speci-
- •356 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Interfere with a decision to ban active homosexuals from serving in the
- •380 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •384 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Vention’ (per Lord Phillips mr in r. (Mahmood) V. Secretary of State
- •Itself and not merely an instrument of effective decision making.
- •In order to define the limits of judicial review. This excluded natural
- •Into most areas of government, including for example prison manage-
- •259 That justice must not only be done but must manifestly and
- •396 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Investigation more flexible than those of the courts but has limited
- •17.1 The Range of Remedies
- •17.2 The Judicial Review Procedure
- •408 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •17.2.1 Standing
- •Ise (r. V. Pollution Inspectorate ex parte Greenpeace (No. 2) (1994)).
- •V. Home Office (1990); r. V. Legal Aid Board ex parte Donn & Co.
- •In Cocks V. Thanet dc (1983) the House of Lords applied o’Reilly to
- •Important interests go beyond legal rules into territory where judges
- •424 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •469 At 477, Lord Donaldson said that ‘you have to look long and hard
- •Informed promptly of the reasons for the arrest and be brought
- •18.4.2 The interpretative obligation
- •8). However, it is not clear how far, if at all, it goes beyond the existing
- •577 At 581, Lord Slynn remarked that ‘it is clear that the 1998 Act
- •440 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •18.4.9 Derogation
- •Introduction of judicial consent for extended periods of detention
- •Vides a means to the end of self-actualisation. This argument has been
- •View that coheres with the thinking of the late Professor Karl Popper
- •V. Holmes (2000) a newspaper was permitted to publish a report on the
- •It is sometimes argued that s. 12 has the effect of privileging freedom
- •Ireland (1992) the Irish government banned a voluntary body from
- •Voluntarily and there seems no reason why these should be especially
- •International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
- •Important. A similar distinction is drawn in us law between the
- •It has been held that under Art. 11 states should take positive
- •Intimidation, including conditions as to the route of the procession
- •478 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Ings because of its broad definition of terrorism. This includes the use
- •480 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •In Sunday Business. In the article it was stated that the plaintiff ’s
- •In order to protect at least some privacy-related interests unprotected
- •506 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •20.7 A Hierarchy of Rights and the Contingencies
- •510 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Ings of an experienced trial judge, the same confidence does not extend
- •21.4.3 Proprieties: sections 2, 3
- •Is no locality condition. If the object is to apprehend someone unlaw-
- •In relation to the need for reasonable suspicion, there is no
- •Information available, upon which to make his suspicion reasonable,
- •530 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Interest in effective policing and the individual’s right to privacy and
- •Ing documents should be attempted before the issue of a warrant
- •538 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Items subject to legal privilege are, except as regards items held
- •540 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •1913). The conditions here are that there exist reasonable grounds for
- •If it is a search warrant (and not a production order) which is
- •It clear that such force can be used to secure entry to premises when
- •546 General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law
- •Interests of the United Kingdom. Nor does the duty to conform or
- •V. Evans (1985)). In Spycatcher, serious iniquity was not established
- •Information supplied under a legal duty had to be disclosed), economic-
- •Vention of crime but subject to the existence of independent safe-
- •22.5 Dan, a property developer, enters into an agreement with Oldcastle Council
- •580 Bibliography
- •Initiative in a public law Frame’, Public Law, 288–307.
- •In the civil law of defamation’, Communications Law, 1(5), 193–197.
- •2Nd edn, London: Cavendish.
2Nd edn, London: Cavendish.
Supperstone, M. (1994) ‘The Intelligence Services Act 1994’, Public Law, 329–331.
Syrett, K. (1998) ‘Prerogative powers: New Labour’s forgotten constitutional reform?’,
Denning Law Journal, 111–129.
Taggart, M. (ed.) (1997) The Province of Administrative Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Taggart, M. (1999) ‘Reinvented government traffic lights and the convergence of
public and private law’, Public Law, 124–138.
Taswell-Langmead, T.P. (1960) English Constitutional History, 7th edn, London:
Stevens & Haynes.
Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, H. (1992) The Origins and Growth of the English Constitution, Denver, CO:
Rothman.
Temple-Lang, J. (1990) ‘Community constitutional law: Article 5 of the EEC Treaty’,
Common Market Review, 27(4), 645–681.
Teubner, G. and Graber, C. (1998) ‘Art and money: constitutional rights in the private
sphere?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 61–73.
Thompson, E. (1963) The Making of the English Working Classes, 1980 edition,
Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Thompson, E. (1975) Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act, London: Allen
Lane.
Tierney, S. (2000) ‘Devolution issues and s. 2 (1) of the Human Rights Act 1998’,
European Human Rights Law Review, 380–392.
Tivey, L. (1999) ‘Constitutionalism and the political arena’, Political Quarterly, 70(2),
175–184.
591
Bibliography
Tomkins, A. (1993) ‘Public interest immunity after Matrix Churchill’, Public Law,
650–668.
Tomkins, A. (1998a) (ed.) Devolution and the British Constitution, London: Key Haven.
Tomkins, A. (1998b) The Constitution after Scott: Government Unwrapped, Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Tomkins, A. (2001) ‘Magna Carta, Crown and colonies’, Public Law, 571–585.
Toulson, R. and Phipps, C. (1996) Confidentiality, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Tribe, L. (1988) American Constitutional Law, 2nd edn, Mineola, New York: Founda-
tion Press.
Tribe, L. (1988) Constitutional Choices, Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Uglow, S. (1999) ‘Covert surveillance and the European Convention on Human
Rights’, Criminal Law Review, 287–299.
Underhill, N. (1978) The Lord Chancellor, Lavenham: Dalton.
University of Cambridge Centre for Public Law (1998) Constitutional Reform in the
United Kingdom: Prctice and Principles, Oxford: Hart Publishers.
Vincent-Jones, P. (2000) ‘Central–Local relations under the Local Government Act
1999: a new consensus?’, Modern Law Review 63(1), 84–103.
Vincenzi, C. (1998) Crown Powers, Subjects, Citizens, London: Pinter.
Wacks, R. (1995) Privacy and Press Freedom, London: Blackstone Press.
Wade, W. (1955) ‘The basis of legal sovereignty’, Cambridge Law Review, 172–197.
Wade, W. (1985) ‘Procedure and prerogative in public law’, Law Quarterly Review,
101, 180–199.
Wade, W. (1998) ‘Human rights and the judiciary’, European Human Rights Law
Review, 5, 520–533.
Wade, W. (2000) ‘Horizons of horizontality‘, Law Quarterly Review, 116, 217–224.
Wakeham, Lord (2000) A House for the Future Royal Commission on the House of
Lords, Cm. 4534, London: HMSO.
Waldron, J. (ed.) (1984) Theories of Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waldron, J. (1990) The Law: Theory and Practice in British Politics, London: Routledge.
Waldron, J. (1993) ‘A right-based critique of constitutional rights’, Oxford Journal of
Legal Studies, 13(1), 18–51.
Waldron, J. (1998) Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Walker, C. (1987) ‘Review of the prerogative: the remaining issues’, Public Law, 62–84.
Walker, D. (1953) ‘The legal theory of the state’, Judicial Review, 65, 255–261.
Walter, N. (1995) ‘European constitutionalism and European integration’, Public Law,
266–293.
Walker, N. (1999) ‘Setting English judges to rights’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,
19, 133–151.
Walker, P. (1995) ‘What’s wrong with irrationality?’, Public Law, 556–576.
Ward, I. (1996) A Critical Introduction to European Law, London: Butterworths.
Ward, I. (1998a) An Introduction to Critical Legal Theory, London: Cavendish.
Ward, I. (1998b) ‘Law, liberty and literature’, Anglo-American Law Review, 27(2),
188–220.
Ward, I. (2000) A State of Mind?: The English Constitution and the Popular Imagination,
Stroud: Sutton.
Wetherall, S. (1985) Law and Integration in the European Communities, Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Webb, P. (2001) ‘Parties and party systems: modernisation, regulation and diversity’,
Parliamentary Affairs, 54(2), 308–321.
Weiler, J. (1987) ‘The Court of Justice on trial’, Common Market Law Review, 24,
555–589.
Weiler, J. (1993) ‘Journey to an unknown destination: a retrospective and prospective
of the European Court of Justice in the arena of political investigation’, Journal of
Common Market Studies, 31(4), 417–446.
White Paper (1985) The Interception of Communications in the United Kingdom,
Cm. 9438, London: HMSO.
592 Bibliography
White Paper (1997a) Rights Brought Home: The Human Rights Bill, Cm. 3782, London:
HMSO.
White Paper (1997b) Your Right to Know: the Government’s Proposal: Freedom of
Information Act, Cm. 3818, London: HMSO.
White Paper (1998) A Mayor and Assembly for London. The Government’s Proposal
for Modernising the Governance of London, Cm. 3897, London: HMSO.
White Paper (2001) The House of Lords: Completing the Reform, Cm. 5291.
White, F., Harden, I. and Donnelly, K. (1994) ‘Audit, accounting officers and account-
ability: the Pergau Dam Affair’, Public Law, 526–534.
White, G. (1996) ‘The First Amendment comes of age: the emergence of free speech
in twentieth-century America’, Michigan Law Review, 95(1), 299–392.
Whitty, N., Murphy, T. and Livingstone, S. (2001) Civil Liberties Law: The Human
Rights Act Era, London: Butterworths.
Widdicombe, D. (1986) Report into the Conduct of Local Authority Business, Cm. 9797,
London: HMSO.
Wilke, M. and Wallace, H. (1990) Subsidiarity: Approaches to Power-Sharing in the
European Community, London: Royal Institute of Economic Affairs.
Willett, C. (ed.) (1996) Public Sector Reforms and the Citizen’s Charter, London:
Blackstone Press.
Williams, D. (1984) ‘Public order and common law’, Public Law, 12–16.
Williams, D. (1987) ‘Processions, assemblies and the freedom of the Individual’,
Criminal Law Review, 167–179.
Williams, E. (1960), The Eighteenth-Century Constitution, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Wilson, D. (1999) ‘Exploring the limits of public participation in local government’,
Parliamentary Affairs, 52, 246–259.
Wilson, D. (2001) ‘Local government: balancing diversity and uniformity’, Parliamen-
tary Affairs, 54(2), 289.
Winterton, G. (1976) ‘The British grundnorm: parliamentary supremacy re-examined’,
Law Quarterly Review, 92, 591–617.
Wolff, J. (1996) An Introduction to Political Philosophy, (Oxford: Oxford University
Press).
Wong, G. (2000) ‘Towards the nutcracker principle: reconsidering the objections to
proportionality’, Public Law 92–109.
Woodhouse, D. (1994) Ministers and Parliament: Accountability in Theory and Prac-
tice, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Woodhouse, D. (1995) ‘Politicians and the judiciary: a changing relationship’,
Parliamentary Affairs, 48(3), 401–417.
Woodhouse, D. (1997a) ‘Ministerial responsibility: something old something new’,
Public Law, 262–282.
Woodhouse, D. (1997b) In Pursuit of Good Administration: Ministers, Civil Servants
and Judges, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Woodhouse, D. (1998) ‘The Office of Lord Chancellor’, Public Law, 617–632.
Woodhouse, D. (2001) The Office of the Lord Chancellor, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Woodhouse, D. (2002) ‘The reconstruction of constitutional accountability’, Public
Law, 73.
Woolf, Sir H. (1995) Protection of the Public: A New Challenge, London: Sweet &
Maxwell.
Wright, J. (2001) Tort Law and Human Rights, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Zuckerman, A. (1994) ‘Public interest immunity – a matter of prime judicial respon-
sibility’, Modern Law Review, 57(5), 703–725.
Index
Aarhus Convention 551 Boundary Committees 255
‘Anxious scrutiny’ 383, 384 Breach of confidence 506 et seq., 558–561
‘Devolution issues’ 153 Breach of the peace 478–480
‘Fair balance’ 434, 446–447, 493 and Broadcasting Parliament and 225
see margin of appreciation, Budget Resolution 276
proportionality Bugging 570
‘Quangos 338 By-elections 247
‘Reasonably incidental’ doctrine 370
‘Serious arrestable offence’, meaning of Cabinet 313–315, 320
525 Cabinet Office (secretariat) 315, 547
‘Special Parliamentary Procedure Catholics 292
271–272 Censorship
‘Special procedure material’ 538–541 Censure Motions 280
‘Stop and search’ 520, 522–523 Channel Islands and Judicial Review 162,
‘Usual Channels’ 266 403
Abuse of discretion 374 et seq. Channel Islands and Parliament 162–163
Abuse of public office 407 Checks and balances 9, 108–109, 112,
Access to governmental Information 114–117
325–326, 334 Chief constable 346–347
Accountability and responsibility Church 237
323–326, 336–337 Citizen’s Charter 335
Adjournment debates 280 Civil disobedience 104–105
Administrative Court 407–408 Civil servants delegation to 332–333
Administrative tribunals 69–70 Civil servants functions of 77, 331–333
Affray 481 Civil servants legal status 329–330
Aggravated trespass 483–484 Civil servants ministers and 76–77,
Allegiance 87, 299 333–334
Anti-Social Behaviour Orders 485 Civil servants Parliament and 330,
Appropriation acts 276–277 333–334, 335–336
Armed forces and courts 355–356, see also Civil servants political independence
courts martial, crown immunity, 76–77, 330–331
prerogative Civil Service Code
Armstrong memorandum 319 Civil Service Commission 82, 334
Arrest by citizen 528 Closure 272
Arrest ECHR and 527–528 Code of Conduct MPs 229
Arrest immunity from 220 Code of Practice open government
Arrest information required 530–531 549–550
Arrest meaning of 526 Collateral Challenge 367
Arrest warrant 526 Collateral question see jurisdictional error
Arrestable offence meaning of 524–525 Collective ministerial responsibility 56, 78,
Artistic expression 463, 468 319–321
Assembly Secretary 161 Commercial confidentiality 548
Attorney General 113, 316–317 Commercial expression
Commission for Public Appointments 338
Bias ‘real danger’ test 395 Committee of Standards and Privileges
Bias financial 393–394 222
Bias human rights and 396 Committee on Standards 18, 82–83, 222,
Binding over 484–485 230–231
Bishops 327 Common law and overseas territories 163
593
594 Index
Common law and Parliament 45–47, Derogation European Convention on
100–101, 136–140 Human Rights from 431–432, 444,
Communications data 569 452
Comptroller and Auditor General 278 Detained persons treatment of 531–532,
Concordats 149 543–544
Confessions 517–518 Detention without trial 444, 452
Consolidated Fund 275, 277 Devolution asymmetric nature 149
Constable powers and status of 344 Direct effect doctrine 200–201
Constituencies 255–257 Directives EC 197–198
Constitution meaning of 3–4 Disclosure of information by ministers
Constitution types of 4–6 324–326
Constitutionalism 92–93 Discretion duty and 381–382
Contempt of Court 466–467 Discrimination 431, 473–474
Contempt of Parliament 221–222 Dissolution of Parliament 77–78, 214–215,
Conventions and courts 55–57 295
Conventions binding force of 48, 49–50, District Councils 167
54 Dominant purpose 374
Conventions change in 51–52 Donations political 259–261
Conventions courts and 55–57 Donoughmore Committee 70
Conventions enforcement of 52–54,
Conventions practices and 41–42, 47–50 Election Court 262
Conventions validity of 49–50, 52 Election expenses 258–261
Coronation 292 Elections broadcasting 261–262
Council of Ministers accountability Elections Scotland and Wales 253
185–186 Electoral Commission 246–247, 255
Council of Ministers voting in 185 Electoral reform 88, 212 et seq. 254–255
County Councils 167 Emanation of the state 200–20
Courts and Parliament 222–223, 231–232 Emergency Debates 280
Courts and politics 13–14 Encryptified data 569
Courts Martial 356 English regions 150
Covert human surveillance 570 Enrolled bill rule 128
Crown commonwealth in 290 Entrenchment 131–136
Crown immunity 296–299, 357 Entry and search powers of 532 et seq.
Crown liability 297–299, 357 Error on the record 371
Crown meanings of 290–292 Estoppel 378
Crown ministers and 76–77 European Commission accountability
Crown part of 338–339 188–189, 193–194
Crown Prosecution Service 352 European Commission membership 186–7
Crown Servants nature of 76–77, European Court of Human Rights 427
Crown succession to 292 European Court of Justice powers of
Custom 42 190–192
European Parliament 187–189
‘D’ Notice 549 European parliamentary elections 253
Damages 405–407, 440, European Union ‘pillars’ 183
Damages and freedom of expression European Union objects 183–184
497–499 Evidence admissibility of 516–517
Data interception of 568–571 Excepted Matters (N.I.) 158
Declaration 404 Excluded material 538–541
Declaration of incompatibility 438 ‘Exclusive cognisance’ 222–223
Declaration of Rights of Man 105 Exclusivity principle 413–414
Defamation 490 et seq. Executive Agencies 79, 334 et seq.
Delegated Legislation control over Executive Committee (Wales) 161
140–141, 281–282 Executive growth of 70–71
Delegation of powers 387–388
Demonstrations see highway, meetings, Fair hearing exclusion of 389–391
processions Fair hearing human rights and 392–393
595
Index
Fair Trial right to 367–368, 373, 392, 396, House of Lords Appointments
397, 428–430, 514 Commission 239
Federalism and EU 194–196 House of Lords attendance in 240
Federalism arguments against 148 House of Lords committees 284
Federalism meaning 147–148 House of Lords composition of 218,
Fettering discretion 377–387 236–239, 242–243
Fingerprinting 529–530 House of Lords functions of 218–219
First Minister (N.I.) 158 House of Lords history of 74, 209–214
First Secretary for Wales 161 House of Lords powers of 74, 214, 267,
Franchise history of 67, 68, 213 273–274
Franchise qualifications for 28–250 House of Lords procedure in 267, 273
Franks Committee on Tribunals and House of Lords reform of 238, 241–243
Inquiries 70 House of Lords size of 236
Freedom of assembly 431 House of Lords standards in 230–231
Freedom of expression 431, 443, 458 et seq., Human rights common law and 423–427
see also press, open government Human rights democracy and 419,
Freedom of expression arguments for 420–423
459–462 Human rights inconsistent legislation
Freedom of expression overrides 462–464 434–438
Freedom of expression official secrets and Human rights nature of 419–420,
464 433–434, 445
Freedom of expression Parliament and
224–227 Immunities public officials and 102,
Freedom of Information exemptions from 405–406
duty to disclose 553–555 Implied repeal 127,
Freedom of information ministerial veto Improper purposes 374–377
553 Independence Acts 129–130
Indirect effect doctrine 201–202
General arrest conditions 529 Individual ministerial responsibility
General election 215 77–79, 108–109, 321–329, 333–334,
General will 30–31, 227 336–337, 364
Good Friday Agreement 156 Information Commissioner 552
Government removal of 77–78, 281 Informal networks 9, 62–64, 81
Government spending control over Injunction 404, 467, 492–493, 505–506
276–279 Insulting behaviour 482–483
Greater London Assembly 168 Intelligence service 567, 571
Guillotine 272 Interception of communications 567 et seq.
Internal and External limits on Parliament
Habeas Corpus 408 122–123
Haldane Committee 318, 340 Internal Proceedings in Parliament 129,
Harassment 482, 484 223
Highway use of 475–477 International human rights 101–102
Home Office 317 Internet service providers 568, 569
Home Secretary police and 348–349 Interpretation of Human Rights Act
Horizontal effect EC and 200, 202, 203 437–438, 453–454
Horizontal effect Human Rights Act and Intimate searches 523
442–443, 489 Intrusive surveillance 570
House of Commons disqualifications Irrelevant considerations 374–377
243–245 Isle of Man 162–163, 403
House of Commons functions of
216–217 Jenkins Commission 254
House of Commons history of 68–69, 74, Judges security of tenure 84
209–214 Judicial Appointments 83–84
House of Commons ministers in 244–245 Judicial bodies see separation of powers
House of Lords Appointments Judicial functions natural justice and 388,
Commission 239 390, 391, 394, 397
596 Index
Judicial Immunity 406 Members of Parliament freedom of speech
Judicial review and civil proceedings and 223–227
414 Minister resignation of 326–329
Judicial review discretionary nature of Ministerial Code 49, 324–325
410–444 Ministerial Code of Conduct (N.I.) 159,
Judicial Review legal basis of 365–366 324
Judicial review permission to apply for Ministerial responsibility, see collective,
409–410 individual, executive agencies, Non-
Judicial review public law and see departmental public bodies,
exclusivity, public functions operational functions, select
Judicial review time limits 410 committees.
Junior ministers and collective Ministers ranks of 316
responsibility 321 Mistake of fact 372
Jurisdictional error 371 see also mistake Mistake of Law 370–372
Jury 117, 492 Mixed constitution 6–7,67, 106–107
Just satisfaction 407 Monarchy functions of 27, 47, 66–9
Justiciability 305–306, 363–365 293–294
Monarchy personal powers 294–296
Kangaroo 272
Kilbrandon Report 148–150 National Audit Office 78, 217, 278–279
National security 364, 390, 451, 564–566
Law Lords 112–113, 240 Natural Justice 388–398
Law Officers 113–114, 316–317 Nichols Committee 222, 224, 232
Legal Privilege 538 Non-departmental public bodies and
Legal representation 392 ministers 339–340
Legitimate expectation 378–380, 392, 398 Northern Ireland Assembly 157–159
Liason committee 284 Northern Ireland Executive 158–159
Liberalism 27–29, 32–35 Nullity 367
Liberalism 35–36
Life right to 428 Obscenity and indecency 468–471
Local government accountability 171, Official secrets 555–557, 566
Local government and courts 168–169, Ombudsman 1777–179, 285–287
170, 175–177, 277 Open government absence of 547–548
Local government autonomy 165–166, Operational functions 322–323, 335–337
171–172, 173–174 Opposition 217
Local government constitutional Opposition Days 280
protection of 165 Oral hearing right to 392
Local government democracy in 171, Ouster clauses 414–415
172–174 Overrides and ECHR 446
Local government ethical standards 172
Local government information and PACE Code of Practice 515–516
550–551 Parliamentary Commissioner for
Local taxation 174 Administration 285–287
Locus standi 408–409 Parliamentary Commissioner for
Lord Chancellor 113, 422 Standards 9, 13, 82, 230
Parliamentary privilege reform of 232
Maastricht treaty 182 Parliamentary procedure nature of
Majoritarianism 9–12, 29 265–266
Maladministration 177 Parliamentary Questions 279–286
Margin of Appreciation/discretion 448, Parliament recall of 215
449–451 Parliamentary Sovereignty and Northern
Marry right to 431 Ireland 130–131
Mayors 171 Parliamentary Sovereignty and Scotland
Media censorship 465 130–131
Members of Parliament conflict of interest Parliamentary Supremacy and European
227–231 Communities 136, 198–199
597
Index
Parliamentary timetable 266 Property rights 432–433
Participation 31–32, 36, Proportional Representation 23, see also
Passport 87, 305 voting systems.
Peerages 237–240 Proportionality 385–386, 447–449,
Personal liberty and security 428, 514 508–509, 561, 565, 569
Personal searches 522–523, 533 Prorogation 215
Police accountability 350, 351 Provisional orders 271
Police Authority 345, 347–348 Public Accounts Committee 278–279
Police centralisation of 346 Public bill 268–270
Police Complaints Authority 354–355 Public bodies and defamation 493–496
Police judicial review of 352–353, 528–529 Public function human rights and 440–442
Police liability of 353–354, 515–516 Public interest and freedom of expression
Police questioning 519, 532 502, 506, 558–560
Political advertising 261 Public interest immunity 561–564
Political Parties 41, 247–248, 259–261, Public law function judicial review and
261, 496–497 411–413
Positive and negative freedoms 20–21 Public meetings 478 see also Highway
Precedent fact 373 see also jurisdictional
error Qualified privilege and press freedom
Preliminary question see jurisdictional 499–502
error Qualified privilege MPs and 226–227
Prerogative and courts 304–306 Queen see Crown, monarch
Prerogative and police 349 Quorum Parliament 266
Prerogative armed forces and 355
Prerogative nature of 301–304 Racial hatred incitement to 473–474,
Prerogative orders 403–404 Reasonable suspicion meaning of 520–521,
Prerogative Orders in Council 302, 308 528
Prerogative Parliament and 76, 304 Reasons for decisions 396–398
Prerogative power abolition of 306 Recall of Parliament 265
Press freedom 458, 465–468, 560–561 Referendums 74–75
see also breach of confidence, Regent 292
damages, defamation, public interest, Regional Development Agencies 150
qualified privilege Register of Interests 229–230
Presumption of innocence 435–436, 514 Religion 431, 443, 471
Presumptions of interpretation 369–370 Representation 12–14
Primary legislation under Human Rights Reputation protection of 489 et seq.
Act 435 Reserved Matters (N.I.) 158
Prime Minister powers of 50, 76, 239, Reserved Matters (Scotland) 152
311–313, 320 Resignation ministers of 320–321, 322,
Principles of Public Life 18, 82, 229 326–329
Privacy and respect for family life ECHR Restitution 404–405
and 430–431, 443, 468, 503–506 Riot 481
Privacy and surveillance 567 et seq. Road checks 523–525
Private bill 270–271 Royal Assent 274–296
Private member’s bill 268 Rule of Law and Parliament 115–116,
Private notice questions 280 136–140
Privatisation 79–80 Rule of law different meanings of 94–9
Privilege defamation and 491–492
Privilege Parliamentary and freedom of Scott inquiry 322, 323, 335, 564
expression Scottish Executive 153–154
Privy Council devolution and 153, 158, Scottish legislative procedure 153
162. Scottish Ministers 153–154
Privy Council Judicial Committee of 85, Scottish Office 151
245 Scottish Parliament 151–153, 154
Processions 477 see also Highway Search records of 523, 542–543
Production Order 535 Search Warrant 534, 535–538, 541–542
598 Index
Security service 566 Taxation 275–276
Sedition 472–473 Telephone tapping 557, 568–571
Select Committees 266, 282–284 Terrorism 452–453, 478, 520, 525
Separation of Powers and Parliament Threatening behavour 482
115–118 Torture 428, 514
Separation of powers functional 110–112, Treasury 317
see also checks and balances Treaties 117
Separation of powers judicial review and Treaty of Amsterdam 182
363, 366 Trespassory assembly 478
Separation of powers significance in UK Tribunal RIPA under 570–571
109–110
Sessions of Parliament 215 Ultra vires doctrine 356–366, 369–370
Silence right to 518–519 Uniforms 481
Single European Act 182 Unitary local authorities 167
Sixteen Eighty Eight Revolution 65–66, United States 5, 23–24, 42, 69, 147–148,
121, 124–125, 211 330, 331, 458–459, 475
Slavery 428 Unreasonableness human rights and
Social Contract different versions of 19, 384
25, 28, 30 Utilitarianism 32–35
Solicitor access to 532
Sovereignty 26, 28, 46–47, 122–123 Victim and Human Rights Act 439–440
Sovereignty and rule of law 94–95 Violent disorder 481
Sovereignty and separation of powers 108, Voluntary bodies 339
121 Voting procedures 255
Speaker 128, 217, 222, 22, 267–268, 280 Voting systems 23, 151, 157, 157,
Special Advisors 77, 331 250–255
Special Immigration Appeal Commission
452–453 Wakeham Commission 26, 109, 218,
Special Majorities 9 241–242, 267
Sponsorship of MPs 228 Welsh Assembly 160–161
Standards Board for England 172 West Lothian Question 150
Standards in Public Life 82–83, 227–231 White Paper on House of Lords reform
State meaning of 17–19, 70–71 242–243
Statement of compatibility 438–439 White Paper on the Human Rights Bill
Statutory instrument, see delegated 426, 435
legislation. White Paper on open government
Subsidiarity 195–196 549–550
Summoning of Parliament 214–215 Written constitution benefits of 43–44
Surveillance Commissioners 570
